Page images
PDF
EPUB

JAMES I. OF SCOTLAND.-OCCLEVE.

19

tal, and whole ages may pass without producing them. From the death of Chaucer in 1400, nearly two hundred years elapsed in England, before any poet comparable to him arose, and yet those two centuries were more enlightened than the times of Chaucer. He has on this account been likened to a genial day in an English spring,' which is frequently followed by very gloomy weather. This long period, however, produced several poets not destitute of merit. The first of these was JAMES I. King of Scotland, whose mind and its productions, notwithstanding his being a native of that country, must be considered as of English growth. James had been taken prisoner in his boyhood by Henry IV. of England, and spent the nineteen years preceding 1424 in that country, where he was instructed in all the learning and polite accomplishments of the age, and appears, in particular to have carefully studied the writings of Chaucer. The only certain production of this ingenious young sovereign, is a long poem called The King's Quhair, or Book, in which he describes the circumstances of an affection which he formed while a prisoner in Windsor Castle, for a young English princess whom he saw walking in the adjacent garden.* This lady, a daughter of the Earl of Somerset, and, as it happened, a niece of Chaucer, was afterwards married to the young king, whom she accompanied to Scotland. While in possession of his kingdom, he is said to have written several poems descriptive of humorous rustic scenes; but these cannot be certainly traced to him. He was assassinated at Perth in the year 1437.

About the year 1420, flourished THOMAS OCCLEVE, a lawyer, who wrote several poems of considerable merit,

* His first thoughts, when this lovely vision was presented to a mind so long immured in prison, are in the highest style of poetry.

[blocks in formation]

Ah, swete! are ye a warldly creature,
Or hevingly thing in likenesse of nature?

Or ar ye Cupidis owne princesse,

And coming are to loose me out of band?
Or are ye very Nature the Goddesse,

That have depainted with your hevinly hand,
This gardyn full of flouris, as they stand?
What shall I think, alace! what reverence
Shall I mester unto your excellence?

6

though now very little read. About the same time, or a little later, JOHN LYDGATE, a monk of Bury, was well known for his poetical compositions, which ranged over a great variety of styles. His muse,' says Warton in his History of English Poetry,' was of universal access; and he was not only the poet of the monastery, but of the world in general. If a disguising was intended by the company of goldsmiths, a mask before his Majesty at Eltham, a Maygame for the sheriffs and aldermen of London, a mumming before the lord mayor, a procession of pageants from the Creation for the festival of Corpus Christi, or a carol for the Coronation, Lydgate was consulted, and gave the poetry. The principal works of this versatile writer are entitled, The History of Thebes, The Fall of Princes, and The Siege of Troy. He had travelled in France and Italy, and studied the poetry of those countries; and though his own writings contain only a few good passages, he is allowed to have improved the poetical language of the country. He at one time kept a school in his monastery, for the instruction of young persons of the upper ranks in the art of versification; a fact which proves that poetry had become a favourite study among the few who acquired any tincture of letters in that age.

Not long after the time of Lydgate, our attention is called to another prose writer of eminence, SIR JOHN FORTESCUE, Chief Justice of the King's Bench under Henry VI., and a constant adherent of the fortunes of that monarch. Besides several Latin tracts, Chief Justice Fortescue wrote one in the common language, entitled, The Difference between an Absolute and Limited Monarchy, as it more particularly regards the English Constitution. In this work he draws a striking, though perhaps exaggerated contrast between the condition of the French under an arbitrary monarch, and that of his own countrymen, who even then possessed considerable privileges as subjects. The next writer of note was WILLIAM CAXTON, the celebrated printer; a man of plain understanding, but great enthusiasm in the cause of literature. While acting as an agent for English merchants in Holland, he made himself master of the art of printing, then recently introduced on the Continent, and hav

[blocks in formation]

ing translated a French book styled, The Recuyell of the Histories of Troye, he printed it at Ghent, in 1471, being the first book in the English Language ever put to the press. Afterwards he established a printing-office at Westminster, and in 1474, produced The Game of Chess, which was the first work printed in Britain. Caxton translated or wrote about sixty different books, all of which went through his own press before his death in 1491. As a specimen of his manner of writing, and of the literary language of this age, a passage is extracted below, in modern spelling, from the conclusion of his Book of the Order of Chivalry.†

The reigns of Edward IV., Richard III., and Henry VII., extending between the years 1461 and 1509, were barren of true poetry, though there was no want of obscure versifiers. *We e may name John Skelton, however, who, though but little remarkable for his rhymes, had a genius which was suited to satire and burlesque, and a spirit which ventured to attack not obscure individuals only, but men of eminence. His poems consist of satires and sonnets, and similar productions, which are unhappily characterized by licentiousness. He flourished partly in the reign of Henry VIII.* It is remarkable that this period produced in Scotland a race of genuine poets, who, in the words of Mr. Warton, 'displayed a degree of sentiment and spirit, a command of phraseology, and a fertility of imagination, not to be found in any English poet since Chaucer and Lydgate.' Perhaps the explanation of this seeming mystery is, that the influences which operated upon Chaucer a century

