in foreign amusements while his countrymen | excuse an act which no wise man will consider were contending for their rights. He therefore as in itself disgraceful. His father was alive; came back to Rome, though the merchants his allowance was not ample; and he supplied informed him of plots laid against him by the its deficiences by an honest and useful employJesuits, for the liberty of his conversations on ment. religion. He had sense enough to judge that there was no danger, and therefore kept on his way, and acted as before, neither obtruding nor shunning controversy. He had perhaps given some offence by visiting Galileo, then a prisoner in the Inquisition for philosophical heresy; and at Naples he was told by Manso, that, by his declarations on religious questions, he had excluded himself from some distinctions which he should otherwise have paid him. But such conduct, though it did not please, was yet sufficiently safe; and Milton stayed two months more at Rome, and went on to Florence without molestation. From Florence he visited Lucca. He afterwards went to Venice; and, having sent away a collection of music and other books, travelled to Geneva, which he probably considered as the metropolis of orthodoxy. Here he reposed as in a congenial element, and became acquainted with John Diodati and Frederick Spanheim, two learned professors of divinity. From Geneva, he passed through France, and came home, after an absence of a year and three months. At his return he heard of the death of his friend Charles Diodati; a man whom it is reasonable to suppose of great merit, since he was thought by Milton worthy of a poem, entitled "Epitaphium Damonis," written with the common but childish imitation of pastoral life. He now hired a lodging at the house of one Russel, a tailor in St. Bride's church-yard, and undertook the education of John and Edward Philips, his sister's sons. Finding his rooms too little, he took a house and garden in Aldersgatestreet, which was not then so much out of the world as it is now; and chose his dwelling at the upper end of a passage, that he might avoid the noise of the street. Here he received more boys to be boarded and instructed. Let not our veneration for Milton forbid us to look with some degree of merriment on great promises and small performance, on the man who hastens home, because his countrymen are contending for their liberty, and, when he reaches the scene of action, vapours away his patriotism in a private boarding-school. This is the period of his life from which all his biographers seem inclined to shrink. They are unwilling that Milton should be degraded to a school-master; but, since it cannot be denied that he taught boys, one finds out that he taught for nothing, and another that his motive was only zeal for the propagation of learning and virtue; and all tell what they do not know to be true, only to This is inaccurately expressed: Philips, and Dr. Newton after him, say a garden-house, i. e. a house situated in a garden, and of which there were, especially in the north suburbs of London, very many, if not few else. The term is technical, and frequently occurs in the Athen. and Fast. Oxon. The meaning thereof may be collected from the article, Thomas Farnaby, the famous schoolmaster, of whom the author says, that he taught in Goldsmith's-rents, in Cripplegate parish, behind Redcross-street, where were large gardens and handsome houses. Milton's house in Jewin-street was also a It is told that in the art of education he performed wonders; and a formidable list is given of the authors, Greek and Latin, that were read in Aldersgate-street by youth between ten and fifteen or sixteen years of age. Those who tell or receive these stories should consider, that nobody can be taught faster than he can learn. The speed of the horseman must be limited by the power of the horse. Every man that has ever undertaken to instruct others, can tell what slow advances he has been able to make, and how much patience it requires to recall vagrant inattention, to stimulate sluggish indifference, and to rectify absurd misapprehension. The purpose of Milton, as it seems, was to teach something more solid than the common literature of schools, by reading those authors that treat of physical subjects; such as the Georgic and astronomical treatises of the ancients. This was a scheme of improvement which seems to have busied many literature projectors of that age. Cowley, who had more means than Milton of knowing what was wanting to the embellishments of life, formed the same plan of education in his imaginary college. But the truth is, that the knowledge of external nature, and the sciences which that knowledge requires or includes, are not the great or the frequent business of the human mind. Whether we provide for action or conversation, whether we wish to be useful or pleasing, the first requisite is the religious and moral knowledge of right and wrong; the next is an acquaintance with the history of mankind, and with those examples which may be said to embody truth, and prove by events the