Page images

ornament. At the same time, however, while he SIR WILLIAU BODKIN has resigned the office of 56. COPYHOLD PRACTICE. - A. by will devised should be glad to support the suggestions by all Assistant-Judge of the Middlesex Sessions. The

real estate, part of which was copyhold fine certain, to the means in his power, he thought they should appointment is worth £1500 a year.

his wife B. absolutely, After his death, B., by her not forget that the new courts and the restoration

will, devised such copyholds to a trustee for immediate A MANCHESTER paper states that the borough

sale, with the usual power of appointment, in order to of the old hall were completed during the chair- of Stockport has twenty-six magistrates and disponse with the trustee's admission. On B.'s death manship of Lord Eversley, and he trusted, there. twenty-eight policemen.

the estate has been sold, and as I am acting both for fore, that his portrait, to be hung in that chamber, The post of high constable of the City of West- the vendor and purchaser, I shall be glad to be informed would form part of the scheme suggested by Mr. minster has become vacant by the death, at the

if it is necessary to take any and what steps to perfect

the trustee's title before passing the estate by bargain Portal. He was not prepared with a motion on age of seventy-five, of Mr. Foster Owen, who

and sale, and as to the rights of the lord and steward of the subject now, but, with the permission of held it many years.

the manor under the circumstances. the court, he hoped to bring it forward again next

DEPUTY STEWARD. sessions. The matter then dropped, but with a more advanced condition of the restoration a CORRESPONDENCE OF THE

Answers. county committee will probably be formed to carry

PROFESSION. out the object in view.

(Q. 44.) LEGATEE-Duty.-On re-consideration, I

think that C. D., whether beneficially entitled or not, THE IRISH LAW COURTS.–The Dublin Evening

may disclaim. “If one gives goods or chattels to an. NOTE.-This Department of the LAW TIMES being open to Mail suggests that the puisne judges should be

free discussion on all professional topics, the Editor is not

other, and the devisee refuse it, by this means the employed regularly in performing their share of responsible for any opinions or statements contained

in it devise is become void, and any waiver or refusal will the work of the after-sittings. It is suggested,

suffice in this case, for a man shall not be compelled also, that the constitution of the Court for Land

nolens volens to take anything devised to him." See

THE PROFESSION.-I observe in your impres- Sheppard's Touchstone, 452; also 3 Preston's Abstracts, Cases Reserved should be altered, and that a rota of judges should be formed to supply one to sit wished for amalgamation of the two branches of sion of Saturday last some remarks relative to the 104. Of course, if there be a valid disclaimer, C. D.

would not pay duty.

Z. Y. regularly in the Court of Appeal in Chancery to the Legal Profession. It happens that this subprovide against the evil consequences of the fre. ject has been much

discussed of late years else

(Q. 45.) FEE FOR SEARCH. - The superintendent quent divisions between the ordinary judges, where,

and as I know something of the actnal

registrar charges ls for compiling the index, and this

whether the date is known or not. à suggestion which seems to merit considera- working of the proposed system, where it has tion. THE Town Council of Liverpool have just decided will not be out of place. The question referred been adopted, a few observations on the subject


Deeds.-A. is entitled to a covenant of indemnity from to raise the salaries of their officers, from the to, has in fact been under discussion in several C. Lord St. Leonards' opinion to this effect is re-stated deputy town clerk downwards ; the total increase of the colonies, and very recently an endeavour

without dissent, Dart, V. & P. 618, 4th edit. Z. Y, in salaries amounts to £2000 annually. This is a step in the right direction, and we commend

this to bring about the desired

was made in New South Wales and Queensland

The attempt

(Q. 52.) PARTNERSHIP.-Smith's ground of complaint decision to the consideration of other municipal failed in both instances, the measure, as might fif any) is much slighter than that of the plaintificin. authorities with a view to an increase of the salary have been expected, meeting with considerable of town clerks.

each partner was held entitled to use the style of the opposition from many of the members of the

firm. MESSRS. HENRY KIMBER and Charles Cydwellyn Colonial Bar.