+ Alas! what do ye but sleep and take ease, and are all disordered from chivalry. How many knights ben there now in England that have the use and exercise of a knight. That is to wit, that he knoweth his horse, and his horse him? That is to say, that he being ready at a point, to have all thing that longeth to a knight; an horse that is according and broken after his hand; his armours and harness meet and fitting and so forth? I suppose, an a due search should be made, there should be many found that lack. The more the pity is. I would it pleased our sovereign lord, that twice or thrice in a year, or at least once, he would do cry Justes of Pees, to the end that every knight should have horse and harness, and also the use and craft of a knight, and also to tourney one against one, or two against two, and the best to have a prize, a diamond or jewel, such as should please the prince. This should cause gentlemen to resort to the ancient customs of chivalry, to great fame and renown, &c.

* AM. ED.

before, were only now coming with their full force upon the less favourably situated nation which dwelt north. of the Tweed. Overlooking some obscurer names, those of Henryson, Dunbar, and Douglas, are to be mentioned with peculiar respect. ROBERT HENRYSON, School-master of Dunfermline, wrote a series of fables in verse, and a few miscellaneous poems, chiefly of a moral nature. * WILLIAM DUNBAR, a man of higher and more varied genius, was a clergyman, and flourished at the Scottish court from about the year 1500 to 1530. Some of his poems are humorous, and refer to humble life; others are allegorical, and full of beautiful natural imagery; a third kind are moral and instructive; and he is equally happy in all. His principal allegorical poems are styled The Golden Terge, The Dance, and The Thistle and Rose. The last was written in 1503, in honour of the nuptials of King James IV. with the Princess Margaret of England. The Dance describes a procession of the Seven Deadly Sins, two of which are described in the striking verses quoted below.†

*One of his fables is the common story of the Town Mouse and Country Mouse; and in the moral with which he concludes it, occurs the following verse, which will convey an idea of his didactic style:Blissit be simple life, withouten dreid; Blissit be sober feist in quieté;

Wha has eneuch of no more has he neid,
Though it be littill into quantité,
Grit habowndance, and blind prosperiti,
Oft tymis make ane evil conclusioun ;
The sweitest lyfe, theirfor, in this countré,
Is of sickerness, with small possession.

Then IRE came in with sturt* and strife;
His hand was ay upon his knife,

He brandeist like a beir;t

Boasters, braggarts, and bargainers,
After him passit in pairs,

All boden in feir of weir,

In jacks, stir'ps, and bonnets of steel,
Thair legs were chenyed to the heel;
Frawart was their effeir;§

Some upon other with brandis beft,¶
Some jaggit others to the heft

With knives that sharp could shear.
Next in the dance followed ENVY,
Fill'd full of feid and fellony,

*Bloody fighting.

Covered with chains.

† Bear;

Forward was their manner.

+Arrayed in warlike manner.
¶ Struck with swords.

DUNBAR.- -DOUGLAS.

23

The moral and didactic style of Dunbar is consic ed superior even to his allegorical manner. Altogether he was certainly a man of the first order of genius and it is evidently his antiquated language alone which prevents his works from being more generally known than they are.

The third eminent Scottish poet of this era was GAVIN DOUGLAS, bishop of Dunkeld, who flourished between the years 1496 and 1522; he shines as an allegorical and descriptive poet. His principal original compositions are entitled the Palace of Honour, and King Hart, -the former being an allegory designed to show to his sovereign, James IV., that nothing but virtue could lead to, happiness, while the latter is a metaphorical view of the progress of human life. It is worthy of notice, that there is a remarkable resemblance between the former of these allegories and Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress, which was written about a century and a half later. Douglas also wrote a translation of the Eneid of Virgil in metre, with an original introductory poem to each of the twelve books. This was the first translation of a Roman classic into English verse, and it is considered one of considerable merit, notwithstanding the writer takes some liberties with the original. The language employed in it is nearly the same as that used by English writers of the same period, and affords a striking example of the rage which had begun to prevail for bringing Latin words with English terminations into the stock of our current speech.*

Hid Malice and despite.

For privy hatred that traitor trembled,
Him followed mony freikt dissembled
With fenyit wordis white:

And flatterers unto men's faces,
And back-biters in secret places,
To lie that had delight,
th rowmaris of false leasings;+
Alas that courts of noble kings

Of them can ne'er be quite!

The spelling is here modernized, except in the words given in italic. *For instance, in a beautiful description of sunrise in the introduction to the twelfth book, the following passage occurs:

The auriate vanes of his throne-soverane
With glittering glance o'erspread the oceane ;
Forward youths.

Circulators of false reports.

« EelmineJätka »