Page images
PDF
EPUB

3. A Justice of the Peace; or,

4. A County Recorder; or,

5. A Notary Public.

N. Y. C. C., Sec. 517; "Conveyances," Sec. 4; Hopkins
vs. Delaney, 8 Cal., 85; Ingoldsby vs. Juan, 12 Cal.,
564; Muller vs. Boggs, 25 Cal., 175; Kimball vs.
Semple, 25 Cal., 440.

SEC. 1171. The proof or acknowledgment of an instrument may be made without this State, but within the United States, and within the jurisdiction of the officer, before either

1. A Judge or Clerk of any Court of record of the United States; or,

2. A Judge or Clerk of any Court of record of any State or Territory; or,

3. A Commissioner appointed by the Governor of this
State for that purpose, pursuant to special statutes; or,
4. A Notary Public.

N. Y. C. C., Sec. 518; "Conveyances," Sec. 4; Lord vs.
Sherman, 2 Cal., 498.

SEC. 1172. The proof or acknowledgment of an instrument may be made without the United States, before either

1. A Minister Plenipotentiary, or Minister Extraordinary, or Chargé d'Affaires of the United States, resident and accredited in the country where the proof or acknowledgment is made; or,

2. A Consul or Vice Consul of the United States, resident in that country; or,

3. A Judge of a Court of record of the country where the proof or acknowledgment is made; or,

4. Commissioners appointed for such purposes by the
Governor of the State, pursuant to special statutes; or,
5. A Notary Public.

N. Y. C. C., Sec. 519; "Conveyances," Sec. 4; Mott vs.
Smith, 16 Cal., 533; McMinn vs. O'Connor, 27 Cal.,
238.

SEC. 1173.. When any of the officers mentioned in the four preceding sections are authorized by law to appoint a deputy, the acknowledgment or proof may be taken by such deputy, in the name of his principal.

"Conveyances," Sec. 4; Muller vs. Boggs, 25 Cal., 175.

[blocks in formation]

Requisites

for acknowledgments.

Officer must indorse certificate.

Form of certificate.

SEC. 1174. The acknowledgment of an instrument must not be taken unless the officer taking it knows, or has satisfactory evidence, on the oath or affirmation of a credible witness, that the person making such acknowl edgment is the individual who is described in and who executed the instrument.

N. Y. C. C., Sec. 520; "Conveyances," Sec. 6; Kelsey
vs. Dunlap, 7 Cal., 160; Wolf vs. Fogarty,
224.

Cal.,

SEC. 1175. An officer taking the acknowledgment of an instrument must indorse thereon a certificate, signed by himself, stating the fact of acknowledgment and that the person making the same was known to the officer to be the person whose name is subscribed to the instrument as a party, or was proved to be such by the oath or affirmation of a credible witness, whose name shall be inserted in the certificate. If the person is a married woman or an attorney in fact, the certificate shall contain such additional facts as are required by Secs. 1177 and 1178.

[New section.]

Based on Sec. 7, "Conveyances;" Kelsey vs. Dunlap, 7 Cal., 160; Hopkins vs. Delaney, 8 Cal., 85; Bryan vs. Ramariz, 8 Cal., 461; Henderson vs. Grewell, S Cal., 584; Fogarty vs. Findey, 10 Cal., 239; Touchard vs. Crow, 20 Cal., 150; Stark vs. Barrett, 15 Cal., 361; Colton vs. Seavy, 22 Cal., 496; Kimball vs. Semple, 25 Cal., 440; Jansen vs. Cahill, 22 Cal., 563; McMinn vs. O'Conner, 27 Cal., 328.

SEC. 1176. The certificate must be substantially in the following form:

Attorney in fact must exhibit to

officer, what.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

day of, in the year

before

me [here insert the name of the officer, followed by the name of the office], personally appeared

-, known -] to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he [or they] executed

to me [or proved to me on the oath of

the same.

[New section.]

[Name of officer and name of office.]

SEC. 1177. When an instrument is subscribed in the name of the principal, by an attorney in fact, who desires to acknowledge the same, he must exhibit to the officer

1. A power of attorney, duly acknowledegd or proved

for recording, authorizing the execution of the instru ment; or,

2. If recorded, the original or a certified copy of the record thereof.

[New section.]

SEC. 1178. The certificate of acknowledgment by an attorney in fact must be substantially in the following

form:

Form of cer acknowledg

tificate when

ment is by attorney in fact.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors]

in the year

before me

known to me

[here insert the name of the officer, followed by the name
of the office], personally appeared
[or proved to me on the oath of

-] to be the person

whose name is subscribed to the within instrument as the attorney in fact of

-

and exhibited to me a

and

power of attorney duly acknowledged [or proved, if so].
purporting to be subscribed by said
acknowledged to me that

name of

name as attorney in fact.

