Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont, 160. köideFox Publishing Company, 1993 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 166
... argues that it should have been granted a di- rected verdict because plaintiff's loss was not foreseeable . Finally , defendant argues that the trial court erred in charging the jury that it could award damages for emotional distress ...
... argues that it should have been granted a di- rected verdict because plaintiff's loss was not foreseeable . Finally , defendant argues that the trial court erred in charging the jury that it could award damages for emotional distress ...
Page 421
... argues second that , in evaluating his applica- tion , the court did not apply the correct criteria as provided in the Village of Woodstock Zoning Ordinance.4 The ordinance lists specific design criteria that the commission must ...
... argues second that , in evaluating his applica- tion , the court did not apply the correct criteria as provided in the Village of Woodstock Zoning Ordinance.4 The ordinance lists specific design criteria that the commission must ...
Page 629
... argues that " promptly " should mean thirty days because Rule 31 ( A ) re- quires the Board to render a decision within thirty days whenever it chooses , on its own motion , to alter a decision . Applicant neglects to note that such sua ...
... argues that " promptly " should mean thirty days because Rule 31 ( A ) re- quires the Board to render a decision within thirty days whenever it chooses , on its own motion , to alter a decision . Applicant neglects to note that such sua ...
Contents
Table of Parallel Atlantic Reporter Citations XV | 162 |
Memorandum Decisions | 601 |
Table of Unpublished Decisions | 651 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abuse action administrative adopted Affirmed agreement alleged Amendment appeal apply attorney award bail Board cause charge child support Cite as 160 claim competence concluded conduct considered contends conviction counsel court erred criminal criteria custody damages decision Defendant argues defendant's denied determine discretion district Dooley due process employee employment evidence fact family court fendant findings Fourth Amendment guilty hearing immunity interest issue judgment Jurgs jurisdiction jury legislative Legislature ment Miranda rights Morse and Johnson motion negligence offense officer parents parties permit person petitioners plaintiff plea prior probation proceedings protect qualified immunity Reapportionment reasonable record redistricting remand res judicata respondent Reversed rule sentence sexual standard State's statute statutory substantial summary judgment Superior Court Supreme Court testified testimony tion towns trial court U.S. Const vehicular homicide Vermont Constitution violation warrant warrantless WCRG