Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

was talked of as if Russia had never at- reference to this difficulty. The Archtempted to reconcile the Poles; but the bishop of Warsaw tendered to the Archhistory of the Poles from 1815 to 1820 duke Constantine his resignation as contradicted that assumption. It so hap- member of the Legislative Assembly; pened that he had a connection who had and what did the Grand Duke say? He been employed by Russia; that connec- said " This is open rebellion at such a tion had always treated him with the ut- time as this. You want to make this a most friendship and confidence. He (Mr. religious war; but He (Mr. religious war; but you will find Russia too Newdegate) had himself entertained many powerful for you. The same Ultramonof the feelings in favour of Polish inde- tane influence which counteracted Engpendence that had been avowed in that land's efforts to conciliate Ireland was at House; and he asked the gentleman to work in Poland, and had been her curse whom he referred to furnish him with for two hundred years. Poland was evidence that proposals for reconcilia- formerly one great source from which tion had not only been made, but that Rome recruited her crusades; the Ultrathere had been an attempt to carry them montane party now was stimulating Poland out by Russia. The gentleman furnished for another crusade-for a religious war him with that evidence, and he showed against Russia; and if Russia were guilty that the very same system which prevent of severities and atrocities which he deed England from producing content in Ire-plored, and which severities and atrocities land was the source of the perpetual disturbance and misery of Poland. He (Mr. Newdegate) asked the House to consider this-Was there anything in the conduct of the present Emperor of Russia which could make them believe that he did not personally share those benevolent feelings towards Poland which actuated Alexander the First? And yet it was assumed that the Emperor had no such disposition. So far was this from being the case, that even Prince Napoleon, speaking in the Senate of France, declared that the intentions of the Emperor of Russia towards Poland were most benevolent; and such an admission from such a quarter must carry conviction to the most sceptical, for the Prince made this admission on the very eve of dividing the Senate on a motion which, if carried, would have involved France in a war with Russia for the independence of Poland. The Grand Duke had granted the most liberal indul gencies to the Poles. And how had these been thwarted? Why, by the same elements of disturbance which had prevented England from reconciling Ireland. No one could read the recent letter of the Archbishop of Orleans to M. Quinet without seeing that the object of the Ultramontane party was to establish their own power in and over Poland. What did the Archbishop say to M. Quinet, in effect, but this?" We, the Ultramontane Party, will not accept your aid for Poland, nor your co-operation; for if by such means we were to succeed, we should not establish in Poland the state of things which we desire. There had appeared in The Times a passage most pregnant with VOL. CLXX. [THIRD SERIES.]

he had no doubt the noble Lord at the head of the Government would do his best to mitigate; and still, if Russia were driven to these acts in order to avoid the occurrence of such a calamity as a religious war, she would ultimately receive, barbarous as she might be in many respects, that justice from public opinion which the too sanguine advocates of Poland denied her. He hoped that the House would excuse him for thus speaking that which he believed to be the honest truth. There were elements in this contest which rendered the Poles insensible to reason, and not content with justicejustice as far as could be granted by a Power which those who had excited the Polish insurrection were seeking to injure in her deepest interests. [4 laugh.] The hon. Member for the King's County (Mr. Hennessy) might laugh-he was the representative of that class of the Roman Catholic opinion which thought all means justifiable to accomplish its ends. Those only would laugh who thought any amount of bloodshed and civil war justifiable if it afforded them some prospect of seeing the favourite order of Rome dominant throughout the world. But the Protestant people of England were not forgetful of their own history; they knew that their forefathers were driven to the use of severities, which they regretted, by this same element of danger and disturbances; and they would yet do justice to Russia, if Russia, at the instance of Europe, was prepared to do justice to Poland.

SIR HARRY VERNEY said, the hon. Member for North Warwickshire (Mr. Newdegate) endeavoured to represent this E