reasonableness of opinions. Prudence and justice are virtues and excellencies of all times and of all places; we are perpetually moralists, but we are geometricians only by chance. Our intercourse with intellectual nature is necessary; our speculations upon matter are voluntary, and at leisure. Physiological learning is of such rare emergence, that one may know another half his life, without being able to estimate his skill in hydrostatics or astronomy; but his moral and prudential character immediately appears. Those authors, therefore, are to be read at schools that supply most axioms of prudence, most principles of moral truth, and most materials for conversation; and these purposes are best served by poets, orators, and historians. Let me not be censured for this digression as pedantic or paradoxical; for, if I have Milton against me, I have Socrates on my side. It was his labour to turn philosophy from the study of nature to speculations upon life; but the innovators whom I oppose are turning off attention from life to nature. They seem to think that we are placed here to watch the growth of plants, or the motions of the stars: Socrates was rather of opinion, that what we had to learn was, how to do good and avoid evil. Οττι τοι ἐν μέγαροισι κακόντ' αγαθόντε τέτυκται. garden-house, as were indeed most of his dwellings after From this wonder-working academy, I do not his settlement in London.-H. know that there ever proceeded any man very eminent for knowledge: its only genuine pro- | antagonists, who affirms that he was "vomited duct, I believe, is a small history of poetry written in Latin by his nephew Philips, of which perhaps none of my readers has ever heard.* That in his school, as in every thing else which he undertook, he laboured with great diligence, there is no reason for doubting. One part of his method deserves general imitation. He was careful to instruct his scholars in religion. Every Sunday was spent upon theology; of which he dictated a short system, gathered from the writers that were then fashionable in the Dutch universities. He set his pupils an example of hard study and spare diet: only now and then he allowed himself to pass a day of festivity and indulgence with some gay gentlemen of Gray's Inn. He now began to engage in the controversies of the times, and lent his breath to blow the flames of contention. In 1641 he published a Treatise of Reformation, in two books, against the established church; being willing to help the puritans, who were, he says, "inferior to the prelates in learning." Hall, bishop of Norwich, had published an Humble Remonstrance, in defence of episcopacy; to which, in 1641, five ministers, † of whose names the first letters made the celebrated word Smectymnuus, gave their Answer. Of this Answer a Confutation was attempted by the learned Usher; and to the Confutation Milton published a reply, entitled, “ Of Prelatical Episcopacy, and whether it may be deduced from the Apostolical Times, by virtue of those Testimonics which are alleged to that purpose in some late Treatises, one whereof goes under the Name of James, Lord Bishop of Armagh." out of the University," he answers in general terms. "The fellows of the college wherein I spent some years, at my parting, after I had taken two degrees, as the manner is, signified many times how much better it would content them that I should stay.-As for the common approbation or dislike of that place as now it is, that I should esteem or disesteem myself the more for that, too simple is the answerer, if he think to obtain with me. Of small practice were the physician who could not judge, by what she and her sister have of long time vomited, that the worser stuff she strongly keeps in her stomach, but the better she is ever kecking at, and is queasy; she vomits now out of sickness; but before it will be well with her, she must vomit by strong physic. The University, in the time of her better health, and my younger judgment, I never greatly admired, but now much less." This is surely the language of a man who thinks that he has been injured. He proceeds to describe the course of his conduct, and the train of his thoughts; and, because he has been suspected of incontinence, gives an account of his own purity: "that if I be justly charged,” says he, "with this crime, it may come upon me with tenfold shame." The style of his piece is rough, and such perhaps was that of his antagonist. This roughness he justifies by great examples in a long digression. Sometimes he tries to be humorous : "Lest I should take him for some chaplain in hand, some squire of the body to his prelate, one who serves not at the altar only, but at the courtcupboard, he will bestow on us a pretty model of himself; and sets me out half a dozen phthiI have transcribed this title to show, by his sical mottoes, wherever he had them, hopping contemptuous mention of Usher, that he had short in the measure of convulsion fits; in which now adopted the puritanical savageness of man- labour the agony of his wit having escaped narners. His next work was, "The Reason of rowly, instead