Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 186. köideVermont printing Company, 2009 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 83
Page 157
... ( holding change in eligibility for furlough does not violate Ex Post Facto Clause , noting that there was no allegation that " eligibility for the furlough program would have any impact on the length of his sentence " ) ; Lee v ...
... ( holding change in eligibility for furlough does not violate Ex Post Facto Clause , noting that there was no allegation that " eligibility for the furlough program would have any impact on the length of his sentence " ) ; Lee v ...
Page 270
... ( holding that federal constitution does not permit state to use pre - arrest silence to imply guilt and characterizing the state's argument to the contrary as " nothing short of incredible " ) ; State v . Remick , 829 A.2d 1079 , 1081 ...
... ( holding that federal constitution does not permit state to use pre - arrest silence to imply guilt and characterizing the state's argument to the contrary as " nothing short of incredible " ) ; State v . Remick , 829 A.2d 1079 , 1081 ...
Page 470
... holding that employers are liable when the employee unlawfully discriminates beyond the scope of his or her employment , but " was aided in accomplishing the [ discrimi- nation ] by the existence of the agency relation . " " ( quoting ...
... holding that employers are liable when the employee unlawfully discriminates beyond the scope of his or her employment , but " was aided in accomplishing the [ discrimi- nation ] by the existence of the agency relation . " " ( quoting ...
Contents
Table of Cases Reported Arranged by County XXV | 1 |
Memorandum Decisions | 523 |
Table of Unpublished Decisions | 653 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Act 250 jurisdiction Adventure Quest Affirmed alleged amend appeal apply argues argument asserts Board Burlington Carvalho charges circumstances Cite as 186 claim claimant Clause concluded conduct Constitution contempt court erred coverage criminal CVPS decision defendant defendant's determination Diocese Diocese of Burlington disclaimer discretion dismiss due process employer Environmental Court error evidence fact failed filed finding Fourth Amendment grievant hearing Hrostek husband injury intent interest intoxicated involuntary manslaughter issue judge judicial juror jury Legislature liability licensee limited Luzenac Lydall matter of law ment motion negligence officer parties plaintiff prior question quotation omitted record regulation Regulation 17 relevant remand respondent result resulting trust sentence specific Stamp Tech standard State's statements statute statutory summary judgment superior court Supreme Court testified testimony tion Town trial court U.S. Const UM/UIM utility Vermont Constitution Vermont Rules VFEPA victim violation Yosef zoning