Staley v. Castleton Overseers (1864), 5 B. & S. 505; 33 L. J. M. C. 178; 10 Jur. (N. S.) 1147; 10 L. T. 606; 12 W. R. 911 State of Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. Janesville Street Railroad Co. (1894, Wis.), 57 N. W. Rep. 970
Stationers' Company v. Salisbury (1693), Comb. 221 Stebbing v. Metropolitan Board of Works (1870), L. R. 6 Q. B. 37; 40 L. J. Q. B. 1
Steele v. Midland Railway Co. (1866), L. R. 1 Ch. 275 Steele v. North Metropolitan Railway Co. (1867), L. R. 2 Ch. 237; 36 L. J. Ch. 540
Stevens, In re (1898), 62 J. P. 810
Stevens v. Jeacocke (1847), 11 Q. B. 731; 17 L. J. Q. B. 163 Stevens v. Midland Counties Railway Co. (1854), 10 Ex. 352; 23 L. J. Ex. 328 -
Steward v. North Metropolitan Tramways Co. (1886), 16 Q. B. D. 556; 55 L. J. Q. B. 157; 54 L. T. 35; 34 W. R. 316; 2 T. L. R.
Stewart v. Glasgow Tramway and Omnibus Co., Ltd. (1883), 21 S. L. R. 47
Stockport District Waterworks Co. v. Manchester Corporation (1863), 7 L. T. 545 Stockport and Hyde Highway Board v. Cheshire County Council (1891), 61 L. J. Q. B. 22; 65 L. T. 85; 39 W. R. 606; 55 J. P.
808 Stockport Union v. London and North Western Railway Co. (1898), 67 L. J. Q. B. 335
Stockton and Darlington Railway Co. v. Barrett (1844), 11 Cl. & F. (8 E. R.), 590
Stockton and Middlesbrough Water Board v. Kirkleatham Local Board, (1893) A. C. 444; 63 L. J. Q. B. 56
Stokell v. Baldwin (1892), 8 T. L. R. 346
Stourbridge Canal Co. v. Whealey (1831), 2 B. & Ad. 792
Strickland v. Hayes, (1896) 1 Q. B. 290; 65 L. J. M. C. 55; 74 L. T. 137; 44 W. R. 398; 12 T. L. R. 199
Sutton Harbour Improvement Co. v. Plymouth Guardians (1890), 63 L. T. 772; 55 J. P. 232; 6 T. L. R. 400 -
Swansea Improvements and Tramway Co. and Swansea and Mumbles Railway Co. and Railway Commissioners, In re (1880), "Times" Newspaper, Apr. 24 Swansea Improvements and Tramway Co. v. Swansea Urban Sanitary Authority, (1892) 1 Q. B. 357; 61 L. J. M. C. 124; 66 L. T. 119; 40 W. R. 283; 56 J. P. 248 1, 75, 253, 307 Sydney Municipal Council v. Young, (1898) A. C. 457; 67 L. J. P. C. 40-
Tarry v. Ashton (1876), 1 Q. B. D. 314; 45 L. J. Q. B. 260; 34 L. T. 97; 21 W. R. 581
Taylor v. Directors, &c. of the Chichester and Midhurst Railway Co. (1870), L. R. 4 H. L. 628; 39 L. J. Ex. 217; 23 L. T. 657 Taylor v. Goodwin (1879), 4 Q. B. D. 228; 48 L. J. M. C. 104; 40 L. T. 458; 27 W. R. 489-
Terrell v. Hutton (1854), 4 H. L. C. (10 E. R.), 1091; 23 L. J. Ch. 345; 18 Jur. 707