of well-sized periods, he greets us Church Government urged against Prelacy, by with a quantity of thumbring poesies. And thus Mr. John Milton, 1642." In this book he disco-ends this section, or rather dissection, of himvers, not with ostentatious exultation, but with calm confidence, his high opinion of his own powers; and promises to undertake something, he yet knows not what, that may be of use and honour to his country. "This," says he, "is not to be obtained but by devout prayer to that eternal Spirit that can enrich with all utterance and knowledge, and sends out his seraphim with the hallowed fire of his altar, to touch and purify the lips of whom he pleases. To this must be added, industrious and select reading, steady observation, and insight into all seemly and generous arts and affairs; till which in some measure be compassed, Í refuse not to sustain this expectation." From a promise like this, at once fervid, pious, and rational, might be expected the "Paradise Lost." self." Such is the controversial merriment of Milton; his gloomy seriousness is yet more offensive. Such is his malignity, tnat hell grows darker at his frown. His father, after Reading was taken by Essex, came to reside in his house; and his school increased. At Whitsuntide, in his thirty-fifth year, he married Mary, the daughter of Mr. Powell, a justice of the peace in Oxfordshire. He brought her to town with him, and expected all the advantages of a conjugal life. The lady, however, seems not much to have delighted in the pleasures of spare diet and hard study; for, as Philips relates, "having for a month led a philosophic life, after having been used at home to a great house, and much company and joviality, her friends, possibly by her own desire, made earnest suit to have her company the remaining part of the summer; which was granted upon a promise of her return at Michaelmas." Milton was too busy to much miss his wife; he pursued his studies; and now and then visited the Lady Margaret Leigh, whom he has mentioned in one of his sonnets. At last Michaelmas arrived; but the lady had no inclination to return to the sullen gloom of her husband's habitation, and therefore very willingly forgot her promise. He sent her a letter, but had no answer: he sent more with the same success. It could be alleged that letters miscarry; he there- | it, have produced a problem in the science of fore despatched a messenger, being by this time government, which human understanding seems too angry to go himself. His messenger was hitherto unable to solve. If nothing may be sent back with some contempt. The family of the Lady were cavaliers. In a man, whose opinion of his own merit was like Milton's, less provocation than this might have raised violent resentment. Milton soon determined to repudiate her for disobedience; and, being one of those who could easily find arguments to justify inclination, published (in 1644) "The Doctrine and Discipline of Divorce;" which was followed by "The Judgment of Martin Bucer, concerning Divorce;" and the next year, his Tetrachordon, "Expositions upon the four chief Places of Scripture which treat of Marriage." published but what civil authority shall have previously approved, power must always be the standard of truth; if every dreamer of innovations may propagate his projects, there can be no settlement; if every murmurer at government may diffuse discontent, there can be no peace; and if every skeptic in theology may teach his follies, there can be no religion. The remedy against these evils is to punish the authors; for it is yet allowed that every society may punish, though not prevent the publication of opinions which that society shall think pernicious; but this punishment, though it may crush the author, promotes the book; and it seems not more rea because writers may be afterwards censured, than it would be to sleep with doors unbolted because by our laws we can hang a thief. This innovation was opposed, as might be ex-sonable to leave the right of printing unrestrained pected, by the clergy, who, then holding their famous assembly at Westminster, procured that the author should be called before the Lords; "but that house," says Wood, "whether approving the doctrine, or not favouring his accusers, did soon dismiss him." There seems not to have been much written against him, nor any thing by any writer of eminence. The antagonist that appeared is styled by him, A serving man turned solicitor. Howel, in his Letters, mentions the new doctrine with contempt; and it was, I suppose, thought more worthy of derision than of confutation. He complains of this neglect in two sonnets, of which the first is contemptible, and the second not excellent. From this time it is observed that he became an enemy to the Presbyterians, whom he had favoured before. He that changes his party by his humour, is not more virtuous than he that changes it by his interest; he loves himself rather than truth. His wife and her relations now found that Milton was not an unresisting sufferer of injuries; and perceiving that he had begun to put