And if anything is ordered to be done under the direction of the Court below, the order of the House must be made an order of Court before it can be carried into effect.

But where a judgment is simply affirmed, it is not necessary to make the order an order of the Court: A. G. v. Scott, 1 Vez. 419.

The order is to be obtained on motion as of course from the Court or the Judge where the action is pending, or to which or to whom it has been transferred: Man v. Ricketts, 3 D. & S. 446.

The motion may be ex parte: Wentworth v. Lloyd, 13 W. R. 146; British Dynamite Co. v. Krebs, 27 W. R. 575; 11 Ch. D. 448; on production of an office copy of an order of the House signed by the clerk of Parliament: but see L., alias H. v. H., L. R. 1 P. & M. 293.

An order of the House annulling a bankruptcy may be made an order of the Court in its appellate jurisdiction in bankruptcy; and the successful appellant was allowed his costs of an application for this purpose: Exp. Harding, 14 W. R. 825.

Where the order of the House directs payment of costs, the order may be enforced by the House, if sitting: see Denison & Scott, 172; Wentworth v. Lloyd, 13 W. R. 146.

If the order has been made an order of Court, it may be enforced by the process of the Court: Man v. Ricketts, 3 D. & S. 446; Wentworth v. Lloyd, sup.

And an action may be brought on the order of the House for the costs awarded by it without making it an order of the Court: Marbella Co. v. Allen, 38 L. T. N.S. 815.

And where the costs are payable by an appellant who has entered into recognizances for payment of the respondent's costs, the recognizance may be estreated, and, notwithstanding the Debtors Act, 1869 (32 & 33 V. c. 62), the appellant may be imprisoned on process issued by the Q. B. Division: Re Smith, 2 Ex. D. 47.

Where no order as to the costs of the proceedings was made by the House, the Court below could not subsequently make any such order: L., alias H. v. H., L. R. 1 P. & M. 293; and see Gann v. Johnson, L. R. 6 C. P. 461.

And the Court below has no jurisdiction to make any order as to interest upon the costs of an appeal to the House: Lanc. & Yorks. Ry. Co. v. Gidlow, L. R. 9 Ex. 35; 7 H. L. 517.

No appeal lies to the House of Lords from an order of the Court of Appeal refusing leave to appeal: Lane v. Esdaile, 64 L. T. N.S. 666.

TABLE OF RULES AND ORDERS.

wwwwww

The* indicates where a Rule is referred to verbatim, in whole or in part.

The* indicates where a Rule is referred to verbatim, in whole or in part.