From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 85
Page 144
Lord MacDermott held that for the purpose of jurisdiction there was no distinction between void and voidable marriages and that the court of the ceremony had jurisdiction to annul . He pronounced a decree accordingly .
Lord MacDermott held that for the purpose of jurisdiction there was no distinction between void and voidable marriages and that the court of the ceremony had jurisdiction to annul . He pronounced a decree accordingly .
Page 158
He held that the place of celebration of a marriage being in England did not ipso facto give jurisdiction in nullity as to void marriages ; though Inverclyde v . Inverclyde was wrongly decided owing to the jurisdiction being founded on ...
He held that the place of celebration of a marriage being in England did not ipso facto give jurisdiction in nullity as to void marriages ; though Inverclyde v . Inverclyde was wrongly decided owing to the jurisdiction being founded on ...
Page 285
All three of their lordships have held that name and arms clauses which in substance follow the language sanctified by respectable antiquity in the books of precedents could not be challenged as being too vague or uncertain .
All three of their lordships have held that name and arms clauses which in substance follow the language sanctified by respectable antiquity in the books of precedents could not be challenged as being too vague or uncertain .
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Contents
Vol 233 | 31 |
Annual Subscriptions and Notices to Advertisers and Correspondents page 28 | 43 |
THE LAW AND THE LAWYERS | 57 |
16 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action ADVERTISEMENTS agreement allowed Amendment application appointed authority BILL Board building carried cause charge claim clause common Company condition considered contract Council Counsel County course Court of Appeal Criminal damages decision defendant duty edit effect England entitled evidence fact February give given Government granted ground held House House of Lords husband income interest issue January JUDGE June jurisdiction justices L. T. Jour land landlord Limited London Lord March marriage matter meaning ment Minister Miss notice offence Office operation Order in Council paid parties payment period person plaintiff planning possession practice premises present Price published purchase question reason received referred refused regard Regulations relating Reported respect respondent Road rule sect Society Solicitors statutory tenant tion trade trust wife