Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 61. köideJ. Spooner, 1889 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 85
Page 2
... deed . Is the filing of the location a taking within the meaning of the statute ? The language of the statute is , R. L. s . 3355 , that such location shall be filed before commencing proceedings to acquire title . This therefore is not ...
... deed . Is the filing of the location a taking within the meaning of the statute ? The language of the statute is , R. L. s . 3355 , that such location shall be filed before commencing proceedings to acquire title . This therefore is not ...
Page 3
... Barre Co. took a deed of the land , and without any notice of any contract by which it had any right to or in the land . If the right thus acquired can , Barre Railroad Co. v . Railroad Companies . be defeated OCTOBER , 1888 . 3.
... Barre Co. took a deed of the land , and without any notice of any contract by which it had any right to or in the land . If the right thus acquired can , Barre Railroad Co. v . Railroad Companies . be defeated OCTOBER , 1888 . 3.
Page 5
... deed of substantially the same land , from the owner , Mr. Burn- ham , which the Granite Company had thus located upon . 66 This deed was taken in fulfillment of a written agreement of Burnham to sell to one Morse in trust for the ...
... deed of substantially the same land , from the owner , Mr. Burn- ham , which the Granite Company had thus located upon . 66 This deed was taken in fulfillment of a written agreement of Burnham to sell to one Morse in trust for the ...
Page 8
... the sale in this case prior or subsequent ? The deed of conveyance was subsequent , but the contract to sell was prior . At the time the contact was executed , February Barre Railroad Co. v . Railroad Companies . 22 , 8 SPECIAL TERM ,
... the sale in this case prior or subsequent ? The deed of conveyance was subsequent , but the contract to sell was prior . At the time the contact was executed , February Barre Railroad Co. v . Railroad Companies . 22 , 8 SPECIAL TERM ,
Page 10
... deed , or by the exercise of eminent domain . The title was , and has remained in the granite dealers , for whose convenience , together with that of the railroad company , these spurs were built . They have been used as designed ever ...
... deed , or by the exercise of eminent domain . The title was , and has remained in the granite dealers , for whose convenience , together with that of the railroad company , these spurs were built . They have been used as designed ever ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admissible Admr agreed agreement alleged allowed appear assumpsit Baker Bank bill Caledonia County cattle-guards Chancery charge claim Clyde Rivers commissioners contract conveyance conveyed counsel County Court Court of Chancery court of equity court was delivered creditors damages debt declaration decree deed defendant defendant's demurrer district duty East Montpelier equity evidence exceptions executed executor fact farm fraud grantor held horse insolvency intention interest intestate Johnsbury Judevine judgment jurisdiction jury land lease liable lien Lucius Robinson Mass matter ment mortgage opinion orator oratrix owner paid parties payment person petition petitioner plaintiff plea pleadings possession premises Probate Court purpose question Railroad Company recover reference residence respondent rule Rutland Smith statute Statute of Frauds statute of limitations sufficient suit tended to show Term testator testified testimony thereof tion town trial trustee wife witness writ Yatter