In that case, as pointed out by Mr. Lindley

In New Zealand, however, the (Partnership, 888, note p. 3rd edit.), it might perhaps Ellis, of 79, Lombard-street, announce that they contemplated reform was actually accomplished have been argued that the use of the name of the firm have dissolved partnership, and in future each gentleman will conduct business on his own

some years since, and I need hardly say by one member of the diseolved partnership would that the alteration has been found to work

expose the other member to some risk. Here the deaccount. The papers and documents of their respective clients will remain with the partner this country as solicitors have, after examination, well enough—in fact, gentlemen admitted in scription" late Smith and Howell” entirely obviates

any such difficulty. If Smith have any claim, it under whose care the particular business has been been admitted as barristers and solicitors in New

must be a claim to have the goodwill sold and the money divided.

Z. Y. carried on, unless they receive an intimation from Zealand, and have been quite as successful as

on the dissolution of a partnership "each partner the client to the contrary. English barristers going to that colony. As a

has a right, in the absence of any stipulation to the THE Supreme Court of Massachusetts has general rule, the only practical result of this state

contrary, to use the name of the old firm. Vide Williams

Personal Property, 6th edit. p. 238; Banks v. Gibson again declared that by the statutes of the State of things is that, as all legal practitioners can be

(M. R. 11 Jur. N. S. 680; 34 L. J. 179, Chan,; 13 W.R. all wagers are void. The action was one for admitted as barristers and solicitors, a certain 1012).

SOCIUS. money had and received against the party winning number of gentlemen, feeling themselves qualified the wager, which had, in good faith, been paid to to do so, devote themselves to advocacy, and the

(Q. "53.) RIGHT OF ACTION.-Tibbs could maintain him by the stakeholder. The presiding judge re- rest pursue the ordinary business of solicitors.

an action against Jinks for money had and received. If fused to admit evidence offered by the defendant Partnerships have, of course, been formed on this liability, having simply obeyed his master's orders, but

Jinks had killed the dog he would have been under no tending to show that he had won the wager, basis. To those acquainted with colonial affairs, having gone out of his way to convert the dog into which, singularly enough, was upon the position it must be somewhat surprising to find that money, he is clearly liable to refund the £5 he received. of certain graves in a cemetery. English solicitors have so long submitted to the

CLIFFORD. COPYRIGHT LAW.-A correspondent in the existing monopoly. It is difficult indeed to see The sale being entirely wrongful, Tibbs cannot

maintain any action for the £5. He may, however, Atheræum suggests that to prevent disputes and why a branch of the Profession, the qualification obtain trover for the setter dog against Jinks; or uncertainty, the registration of titles of books for membership in which until recently con

detinue (Jones v. Dowle, 9 M. & W. 19.) He may also should be effected prior to publication, and that sisted in the eating of dinners, and the expen- maintain trover or detinue against Poucher, unless the the registration fee shall be reduced to one half. diture of so much cash, should be entitled to such dog was purchased bona fide and in market overt.

Z, Y, Also that an alphabetical register of titles, with privileges and pecuniary advantages as barristers the date of registration and name of the publisher, possess over solicitors in this country. And

(Q. 54.) MARRIED WOMEN'S PROPERTY ACT.-It ap. should be kept open to an applicant upon pay. the curious part of the case is this—that whereas

pears to me that a deposit in a savings' bank in the ment of 18.; the entry to be null and void at the the barrister pays no annual fee for the right to name of a married woman,

if made prior to the 9th end of a year, to prevent any “phantom” title practise, the solicitor is burdened with the charge Aug. 1870, is not even prima facie her separate estate, from incumbering the register. of £9 or £6 as the case may be. Legal reforms

In such a case sects. 2 and 9 have no application. Z. Y. A NEW CLAIMANT.-A claim to the title and still he remains in the same position, whilst the

are made, and the solicitor's profits cut down, but estates of the Earl of Eglinton came before the

(Q. 51.)