[New section.]

subscribed the

thereto as principal, and his own

[Name of officer and name of office.]

Goode vs. Smith and Wife, 13 Cal., 83; Hopkins vs.
Delaney, 8 Cal., 85; Jansen vs. McCahill and Wife,
22 Cal., 563.

Acknowl

edgment by

women.

SEC. 1179. The acknowledgment of a married woman to an instrument purporting to be executed by her must married not be taken, unless she is made acquainted by the officer with the contents of the instrument on an examination without the hearing of her husband, nor certified unless she thereupon acknowledges to the officer that she executed the instrument, and that she does not wish to retract such execution.

[New section.]

"Conveyances," Sec. 23; N. Y. C. C., Sec 521; Jansen
vs. McCahill, 22 Cal., 563; Kendall vs. Miller, 9
Cal., 591; Pease vs. Barbiers, 10 Cal., 436.

SEC 1180. The certificate of the acknowledgment of a married woman must be substantially in the following

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

[here insert the name of the officer, followed by the name

Conveyance by married

woman. effect of.

Interpreter may be employed.

Proof of execution,

how made.

Witness must be personally

known to officer.

Witness shall prove, wnat.

known to me -] to be the person

of the office], personally appeared
[or proved to me on the oath of —
whose name is subscribed to the within instrument, de-
scribed as a married woman; and, upon an examination
without the hearing of her husband, I made her acquainted
with the contents of the instrument and thereupon she
acknowledged to me that she executed the same, and
that she does not wish to retract such execution.

[New section.]

[Name of officer and name of office.]

SEC. 1181. A conveyance or other instrument affecting real property, when acknowledged by a married woman, has the same effect as if she were unmarried, and may be acknowledged in the same manner, except as mentioned in the last two sections, but has no validity until so acknowledged.

N. Y. C. C., Sec. 522.

SEC. 1182. An interpreter may be employed and sworn by the officer, to interpret, in taking acknowledgment or proof of an instrument, when the parties acknowledging or the witnesses proving do not understand the English language. An interpreter is prima facie presumed to have been employed when necessary, and the fact need not be stated in the certificate.

[New section.]

SEC. 1183. Proof of the execution of an instrument, when not acknowledged, may be made, either

1. By the party executing it, or either of them; or, 2. By a subscribing witness; or,

3. By other witnesses, in cases mentioned in Sec. 1187. [New section.] "Conveyances," Sec. 10-modified.

SEC. 1184. If by a subscribing witness, such witness must be personally known to the officer taking the proof to be the person whose name is subscribed to the instru ment as a witness, or must be proved to be such by the oath of a credible witness.

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

SEC. 1185. The subscribing witness must prove that the person whose name is subscribed to the instrument as a party is the person described in it, and that such

person executed it, and that the witness subscribed his name thereto as a witness.

[New section.]

SEC. 1186.

"Conveyances," Sec. 12-modified.

officer shall be indorsed thereon.

The officer taking the proof must indorse Certificate of a certificate on the instrument, which must set forth1. If proved by the party: the facts required to have setting forth been shown in the certificate of acknowledgment of the party, if it had been taken.

2. If proved by the subscribing witness: that such witness was personally known to the officer granting the certificate to be the person whose name is subscribed to the instrument as a witness, or was proved to be such by the oath or affirmation of a witness whose name must be inserted in the certificate.

3. The proof' given by the witness of the execution of the instrument, and of the facts that the person whose name is subscribed to it as a party is the party who executed the same, and that the witness subscribed his name to the instrument as a witness.

[New section.]

SEC. 1187.

"Conveyances," Sec. 13-modified; Kelsey vs. Dunlap,

7 Cal. 160; Fogarty vs. Finlay, 10 Cal., 239; Whit-
ney vs. Arnold, 10 Cal., 531.

The execution of an instrument may be
established by proof of the handwriting of the party
and of a subscribing witness, in the following cases:
1. When the parties and all the subscribing witnesses
are dead; or,

2. When the parties and all the subscribing witnesses are non-residents of the State and refuse to appear and make proof before the proper officer in the jurisdiction where they reside; or,

3. When the place of their residence is unknown to the party desiring the proof, and cannot be ascertained by the exercise of due diligence; or,

4. When the subscribing witness conceals himself, or cannot be found by the officer by the exercise of due diligence, in attempting to serve the subpoena or attachment; or,

5. In case of the continued failure or refusal of the witness to testify, for the space of one hour, after his appear

ance.

[New section.]

Stats. 1851, 521; "Conveyances," Sec. 17-modified;
Landers vs. Bolton, 26 Cal., 393.

what.

Handwriting proved, when

may be

« EelmineJätka »