Page images
PDF
EPUB

Not to let a man be private in his house is a great injury, but not to let a man be private in his heart is a wrong inexcusable. And yet this is the strange presumption of some. They know the heart of another; they know what troubles it and what pains it. Perhaps by some discoveries thou mayest have some conjectures; but let not a small conjecture make thee a great offender. Wrong not another with unjust surmising. Every key a man meets with is not the right key to this lock; every likelihood thou apprehendest is not a sure sign to make thee know the heart of another. Jermin.

"A knowing heart is a bitterness to itself; but with its joy it does not hold intercourse as an enemy." We venture upon this translation. We find no spiritual sense in the one heretofore given. A heart spiritually enlightened is a bitterness to itself on the principle which Christ meant when He said, He " came not to send peace, but a sword" (Matt. x. 34); but with its joy, weak as it may be, and small and easily clouded, "it does not," as the impenitent do, "hold intercourse as with an enemy.' His joy is like his bitterness, a friend; and all will work in opposite direction to the joy of the wicked.-Miller.

Eli could not enter into the "bitterness of soul" of Hannah (1 Sam. i. 10, 13, 16) nor Gelazi into that of the Shunamite woman (2 Kings iv. 27). Michal, though the wife of David, was "a stranger to his joy" at the bringing up of the ark to Zion (1 Sam. xviii. 13, 20, with 2 Sam. vi. 12-16).— Fausset.

The two extreme experiences of a human heart, which comprehend all others between them, are "bitterness and "joy." The solitude of a human being in either extremity is a solemn ising thought. Whether you are glad or grieved, you must be alone. The bitterness and the joyfulness are both It is only in a modified sense, and in a limited measure, that you can share them with another, so as to have less of them yourself.

your own.

...

Sympathy between two human beings is, after all, little more than a figure of speech. A physical burden can be divided equally between two. If you, unburdened, overtake a weary pilgrim on the way, toiling beneath a load of a hundred pounds weight, you may volunteer to bear fifty of them for the remaining part of the journey, and so lighten his load by half. But a light heart, however willing it may be, cannot so relieve a heavy one. The cares that press upon the spirit are as real as the load that lies on the back, and as burdensome; but they are not so tangible and divisible. There

.. •

are, indeed, some very intimate unions in human society, as organised by God. . . . . The closest of them all, the two "no longer twain, but one flesh," is a union of unspeakable value for such sympathy as is compatible with distinct personality at all. The wife of your bosom can, indeed, intermeddle with your joys and sorrows, as no stranger can do, and yet there are depths of both in your breast which even she has no line to fathom. When you step into the waters of life's last sorrow, even she must stand back and remain behind. Each must go forward alone.

The Indian suttee

seems nature's struggle against that fixed necessity of man's condition. But it is a vain oblation. Although the wife burn on the husband's funeral pile, the frantic deed does not lighten the solitude of the dark valley. One human being cannot be merged in another. Man must accept the separate personality that belongs to his nature. Arnot.

Be

It is true, observes a philosophic essayist, that we have all much in common; but what we have most in common is this, that we are all isolated. Man is more than a combination of passions common to his kind. yond them and behind them, an inner life, whose current we think we know within us, flows on in solitary stillness. Friendship itself is declared to have nothing in common with this dark sensibility, so repellent and so forbidding, much less may a stranger pene

trate to those untrodden shores. We may apply Wordsworth's lines,

To friendship let him turn

For succour; but perhaps he sits alone
On stormy waters, tossed in a little boat
That holds but him, and can contain no more.
Jacox.

By this thought the worth and the significance of each separate human personality is made conspicuous, not one of which is the example of a species, but each has its own peculiarity, which no one of countless individuals possesses.-Elster.

Who but a parent can fully know the bitterness" of his grief who "mourneth for an only son"-of him who is "in bitterness for his first-born."

Who but a parent can sympathise with the royal mourner's anguish over a son that had died in rebellion against his father and his God! Who but a widow can realise the exquisite bitterness of a widow's agony when bereft of the loved partner of her joys and sorrows! Who but a pastor can know, in all its intensity, the bitterness of soul experienced in seeing those on whom he counted as genuine fruits of his ministry, and on whom he looked with delighted interest, as his anticipated "joy and crown" in "the day of the Lord," falling away-going back and walking no more with Jesus. -Wardlaw.

