Page images
PDF
EPUB

two members to parliament. It is a very old corporation, and is governed by a portreeve. Its former name was Atereth. It is 117 miles W. by S. of Dublin, and 14 E. of Galway.

There are three fairs in the year. The church is in good repair. The London Hibernian Society and the Kildare Place Society unite with the incumbent in the support of a free school, in which about forty children (boys and girls) are educated. The population of the town in 1831 was 1093: that of the whole parish, 12,580. This last statement includes the population of the chapelry of Monivea; in which are a chapel of ease and several free schools, including a charter school, and two schools connected with the Kildare Place Society. The living is a consolidated rectory and vicarage, in the diocese and province of Tuam.

Athens is situated about five miles from the sea-coast, 37° 58' N. lat., 23° 43' E. long., occupying part of the central plain of Attica, and some heights which run down into the plain, but are quite detached from the mountains on the north frontier of the province. Of these eminences, the most conspicuous are Mount Anchesmus (now St. George) with its peaked summit rising higher than the Acropolis, on the north east of the city and beyond the antient walls; the Acropolis, which was entirely included within the old walls; the Areopagus, opposite to the west end of the Acropolis; and the hill of the Museum, partly included within the antient walls, the highest eminence on the south. On the east side of the city, the little river Ilissus, which rises a few miles north-east of Ambelókipo, runs in a south west direction past the city, separating the heights of Athens on the west, from the higher and more continuous range of Hymettus on the east: it was joined a little above the site of the Lyceium by the Eridanus from the east. This little river, which in its natural state might have reached the marshy lands near the coast, is now reduced by the heats of summer and the channels for artificial irrigation to an ineonsiderable stream; and in antient times its current must have been diminished from the same cause. The Cephisus, which runs due south past the west side of the city, at the distance of about a mile and a half from the walls, is also nearly exhausted by the cuts for irrigation before it reaches the neighbourhood of Peiræus.

There was a Dominican friary in Athenry, which was burnt in the year 1432. The remains show it to have been a fine building; the great east window is bold, and of good workmanship. Part of the ruins have been taken down to erect barracks. A Franciscan friary was also founded here in 1464.

This town gives name to one of the baronies of the county. (Parliamentary Papers. Seward's Topog. Hibernica.) ATHENS, or ATHE'NE (ASñva), the chief city of Attica, one of the antient political divisions of Greece.

We propose in this article to give, first, a brief description of the topography of the city, referring to ATTICA for the geographical description of the province; and next, a brief outline of its political and literary history, referring to the proper articles for the minuter detail.

[blocks in formation]

The accompanying plan of Athens will show the circuit of the wall at the time when the city had attained its greatest magnitude. Beginning with the Gate of Acharnæ on the

[graphic]

[Plan of Athens, from the authorities of Col. Leake and Mr. Cockerell.]

north, it ran eastward near the base of Anchesmus, and past |
the Diomeian Gate to the Gate of Diochares, which led to
the Lyceium: it then continued parallel to the Ilissus on the
west side of that stream to the Fountain Callirrhoe, or En-
neacrunus; and thence to the hill of the Museum, which
it crossed, comprehending the still existing monument of
Philopappus within its circuit. Its course from the Museum
was north, taking in the chief part of the Pnyx and Mount
Lycabettus, to the Dipylum which led to the outer Cera-
meicus, or great burying ground, and to the Academia, or
school of Plato: in the depression between the Pnyx and
Lycabettus was the Peiraic Gate. A line from Dipylum to
the Gate of Acharnæ completes the circuit. The direction
of the wall from the Ilissus along the south and west sides
of the city to the Dipylum is quite clear; the rest of the

wall, being built of brick chiefly, or entirely, has not left any traces. The city was connected with its ports, Peiræus, Munychia, and Phalerum, by Long Walls (paxpȧ TEIXn), which abutted on the city, respectively at the hill of the Museium, and the Gate of Peiræus. The direction of the Long Walls from the Peiræus is E. by N. by compass, as appears from examination of their existing foundations. The southern wall, which ran from the city to the Phalerum, was called the Phaleric wall; the northern, which ran from the Peiraic Gate to the Peiræus, and was a

double wall, was sometimes called the Long Walls and sometimes the Peiraic Wall.* (See the plan annexed to the

Much has been written on the passage of Thucyd. ii. 13; and we are aware We have given in the of the difference of opinion as to these Long Walls. text what we believe to be the true interpretation with reference to the time when Thucydides wrote.

map of Attica.)