Thomas v. Sutters, (1900) 1 Ch. 10; 69 L. J. Ch. 27; 81 L. T. 469; 48 W. R. 133; 16 T. L. R. 7 Thompson v. Brighton Corporation, (1894) 1 Q. B. 332; 181; 70 L. T. 206; 42 W. R. 161; 10 T. L. R. 98 Thompson v. Buffalo Railway Co. (1895), 145 N. Y. 176 - Thompson v. City Glass Bottle Co., (1902) 1 K. B. 233; 71 L. J. K. B. 145; 85 L. T. 661; 18 T. L. R. 69 Thomson v. Edinburgh and District Tramways Co., Ltd. (1901), 3 F. 355; 38 S. L. R. 263; 8 S. L. T. 277 Thorogood v. Bryan (1849), 8 C. B. 115; 18 L. J. C. P. 336 Tilleard, In re (1863), 3 De G. J. & S. 519; 32 L. J. Ch. 765; 9 Jur. (N. S.), 1217; 8 L. T. 587; 11 W. R. 764
Tilson v. Warwick Gas Light Co. (1825), 4 B. & C. 962 ; 4 L. J. (O. S.) K. B. 53; 7 D. & R. 376-
Toronto Corporation v. Toronto Street Railway Co. (1888), 15 Ont. App. 30-
Toronto Corporation v. Toronto Street Railway Co. (1894), 23 Can. S. C. R. 198 Toronto Corporation v. Virgo, (1896) A. C. 88; 65 L. J. P. C. 4; 73 L. T. 449 Toronto Street Railway Co. v. Fleming (1875), 37 Upp. Can. R. 116- Toronto Street Railway Co. v. Toronto Corporation, (1893) A. C. 511; 63 L. J. P. C. 10; 1 R. 418
Touche v. Metropolitan Railway Warehousing Co. (1871), L. R. 6 Ch. 371; 40 L. J. Ch. 496
Tralee and Dingle Light Railway Co., (1894) 2 I. R. 115 - Tuckett v. Isle of Thanet Electric Tramways and Lighting Co., Ltd. (1901), "Times" Newspaper, Dec. 21
Turpin v. Somerton, &c. Tramway Co. (1900), W. N. 94 Tyne Boiler Works Co. v. Longbenton Overseers or Tynemouth Union (1886), 18 Q. B. D. 81; 56 L. J. M. C. 8; 55 L. T. 825; 35 W. R. 110; 51 J. P. 420; 3 T. L. R. 134 Tynemouth Borough Tramway Co., Ltd., In re (1875), 33 L. T. 8 108
Uckfield Rural District Council v. Crowborough District Water Co., (1899) 2 Q. B. 664; 68 L. J. Q. B. 1009; 81 L. T. 539; 48 W. R. 63; 16 T. L. R. 3
United Electric Railroad Co. v. Shelton (1891), 89 Tenn. 423 Uxbridge and Rickmansworth Railway Co., In re, (1890) 43 Ch. D. 536; 59 L. J. Ch. 409; 62 L. T. 347; 38 W. R. 644
Vale of Clyde Tramway Co. v. Munro (1883), 21 S. L. R. 273 - Vallance v. Falle (1884), 13 Q. B. D. 109; 53 L. J. Q. B. 459; L. T. 158; 32 W. R. 769; 48 J. P. 519; 5 Asp. M. C. 280 Vaughan v. Taff Vale Railway Co. (1860), 5 H. & N. 679; 29 L. J. Ex. 247; 6 Jur. (N. S.) 899; 2 L. T. 394; 8 W. R. 549 Verner v. General and Commercial Investment Trust, (1894) 2 Ch. 239; 63 L. J. Ch. 456; 7 R. 170; 70 L. T. 516; 1 Manson, 36; 10 T. L. R. 393 Vernon v. Vestry of St. James, Westminster (1880), 16 Ch. D. 449; 50 L. J. Ch. 81; 44 L. T. 229; 29 W. R. 222 Victoria Corporation v. Patterson, (1899) A. C. 615; 68 L. J. P. C. 128; 81 L. T. 270
BEFORE THE COURT OF REFEREES, THE LIGHT RAILWAY COMMISSIONERS, THE BOARD OF TRADE AND THE COMMISSIONERS APPOINTED UNDER THE PRIVATE LEGISLATION PROCEDURE (SCOTLAND) ACT, 1899.