his doctrine in practice, by courting a young woman of great accomplishments, the daughter of one Doctor Davis, who was however not ready to comply, they resolved to endeavour a reunion. He went sometimes to the house of one Blackborough, his relation, in the lane of St. Martin's le-Grand, and at one of his usual visits was surprised to see his wife come from another room, and implore forgiveness on her knees. He resisted her entreaties for a while "but partly," says Philips, "his own generous nature, more inclinable to reconciliation than to perseverance in anger or revenge, and partly the strong intercession of friends on both sides, soon brought him to an act of oblivion and a firm league of peace." It were injurious to omit, that Milton afterwards received her father and her brothers in his own house, when they were distressed, with other royalists. But, whatever were his engagements, civil or domestic, poetry was never long out of his thoughts. About this time, (1645,) a collection of his Latin and English poems appeared, in which the "Allegro" and "Penseroso," with some others, were first published. He had taken a large house in Barbican for the reception of scholars; but the numerous relations of his wife, to whom he generously granted refuge for a while, occupied his rooms. In time, however, they went away: "and the house again," says Philips, "now looked like house of the muses only, though the accession of scholars was not great. Possibly his having proceeded so far in the education of youth may have been the occasion of his adversaries calling him pedagogue and schoolmaster; whereas it is well known he never set up for a public school, to teach all the young fry of a parish; but only was willing to impart his learning and knowledge to his relations, and the sons of gentlemen who were his intimate friends, and that neither his writings nor his way of teaching ever savoured in the least of pedantry." Thus laboriously does his nephew extenuate what cannot be denied, and what might be confessed without disgrace. Milton was not a man who could become mean by a mean employment. This, however, his warmest friends seem not to have found: they therefore shift and palliate. He did not sell literature to all comers at an open shop; he was a chambermilliner, and measured his commodities only to his friends. Philips, evidently impatient of viewing him in this state of degradation, tells us that it was not long continued: and, to raise his character again, has a mind to invest him with military splendour: "He is much mistaken," he says, "if there was not about this time a design of He published about the same time his Areopa-making him an adjutant-general in Sir William gitica, a Speech of Mr. John Milton for the Liberty of unlicensed Printing. The danger of such unbounded liberty, and the danger of bounding It was animadverted upon, but without any mention of Milton's name, by Bishop Hall, in his Cases of Conscience Decaie, 4, Case 2.-J. B. He terms the author of it a shallow brain'd puppy; and thus refers to it in his index, "Of a noddy who wrote a book about winning."-J. B. Waller's army. But the new-modelling of the army proved an obstruction to the design." An event cannot be set at a much greater distance than by having been only designed about some time, if a man be not much mistaken. Milton shall be a pedagogue no longer: for, if Philips be not much mistaken, somebody at some time designed him for a soldier. About the time that the army was new-mo delled, (1645,) he removed to a smaller house in whose doctrine he considers as servile and unHolborn, which opened backward into Lin- manly, to the stream of Salmasius, which, whocoln's Inn Fields. He is not known to have ever entered, left half his virility behind him. published any thing afterward till the King's Salmasius was a Frenchman, and was unhapdeath, when, finding his murderers condemned pily married to a scold. Tu es Gallus, says Milby the presbyterians, he wrote a treatise to jus-ton, et, ut aiunt, nimium gallinaceus. But his tify it, and to compose the minds of the people. supreme pleasure is to tax his adversary, so reHe made some "Remarks on the Articles of nowned for criticisms, with vicious Latin. He Peace between Ormond and the Irish Rebels." opens his book with telling that he has used perWhile he contented himself to write, he per-sona, which according to Milton, signfies only haps did only what his conscience dictated; a mask, in a sense not known to the Romans, and if he did not very vigilantly watch the in- by applying it as we apply person. But as Nefluence of his own passions, and the gradual mesis is always on the watch, it is memorable prevalence of opinions, first willingly admitted, that he has enforced the charge of a solecism and then habitually indulged; if objections, by by an expression in itself grossly solecistical, being overlooked, were forgotten, and desire su- when for one of those supposed blunders, he perinduced conviction; he yet shared only the says, as Ker, and I think some one before him, common weakness of mankind, and might be has remarked, propino te grammatistis tuis vano less sincere than his opponents. But as fac- puladum.