ATH

That part of the city walls included between the two points where the Phaleric and Peiraic walls respectively abut on them is not included by Thucydides (ii. 13) in his estimate of the extent of the city walls which required defence; and we must, in like manner, deduct from the circuit of the wall inclosing the Peiræus and the Munychia, the space on the land side between the western extremities of the Phaleric and the Peiraic walls. The circumference of the city, then, according to Thucydides, in B.C. 431,

[blocks in formation]

Stadia.

43

35

[ocr errors]

40

56

174

This result will give a total circuit of about nineteen or twenty miles. (See Leake's Topography of Athens, p. 368.) The chief Gates of Athens, as far as their position can be with any probability determined, are indicated in the plan. The cemeteries of the city surrounded it on every side, but were most conspicuous on the north and north-west, where they commenced immediately on the outside of the walls. The road from Dipylum to the Academy was lined with the tombs of illustrious men, such as Pericles, Thrasybulus, Chabrias, and Phormion. Here too were the monuments erected to the memory of those who fell in their country's service: a slab of stone, with the name and township (nog) of each individual, was the honour paid by the state to its citizens who died in battle. (Pausanias, i. 29.) The Academy itself was surrounded with a wall, planted with trees, and ornamented with fountains of water. Near it was the tomb of Plato.

The tombs on the east side of the city were separated from it by the Gardens (Kño), the Lyceium, and the Cynosarges, and do not appear to have been so extensive.

The wall which surrounded the city was strengthened at intervals with towers: there were also square towers on the long walls which connected the city with the ports. These walls (the Peiraic and Phaleric) were about four miles in length, and at a distance of 550 feet from one another: when the city was in its highest state of prosperity, the open space between them contained a considerable number of houses, which formed a kind of intermediate town between the Asty, or Upper City, and the Peiræus.

The three ports of Athens, going from west to east, were the Peiræus, now Port Dhrako, which contained three natural bays; the Munychia, now Stratiotiki, separated from the Peiræus by the round projecting and hilly peninsula of Munychia; and Phalerum, now Port Phanári. These three ports, with the buildings attached to them, once formed a separate city larger than Athens itself. A sea wall, sixty Greek feet high, and constructed of wrought stone, extended from the bay of Phalerum all round the rocky peninsula of Munychia, terminating about Cape Alcimus: the north-west and west side of the Peiræus was also inclosed by a wall running down to the sea; a wall ran from the Phaleric Port across the high ground to the head of the middle bay of the Peiræus; and a third wall ran across the narrow isthmus of the Munychia. The importance and strength of the fortifications of the maritime city, and especially of the Munychia, appear from the siege of this place by Demetrius Poliorcetes, and by Sulla; the possession of the ports enabled any person to command the city.

The Peiræus was the great dock-yard of the Athenians, and the chief harbour for the vessels engaged in the corn and other foreign trade. It contained large warehouses, public arsenals, the armoury of Puilon, several temples, a theatre, of which some traces remain, a long portico or arcade (papà σroά) analogous to the bazaars of Eastern cities, which probably contained the Deigna (a place for the exhibition of samples of goods), and Phreattys (a court of summary justice), and other buildings. Of all the edifices of the Peiræus, nothing now remains but some traces of foundations and broken pieces of sculptured The port, though its entrance is very narrow, is still a safe one: the ground inside is very good, and rather to the southward of the centre a ship may drop her anchor in about seven fathoms stiff mud, and moor with open hawse towards any point of the compass, for she will ride so secure

marble.

11

that neither wind nor sea can hurt her.' (Capt. W. H.
The peninsula of the Munychia contains the
Smyth.)
foundation of a temple, the remains of a small theatre, and
clear indications that it was extensively built upon. Nothing
remains of the buildings which once adorned the Phalerum.
The line, however, of the extensive system of walls which
defended the maritime demi, or towns, can still be traced
in most parts; and in the Munychia, on the side towards
exist, formed in some parts of large squared stones cramped
the sea, courses of masonry, both of walls and towers, still
with iron. (See Thucyd. i. 93.)

