 | United States. Supreme Court - 1853 - 672 lehte
...doctrine that a master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment, when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general...master. Such a qualification of the maxim of respondeat superiors-would, in a measure, nullify it. A large proportion of the accidents on railroads are caused... | |
 | Conway Robinson - 1855 - 884 lehte
...doctrine that a master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment, when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general...of the master. Such a qualification of the maxim of respondent superior, would, in a measure, nullify it. A large proportion of the accidents on railroads... | |
 | William Wetmore Story - 1856 - 848 lehte
...doctrine, that a master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment, when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general...of the master. Such a qualification of the maxim of respandeat superior, would, in a measure, nullify it. A large proportion of the accidents on railroads... | |
 | Alexander Ralston Tiffany - 1859 - 656 lehte
...his employment, when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general order or special command of the master. Such a qualification of the maxim of respondcat superior, would, in a measure, nullify it. A large proportion of the accidents on railroads... | |
 | Theophilus Parsons - 1859 - 846 lehte
...doctrine that a master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment, when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general orders or speeial command of the master. Such a qualification of the maxim of respondeat superior, would, in... | |
 | Theophilus Parsons - 1869 - 950 lehte
...doctrine that a master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment, when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general...respondeat superior, would, in a measure, nullify it." la Keene v. Lizardi, 5 La. 431, the owners of a vessel were held liable fur the misbehavior of the... | |
 | Theophilus Parsons - 1869 - 952 lehte
...doctrine that a master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment, when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general...of the master. Such a qualification of the maxim of renpon'leat superior, would, in a measure, nullify it." In Keenei>. Lizardi, 5 La. 431, the owners... | |
 | Benjamin Vaughan Abbott, Austin Abbott - 1869 - 1028 lehte
...doctrine that the master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general...command of the master. Such a qualification of the maxim "•respondent superior," would in a measure nullify it. US Supreme Ct. 1852, Philadelphia & Reading... | |
 | Nathan Howard (Jr.) - 1875 - 674 lehte
...doctrine that a master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general orders or special command of the master. In the present case the care of the oats on the boat was confided to the captain of the boat. The owner... | |
 | 1888 - 912 lehte
...doctrine that a master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment when the particular act causing the injury was. done in disregard of the general...of the master. Such a qualification of the maxim of respondent superior would, in a measure, nullify it. A large proportion of the accidents on railroads... | |
| |
... we find no case which asserts the doctrine that a master is not liable for the acts of a servant in his employment, when the particular act causing the injury was done in disregard of the general orders or special command of the master. Such a qualification... 