PROCEDURE.-Gen. Rule 204 provides as fol. Sheriff Court of Chancery, Edinburgh, on Monday. gentlemen of the long robe” preserve their lows: "The place of sitting of each County Court in

matters of bankruptcy shall be the town in which the The claimant, Mr. Foulton, maintains that he is profits and privileges intact. The Profession in this country would do well to follow the example the common law business of the court, under the pro

court now holds, or may hereafter hold, its sittings for the great grandson of James Foulton, who was younger brother to the eleventh Earl of Eglinton. of New Zealand in this respect. In that colony visions of the County Courts Act 1946.5

. und have never Having eloped with one of his father's domestics, well as the two branches of the Profession. Why court other than where the proceedings are carried on.

heard of County Court judges hearing applications in a disowned by the family,

enlisted as a soldier, and should not the same be done here ? Should this except in matters of arrest, when the bankrupt intends died in the service. His son, James Foulton, happen, we should, I think, very soon see what leaving the country. This matter is of such urgency are the relative merits of the members of the two

that the warrant is signed by the judge whenever the served in the navy, and the son of the latter, distinct branches. There can be little doubt but

application is made. Thomas Foulton, who was the father of the pre- that the places of many of our "junior counsel", sent claimant, again became a soldier. His son, would soon be supplied by members of legal the claimant also entered the army, and was pre-firms. We should see

LAW SOCIETIES. sent with the Light Brigade in the Balaklava before the court, briefs not left unread, but the

cases properly brought charge. Since he left the army he has lived in advocates fully in possession of all the facts of

LEGAL PRACTITIONERS' SOCIETY. Edinburgh, and has occupied bimself in getting the cases in which they are concerned, and The adjourned meeting of this new society, the his great-grandmother had documentary evidence thereby enabled to do justice to the clients they object of which

is the reform of abuses in connecSOLICITOR.

tion with the legal profession, was held last Wed. in her possession which would have proved him represent.

nesday evening at the rooms of the Social Seience the heir to the title and estates. These docu

Association, 1, Adam-street, Adelphi. ments were obtained from her by Robert, NOTES AND QUERIES ON

Mr. W. T. Charley, D.C.L., M.P., was called to sixth Baron of Skelmorlie, whose son Hugh

the chair, and there was a large attendance of became the twelfth Earl of Eglinton, under a POINTS OF PRACTICE.

members. promise that he would look after the interests

Mr. Charles Ford (hon. secretary), read the who was then a minor. It is alleged, NOTICE.-We must remind our correspondents that this minutes of the last meeting, which were conhowever, that he used the papers to obtain posses.

column is not open to questions involving points of law firmed. He then stated that he had received

such as a solicitor shonld be consulted upon. Queries will sion of the estates for his own family. At any

be excluded which go beyond our limits.

numerous letters from all parts of the kingdom rate, his son married the daughter of the eleventh N.B. - None are inserted unless the name and address of the from members of the legal profession, in which Earl, who had no heirs male, and from him the writers are sent, not necessarily for publication, but as a

guarantee for bona fides.

they fully sympathised with the objects of the present Earl of Eglinton is lineally descended.

new society, and wished it every success. As au The case came before the court on an application


instance of this he read the following extracts : for a commission and diligence to examine certain

Mr. Copp (Essex-street, Strand): "I wish the title deeds. Mr. Blair, who appeared for the 55. LANDLORD AND TENANT-RENT.-A. lately sola society every success, and shall be happy to copresent earl, said there was no such deed in some property, the rent of which is payable yearly at operate with you and other members of the Proexistence. Mr. Menzies, who appeared for the Michaelmas. The day of settlement was by the con

Is not A.

fession who have taken such a warm interest in claimant, said he found there was such a deed by entitled to the quarter's rent accruing from Michael. the subject, in seeking to weed out from our ranks date and designation in a Crown charter in the mas to the day of settlement ? As the purchaser those who by their unprofessional, and in some Register House, and if such deed were not now in objects to pay the proportion, will not the course be for cases even nefarious practices, would seek to bring existence it must have been at one time. He would the vendor to wait till next Michaelmas; and then, if the Profession into disrepute.” take his chance of recovering it after diligence. the purchaser receives the whole year's rent, sue bim

Mr. Charles E. Lewis, M.P. (Old Jewry): "The for the proportion? Does not The Apportionment Act The sheriff ordered answers to be lodged in four1870 apply to cases between vendor and purchaser ?

objects of your proposed society appear to be to teen days.