as a religions war, but he thought he would ality, their native language, the Poles did not convert the people of England to that not obtain justice, for there were no col view. The present insurrection was not leges nor schools for the cultivation of caused by any internal dissension among the Polish language in the four provinces. the Poles, but by the external pressure He asserted that there were none in East put upon them by their oppressors. Never or West Prussia, or in the Grand Duchy had greater tyranny been exercised by one of Posen there were not even village civilized country towards another, than that schools-and when the Poles complained which Russia had inflicted on Poland. The of any act of severity on the part of constant and systematic attempts of Russia their rulers, they were told they were to govern Poland by the instrumentality of Prussians, and not Poles. It was clear Russians lay at the root of all the disturb therefore, notwithstanding the assertion of ances in that country. The friends of the noble Lord, that the nationality of Poland would never cease calling the atten- Poland was not preserved in Prussia. tion of Europe and of this country to the he grievous oppressions to which she had been Bubjected for so many years, but it was not bare words of encouragement they were prepared to give her. What had fallen from the noble Viscount to night had led him to hope that he would take measures, in concert with the other Powers who had signed the Treaty of Vienna, to obtain those concessions to Poland to which she had a right. He hoped this country would combine with Austria and France in order to give to Poland one frontier upon which she might depend, and that we should yet see Galicia independent. If that were effected-if it were possible to establish an independent kingdom between Germany and Russia, it would form a most important element of the peace and safety of Europe.

MR. H. R. GRENFELL said, regretted that on that, the first time on which he addressed the House, he should differ in some respects from the opinions of the Liberal party, to which he belonged. The Liberal party always professed to advocate peace, retrenchment, and reform. Reform had been put aside, and he did not see much sign of retrenchment; he hoped, then, he might be permitted to say a few words upon the subject of peace. Now, if there was any meaning in the argument of the hon. Member for the King's County (Mr. Hennessy), they meant this, that he did not believe in the ability of the noble Viscount and the Government to steer clear on the one side of pusillanimous advice, and on the other of war. But the sympathies of England and those of the noble SIR HENRY STRACEY said, that Viscount and of the Governments which the speech of his hon. Friend the Member had preceded his had never been wanting for North Warwickshire (Mr. Newdegate) to the cause of Poland. At the time of contained many generous sentiments; still, the first partition of Poland the greatest on the question of the established religion political and philosophical writer of that of this country, he could not but think, if day had endeavoured to awaken publie we adhered to the Treaty of Vienna, we opinion in Europe to the general wrong must support the religion and clergy of sustained by all nations through that the Poles. He could not understand why event; and in 1815 the noble Lord who Prussia should have been treated with so represented England at the Congress of much delicacy in this debate. Prussia Vienna (Lord Castlereagh) had endeavourwas as culpable as Russia. He remem-ed, by acting in concert with Austria, to bered that the noble Viscount, on a former occassion, asserted that in Prussia the nationality of Poland was preserved. But, with the utmost deference to the noble Viscount, and as far as his information went, he could not agree with him in that opinion. In the four provinces of East and West Prussia, Silesia, and the Grand Duchy of Posen, there were in all 7,500,000 inhabitants, of whom 2,830,000 were Poles. In Posen there were 850,000 Poles, and only 550,000 Prussians. According to the Treaty of Vienna, these Poles ought to have their nationality preserved; and yet in that important element of nation

obtain justice for Poland. In 1831 Poland was not the only country which the noble Viscount had to watch over. It should not be forgotten that besides arranging the great and dangerous question of Belgium the noble Lord was occupied then in watching over the nascent liberties of Spain and Portugal; and Belgium, Spain, and Portugal were countries far nearer and more interesting to us than Poland. Again, at the close of the Crimean war, the noble Viscount and Lord Clarendon showed that they were not unmindful of Poland; and he maintained that the noble Viscount had on

all occasions displayed his willingness to enter into the cause of Poland, when he could do so consistently with the interests of this and other countries. He therefore thought they might safely leave the cause of Poland in the hands of the noble Lord. A great many Members, who had spoken on this occasion, seemed to forget that there were interests of England as well as interests of Poland to be considered. No one who looked at our relations with America, would doubt that retrenchment ought to be a leading object with the Government of this country. He entreated those who were so enthusiastic about Poland to pause before they forced Her Majesty's Government into action on this subject. Ministers should rather be urged to tender sound and confidential advice at the present juncture to those upon whom the fate of Poland now depended.

[blocks in formation]

MR. BLAKE said, he would beg to ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, Whether, in the case of the convict Burton, now under sentence of death at Maidstone Gaol for the murder of a child at Chatham Lines, an application was not made at the trial for the examination of the prisoner by Dr. Forbes Win slow, or some other physician of experience in insanity, and refused by the Judge; and whether, taking into consideration the fact then stated of Burton's mother being confined in a Lunatic Asylum, and his brother not being of sound mind, it is his intention to order such an examination to be now made? He was informed that the prisoner's counsel applied to the Judge to order that the evidence of eminent medical men should be procured to show whether, when the prisoner committed the act, he was labouring under insanity or not. Mr. Justice Wight man, however, stated that he had funds at his disposal for such a purpose. The execution of the convict would, under usual circumstances, take place within a very short time, and his object in putting

no

the Question was to induce the right hon. Gentleman to satisfy himself, either by adopting the course asked for at the trial or otherwise, whether this unfortunate man was insane or not.

