...purpose. Neither do they distinguish between an extradition warrant and the usual arrest warrant. Indeed, the "security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion...— which is at the core of the Fourth Amendment," Wolf v. Colorado, 338 US, at 27, applies with undiminished force to the intrusion that occurs in the...

...Id., at 33. Although our holding was thus narrowly confined, in the course of the opinion it was said: "The security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion...against the States through the Due Process Clause. . . . Accordingly, we have no hesitation in saying that were a State affirmatively to sanction such...

...Id., at 33. Although our holding was thus narrowly confined, in the course of the opinion it was said: "The security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion...against the States through the Due Process Clause. . . . Accordingly, we have no hesitation in saying that were a State affirmatively to sanction such...

...Id., at 33. Although our holding was thus narrowly confined, in the course of the opinion it was said: "The security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion...against the States through the Due Process Clause. . . . Accordingly, we have no hesitation in saying that were a State affirmatively to sanction such...

...to the Federal Government (Barren v. Baltimore, 7 Peters 243; Adamspn v. California, 332 US 40, 51), "(t)he security of one's privacy against arbitrary...therefore implicit in "the concept of ordered liberty" (Palho v. Connecticut, 302 US 309, 324-325) and as such enforceable against the States through the...

...and inclusive: 360 DOUGLAS, J., dissenting. The Court said in Wolf v. Colorado, supra, at 27, that "The security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion...Fourth Amendment — is basic to a free society." Now that resounding phrase is watered down to embrace only certain invasions of one's privacy. If officials...

...and inclusive: 360 DOUGLAS, J., dissenting. The Court said in Wolf v. Colorado, supra, at 27, that "The security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion...Fourth Amendment — is basic to a free society." Now that resounding phrase is watered down to embrace only certain invasions of one's privacy. If officials...

...federal violations, in what was said in 1949 in Wolf v. Colorado, 338 US 25, 27-28, recognizing that "[t]he security of one's privacy against arbitrary...against the States through the Due Process Clause." The Court asserts that there is no longer any logic in restricting the application of the Weeks exclusionary...

...federal violations, in what was said in 1949 in Wolf v. Colorado, 338 US 25, 27-28, recognizing that "[t]he security of one's privacy against arbitrary...against the States through the Due Process Clause." The Court asserts that there is no longer any logic in restricting the application of the Weeks exclusionary...

...sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life. . . ." Boyd v. United States, 116 US 616, 630. "The security of one's privacy against arbitrary intrusion...Fourth Amendment — is basic to a free society." Wolf v. Colorado, supra, at 27. In addition, see, eg, Davis v. United States, 328 US 582, 587; 497...