AN ARTICLED CLERK, do the work which ought to be done by the



of her son,

existing bodies. I fear that there is but little couple of sets of the notices which have been discipline was most lax. He thought that it prospect of rousing our profession into anything issued, and any other printed matter you may might be desirable to organise a deputation to the like real activity, and I have recently, as you have, I will canvass my friends with the view of Lord Chancellor to tender to him their desire to know, given a great deal of time and energy, getting them to join the society. You must of support in every way in their power his Bill (Hear), without much result, to try and accomplish this. course be aware it is a difficult matter for solicitors and to bring under his notice the importance of I must leave others to do what they can in the as a body to attend meetings; but I think if a re-organising the Inns of Court on the basis of same direction, but can only give my best wishes canvass by some of those interested were orga. having a representative body to govern the Bar. for success.

nised, much good might be done, and perhaps one There were many grievances which attorneys and Mr. J. T. Shapland (South Malton): “Will you of the principal objects of meetings accom. solicitors complained in connection with the Inns kindly give me some information respecting it plished.”

of Court. These could be mentioned to Lord Sel. (the society), as it appears to me from the little Mr. H. L. Turner (Newcastle-upon-Tyne).- borne. It was all the more necessary that they I have seen, that it is just such a society as we "From what I have heard of the society it seems should tender their support to the Lord Chan. attorneys and solicitors require.”

to me to be far more likely than any other to bene cellor, because, in the course of his speech, he said Mr. W.J. Wheatcroft (Eastbourne).-"My fear fit the Profession and look after the interests of that he was afraid that if he introduced his Bill is that the objects of the society are not suffi- of its members, which the Incorporated Law next session it would be made the groundwork of ciently extensive. The legal profession must use Society does not seem to trouble much about.” a party attack against the Government, but they the influence in their own behalf, which, at Mr. R. A. Ward (Maidenhead).-"I highly could assure him that such would not be the case. general elections, they have so often used on approve of your Legal Praotitioners' Society. I The question about the representative body for behalf of their clients, if any great good is to be am desirous of joining the society, and if you can the government of the Bar would involve their done. Our branch of the Profession must have a send me any prospectuses should canvas my pro- consulting its members upon the subjeot. A share of the plums which the higher branch at fessional brethren."

memorial the Lord Chancellor should be subpresent monopolise, and this, I believe, can only Mr. H. Symonds (Dorchester).-“ Please to mitted to the Bar, especially to its junior membe done through combined influence at the time of enrol me as a member of Legal Practitioners' | bers. Thus, by means of their Bill, their memo. a general election. There is much however, for Society. I hope something may be done towards rial, and their deputation, they would bring the the proposed society to accomplish, and I will do facilitating the change from solicitor to barrister. society very prominently under the notice of the what I can to aid it.”

It is unfair to have to pass & preliminary and read Profession and the public, and would acquire both Mr. C. R. Gibson (Dartford).-"I thank you for for three years after having been in the legal Pro. moral and numerical strength. (Loud cheers.) the printed circular. I am very willing to do any fession for some years.".

The hon. secretary (Mr. Ford) then read a draft thing I can to advance the interests of our Pro- Mr. J. Borough (Derby), -"One of the main of the proposed rules which he had prepared. fession, and if I can I will attend your meeting, grievances of my branch of the Profession which Mr. Holroyd Chaplin proposed that the rules be and learn whether the present movement at all I hope to see removed is our exclusion from the referred to a sub-committee of five, three to form embraces the objects which I venture to think are Inns of Court. Though not objecting to a certain a quorum, comprised of members of the society, 80 essential for the welfare of the Profession at interval (say two or three terms) between removal and that those rules be presented, with the suglarge."

from the Rolls and being called to the Bar, I gested alterations, at the next meeting, to be fully Mr. Wm. Gresham (High Bailiff of Southwark). think it anjust and unwise on the part of those discussed, which was carried unanimously. -“I vastly approve of your circular just come to venerable societies to refuse us permission to It was then proposed and carried that the fol. hand. Pray put me down as an annual subscriber. enter as students or members. I feel sure that lowing gentlemen should serve on this committee : I shall be happy in any other mode to support the the removal of this restriction would tend as much Messrs. Charley, Jencken, Chaplin, Ford, and views of the society. My son, Thos. Gresham, to the benefit of the Bar as of ourselves, and Delamar. who is my partner here, desires to do the same.' would greatly increase the incomes of the Inns. A Mr. F. A. Rowland moved and Mr. Gresham