* From vapulo, which has a passive tion seldom leaves a man honest, however it sense, vapulandus can never be derived. No might find him, Milton is suspected of having man forgets his original trade; the rights of nainterpolated the book called "Icon Basilike," tions, and of kings, sink into questions of gramwhich the council of state, to whom he was mar, if grammarians discuss them. now made Latin secretary, employed him to censure, by inserting a prayer taken from Sidney's "Arcadia," and imputing it to the King; whom he charges, in his "Iconoclastes," with the use of this prayer, as with a heavy crime, in the indecent language with which prosperity had imboldened the advocates for rebellion to insult all that is venerable or great; "Who would have imagined so little fear in him of the true all-seeing Deity-as, immediately before his death, to pop into the hands of the grave bishop that attended him, as a special relic of his saintly exercises, a prayer stolen word for word from the mouth of a heathen woman praying to a heathen god?" Milton, when he undertook this answer, was weak of body and dim of sight; but his wili was forward, and what was wanting of health was supplied by zeal. He was rewarded with a thousand pounds, and his book was much read; for paradox, recommended by spirit and elegance, easily gains attention; and he, who told every man that he was equal to his King, could hardly want an audience. That the performance of Salmasius was not dispersed with equal rapidity, or read with equal eagerness, is very credible. He taught only the stale doctrine of authority, and the unpleasing duty of submission, and he had been so long not only the monarch but the tyrant of literature, that almost all mankind were delighted to find him defied and insulted by a new name, not yet considered as any one's rival. If Christina, as is said, commended the Defence of the People, her purpose must be to torment Salmasius, who was then at court; for neither her civil station, nor her natural character, could dispose her to favour the doctrine, who was by birth a queen and by temper despotic. The papers which the King gave to Dr. Juxon on the scaffold the regicides took away, so that they were at least the publishers of this prayer; and Dr. Birch, who had examined the question with great care, was inclined to think them the forgers. The use of it by adaptation was innocent; and they who could so noisily censure it, with a little extension of their malice, could contrive what they wanted to accuse. King Charles the Second, being now sheltered in Holland, employed Salmasius, professor of polite learning at Leyden, to write a defence of his father and of monarchy; and, to excite his industry, gave him, as was reported, a hundred Jacobuses. Salmasius was a man of skill in languages, knowledge of antiquity, and sagacity of emendatory criticism, almost exceeding all hope of human attainment; and having, by excessive praises, been confirmed in great conHe prepared a reply, which, left as it was imfidence of himself, thought he probable had not perfect, was published by his son in the year of much considered the principles of society, or the Restoration. In the beginning, being prothe rights of government, undertook the em- bably most in pain for his Latinity, he endeaployment without distrust of his own quali-vours to defend his use of the word persona; but, fications; and, as his expedition in writing was if I remember right, he misses a better authority wonderful, in 1649 published "Defensio Regis." than any that he has found, that of Juvenal in To this Milton was required to write a suffi- his fourth satire: That Salmasius was, from the appearance of Milton's book, treated with neglect, there is not much proof; but to a man so long accustomed to admiration a little praise of his antagonist would be sufficiently offensive, and might incline him to leave Sweden, from which however he was dismissed, not with any mark of contempt, but with a train of attendants scarcely less than regal. -Quid agas, cum dira et fædior omni cient answer; which he performed (1651) in The work here referred to, is "Selectarum de linguâ Latina observationem libri duo. Ductu et curâ Joannis Ker. 1719." Ker observes, that vapulandum is "pinguis solecismus ;" and quotes Varassor and As Salmasius reproached Milton with losing | quence is not merely satirical; the rudeness of his eyes in the quarrel, Milton delighted him- his invective is equalled by the grossness of his self with the belief that he had shortened Sal- flattery. "Deserimer, Cromuelle, tu solus sumasius's life, and both perhaps with more ma- peres, ad te summa nostrarum rerum rediit, in lignity than reason. Salmasius died at the Spa, te solo consistit, insuperabili tuæ virtuti cedimus Sept. 3, 1653; and as controvertists are com- cuncti, nemine vel obloquente, nisi qui a quales monly said to be killed by their last dispute, Mil- inæqualis ipse honores sibi quærit, aut digniori ton was flattered