The principal thought of verse 11 has been treated before. See on chapter ii., 21, 22, etc.

OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS.

The wicked build houses on the earth; the earth is their home, where they desire to be, and they imagine to settle themselves in it. The upright do set up tabernacles only, seeking another country, and as knowing the uncertainty upon which this world standeth. For though the habitation. of the wicked be a house, and rooted in the earth, yet it shall not only be shaken, but overthrown, and though the abiding of the upright be but a tabernacle pinned to the earth, yet shall it stand so safely that it shall flourish like a rooted tree. Wherefore, when in the Revelation we read "Woe to the inhabitants of the earth" (chap. viii. 13), St. Jerome understands it

of the wicked only. of the wicked only. For a godly man is not an inhabiter of the earth, but a stranger and a sojourner. And his tabernacle doth so flourish, that it reacheth to heaven, for he hath his dwelling in heaven to whom the whole. world is an inn.—Jermin.

The "house of the wicked" may be a most prosperous one, and may seem to be full of peace; but it is doomed. It must become "desolate," literally astonished; which is the Eastern way of describing grand downfalls. "But the tent of the upright" (another intensive clause) his slenderest possessions; like a sprout; like some poor tender plant, shall bloom forth. Such is the meaning of "flourish."-Miller.

[ocr errors]

MAIN HOMILETICS of verse 12.

WHAT SEEMS TO BE AND WHAT IS.

[ocr errors]

I. Human nature needs more light than is found in the human conscience. The way which seems right unto a man may be "the way of death." A mariner who has insufficient light to observe correctly the needle in the compass, may think he is steering for the haven when he is taking the vessel straight upon the rocks. He may be very sincere in his conviction that he is going right, but his thinking so will not make it so. He needs more light than he has. So the light of conscience is not enough to guide a man with certainty in the true and

[ocr errors]

right way. If conscientious sincerity was an infallible guide Paul would not have delivered to prison" men and women for being followers of Jesus of Nazareth (Acts xxii. 4). The way that in his ignorance seemed right to him, was felt by him to be a "way of death" when his conscience was enlightened. Conscience may be deadened by sin, or warped by prejudice or self-interest; it is not a reliable and certain guide. If it were, it was needless for the Son of God to visit the earth and make known the will of His Father-the revelation of God's will in the books of the Old and New Testaments is a superfluity. The existence of the Bible is explained by the fact which is found to be true by all God-taught men, that "the way of man is not in himself: it is not in man that walketh to direct his steps" (Jer. x. 23). God, by speaking unto men in "sundry times and in divers manners," and especially "in these last days by His Son" (Heb. i. 1) declares plainly that man needs something outside of himself to guide him into that path of righteousness which alone is a way of life. The history of the world confirms this truth. Observation of every-day life tells the same tale.

[ocr errors]

II. The need of human nature has been fully met. All that the mariner needs in order to keep the vessel's head right is light to see the compass. God in Christ is a sufficient light to man. Paul says: God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ" (2 Cor. iv. 6). Christ Himself tells us that it is those only who "follow Him" who have the "light of life" (John viii. 12). That the way thus revealed is fully adapted to meet man's need is proved by the results which follow from walking in it. The progress which a sick man makes towards health is the most convincing proof of the efficacy of his physician's treatment. The light which is shed upon men by the revelation of God, and especially by the Gospel, has been proven by its result upon individuals and upon nations, to be all-powerful to turn men from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God" (Acts xxvi. 18). The way of sin is the way of death-death morally, socially, and physically. The way of holiness is the only way of spiritual life to the soul and to the community, and ensures victory over the penalty of bodily death.

[ocr errors]

ILLUSTRATION.