[NOTE. The references set against the Light Railway Cases are to the Annual Reports of the Board of Trade, and to Mr. Oxley's Reports. As to these references, see further the note to Light Railways Act, 1896, post, p. 449.]
Aberdare Case (1900), Rep. vI. 39; Oxley 227
Aberdeen Suburban Tramways Provisional Order (1902), 39 S. L. R. 872 Abergavenny and Monmouth Case (1898), Rep. III. 1; IV. 20; Oxley, 44
Accrington Corporation Tramways Bill (1882), 3 Cl. & R. 117 - Airdrie and Coatbridge Tramways Bill (1900), 2 S. & A. 1 Arizona Copper Co., Ltd., Provisional Order (1901), 38 S. L. R. 862
Ayr Burgh Bill (1899), 1 S. & A. 297
Barnsley and District Case (1899), Rep. v. 31; VII. 2; Oxley, 231 -452,
Basingstoke and Alton Case (1897), Rep. I. 11; Oxley, 1 Bath and District Case (1900), Rep. vi. 3; Oxley, 242 Bath and District Case (1900), Rep. VIII. 2
Belfast and Northern Counties Railway Bill (1899), 1 S. & A. 298 - 43 Bere Alston and Calstock Case (1899), Rep. VI. 4; Oxley, 102 - Bexhill and St. Leonards Tramroads Bill (1899), 1 S. & A. 301 - Birkenhead Corporation Bill (1897), 1 S. & A. 148 Birkenhead Corporation (Ferries) Bill (1897), 1 S. & A. 152 Blackpool Improvement Bill (1892), R. & S. 167 Bourne Valley Case (1899), Rep. vI. 7; Oxley, 100- Brackenhill Case (1899-1900), Rep. VI. 8; VII. 5; Oxley, 99 -
468, 491 - 470, 471, 481 35, 40, 152
Brentford and District Tramways Bill (1885), R. & M. 5 Brentford, Isleworth and Twickenham Tramways Bill (1879), 2 Cl. & R. 139
Bridgwater, Langport and Glastonbury Case (1899), Rep. vI. 9; Oxley, 109
Burnham, Berrow and Brent Knoll Case (1898), Rep. IV. 4; Oxley, 62 - Burnley Corporation (Tramways, &c.) Bill (1898), 1 S. & A. 232 - 35, 40, 42, 120, 186
Burton and Ashby Case (1902), Rep. (1903) XI. 2; XII. 2 Bury Corporation Bill (1899), 1 S. & A. 303 Bury Improvement Bill (1885), R. & M. 9
Cawood, Wistow and Selby (Extension) Case (1899), Rep. v. 6; Oxley, 96
Chatham, Rochester and Gillingham Case (1898), Rep. IV. 5; Oxley, 156 Cheltenham and District Case (1897), Rep. 1. 1; Oxley, 120 Cheltenham and District Case (1899), Rep. v. 7; Oxley, 217 City of Bath Case (1900), Rep. VII. 9 Coatbridge and Airdrie Case (1898), Rep. III. 30; Oxley, 149
Colne and Trawden Case (1898), Rep. v. 9, 31; Oxley, 208 Commercial Road East (Tramways) Bill (1871), 2 Cl. & St. 168 - Corporation of London Foreign Cattle Market, Deptford, Case (1897), Rep. II. 2; Oxley, 120
County of Middlesex (Extensions), No. 4, Case (1901), Rep. x. 5 Cranbrook, Tenterden and Ashford Case (1899), Rep. v. 11; Oxley,
Crewe Case (1897), Rep. 1. 2; Oxley, 111
Crewe Case (1901), Rep. x. 6
Cromarty and Dingwall Case (1897), Rep. I. 21; Oxley, 10
Crowland and District (Amendment) Case (1901), Rep. x. 7 Cuckmere Valley Case (1898), Rep. III. 7; Oxley, 56
Dartford District Case (1897), Rep. II. 3; VI. 13; Oxley, 49
