other person in the like position. The governing gr the decision is that which is insisted on in the judgi Willes, J., that in the circumstances no specific good ever appropriated to the contract. Shepherd v. O p. 745, is a standing reproach to the apathy of Parlia and we fear the public must be included-in mat general utility which are outside party politics and no reward of votes for their workmanlike treatment tangle of our domestic copyright statutes, with differ of provisions and irrational, for the most part accidental, variations for every kind of literary and production, is no better at this day than it was in 185 F 5 DE GEX, MACNAGHTEN & GORDON; 18 BEAVAN; t.-Gen. . Chesterfield (Earl of), 18 Beav. 596; 18 Jur. 686; 2 W. R. 499 542 545 tt.-Gen. . Rochester (Corporation of), 5 D. M. & G. 797 287 arrow r. Barrow, 5 D. M. & G. 782; 24 L. J. Ch. 267; 33 W. R. 122; arton v. Latour, 18 Beav. 526 277 514 514 here in the Revised Reports, or omitted for special reasons, the names of Bayntun v. Satchell, 17 C. B. 383 Beech v. Keep, 18 Beav. 285 Bennett's Case, 3 D. M. & G. 284; 24 L. J. Ch. 130; 2 W. R. 448 ; L. T. O. S. 122; affirming 18 Beav. 339 Bennett's Case, 18 Beav. 339 Bentley. Craven, 15 Beav. 75 Bold v. Hutchinson, 5 D. M. & G. 558; 25 L. J. Ch. 598; 2 Jur. N. 97; 4 W. R. 3; 26 L. T. O. S. 229; affirming 24 L. J. Ch. 285 ; 1 Ju N. S. 365; 25 L. T. O. S. 28 Boosey. Gardener, 5 D. M. & G. 122 r. Gardner, 18 Beay. 471. Boyle, In re, Er parte Turner, 5 D. M. & G. 540; 24 L. J. Ch. 71; W. R. 617; 23 L. T. O. S. 262 Briggs v. Wilson, 5 D. M. & G. 12; 2 Eq. R. 153; 23 L. T. O. S. 136 British Industry Life Assurance Co. v. Ward, 17 C. B. 644 Brodie v. Howard, 17 C. B. 109; 25 L. J. C. P. 57; 1 Jur. N. S. 1209 L. J. Ch. 190; nom. Broughton . White, 3 W. R. 130; . White. See Broughton v. Broughton. Brown v. Thompson, 17 C. B. 245; 25 L. J. C. P. 55. Browne v. Emerson, 17 C. B. 361; 25 L. J. C. P. 104; 2 Jur. N. S. 190 Burrows v. Walls, 5 D. M. & G. 233 ; 3 W. R. 327; 25 L. T. O. S. 18 Carew's Case, 5 D. M. & G. 94 Carver . Burgess, 18 Beav. 541; affirmed, 7 D. M. & G. 96 Catlin, Re, 18 Beav. 508; 7 Jur. N. S. 669; 9 W. R. 756 Chaffers v. Baker, 5 D. M. & G. 482 Chester . Wortley, 17 C. B. 410; 25 L. J. C. P. 117; 2 Jur. N. S. 287; W. R. 325 Child v. Douglas, 5 D. M. & G. 639 Clifton's Case, 5 D. M. & G. 743 Coles . Sims, 5 D. M. & G. 1; 23 L. J. Ch. 258; affirming Kay, 56 Colquhoun, In re, Ex parte Ford, 5 D. M. & G. 35; 23 L. J. Ch. 515; W. R. 286; 2 Eq. R. 304; 23 L. T. O. S. 299 Cooke v. Darwin, 18 Beav. 60 Cumming, In re, 5 D. M. & G. 30 Cust v. Goring, 18 Beav. 383; 24 L. J. Ch. 308; 18 Jur. 884; 2 W. R. 370 Daniel's Trust, In re, 18 Beav. 399 Danvers . Morgan, 17 C. B. 530; 25 L. J. C. P. 144. Darby v. Darby, 18 Beav. 412 Davidson v. Mason, 18 Beav. 540 Davies . Pratt, 17 C. B. 183; 25 L. J. C. P. 71. Davis . Jones, 17 C. B. 625; 25 L. J. C. P. 91; 4 W. R. 248 Desborough v. Harris, 5 D. M. & G. 439 Diplock . Hammond, 5 D. M. & G. 320; 23 L.. J. Ch. 550 ; 2 W. R. 500; 23 L. T. O. S. 181; affirming 2 Sm. & G. 141; 2 W. R. 287 Dismore, Re, 18 Beav. 538 Douglas v. Watson, 17 C. B. 685 Douthwaite . Spensley, 18 Beav. 74 |