Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 186. köideVermont printing Company, 2009 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 78
Page 345
... erred by allowing the State to present its case to the jury as one involving two counts of sexual assault and allowing the jury to convict him on both counts , notwithstand- ing our decision in State v . Hazelton , 2006 VT 121 , 181 Vt ...
... erred by allowing the State to present its case to the jury as one involving two counts of sexual assault and allowing the jury to convict him on both counts , notwithstand- ing our decision in State v . Hazelton , 2006 VT 121 , 181 Vt ...
Page 360
... erred in concluding that his failure to engage his patients in a collaborative process aimed at evaluating the need for surgery was unprofessional conduct ; ( 3 ) the Board erred in concluding that his description of certain cataracts ...
... erred in concluding that his failure to engage his patients in a collaborative process aimed at evaluating the need for surgery was unprofessional conduct ; ( 3 ) the Board erred in concluding that his description of certain cataracts ...
Page 551
... erred warrant- ing reversal ) . ¶ 17. Finally , plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on two claims against the Town . The claims are ( 1 ) that the Town violated 24 V.S.A. § 1932 by failing to ...
... erred warrant- ing reversal ) . ¶ 17. Finally , plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on two claims against the Town . The claims are ( 1 ) that the Town violated 24 V.S.A. § 1932 by failing to ...
Contents
Table of Cases Reported Arranged by County XXV | 1 |
Memorandum Decisions | 523 |
Table of Unpublished Decisions | 653 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Act 250 jurisdiction Adventure Quest Affirmed alleged amend appeal apply argues argument asserts Board Burlington Carvalho charges circumstances Cite as 186 claim claimant Clause concluded conduct Constitution contempt court erred coverage criminal CVPS decision defendant defendant's determination Diocese Diocese of Burlington disclaimer discretion dismiss due process employer Environmental Court error evidence fact failed filed finding Fourth Amendment grievant hearing Hrostek husband injury intent interest intoxicated involuntary manslaughter issue judge judicial juror jury Legislature liability licensee limited Luzenac Lydall matter of law ment motion negligence officer parties plaintiff prior question quotation omitted record regulation Regulation 17 relevant remand respondent result resulting trust sentence specific Stamp Tech standard State's statements statute statutory summary judgment superior court Supreme Court testified testimony tion Town trial court U.S. Const UM/UIM utility Vermont Constitution Vermont Rules VFEPA victim violation Yosef zoning