-

PAGE

-

382

STANDING ORDERS OF PARLIAMENT RELATIVE TO PRIVATE BILLS
AND BILLS FOR CONFIRMING PROVISIONAL ORDERS

GENERAL ORDERS FOR THE REGULATION OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER AND

IN PURSUANCE OF THE PRIVATE LEGISLATION PROCEDURE (SCOT-

LAND) ACT, 1899

-

-

PRECEDENT OF A TRAMWAYS ORDERS CONFIRMATION ACT

- 417

- 423

Part III.

LIGHT RAILWAYS.

THE LIGHT RAILWAYS ACT, 1896.

(59 & 60 Vict. c. 48.)

SECT.

1. Establishment of Light Railway Commission

2. Application for Orders authorising light railways

3. Powers of local authorities under Order

4. Loans by Treasury -

5. Special advances by Treasury

6. Limitation on amount of advance and provision of money by

National Debt Commissioners

7. Consideration of application by Light Railway Commissioners

8. Submission of Order to Board of Trade for confirmation

9. Consideration of Order by Board of Trade -

10. Confirmation of Order by Board of Trade

-

11. Provisions which may be made by the Order

12. Application of general Railway Acts

€ 500

500

- 501

13. Mode of settling purchase-money and compensation for taking
of land

14. Payment of purchase-money or compensation

15. Provisions as to Board of Trade in respect of local inquiries,
rules, fees and expenses

- 504

19. Power of owners to grant land or advance money for a light

railway

20. Power to grant Crown lands

- 510

538

THE LIGHT RAILWAYS (COSTS) RULES, 1898

FORM OF PROOF OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE LIGHT RAILWAYS ACT

AND RULES

-

543

- 548

- 586

- 638

- 640

- 642

- 644

- 647

TABLE OF CASES.

Abraham v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1894), "Times" Newspaper, Mar. 22

PAGE

Abrahams v. Deakin, (1891) 1 Q. B. 516; 60 L. J. Q. B. 238; 63 L.
T. 690; 39 W. R. 183; 55 J. P. 212; 7 T. L. R. 117
Abrath v. North Eastern Railway Co. (1886), 11 A. C. 247; 55 L. J.
Q. B. 457; 55 L. T. 63; 30 J. P. 659; 2 T. L. R. 416
Acton, Middlesex, Local Board, Ex parte (1888), "Times" News-
paper, Nov. 6-

Adamson v. Edinburgh Street Tramways Co. (1872), 10 M. 533; 9 S.
L. R. 369

. 243

217

215

429

105

Adamson v. Miller (1900), 44 So. J. 278; 16 T. L. R. 185 Alldred v. West Metropolitan Trams Co., (1891) 2 Q. B. 398; 60 L. J. Q. B. 631; 65 L. T. 138; 39 W. R. 609; 55 J. P. 824; 7 T. L. R. 609 143, 147, 231 Allen v. London & South Western Railway Co. (1870), L. R. 6 Q. B. 65; 40 L. J. Q. B. 55; 23 L. T. 612; 19 W. R. 127; 11 Cox, C. C. 621 Alston v. Herring (1856), 11 Ex. 822; 25 L. J. Ex. 177 Alton Railroad and Illumination Co. v. Foulds, 81 Ill. App. 322 Alty v. Farrell, (1896) 1 Q. B. 636; 65 L. J. M. C. 115; 74 L. T. 492; 60 J. P. 373; 18 Cox, C. C. 321; 12 T. L. R. 346 Ambler, Jeremiah, & Sons, Ltd. v. Bradford Corporation, (1902) 2 Ch. 585; 71 L. J. Ch. 744; 87 L. T. 217; 66 J. P. 708; 18 T. L. R. 758 Amesbury Union v. Wiltshire JJ. (1883), 10 Q. B. D. 480; 52 L. J. M. C. 64; 31 W. R. 521; 47 J. P. 184

Antrim (Earl of) v. Dobbs (1891) 30 L. R. I. 424
Apthorpe v. Edinburgh Street Tramways Co. (1882), 10 R. 344; 20
S. L. R. 256
Armstrong v. South London Tramways Co., Ltd. (1891), 64 L. T. 96 ;
55 J. P. 370; 7 T. L. R. 123

· 240

199

245

Armytage, In re (1880), 14 Ch. D. 379; 49 L. J. Bk. 60; 42 L. T. 443; 28 W. R. 924

Atkinson v. Newcastle and Gateshead Waterworks Co. (1877), 2 Ex. D. 441; 44 L. J. Ex. 775; 36 L. T. 761; 25 W. R. 794 Attorney-General v. Ashbourne Recreation Ground Co., (1903) 1 Ch. 101; 72 L. J. Ch. 67; 87 L. T. 561; 51 W. R. 525; 67 J. P. 73; 1 L. G. R. 146; 19 T. L. R. 40 Attorney-General v. Bournemouth Corporation, (1902) 2 Ch. 714; 71 L. J. Ch. 730; 87 L. T. 252; 51 W. R. 129; 18 T. L. R. 744 -116, 117, 118, 178, 245, 299

Attorney-General v. Cambridge Consumers' Gas Co. (1868), L. R. 4
Ch. 71; 38 L. J. Ch. 94; 19 L. T. 508; 17 W. R. 145

S.

b

137

301; 64
59 J. P.

