The Law Journal Reports, 75. köideE.B. Ince, 1906 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 9
... Held , that the city was only entitled to a percentage of earnings within the city , and that its • 66 Outside * Coram , Lord Davey , Lord James of Here- ford , Lord Robertson , and Sir Andrew Scoble . C MONTREAL STREET RAILWAY v . CITY ...
... Held , that the city was only entitled to a percentage of earnings within the city , and that its • 66 Outside * Coram , Lord Davey , Lord James of Here- ford , Lord Robertson , and Sir Andrew Scoble . C MONTREAL STREET RAILWAY v . CITY ...
Page 10
... held that the percentage was limited to the earnings of the railway in the city , and , upon appeal to the Court of King's Bench , his decision was affirmed by a majority of three to two . But upon appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada ...
... held that the percentage was limited to the earnings of the railway in the city , and , upon appeal to the Court of King's Bench , his decision was affirmed by a majority of three to two . But upon appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada ...
Page 18
... held unanimously that Baron Graham's direction was accurate , and some of them added that if the verdict had been the other way they would not have allowed it to stand . The case to which I refer is Bealey v . Shaw [ 1805 ] .2 It ...
... held unanimously that Baron Graham's direction was accurate , and some of them added that if the verdict had been the other way they would not have allowed it to stand . The case to which I refer is Bealey v . Shaw [ 1805 ] .2 It ...
Page 20
... held unsatisfac- tory by the Judge at the trial , but no appli- cation having been made on the appeal to enter judgment for the defendants , a new trial was ordered . Appeal from a judgment dated June 28 , 1904 , of the Supreme Court of ...
... held unsatisfac- tory by the Judge at the trial , but no appli- cation having been made on the appeal to enter judgment for the defendants , a new trial was ordered . Appeal from a judgment dated June 28 , 1904 , of the Supreme Court of ...
Page 21
... held justified . The question whether the evidence was sufficient to justify dismissal was one for the Judge and not for the jury ; and the Judge at the trial , being of opinion that the verdict was unsatisfactory , ought to have ...
... held justified . The question whether the evidence was sufficient to justify dismissal was one for the Judge and not for the jury ; and the Judge at the trial , being of opinion that the verdict was unsatisfactory , ought to have ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
12mo Edition Act anent adultery aganis agreement Amendment amount appeal apply appointed authority Barrister-at-Law berth bill of lading Board of Trade British British Columbia cargo certificate charge claim Commissioners compensation contract council Court of Session Crown damage decree defendants discharge divorce domicil dredger duty Enactment and Extent entitled evidence exceeding expenses Extent of Repeal Gillig Government grant ground harbour hundred husband insured Ireland judgment jurisdiction jury Justice kingis land learned Judge liable Lord Macnaghten lordis Lords Spiritual Lordships loss marriage master ment Merchant Shipping Act methylated spirits Montreal offence officer owners paid Parliamentum apud Edinburgh parties payable payment person petitioner plaintiffs port principal Act proceedings provisions public trustee purpose question railway Ratificatioun Record Edition Registrar respect respondent rules Schedule Scotland Scotstoun seaman Short title soverane thereof tion Title of Enactment United Kingdom vessel Vict voyage words
Popular passages
Page 42 - 92 of the British North America Act, which secures to the Dominion Parliament exclusive legislative authority in respect of lines of steam or other ships, railways, canals, telegraphs, and other works and undertakings connecting any province with any other or others of the provinces, or extending beyond the limits of the province, a description which clearly applies to the
Page 237 - hard labour, for ^~ a term not exceeding two years, or to a fine not exceeding five hundred pounds, or to both such imprisonment and such fine, or on summary conviction to imprisonment, with or without hard labour, for a term not exceeding four months, or to a fine not exceeding fifty pounds, or to both such imprisonment and such fine.