SIR GEORGE GREY said, he was not aware that any application had been made to the Judge of the nature described by the hon. Member. The defence of the prisoner was his alleged insanity. A great deal of evidence was adduced on both sides on the subject, and the Judge laid down the law in accordance with the highest legal authorities. The jury, after full and patient consideration, were of opinion that the prisoner was morally responsible for his actions, and therefore that he was not insane. In answer to the second Question he had to state, that no facts had been laid before him which would justify him in ordering such an examination as that referred to.

Motion agreed to.

Supply considered in Committee.
House resumed.

Committee report Progress; to sit again on Monday 13th April.

SAVINGS BANKS ACTS.-COMMITTEE. Savings Banks Acts considered in Committee.

(In the Committee.)

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER rose to move a Resolution with a view to founding a Bill thereupon. The object of the Bill which he proposed to introduce was to some extent identical with a Bill which had been only partly adopted in a former Session; he had now endeavoured to avoid giving rise to differences of opinion that were formerly mooted. One object of the measure was to extend the principle of the conversion of perpetual into terminable annuities to a further extent than it had yet been carried. At present the amount paid annually for terminable annuities was £1,900,000, part of which was interest and part repayment of capital. It might be said that about £1,000,000 was paid every year towards the reduction of the National Debt. In the year 1867 a portion of the terminable annuities, to the amount of £585,000, would cease. The operation of the Post Office Savings Banks Act was to convert a proportion, not exceeding one-sixth, of the stock purchased for those savings banks into the form of terminable annuities. He

dealing with terminable annuities was that the capital should be reinvested in some form or other, otherwise the danger of spending capital as income was incurred. There could not be a question of the prudence of recognising by statute the claims of the savings banks to repayments in full at the hands of the Commissioners of the National Debt.

MR. AYRTON said, persons throughout the country were extremely sensitive about the right to receive back the money deposited with the Commissioners of the National Debt. In such an extraordinary emergency as the funds at the disposal of the Commissioners proving insufficient to meet all the claims upon them, there could be no doubt that Parliament would make good the deficiency; but he was anxious to know how the fund could be rendered available if there should happen to be a run upon them.

proposed to apply the same principle to the the amount of interest would be. He ap. old savings banks. He asked Parliament prehended that the very first principle in to give power to convert four millions of 3 per cent stock into terminable annuities of 1885. The effect of the measure would be to add £120,000 a year to the present charge for the National Debt, with a view to the relief to be obtained by the extinction of so much of the capital within a limited period. The next enactment in the proposed Bill would be to convert £24,000,000 of the savings banks money into a passive charge, resembling the debt now due to the Bank. He also proposed to remedy an existing defect in the law relating to savings banks. Although at present there was no doubt of the moral, and to some extent the legal, liability of the State to repay to the trustees of savings banks all the money received from them with the interest accrued, yet the machinery for giving effect to that obligation did not exist. The value of stock in the hands of the Commissioners might not be sufficient to liquidate all their engagements. He proposed, that in case of a demand on account of the savings banks arising that could not be met out of the proceeds of the securities and the cash at the credit of the Commissioners, such deficiency should be a charge upon the whole Consolidated Fund-giving full security to the savings banks. Another provision in the Bill would authorize the Commissioners, whenever they might think it desirable, to meet any demands out of the cash in the Exchequer, instead of going into the market to sell stock, which, at a time when the price was low, was a disadvantageous operation with a forced sale. Resolution moved,

[ocr errors]

MR. LYGON understood the Bill to apply to all past operations, but wished to know whether it would apply to any deficiency to be created hereafter. If so, that would open a very wide question.

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHE. QUER held, that there could be no doubt of the right of trustees of savings banks to receive back from the State every farthing they had paid; but there was all the difference in the world between a right to receive payment and provision of the machinery for making that payment. As to the apprehension of future deficits, he reminded the Committee that by the Act of 1861 security had been taken that any operation in which a Finance Minister That it is expedient to amend the Laws relating might engage for any public purpose must to the investment of the monies of Savings Banks, come under the review of Parliament beestablished under the Act 9 Geo. 4, c. 92, to create, fore it could take effect. Until 1861 the a charge for such Savings Banks upon the Con- Chancellor of the Exchequer had the power solidated Fund in place of certain perpetual Annuities now standing in the names of the Commissioners for the Reduction of the National Debt for such Savings Banks, to give powers for converting certain other amounts of such perpetual Annuities into certain other Annuities, and to provide for the due payment out of the Consolidated Fund of any deficiency which may arise from insufficiency of the securities to meet the legal claims of the Trustees of such Savings

Banks.