Derby and Ashbourne Case (1897-8), Rep. II. 4; IV. 7; Oxley, 122 - 482 Derby, Nottingham and District Case (1902), Rep. (1903) XI. 12 Devon, South Hams, Case (1900), Rep. vII. 15 Didcot and Watlington (Amendment) Case (1902), Rep. (1903) XIII. 5 - 516 Didcot and Watlington (Extension) Case (1899), Rep. v. 13; Oxley, 74- 513 Dornoch Case (1897), Rep. 1. 28; Oxley, 6 462, 491, 507, 508 Dover, St. Margaret's, and Martin Mill Case (1902), Rep. (1903) XII. 15 509 Dublin Central Station Railway Bill (1872), 2 Cl. & St. 283 Dublin Southern District Tramways Bill (1893), R. & S. 242
Dublin Southern District Tramways Bill (1898), 1 S. & A. 240 - Dublin Tramways Bill (1871), 2 Cl. & St. 142 - Dublin Tramways Bill (1873), 1 Cl. & R. 13 Dublin United Tramways (Electrical Power) Bill (1897), 1 S. & A. 157 16 Dudley and District Case (1897), Rep. II. 5; Oxley, 135 - Dudley, Halesowen and District (Extensions) Case (1902), Rep. (1903) XIII. 7 Dundee and Broughty Ferry Case (1898), Rep. IV. 32; Oxley, 176 -452, 473, 476, 493
Edinburgh Corporation Bill (1897), 1 S. & A. 161 Edinburgh Corporation Tramways Bill (1893), R. & S. 250 16, 18, 34, 41,
120, 186 44
-34, 41, 120 - 25, 30, 38
Edinburgh Extension and Sewerage Bill (1885), R. & M. 23 Edinburgh Improvement and Tramways Bill (1896), 1 S. & A. 80 Edinburgh Northern Tramways Bill (1884), 3 Cl. & R. 397 Edinburgh Street Tramways Bill (1870), 2 Cl. & St. 85 Edinburgh Street Tramways Bill (1873), 1 Cl. & R. 16 Edinburgh Street Tramways Bill (1892), R. & S. 184 Edinburgh Street Tramways Bill (1893), R. & S. 262 Edinburgh Street Tramways Bill (1896), 1 S. & A. 83 Elsenham, Thaxted and Bardfield Case (1897), Rep. 1. 6; Oxley, 19- 461 Erewash Valley Case (1902), Rep. (1903) XII. 17
Falkirk and District Tramways Provisional Order (1901), 38 S. L. R. 863 Finchley Case (1900), Rep. vi. 15; Oxley, 249-
Finchley, Hendon and District Case (1898), Rep. III. 8; Oxley, 130 - 469 Finchley, Hendon and District Case (1899), Rep. v. 19; Oxley,
Finchley, Hendon, Edgware and District Case (1899), Rep. VI. 16; Oxley, 246 Flamborough and Bridlington Case (1897), Rep. 1. 7; Oxley, 126 . 481 Folkestone, Sandgate and Hythe Tramways Bill (1891), R. & S. 102 - 36 Forsinard, Melvich and Port Skerra Case (1898), Rep. I. 22; Oxley, 9 507, 508 Fraserburgh and St. Combs Case (1897), Rep. II. 25; Oxley, 28 - 460, 461
Gifford and Garvald Case (1896), Rep. I. 23; Oxley, 31 Glasgow and Ibrox Tramway Bill (1877), 2 Cl. & R. 12 Glasgow, Bothwell, Hamilton and Wishaw Tramways Bill (1872), 2 Čl. & St. 281
Glasgow, Coatbridge and Airdrie Tramways Bill (1871), 2 Cl. & St. 199 14 Glasgow Corporation Tramways Bill (1878), 2 Cl. & R. 95 Glasgow Corporation Tramways Bill (1899), 1 S. & A. 318 Glasgow Corporation (Tramways and General) Provisional Order (1901), 38 S. L. R. 865
« EelmineJätka » |