IN THE COURT OF EXCHEQUER AT WESTMINSTER, MICHAELMAS TERM, 27TH VICTORIA, BEFORE THE RIGHT HON. AND MR. BARON PIGOTT. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL v. SILLEM AND OTHERS, Enlistment Act, REPORT OF THE ARGUMENTS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR LEAVE TO MOVE FOR A NEW TRIAL AFTER THE FIRST FOUR DAYS OF TERM, RESULTING IN A RULE NISI TO SHOW CAUSE WHY A NEW TRIAL SHOULD NOT BE HAD, LONDON: PRINTERS TO THE QUEEN'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY, FOR HER MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE. 1864. ۔ 24 125 1866, Jan. 14. Gift of of Boston. Counsel for the Crown. Q.C., D.C.L. Counsel for the Claimants. Solicitor for the Crown. Solicitors for the Claimants. Agents for CONTENTS. Page 5 Argument on Application for leave to move for New Trial after the Expiration of the First Four Days of Term Motion to apply the Common Law Procedure Acts 1852 and - TUESDAY, 17TH NOVEMBER 1863, 1st Day. Argument for Motion to make the Rule for New Trial absolute 67 WEDNESDAY, 18TH NOVEMBER 1863, 2d Day. THURSDAY, 19TH NOVEMBER 1863, 3d Day. FRIDAY, 20TH NOVEMBER 1863, 4th Day. SATURDAY, 21st NOVEMBER 1863, 5th Day. MONDAY, 230 NOVEMBER 1863, 6th Day. Judgment on Motion to make Rule Nisi for New Trial absolute 525 Letter from Earl Russell to the Lords of the Treasury, dated Decree pronounced on 2d August 1862 by the Judge of the Vice Admiralty Court of the Bahamas in the Case of the N.B.- To render intelligible the frequent reference made by Counsel to the reports of the trial, it may be observed that two copies have been printed, the one for the Crown containing an appendix and termed by Counsel the LAREGR copy, and the other for the claimants termed by Counsel the SMALLER copy. There is no substantial difference between the two reports, the variances consisting chiefly of clerical inaccuracies for the most part rectified in the larger book. |