Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, 14. köidePublished for John Conrad and Company, 1864 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 12
... held that survivorship did not take place , where several individuals had pur- chased an estate , which was necessary to the accomplishment of an enterprise in which they were engaged . That the payment of the money created a trust for ...
... held that survivorship did not take place , where several individuals had pur- chased an estate , which was necessary to the accomplishment of an enterprise in which they were engaged . That the payment of the money created a trust for ...
Page 24
... , then the adjacent lands , which were considered and held by the Spanish government . Mitchel v . United States . 15 P. or the 24 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . The decree of the court of appeals for the territory ...
... , then the adjacent lands , which were considered and held by the Spanish government . Mitchel v . United States . 15 P. or the 24 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . The decree of the court of appeals for the territory ...
Page 27
... held by the Florida Indians in these lands under Spain . That was satisfactorily done in the * decision given by this court in the original case , 9 Pet . It [ 84 ] was then shown that the Indians " held under Great Britain and Spain ...
... held by the Florida Indians in these lands under Spain . That was satisfactorily done in the * decision given by this court in the original case , 9 Pet . It [ 84 ] was then shown that the Indians " held under Great Britain and Spain ...
Page 28
... held at St. Marks , the governor being present , the sale was ratified . This was Forbes's first purchase . It embraced the land between the Appalachicola and Wakulla , ex- Mitchel v . United States . 15 P. tending several 28 SUPREME ...
... held at St. Marks , the governor being present , the sale was ratified . This was Forbes's first purchase . It embraced the land between the Appalachicola and Wakulla , ex- Mitchel v . United States . 15 P. tending several 28 SUPREME ...
Page 31
... held good , as to whatever land was within the line established between the State and the Indian territory . Danforth v . Wear , 9 Wheat . 673 ; Patterson v . Jenks , 2 Pet . 216 ; and Winn and Patterson , decided by the supreme court ...
... held good , as to whatever land was within the line established between the State and the Indian territory . Danforth v . Wear , 9 Wheat . 673 ; Patterson v . Jenks , 2 Pet . 216 ; and Winn and Patterson , decided by the supreme court ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
16 Peters acres act of congress action admitted affirmed Alabama alleged amount appears apply assignment assumpsit authority Bank bond cause certificate circuit court City of Mobile claim common law Commonwealth of Pennsylvania complainants consideration constitution construction contrà contract court of chancery court of equity creditors debts decision declaration decree deed defendant in error delivered the opinion discharge district duty East Florida entitled equity evidence execution executors fact Florida fugitive grant heirs held Indian Key instruction insured interest judge judgment jurisdiction jury land legislation Mauran ment mortgage Nixdorff object owner parties patent payment person petitioner plaintiff in error plea pleadings possession premises Prigg proceedings provision purchase question regulation remedy River rule seisin slaves Spain Stats statute suit supreme court sureties survey thereof tion trust United void writ of error