We shall endeavour briefly to describe those localities in
antient Athens which seem at present to be pretty well iden-
tified. It appears probable that even in its best days the first
appearance of Athens was not very pleasing, and that its
attractions were mainly due to the public edifices. A Greek
traveller of the latter part of the fourth century B.C. (Dica-
archus, Hud. Min. Geog. vol. ii.) describes the city as dusty,
and badly supplied with water, and the streets ill laid out,
a fault which he attributes to the great antiquity of the
A stranger, on the first view,' he adds, ' might doubt if this
place. Most of the houses were mean, and only a few good.
The most striking object is the Acropolis, or Citadel, a
is Athens; but after a short time he would see that it was.'
rock which rises abruptly from the plain, and is crowned
with the Parthenon. Opposite to the west end of the Acro-
polis, and separated from it by a depression, is the Areopa-
gus, or Hill of Mars, on the eastern and highest extremity of
Adjacent to the Areopagus on the west was the Pnyx,
which was the court of the Areopagus. [See AREOPAGUS.]
where the public meetings were held in the more antient
period of the state, and where a béma, or pulpit of stone,
still marks the place from which the assembly was ad-
dressed. (On this béma, compare Leake, p. 42, and art.
ATTICA. Ersch and Gruber.)

North of the Areopagus is the Temple of Theseus, built of Pentelic marble, one of the best-preserved buildings of us doubt if we are really contemplating a building that was antient Athens. At first sight it appears so entire as to make erected about B.C. 470-465. It is a Doric temple of moderate The eastern pediment was adorned with on each flank. dimensions; a peripteral hexastyle, with thirteen columns sculptures, as well as the ten metopes of this front, and the four adjacent to them on each flank: casts of three of these metopes, which appear to refer to the exploits of Theseus and Hercules, and also of the frieze, are in the Stuart's Athens, vol. iii.] Elgin Room of the British Museum. [See THESEIUM, and

[ocr errors]

Nearly due east of the Temple of Theseus are the remains of what is probably the Stoa or Portico of Hadrian, one of the monuments with which this munificent emperor as has been done, that the architectural character of the embellished the city of Athens. It is not exact to state, west colonnade of this building corresponds to that of the Arch of Hadrian; still it seems most likely that these remains are part of the great work of that emperor, described was adorned with a hundred and twenty columns of Phrygian by Pausanias (i. 18), who informs us that the Stoa of Hadrian marble, and contained apartments whose roofs were gilded and made of alabaster: it contained also a library, and the apartments were decorated with statues and paintings. The Gymnasium of Hadrian was probably near the Stoa; and the Gymnasium of Ptolemy between the Stoa and the Temple of Theseus. South of the Stoa is the Tower of the Winds, called also the Tower of Andronicus Cyrrhestes. the New Agora, in the quarter called Eretria, between the [See ANDRONICUS; and Stuart, vol. i. p. 42.] The Gate of four fluted Doric columns, of Pentelic marble, supporting Great Stoa and the Tower, still exists: it is a portico of an entablature and pediment. (See the view and plans in Stuart, vol. i.)

The south-east quarter of the city, which is entered by next to the Acropolis. This building, of Pentelic marble, the Arch of Hadrian, was one of the oldest parts of it, consists of a circular arch with Corinthian columns, the rinthian columns, surmounted by an entablature, with a (See Stuart, iii. 90.) An inscripentablature of which supports another ordinance of Copediment in the centre. still testifies that the emperor gave his name to the part tion upon the frieze on the south-east side of the arch C 2 of the city between this edifice and the Ilissus. Here stood the magnificent temple of Jupiter Olympius, which being re-commenced about B.C. 175-165, on the site of an

[graphic][subsumed]

[Temple of Theseus, from Stuart's Athens.]

older temple, and worked upon at intervals, was at length finished by the liberality of Hadrian. Sixteen columns of Pentelic marble, 60 feet high, and above 64 in diameter, are all that now remain of the 128 which once adorned this magnificent building, one of the largest erected by the Greeks in honour of their deities. (See Stuart, iii. p. 83.) This temple and its sacred enclosure were filled with statues: two of the emperor were made of stone from Thasos, and two others of stone from Egypt; the statue of the deity was a chryselephantine (gold and ivory) statue of colossal size. The fountain called Callirrhoe, or Enneacrunus (the nine springs), the only source of fresh water in the neighbourhood, was only a short distance from the south-east angle of the great temple. There were wells, as Pausanias remarks (i. 14), all through the city, but this was the only source of pure water. An aqueduct from Cephisia on the Cephisus was constructed for the use of the city by Hadrian and Antoninus his successor. The reservoir of water was made at the foot of Anchesmos, and adorned with a frontispiece of four Ionic columns. (See Stuart, iii. 94.) This monument, of which two columns were standing in 1754, is now destroyed.