with the credit of destroying concessos invidet, aut non intelligit nihil esse in him. societate hominum magis vel Deo gratum, vel Cromwell had now dismissed the parliament rationi consentaneum, esse in civitate nihil æquiby the authority of which he had destroyed mo- us, nihil utilius, quam potiri rerum dignissi narchy, and commenced monarch himself, under mum. Eum te agnoscunt omnes, Cromuelle, ea the title of Protector, but with kingly and more tu civis maximus et gloriosissimus, dux publici than kingly power. That his authority was consilii, exercituum fortissimorum imperator, lawful, never was pretended; he himself found- pater patriæ gessisti. Sic tu spontanea bonoed his right only in necessity; but Milton, hav- rum omnium et animitus missa voce salutaris." ing now tasted the honey of public employment, Cæsar, when he assumed the perpetual dictawould not return to hunger and philosophy; torship, had not more servile or more elegant but, continuing to exercise his office under a ma- flattery. A translation may show its servility; nifest usurpation, betrayed to his power that li- but its elegance is less attainable. Having exberty which he had defended. Nothing can be posed the unskilfulness or selfishness of the formore just than that rebellion should end in sla- mer government, "We were left," say Milton, very; that he who had justified the murder of "to ourselves: the whole national interest fell his king, for some acts which seemed to him un- into your hands, and subsists only in your abililawful, should now sell his services and his flat-ties. To your virtue, overpowering and resistteries to a tyrant, of whom it was evident that he could do nothing lawful. He had now been blind for some years; but his vigour of intellect was such, that he was not disabled to discharge his office of Latin secretary, or continue his controversies. His mind was too eager to be diverted, and too strong to be subdued. less, every man gives way, except some who, without equal qualifications, aspire to equal honours, who envy the distinctions of merit greater than their own, or who have yet to learn, that in the coalition of human society nothing is more pleasing to God, or more agreeable to reason, than that the highest mind should have the sovereign power. Such, sir, are you by ed by you, the greatest and most glorious of our countrymen, the director of our public councils, the leader of unconquered armies, the father of your country; for by that title does every good man hail you with sincere and voluntary praise." About this time his first wife died in child-general confession; such are the things achiev bed, having left him three daughters. As he probably did not much love her, he did not long continue the appearance of lamenting her; but after a short time married Catharine, the daughter of one Captain Woodcock, of Hackney; a woman doubtless educated in opinions like his own. She died, within a year, of child-birth, or some distemper that followed it; and her husband honoured her memory with a poor sonnet. The first reply to Milton's "Defensio Populi" was published in 1651, called "Apologia pro Rege et Populo Anglicano, contra Johannis Polypragmatici (alias Miltoni) defensionem destructivam Regis et Populi." Of this the author, was not known: but Milton, and his nephew Philips, under whose name he published an answer so much corrected by him that it might be called his own, imputed it to Bramhal; and, knowing him no friend to regicides, thought themselves at liberty to treat him as if they had known what they only suspected. Next year appeared “Regii Sanguinis clamor ad Coelum." Of this the author was Peter du Moulin, who was afterwards prehendary of Canterbury; but Morus, or More, a French minister, having the care of its publication, was treated as the writer by Milton in his "Defensio Secunda," and overwhelmed by such violence of invective, that he began to shrink under the tempest, and gave his persecutors the means of knowing the true author. Du Moulin was now in great danger; but Milton's pride operated against his malignity; and both he and his friends were more willing that Du Moulin should escape than that he should be convicted of mistake. Next year, having defended all that wanted defence, he found leisure to defend himself. He undertook his own vindication against More, whom he declares in his title to be justly called the author of the " Regii Sanguinis Clamor." In this there is no want of vehemence or cloquence, nor does he forget his wonted wit. "Morus es? an Momus? an uterque idem est ?" He then remembers that Morus is Latin for a mulberry-tree, and hints at the known transformation: -Poma alba ferebat Quæ post nigra tulit Morus. he from this time gave himself up to his private to have written the declaration of the reasons blind. Being now forty-seven years old, and seeing It may be doubted whether gloriosissimus be here used with Milton's boasted purity. Res gloriosa is an illustrious thing; but vir gloriosus is commonly a bragIn this second defence he shows that his elo-gart, as is miles gloriosus.-Dr J |