The Law Journal Reports, 75. köideE.B. Ince, 1906 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 7
... damage to private property , is guilty of negligence , and liable in damages to the owner of such property ; and it is no defence that the system was sufficient at the time of its construction . Appeal from a decision of the Supreme ...
... damage to private property , is guilty of negligence , and liable in damages to the owner of such property ; and it is no defence that the system was sufficient at the time of its construction . Appeal from a decision of the Supreme ...
Page 8
... damage is due to the respondents - Colac , President & c . v . Summerfield [ 1893 ] .15 [ They also referred to Curry v . Benulla Shire [ 1895 ] 16 and Southwark and Vaux- hall Water Co. v . Wandsworth District Board [ 1898 ] .17 ] ...
... damage is due to the respondents - Colac , President & c . v . Summerfield [ 1893 ] .15 [ They also referred to Curry v . Benulla Shire [ 1895 ] 16 and Southwark and Vaux- hall Water Co. v . Wandsworth District Board [ 1898 ] .17 ] ...
Page 9
... damage to Mr. Kannuluik ? As for negligence , it is difficult to imagine a more conspicuous example of negligence than is shewn by repeatedly pouring offensive stuff into a receptacle or channel proved over and over again to be ...
... damage to Mr. Kannuluik ? As for negligence , it is difficult to imagine a more conspicuous example of negligence than is shewn by repeatedly pouring offensive stuff into a receptacle or channel proved over and over again to be ...
Page 21
... damages . The statement of defence justified the dismissal of the plaintiff on the grounds -first , that the plaintiff had disobeyed the orders of the directors of the defendant company ; secondly , that the plaintiff had on November 9 ...
... damages . The statement of defence justified the dismissal of the plaintiff on the grounds -first , that the plaintiff had disobeyed the orders of the directors of the defendant company ; secondly , that the plaintiff had on November 9 ...
Page 22
... damages , if any , is the Plaintiff entitled to recover ? " To the first of the above questions the jury answered , Yes . To the second and third No. To the fourth , 875l . After the verdict had been given the learned Chief Justice ...
... damages , if any , is the Plaintiff entitled to recover ? " To the first of the above questions the jury answered , Yes . To the second and third No. To the fourth , 875l . After the verdict had been given the learned Chief Justice ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
12mo Edition Act anent adultery aganis agreement Amendment amount appeal apply appointed authority Barrister-at-Law berth bill of lading Board of Trade British British Columbia cargo certificate charge claim Commissioners compensation contract council Court of Session Crown damage decree defendants discharge divorce domicil dredger duty Enactment and Extent entitled evidence exceeding expenses Extent of Repeal Gillig Government grant ground harbour hundred husband insured Ireland judgment jurisdiction jury Justice kingis land learned Judge liable Lord Macnaghten lordis Lords Spiritual Lordships loss Majesty marriage master ment Merchant Shipping Act methylated spirits Montreal offence officer owners paid Parliamentum apud Edinburgh parties payable payment person petitioner plaintiffs port principal Act proceedings provisions public trustee purpose question railway Ratificatioun Record Edition Registrar respect respondent rules Schedule Scotland Scotstoun seaman Short title soverane thereof tion Title of Enactment United Kingdom vessel Vict voyage words
Popular passages
Page 42 - 92 of the British North America Act, which secures to the Dominion Parliament exclusive legislative authority in respect of lines of steam or other ships, railways, canals, telegraphs, and other works and undertakings connecting any province with any other or others of the provinces, or extending beyond the limits of the province, a description which clearly applies to the
Page 237 - hard labour, for ^~ a term not exceeding two years, or to a fine not exceeding five hundred pounds, or to both such imprisonment and such fine, or on summary conviction to imprisonment, with or without hard labour, for a term not exceeding four months, or to a fine not exceeding fifty pounds, or to both such imprisonment and such fine.