Mr. E. James (Eastbourne).—“I have perused powerful body, supporters of the present privi. seconded a motion to the effect that Mr. Charley the circular you were kind enough to hand me leges of the Inns, would also be created. I should should be appointed treasurer, which was also respecting the formation of a new society, under be very sorry to see the constitution of the Inns carried. the title of the 'Legal Practitioners' Society,' of Court altered, or their powers over the Profes. A like resolution was adopted requesting Mr. and beg to say, that as a gentleman who has sion interfered with in any way, and I advocate Charles Ford to continue his duties as hon. secrepassed and is about to be admitted, I consider the slight relaxation of the rules which I have tary. such a society very much needed in order to pro mentioned as a truly conservative measure. The The chairman then brought forward the subject tect the interests of the Profession, which at the revival and extension of the Inns of Chancery of the desirability of protecting the public against present time are so much trespassed upon by mere might also be taken in hand by your society with the money lenders, quacks, and agents of all kinds outsiders."

advantage to the general body of attorneys and which were the bane of the Profession. Mr. W. Cheesman (Eastbourne).-"I shall be solicitors. I should say that I am strongly Mr. Gresham, in speaking to this subject, said glad if you will kindly add my name as a member opposed to any amalgamation of the two branches it was a matter of common notoriety in the Proof the Legal Practitioners' Society,' of whose of the Profession.”

fession that many men were in the habit of lending utility there cannot be a second opinion.”

The hon. secretary also read numerous other their names. The Incorporated Law Socioty had Mr. C. Matthews (Eastbourne). -"My attention extracts from the letters of solicitors who had undertaken to remedy many of the evils comhaving been called to a new society, called the joined the society,

plained of, but without much good resulting. It Legal Practitioners' Society, and having read over The Chairman said that this meeting, as they was not, he thought, so much the result of legisthe prospectus, I cordially approve of its objects. were aware, was an adjourned meeting of the lative power as the way of checking the practice In the course of my twelve years' experience in Legal Practitioners' Society. At the last meeting in some way which would do the most good. the Profession, I have frequently known great it was decided that this society should be estab. Mr. Lowe said that he came constantly in con. misery and hardship inflicted upon the poorer lished. They were now met to frame the rules for tact with those persons who assumed the liberty classes, who have entrusted small matters to the society and to start it on its career of useful to practise who had not the ability or the right so agents, and who have invariably managed, some- ness to the Profession, and, he trusted, to the to do. Personally he had never taken objection how or another, to plunder their victims more or public at large., Draft rules would be placed to any man who had appeared from a bona fide less. I shall be happy to become a member, and before them and they would be discussed seriatim. office; but there were men who had been clerks I wish the society every success in its praise. The next point would be to make one to auctioneers who frequently conducted cases, worthy efforts.”