Beyond the quarter called Hadrian's City, on the east side of the Ilissus, is the Panathenaic Stadium, first constructed by Lycurgus the orator, B.C. 350, and adorned with Pentelic marble by Herodes Atticus, in the reign of Hadrian. All the marble has disappeared; but part of the masonry at the south-east or circular end, and the cavea, or part destined for the exhibition of the Panathenaic games, remains. Its length in the interior is 675 feet.

On the hill of the Museium, which is separated from the Acropolis by a depression, we find the monument of the Syrian mentioned by Pausanias (i. 25). According to the inscriptions it was erected by Philopappus, or in honour of Philopappus, the son of Epiphanes, in the reign of Trajan: it contained three niches, two of which remain, in which were placed the statue of Philopappus himself, occupying the centre, of his grandfather Antiochus the last king of Commagene, and that of Seleucus Nicator, the founder of the dynasty of the Seleucida. (See Spon, ii. 157, Amst. ed.; Dodwell's Travels, i. 392; and the view in Stuart, iii. 99.) We have now noticed the chief existing monuments of Athens in the lower part of the city, with the exception of the small choragic monument of Lysicrates, erected about B.C. 334 (the year of Alexander's expedition into Asia), vulgarly called the Lantern of Demosthenes: it stands between the south-east angle of the Acropolis and the great Temple of Jupiter, and is or was partly walled up in the buildings of the Capuchin convent. This little edifice, which consists

of a circular colonnade of Corinthian columns, resting on a high quadrangular basement, is only six feet in diameter. on the central piece, which rises from the cupola that crowns the colonnade, a tripod originally stood.

Of the great divisions of Athens which appear to be ascertained, we may mention the Inner Cerameicus, adjacent to the Dipylum, within the walls; the Old Agora, in the depression about the Areopagus; the New Agora, on the north side of the Acropolis, the gateway of which, as already observed, and three inscriptions still remain; and the Limnæ, or Marshes, a low and originally a swampy part of Athens, which contained the Lenæum, or Temple of Bacchus. This last quarter of Athens was always considered inferior in salubrity to that north of the Acropolis.

The Acropolis, or the old Cecropian fortress of Athens, is a rock, which rises abruptly from the plain, with its sides naturally scarped, except at the west end; its greatest length may be about 1200, and its greatest breadth about 550 feet. Before we describe briefly the edifices which stand on the platform of the Acropolis, we must notice those which stood immediately around its base.

Along the base, on the east side, extending southwards from the supposed site of the Prytaneum, probably ran the street to which Pausanias gave the name of Tripods (i. 20). This street, or quarter, was so called from a number of small temples or edifices crowned with tripods, to commemorate the victories gained by the Choragi in the neighbouring theatre. The great Dionysiac Theatre, the place for dramatic exhibitions, was on the south-east side of the Acropolis; the inner curve was excavated in the rock, and the part which projected into the plain was formed of masonry. In the recess of this excavation, and above the theatre, Pausanias (i. 21) describes a cavern, which was converted by Thrasyllus (B.c. 320), a victorious choragus, into a small temple. A noble seated figure, of colossal size, now generally called the statue of Bacchus, which originally was placed on the entablature of the small temple, is in the Elgin Room (No. 111) in the British Museum. (See article ATTIC; and the plate in Stuart, ii. 92.) A brass coin of Athens, in the British Museum, represents the interior of the theatre, showing distinctly the seats for the spectators, with the caves (for there are more than one) just under the south wall of the Acropolis; rising above which we observe the Parthenon, and other buildings which stand on the platform of the rock.

The dimensions of this theatre cannot now be ascertained, but we may safely infer it was a very large one. Dicæarchus expresses his admiration of its beauty.

On the south-west side of the Acropolis is the site of the

[blocks in formation]

[Enlarged.]

[Real size.]