PAGE

261

112

Attorney-General v. Conduit Colliery_Co., (1895) 1 Q. B. L. J. Q. B. 207; 15 R. 267; 71 L. T. 771; 43 W. R. 366; 70; 11 T. L. R. 57 Attorney-General. Eastbourne Corporation, (1901) 2 K. B. 773; (1902) 1 K. B. 403; 70 L. J. K. B. 1046; 71 L. J. K. B. 181; 85 L. T. 745; 50 W. R. 161; 66 J. P. 36; 18 T. L. R. 122 187, 191 Attorney-General v. Folkestone Corporation (1903), "Times" Newspaper, April 29 Attorney-General . Gas Light & Coke Co. (1877), 7 Ch. D. 217; 47 L. J. Ch. 334; 37 L. T. 746; 26 W. R. 125 Attorney-General v. Great Eastern Railway Co. (1872), L. R. 7 Ch. 475; L. R. 6 H. L. 307; 41 L. J. Ch. 505; 26 L. T. 749; 20 W. R. 599; 22 W. R. 281 Attorney-General v. Great Eastern Railway Co. (1880), 11 Ch. D. 449; 5 A. C. 473; 48 L. J. Ch. 428; 49 L. J. Ch. 545; 40 L. T. 265; 42 L. T. 810; 27 W. R. 759; 28 W. R. 769 Attorney-General v. Hanwell Urban District Council, (1900) 2 Ch. 377; 69 L. J. Ch. 626; 82 L. T. 778; 48 W. R. 690; 16 T. L. R.

452

Attorney-General for Ontario v. Hamilton Street Railway Co. (1895),
27 Önt. R. 49 -
Attorney-General for Ontario v. Hamilton Street Railway Co. (1903),
19 T. L. R. 612
Attorney-General v. Hastings Corporation (1902), 19 T. L. R. 9
Attorney-General v. Logan, (1891) 2 Q. B. 100; 65 L. T. 162; 55 J.
P. 615; 7 T. L. R. 279

Attorney-General v. London & North Western Railway Co., (1900) 1 Q. B. 78; 69 L. J. Q. B. 26; 81 L. T. 649; 63 J. P. 772; 16 T. L. R. 30 - 132 Attorney-General v. London County Council, (1901) 1 Ch. 781; (1902) A. C. 165; 70 L. J. Ch. 367; 71 L. J. Ch. 268; 86 L. T. 161; 50 W. R. 497; 66 J. P. 340; 18 T. L. R. 298 Attorney-General v. Margate Pier & Harbour Co., (1900) 1 Ch. 749; 69 L. J. Ch. 331; 82 L. T. 448; 48 W. R. 518; 64 J. P. 405 Attorney-General v. Mid-Kent Railway Co. and South Eastern Railway Co. (1867), L. R. 3 Ch. 100; 16 W. R. 258 Attorney-General v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1873), "Times" Newspaper, Nov. 3, Dec. 10, Dec. 18

Attorney-General v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co., (1892) 3 Ch. 78; 61 L. J. Ch. 693

245

126

- 138

180

251

25

Attorney-General v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1895), 72 L.
T. 340
Attorney-General v. Rufford, (1899) 1 Ch. 537; 68 L. J. Ch. 179; 80
L. T. 17; 47 W. R. 405; 63 J. P. 232; 15 T. L. R. 152
Attorney-General v. Sheffield Gas Consumers' Co. (1853), 3 De G.
M. & G. 304; 22 L. J. Ch. 811; 17 Jur. 677; 1 W. R. 185
Attorney-General v. Southall, Ealing and Shepherd's Bush Tramways
Co. (1874), "Times" Newspaper, July 10
Attorney-General v. Swansea Tramways Co. (1878), "Times" News-
paper, June 20

Attorney-General v. Toronto Street Railway Co. (1868), 14 Upp. Can.
Ch. 673; 15 Upp. Can. Ch. 187

137

134

165

133, 134

Badcock v. Sankey (1896), 54 J. P. 564
Baddeley v. Gingell (1847), 1 Ex. 319

- 207

- 104