THE LAST WORDS OF HILDEBRAND.-One of the greatest of the sons of earth (if we measure greatness either by posthumous fame or posthumous influence) lay on his death-bed. Prelates, princes, priests, devoted adherents and attendants stood around. Anxious to catch the last accents of that once oracular voice, the mourners were bending over him, when, struggling in the very grasp of death, he collected, for one last effort, his failing powers, and breathed out his spirit with the indignant exclamation, "I have loved righteousness and hated iniquity, and therefore I die in exile."... That he went into the unseen world consciously and deliberately with a lie in his right hand, is a supposition utterly inadmissible. Passionate earnestness and intense conviction were stamped upon all his words and works. . . . . He had climbed by the slippery steps of intrigue to the Papal throne, and to set that throne above all the thrones of the earth, and to cause everyone, "both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond," to bow down in the dust before it, was thenceforward his sole aim

[ocr errors]

...

He

and object. . . . . It was for this that he
enforced that celibacy of the clergy which has
ever since been the law of the Church.
found thousands of married priests ministering
at her altars in innocence of heart, thinking
no sin, and fearing no dishonour. . . . He
commanded them to put away their wives on
pain of excommunication, which meant depri-
vation of all rights, spiritual, social, and human.
One cry of indignation, one prolonged
and bitter wail of agony, arose throughout
Europe, from the Apennines to the Baltic Sea,
Wives were torn from their husbands,
children from their fathers. Popular fanati-
cism allied itself with Papal tyranny.
There was no pity for worse than widowed
wives, and worse than orphaned children
flung out upon the cold world to starve. The
Pontiff trod his stern, remorseless way over
broken hearts.
But he had a dangerous
antagonist to encounter.
The Holy
Roman Empire and the Holy Roman Church
were together to dominate the world. But
which of them was to dominate the other i

Hildebrand's long contest with Henry IV.
may be said to have decided the question. But
with what weapons was it fought? We see
the gallant Saxons tempted by bribes and
promises to revolt, and then, in their hour of
distress, treacherously abandoned by him who
was at once their ally and " spiritual father,"
and to whom they addressed in vain those
noble and pathetic remonstrances which, even
to this day, cannot be read without emotion.
Thus Hildebrand "loved righteousness."
But the Pontiff, so stern to his antagonists,
could be mild to his allies. Keen swords in
strong hands were necessary to support his
power, the heaviest swords in Europe were
borne by Norman knights. Robert, the con-
queror of Sicily, William, the conqueror of
England, were the representative men of this
fierce and fiery race. . They were bloody,

[ocr errors]

avaricious and unscrupulous. No more cruel
conquerors ever turned a fruitful land into a
waste, howling wilderness. No more remorse-
less oppressors ever trod down the poor with a
heel of iron.
But their crimes were
William

unrebuked by Hildebrand.

was "addressed in the blandest accents of esteem and tenderness," while Robert, the tyrant of Sicily, "was embraced and honoured as the faithful ally of Rome." Thus Hildebrand "hated iniquity." That "way" in which he walked all his life long with a consistency of purpose and intensity of energy that moves our admiration, seemed "right unto himself," nay, it seemed to be preeminently the way of righteousness, but what shall we say of "the end thereof."-Etchings from History, by Miss Alcock. See Sunday at Home, February 15th, 1879.

OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS.

Souls perish always with surprise... But yet the seeming here noted must be taken cum grano. Deep in the lost heart is the knowledge of its "end," rather its "afterpart.' The way lasts for ever, and its afterward "is the ways of death!" Deep in the lost man's heart he knows all this, and this makes a dark ground for his gaieties. (See next verse).-Miller.

There are some ways which can hardly seem right" to any manthe ways, namely, of open and flagrant wickedness. But there are many ways, which, under the biassing influence of pride and corruption, "seem right," and yet their "end" is "death." I. The way of the sober, well-behaved worldling. He thinks of the law as if it had been only one table, the first being entirely overlooked. He passes among his circle for a man of good character, and flatters himself, in proportion as he is flattered by others, that all is right. . . . But his way is not the way of life, for God is not in it. II. The way of the formalist. He follows, strictly and punctually, the round of religious observance. But his heart has not been given to God. The world still has it. He compromises the retention of its affections for the things of sense by giving God the pitiful and worthless offering of outward homage. But it will not do. Those services cannot terminate

in life, which have no life in them. III. The way of the speculative religionist. From education, or as a matter of curiosity, he has made himself an adept in religous controversy. He holds by the creed of orthodoxy, and imagines that this kind of knowledge is religion. But speculative opinion is not saving knowledge-is not the faith which "worketh by love" and "overcomes the world."-Wardlaw.