At the west end of the Acropolis, where alone the approach is practicable, the open space was filled up with the Propylæa, a magnificent work of Pentelic marble, which served both as an approach and a military defence to the citadel. The front or central part, which was flanked by two projecting wings, consisted of six fluted Doric columns, about 29 feet high, supporting a pediment, and approached by four steps. A vestibule, formed by six Ionic columns, placed in a double row and parallel to one another, stood behind this portico, and led to five openings or doors, of which that in the centre was the widest. The roof or ceiling of this vestibule rested on triple lengths of marble beams laid across the vestibule; the beams belonging to the two side-aisles rested respectively on a lateral wall, and the architrave of the nearest row of columns: these beams were about 22 feet long. Those lying across the central passage were about 17 feet long. On these beams rested the slabs of the ceiling, which was decorated with various ornaments. The five openings led, by steps, into a portico which faced the platform of the Acropolis, and had a front and pediment similar to that at the western entrance of the Propylæa. This beautiful work has suffered grievously since the occupation of Athens by the Turks. A great part of the eastern side of the Propylaea was destroyed, about 1656, by an explosion of gunpowder (Spon, ii. 107), that took place in the part between the five doors and the west front, which had been formed into a powder-magazine. Spon (ii. 106) describes the west front, with its pediment and the Ionic columns of the vestibule, as existing in 1676; but the upper part of the west front is now entirely gone. [See Stuart, iii. 104; and PROPYLEA.]

The chief ornament of the Acropolis was the Parthenon (erected about B.C. 450-440), or Temple of the Virgin Goddess Minerva, which stood on the highest level of the Acropolis, and was built of the hard white marble of Pentelicus. This noble monument of antient art is now greatly daraaged, though a few centuries ago it was probably in a state little worse than it had been for two thousand years before. It suffered from the ravages of war between the Turks and Venetians, and also more recently in our own times. The remnant of the sculptures which decorated the pediments, with many of the metopes and a large part of the frieze, are now in the Elgin collection of the British Museum. These sculptures form an epoch in antient art,

and, together with the temple to which they belonged, will be the subject of a separate article. [See PARTHENON.] The position of this temple is indicated in the plan of the Acropolis: it is in 37° 58' 2" N. lat.; 23° 43′ 37′′ E. long. (Captain W. H. Smyth.)

Of the other remains on the Acropolis, the most interesting is the building, which, consisting of various parts, is now commonly known by the general name of the Erechtheium. The site of this edifice is denoted in the plan: its details require to be treated separately. [See ERECHTHEIUM.] The south portico of the Pandrosium (which is a part of this edifice), instead of pillars, was supported by six female figures, about seven feet high, technically called Caryatides, one of which is now in the Elgin collection; and another had disappeared even when Stuart and Revett visited Athens in 1750.

Besides these, and other smaller edifices which adorned the Acropolis, it contained a prodigious number of statues and other works of art-some of colossal size, and others distinguished for their exquisite beauty. The bronze colossal statue of Minerva the Defender (Anvã IIpóμaxos), the work of Phidias, is probably the statue represented on the coin which shows the steps of the Acropolis. The spear and helmet of this colossal figure (Pausan. i. 28) were visible towering above the Acropolis to those who approached Athens by sea, as soon as they had rounded Cape Sunium.

The Propylæa formed the defence of the western end of the Acropolis; the rest was surrounded by a strong wall. That on the north side was called the Pelasgicum, a term also applied to that part of the city immediately below it, and by Herodotus (v. 64) to the whole Acropolis. According to tradition, the north wall was built by the Pelasgi: possibly the existing wall may be part of this original construction, which, in all probability, is the oldest existing monument of Athens. The south wall was built, or probably rebuilt, and strengthened by Cimon, the son of Miltiades, from whom it took the name of Cimonium; in some parts it is sixty feet high. Near this south wall, as Pausanias tells us (i. 25), was the representation of the the Amazons, the battle of Marathon, and the defeat of the wars of the giants, the battle between the Athenians and Gauls in Mysia by king Attalus I. [See ATTALUS.] dreadful state, being little more than a heap of ruins, and At the close of the late Greek war, Athens was in a almost without inhabitants. At present, building is going on in the north part of the city, and if the unfortunate country of Greece can enjoy security, we may hope that, in a few years, the town will be in a more flourishing condition than it has been for many centuries. The excavations that are made for the purpose of erecting new buildings will probably determine some sites hitherto uncertain, and bring to light some valuable monuments of the best ages.