two appointments under those rules. About armed with a letter duly signed by some solicitor, Mr. T. Marshall (Leeds.)—"I have received sixty gentlemen had signified their intention this occurring time after time. He himself could the circulars of the Legal Practitioners' Society, of joining the society; but he thought they name twenty persons whose certificates were taken wbich you have kindly sent me. I should be would agree that they had not as yet sufficient out by subscription (laughter), who were either obliged by your answering the following queries : material from which to select their governing bedridden or what not, whose names were kept 1. By what authority the proposed code of eti- body. Correspondence, however, must be carried upon the Law List simply for the purpose of guette is to be enforced. 2. Whether the rights on, and receipts given for subscriptions, and it enabling robbers (if he might use the word), to and liabilities of the two branches of the legal was therefore necessary that an honorary trea- prey upon the public, and the testimony of variprofession sought to be defined are the existing surer, &c., and honorary secretary should be ap- ous metropolitan magistrates would, he was rights and liabilities, and no others. 3. Whether pointed. The next point was the consideration of assured, fully bear him out in his assertion. The placing the government of the legal profession on the most suitable subject for legislation next ses- thing was perfectly scandalous. As a remedy, he à sound representative basis implies that the sion. It would be remembered that at the last proposed that when a practitioner found a person authority of the Benchers of the various Inns of meeting there was a general concurrence of opinion who was perfectly unknown to him, conducting a Court to disbar members of the Bar, and of the that the subject, which was the most pressing and case, he would suggest that the magistrate's clerk judges to strike off the rolls attorneys and solici- the most ripe for legislation, was the protection should inquire into his antecedents, and if they citors, is to be taken from them and vested in a of the legal Profession against the encroachments were not satisfactory the magistrate should refuso governing body elected by the Profession at of unqualified persons. (Hear, hear.) He gathered to hear him. Large, or what else the prospectus does mean. 4. from the manner in which they received that Mr. J. Seymour Salaman said that, being a Whether the protection of the legal profession statement that they would agree in thinking that member of the Incorporated Law Society, he had from the depredations of unqualified men means the time had come when legislation upon that ques. long seen considerable apathy in many questions further restrictive legislation, or merely the tion should be initiated. The next thing would be affecting the legal Profession, and there was no establishment of a means for reforming the exist- the appointment of a sub-committee to frame a doubt but that the Incorporated Law Society had ing laws which protect us."

Bill upon the subject. Since they last met a very failed to do its duty. With regard to the Legal Mr. W. Duignan (Walsall).—“I do not feel important speech had been delivered by the Lord Practitioners' Society many of its objects he fully interested in any question except the amalgama- Chancellor to a deputation

of the Legal Education concurred in, and it would be, he was of opinion, tion of barristers and solicitors, and I think it Association, in the course of which his Lordship instrumental in doing good to the Profession; idle to redress small grievances, leaving the great announced that he was prepared io introduce a and he would give it every support in his power. ones untouched. I do not think, therefore, that bill into Parliament to re-organise the Inns of Mr. Webster thought that the question of dealI can take any interest in the objects of the Court. This re-organisation was a subject matter ing with the quacks of the Profession was a very Society. I am, nevertheless, exceedingly obliged of which they could very well take cognizance and important one. He suggested that an amendment for your courteous note.”

tender to the Lord Chancellor their support to the of the Stamp Act would be serviceable, so as to Mr. J. E. Mason (Alford).—“I shall be glad if Bill, provided it/was a fairland reasonable one and punish them. Auctioneers and accountants to you will add my name to the list of members. The one which the legal Profession had a right to the Court of Chancery being the worst of these vis inertiæ of the 'Incorporated and the 'Inland expect from so eminent a man as Lord Selborne. quacks. For an infringement of laws of this deRevenue' to be overcome, in forcing either to deal There were several points in connection with the scription, every unqualified person should be sent with unqualified

persons, I found to be almost past Inns of Court which required legislating upon to prison; and this matter should he thought, belief during three years service as secretary to It was very important that the Bar should be have the attention of the society directed to it. the Plymouth Law Society, since incorporated. I governed by a representative body. The Benchers Dr. Tompkins, D.C.L., was of opinion that, in trust the projected society may be more success.

were practically the nominees of the Lord Chan. dealing with matters of the description urged by ful than I was."

cellor for the time being. In Paris the advocates previous speakers, it was necessary to take a Mr. W. Merrick (Old Jewry).-"In common were governed by a representative body, and their broad view of the question. They were on the eve with many others I approve the objects of this discipline was most exact; in England the Bar of great changes, and that in regard to the society; and if you will kindly forward me a was governed by an irresponsible body, and its administration of justice the time had come when


taken up.

the two branches of the Profession were proposed honorary secretary of the Legal Practitioners

NEW TRIAL PAPER, to be amalgamated, and it was necessary to know Society, to say that numerous communications on

For Judgment. whether this fusion would be for the public good. the subject of the society which he has received Searle v. Laverick The better course, he thought, was to have an from solicitors since the commencoment of the

For Argument, appointed committee to inquire into the matter; present year, he has been obliged to leave un:

Moved Michaelmas Term, 1872. and if they could get annual committees of the answered owing to pressure, and the number of LONDON-Ionides v. Pender and another (part heard) Bar, appointed by the different Inns of Court, and suoh letters, and we are requested to add that the Bristol-London and South Western Bank v. Williams

[Hannen, J.-Mr Butt oomposed of attorneys and solicitors, might information in most cases asked for can be fully hold a conference wherein the questions with ascertained by a perusal of the above report of the

[Mellor, J.-Mr Lopes

Noved Hilary Term, 1873. regard to the duties and relations of the two meeting of the society.-Ed.]