SIR HENRY WILLOUGHBY said, as far as he understood the scheme of the right hon. Gentleman, one portion seemed very good, and another somewhat doubtful. The Committee was dealing with a very large sum, and he wished to know what

of refunding Exchequer Bilis. Now, all that power was taken away from him, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer must submit himself to the judgment of Parliament with regard to any of these financial operations.

SIR HENRY WILLOUGHBY thought it would be better to place this power in the hands of the Commissioners of the Treasury, who were well known and responsible to the House, than in the hands of an ex-officio body like that of the Commissioners for the Reduction of the National Debt.

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCIEQUER admitted that that question might

very fairly be debated hereafter, separately two most able men-Sir John Lefevre and from the Bill.

Motion agreed to.

House resumed.

This

Sir Edward Ryan-both of whom received
salaries from other appointments.
was a state of things that could not be ex-
pected to last. Sir John Lefevre for eight

Resolution to be reported on Monday years discharged most arduous duties on

13th April.

SUPPLY.-REPORT.

Resolutions (March 26) reported.

First Thirteen Resolutions agreed to.
Fourteenth Resolution read,

"That a sum, not exceeding £6,741, be granted to Her Majesty, to complete the sum necessary to defray the Charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March 1864, for conducting the

business of the Civil Service Commission."

LORD HENRY LENNOX asked for an explanation respecting the first appearance in these Estimates of the First Commissioner of the Civil Service Commission. The duty had been hitherto performed by unpaid Commissioners. It appeared now, that though the duty had been well done by the unpaid Commissioners, the country was now called upon to vote £1,500 for this First Commissioner of the Civil Service Commission. He, like many other hon. Members, had been taken entirely by surprise by the rapid progress made last night by the Government in taking these Votes; and he thought they ought to feel indebted to the right hon. Gentleman the Member for Oxfordshire (Mr. Henley) for having exposed this juggling system of passing the Votes.

THE CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER said, that he could not understand the debt of gratitude which oppressed his noble Friend in connection with what he had described in the not very complimentary term "juggling." He could not understand the disappointment of hon. Gentlemen who had failed to be in their places when the Votes were brought for ward after due notice. The words used by the noble Lord were hard ones, and hard words ought not to be lightly used; when they were applied, they ought to be supported by proof that they were deserved. If they were used, and that such proof could not be brought forward, they ought to be apologized for. With respect to the Vote on which his noble Friend asked for Bome explanation, it was explained last year. The fact was, that when the Civil Service Commission was appointed in 1855, the country had been fortunate enough to obtain the services as Commissioners of

the Commission, but in 1861 he informed the Government that his physical strength was not equal to the discharge of the duties of the Civil Service Commission and of the Ecclesiastical Commission, in conjunction with those of Clerk to the House of Lords. Therefore, it became absolutely necessary to appoint some person in his place on the Civil Service Commission, but it could not be expected that they should meet with another person who would discharge the duties of a Commissioner gratuitously. Sir Edward Ryan received a salary as a retired Indian Judge, and likewise as Assistant Controller of the Exchequer. during the eight years he had been on the Civil Service Commission in conjunction with Sir John Lefevre. The Deputy Controllership of the Exchequer had been virtually abolished, and by the re-arrange ments made by the Government he thought they saved more money than they spent in giving Sir Edward Ryan a salary as Civil Service Commissioner.

MR. HENNESSY said, that the charge against the Government was not that they had proceeded with the Estimates, but that after the Secretary of the Treasury had placed on the paper this notice

Civil Service Estimates: Votes on account," they had proceeded with the Votes themselves. A Cabinet Minister, while defending the Government, was forced to admit that this course was unprecedented and inconvenient, and surely, therefore, a Member of the Opposition might describe it as "juggling.

He was anxious to know how it was that since the public funds had been expended upon this Civil Service Commission the number of open competitions had declined.

SIR HERVEY BRUCE thought that the Secretary of the Treasury had been wanting in consideration, he would say courtesy, to Irish Members in proceeding with the Irish Votes without sufficient notice.

MR. PEEL said, that the fact that Irish Votes were passed last night in the absence of Irish Members might easily be accounted for without supposing that Irish Members were inattentive to their duties, and without there being any justification for the charge that he had been wanting

« EelmineJätka »