The authorities which may be consulted for the topography of Athens are very numerous: Strabo, book ix.; Pausanias, book i.; with the scattered passages of other Greek and Latin writers; Spon and Wheler; Chandler's Travels, of which there is a French translation, with notes,

by B. du Bocage; Stuart's Athens, 4 vols. folio, re-published by Priestley and Weale, London, 1827; Leake's Topogra phy of Athens; Wilkins's Atheniensia; and Elgin Marbles, 2 vols. 12mo., published by the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, in which these and other authorities are more particularly referred to: see also Encyc. of Ersch and Gruber, art. Attica. 1821.

History of Athens.-The origin of civil communities is generally unknown, and that of Athens does not form an exception to the remark. Our object here will be to give a brief sketch of the history of this state, referring to the particular heads for a more detailed account of the most important periods and events.

[graphic][graphic][subsumed][merged small][subsumed]

The first period of Athenian history, ending with the war of Troy, is of a mythical character. Actæus (Pausan. i. 2.) was the first king of Attica. Cecrops, according to one fable, was a native of Attica, who married the daughter of Actæus, and succeeded to the monarchy. According to another fable, Cecrops was an Egyptian, who brought from Egypt the arts of social life, and laid the foundations of the religious and political system of the Athenians. The name of Cecrops, whatever may have been its origin, was perpetuated among the Athenians to the latest epoch of their existence as a people. Of the successors of Cecrops, Erechtheus the first, otherwise called Erichthonius, was of divine or unknown descent; his name also survived and retained a place in the religious observances of Athens. In the reign of Pandion, the son of Erichthonius, Demeter (Ceres) was wandering on earth in quest of her lost daughter; out of gratitude for information about her child, the goddess taught Triptolemus of Eleusis the art of agriculture, and the Rharian plain waved with a harvest hitherto unknown to man. A second Erechtheus fought with the Eumolpida of Eleusis, and lost his life. Ægeus, the son of a second Pandion, in course of time came to the throne, and his son Theseus, as he was the last, so he was the greatest of the Athenian heroes. Theseus was the friend of Hercules and Peirithous; and the venerable Nestor, who assisted the Greeks with his counsels at the war of Troy, had fought, when a young man, in the same ranks with Theseus. The mythological fame of Theseus was perpetuated by his martial exploits against the bull of Marathon; by his descent to the infernal regions; his voyage to Crete, and his combat with the Centaurs. As the reputed founder of the Athenian polity, who united in one confederation the twelve hitherto independent states or cities of Attica, established by Cecrops (Strab. p. 397), he appears to be invested with the character of an historical personage. (See Thucyd. ii. 15.) Theseus is also said to have instituted the great quinquennial festival of the Panathenæa, in commemoration of the political union of all Attica. (Pausan. viii. 2.) To the latest period of their history the Athenians retained the grateful remembrance of this hero, and the beautiful temple, which is still called the Theseium, has perpetuated to the present day a name which belongs to a period when the truth of history is wrapped in the impenetrable veil of the mythi of the Greeks.

The Athenians sent fifty ships to the war of Troy, under the command of Menestheus, who had driven Theseus from Athens; but neither the general nor his soldiers occupy a conspicuous place among the worthies of Homer.

If we endeavour to trace the history of the Athenian people, we find the obscurity of their origin expressed by the statement that they were Autochthones-people coëval with the land which they inhabited. Herodotus (i. 57) says that the Athenians were originally Pelasgi, and that they became changed into Hellenes (Greeks). Such a change implies the conquest of the country by one race while it was already in the possession of another; it implies also either the amalgamation of the conquered and the conquering races, or the extinction of those who were compelled to yield. The former we believe to be supported by more probabilities. Xuthus, the son of Hellen, married a daughter of the second Erechtheus, and became the father of Achæus and Ion: thus the name Ionian became attached to the Attic soil; and we have the historical fact, that the names of the four tribes which existed till the time of Cleisthenes were supposed to be derived from the names of the four sons of Ion. (Herod. v. 66: comp. Pausan. vii. 1.) The Athenians, says Herodotus (viii. 44), ‘during the occupation by the Pelasgi of the country now called Hellas, were Pelasgi, with the distinctive name of Cranai. From Cecrops they received the name of Cecropida; and upon Erechtheus succeeding to the royal power, their name was changed to Athenians. After Ion, the son of Xuthus, had become the leader of the forces of the Athenians, the people got the name of Ionians. In the fable of Poseidon and Athena (Neptune and Minerva) contending for the honour of giving a name to Athens, Poseidon, the god of the Ionians of Helice and the national god of those who were afterwards the Ionians of Asia, contended, though unsuccessfully, against Athena, the primitive deity of the country. Yet the name and worship of Poseidon was not neglected in Athens; the Erechtheium of the Acropolis preserved the remembrance of the contest, and the altar on which it was usual to sacrifice (Pausan. i. 26) both to Erechtheus and Poseidon, indicated that the mythical king