MIDDLESEI-Angel v. Collins branches of the Profession might be discussed.

[Mellor, J.-Mr M. Chambers In the duty they owed to society and to the

LONDON—Parker v. The Imperial Royal Azienda Co.

Profession, he thought that the matter should be A MEETING of this society was held at the Law London-Morrison v. Thompson

[L. C. J.-Mr Day Library, Parliament-street, on Tuesday evening

[L. C. J.-Sir J. Karslaks Mr. Holroyd Chaplin said that they did not last . Henry Cook, Esq., the president, occupied LONDON-CorrypePatton

[L. C. J.-Mr Matthews know what the feeling in the House of Commons the chair. J. T. Woodhouse, Esq., solicitor, read

MANCHESTER- Taylor v. Greenhalgh would be regarding their proposed course of

[Mellor, J.-Mr Pope a paper on the “Judicature Act 1873," after MANCHESTER-Pendlebury v. Same action, nor did they know what feeling the press which a discussion took place on certain parts had towards them. He thought that there would be of the Act, in which J. Cook, Esq., Mr. A. M. MANCHESTER–Pearson v. Johnson and another

(Mellor, J.-Mr Pope

[Mellor, J.-Mr Pope would recommend that they should endeavour to thanks was passed to Mr. Woodhouse for his LIELERPOOL Batcheldor v. Lancashire

, and more serica enforce the existing acts before legislating paper, and to the president for presiding, and the

Railway further.

Tried during Term. Mr. Jencken, barrister, considered that in the meeting adjourned.

MIDDLESEX-Smith v. Palmer (Lush, J.-Mr Salter

MIDDLESEX-Tuson v. Parkbouse (Lush, J.-Mr Day absence of any knowledge on the subject, it was

MIDDLESEX-Scott v. The London General Omnibus difficult to discuss the question, the principal SOLICITORS' BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION.


[Lush, J.-Mr Giffard point being the repression of outsiders. The The usual monthly meeting of the board of di.

Moved Easter Term, 1873. most important question was to find out how the rectors of this association was held on Wednesday MIDDLESEX-Burnaby v. Earl [L. C. J.-Mr Garth law stood in relation to this subject, so that they last, the 7th inst., at the Law Institution, London. LONDON-Dean v. Stokes (L. C. J.-Mr D. Seymour should know properly how they stood.

Mr. Park Nelson in the chair ; the other directors MIDDLESEX-Toole v. Young (L. C. J.-Sir J. Karslake Mr. J. S. Salaman was fully aware of the present being. Messrs. Brook, Burton, Hedger, LONDON=bie Elbinger o. Armstrong

[Mellor, J.-Mr Day enormous number of quacks in the Profession, Rickman, Smith, Styan, and Torr: Mr. Eiffe,

[Lush, J.- Attorney-General complaints of them having frequently been made secretary. A sum of £122 was distributed in London-Kennard v. Payne [Quain, J.-Mr Murphy in the Law TIMES ; but, whilst being aware of grants of assistance to the families of three de- KENT-Harvey v. Lewis

[L.C.J.-Mr Biron this, he thought that in a society so young as the ceased solicitors ; eleven new members were SURREY-Bawden +. English present one, it was a little too premature to pre- admitted to the association. A communication

[Brett, J.-Mr Serjt. Ballantino pare a Bill to Parliament, having for its object from the Lord Chancellor was read, stating that NEWCASTLE-Robinson v. River Wear Commissioners the dealing with these outsiders. With regard to his Lordship would be happy to preside at the Durian–North-Eastern Railway Company v. Bowman

[Archibald, J.-Mr Herschell the practitioners in the Court of Bankruptcy, the ensuing anniversary festival of the association in

[Pollock, B.- Mr Holker members of this society should first read the June next; and other general business was trans- DURHAM-Oliver v. North-Eastern Railway Company existing law on the subject, and then act accord acted.