Good intentions are not a justification for wrong doing (2 Sam. vi. 6). Judges xvii. 6 gives an awful illustration of the end of "every man doing that which is right in his own eyes." (Cf. the prohibition of this, Deut. xii. 8.)Fausset.

This may be his easily besetting sin, the sin of his constitution, the sin of his trade. Or it may be his own false views of religion: he may have an imperfect repentance, a false faith, a very false creed. Many of the Papists, when they were burning the saints of God in the flames at Smithfield, thought they were doing God service. A. Clarke.

The self-delusion of one ends in death by the sentence of the judge, that of another in self-murder; of one in loathsome disease, of another in slow decay under the agony of conscience, or in sorrow over a henceforth dishonoured and distracted life.Delitzsch.

Sin comes clothed with a show of reason (Exodus i., 10); and lust will so blear the understanding, that he shall think there is great sense in sinning. "Adam was not deceived." (1 Tim. ii. 14), that is, he was not so much deceived by his judgmentthough also by that too-as by his affection to his wife, which at length blinded his judgment. The heart first deceives us with colours; and when we are once a-doting after sin, then we join and deceive our hearts (James i. 26), using fallacious and specious sophism, to make ourelves think that lawful to-day which we held unlawful yesterday.. But it falls out with us as with him that, lying upon a steep rock, and dreaming of good matters befallen him, starts suddenly for joy, and breaks his neck at the bottom. As he that makes a bridge of his own shadow cannot but fall into the water, so neither can he escape the pit of hell who lays his own presumption in the place of God's promise.-Trapp.

[ocr errors]

Some say, surely God will not punish a man hereafter who conscientiously walks up to his convictions, although these convictions be in point of fact mistaken. They err, knowing neither the inspired word of God nor natural laws. Do men imagine that God, who has established this world in such exquisite order, and rules it by regular laws, will abdicate, and leave the better world in anarchy? This world is blessed by an undeviating connection between cause and effect; will the next be abandoned to random impulses, or left to chaos? . . . It is not even conceivable that the direction of a man's course should not determine his landing-place. . . . Perhaps the Perhaps the secret reason why an expectation so contrary to all analogy is yet so fondly entertained, is a tacit disbelief in the

reality of things spiritual and eternal. We see clearly the laws by which effects follow causes in time; but the matters upon which these laws operate are substantial realities. If there were a firm conviction that the world to come is a substance, and not merely a name, the expectation would naturally be generated, that the same principles which regulate the divine administration of the world now, will stretch into the unseen, and rule it all.

.. Truth shines like light from heaven; but the mind and conscience within the man constitute the reflector that receives it. Thence we must read off the impression, as the astronomer reads the image from the reflector at the bottom of his tube. When that tablet is dimmed by the breath of evil spirits dwelling within, the truth is distorted and turned into a lie.Arnot.

There is no way which doth not seem right in his eyes who liketh to go in it. For man is led in all things by a seeming good; and such is the foulness of doing amiss, that it must put on the painted colours of doing right, or else it cannot draw the eyes of man's mind unto it. But it is the not seeing the end which causeth the seeming rightness of the way, and it is to man that it seems so, who is so apt to be deceived. He that hath a long fight, and in the beginning can see the end, he maketh the shortest journey and speedeth the best in it. If the beginning be a due consideration of the end, the end will be a beginning of true joy and comfort. It is not so in the way which seemeth to be right. For being but a way, it is passed and ended, and then begin the ways of death, which are said to be many, because there is an endless going on in them.-Jermin.

MAIN HOMiletics of VERSE 18.

TRUE AND FALSE MIRTH.

This proverb, as it stands in our English version, cannot be taken as universally true. The first clause is rendered by some translators-" Even in

« EelmineJätka »