was the representative of the deity whose worship strove for | the supremacy. Among the various names by which Athens was known, we find that of Poseidonia, or the City of Neptune (Strabo, ix. 397); and the name of Athens itself was given to eight different places, (See Steph. Byzant. 'Anvaι.)

|

The fable of the two deities contending for Attica is represented on a coin of Athens.

The remembrance of the Pelasgi was retained in the name of the northern wall of the Acropolis, of which they were the architects, and in that part of the city which was below it in the plain. Tradition, however, reported that the Pelasgi, or that portion of the old inhabitants which did not mix with the new comers, were finally driven out of Attica, and retired to Lemnos. The connexion between the Lemnian and Thracian Pelasgi and the Athenians seems sufficiently indicated by old traditions and other circumstances. The Pelasgi were in Attica before the time assigned to the reign of Cecrops; and it has been remarked (Ersch and Gruber, Encyc. Attic.) that the analogy of the name Pallas to the Thracian peninsula Pallene, and of the mountain Athos to the name Athene, appears to indicate the Thracian origin of these Athenian denominations.

The line of Athenian kings, whatever may have been its historical commencement, terminated with Codrus, son of the Messenian Melanthus. Melanthus, himself a fugitive, had received the Ionians, who fled from the Peloponnesus before the victorious Heraclidæ (B.c. 1104), partly, as it is said, for the sake of Ion, that is, because they were kinsmen, and partly because the Athenians wished to strengthen themselves against the Dorians. On the death of Codrus, who fell during an invasion of Attica by a Peloponnesian army (B.c. 1068), his sons, disputing about the right of succession, referred the matter to the oracle of Delphi, who decided in favour of Medon. Neileus, the other son, left his country at the head of a colony, chiefly Ionian refugees, and with them founded the twelve Ionian states of Asia. Thucydides, in his brief sketch of the early history of Greece, instead of attempting to unravel the web in which even in his time it was involved, gives only these as the general results of his inquiries into the earliest state of his native country :-The sterility of Attica offered no temptation to an invader, and it consequently had not, like the more fertile parts of Greece, a continual change of inhabit ants; the security which it enjoyed made it a place of refuge for those who were driven from other states; and the increase of wealth and population led to the colonization of Ionia and the greater part of the islands of the Agean after the war of Troy. (Thucy. i. 2, 12.)-Herodotus (viii. 45) has furnished us with a list of those islands, which, at the time of the great invasion of Xerxes, came to the assistance of their mother state. They are Eretria and Chalcis in Euboea, both founded before the war of Troy (Strabo, 446), and the islands of Ceos, Naxos, Siphnos and Seriphos. The circumstances of the Athenians at this early period directing their attention to the colonization of islands, tends to show that they were always a maritime people, though the foundation of their naval power is referred by their own historians to the epoch of the Persian wars.

With the death of Codrus the office of king ceased in Atheus, and the supreme executive power was vested in an archon, or governor, whose office, from being at first hereditary and for life, was by degrees changed into a decennial, and finally into an annual office. When the last change took place, a further alteration was made by distributing the duties of the archon among nine magistrates, instead of giving them all to one. [See ARCHON, COLRUS.] From the death of Codrus to the legislation of Solon, Athenian history presents but few and doubtful facts; and though the personality of Solon and his framing of a code cannot be matters of doubt, the events of his life belong to that epoch where the records of history are still obscure and disputed. Solon was the contemporary of Amasis, king of

« EelmineJätka »