[Pollock, B.-Mr Holker ingly. They were not quite prepared that evening,

LIVERPOOL-Siven v. Heineman he thought, to discuss what form the proposed ARTICLED CLERKS' SOCIETY.

[Archibald, J.-Mr Herschell

LIVERPOOL-Doughty v. Milnourn Bill should take, and he would suggest that the A MEETING of this society was held at Clement's

[Archibald, J.-Mr C. Russell matter for the present be deferred.° °If such a Bill Inn Hall on Wednesday, the 7th Jan. Mr. S. LIVERPOOL—Sidley o. Longrigg was proved to be absolutely necessary, he did Chester in the chair. Mr. Castle opened the sub

[Archibald, J.-Mr R. G. Williams not think it could be placed in better hands than ject for the evening's debate, viz. : “ That the NOTTINGHAM-Topham v. Bettney the chairman's. (Applause.) general powers of licensing are not satisfactorily NOTTINGHAM-Clayton v. Stapleford Colliery Company

(Denman, J.-Yr Field The Chairman said that there must be some exercised by magistrates.' The motion was car.

[Denman, J.-Mr D. Seymour thing definite done if they wanted to be practical, ried by a majority of one.

LINCOLN-Howell v. Copland [Bovill, L.C.J.-Mi Field and they must not be content with only talking

LEEDS-Hirst v. Roebuck [Bovill, L.C.J.-MrManisty over these matters.

LEEDS-Sneesley v. Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Mr. Wingfield referred at length to what he PROMOTIONS AND APPOINT- LEEDS-Sturdy v. Sanderson

[Bovill, L.C.J.-Mr Field called old grievances of the law stationers taking

[Denman, J.-Mr Field the bread from the mouth of the legal practi.N.B.-Announcements of promotions being in the nature


LEEDS-Reg. v. Inhabitants of Bradfield

[Denman, J.-Mr Field tioner. There was, he considered, quite sufficient

of advertisements, are charged 28. 6d, each, for which

LEEDS-Same v. Same

(Denman, J.-Mr Field law to prevent this if it were put into force.

postage stamps should be inclosed.

DEVON-Bentney v. Lumbard Mr. F. A. A. Rowland then proposed, and Mr.

[Pigott, B.-Mr H. T. Cole

Tried during Term. Webster seconded, a resolution to the effect that The Right Hon. Sir John Duke Coleridge, Knt., MIDDLESEX-Cooke v. Goodman

[Quain, J.-Mr Holl a sub.committee be appointed, with the view of Lord Chief Justice of Her Majesty's Court of MIDDLESEX–Bridges v. Barnsley considering whether it was necessary to initiate Common Pleas, has appointed Mr. Robert William

(Pigott, B.-Mr Bullen legislation upon the subject of quacks and other Litchfield, of Newcastle, Staffordshire, solicitor, MIDDLESEX-Heywood v. Pickering banes of the Profession; the sub-committee being to be a Commissioner for taking acknowledgments

[Pigott, B.-M: H, T. Cole and

MIDDLESEX-Waddell v. Wolfe Dr. Tompkins, Messrs. Charley Mantell , Rowland, of Deeds of Married Women, under the Fin

[Pigott, P.-Mr H, T. Coie Salaman, Webster, and C. Ford. Recoveries Act, for the county of Yorkshire.

Moved Trinity Term, 1873. The Chairman, in bringing forward the subject The Right Hon. Sir John Duke Coleridge, Knt., MIDDLESEX-Doulton v. Timms of the representative governing body of the Bar, Lord Chief Justice of Her Majesty's Court of

[Bramwell, B.-Mr Day said that it would be as well to have a memorial Common Pleas, has appointed Mr. Basil Edmund

Tried during Term.

MIDDLESEX-Finigan v. Fraser prepared, to be signed by the junior members of Greenfield, of Guildford, Surrey, to take affidavits the Bar.

[Bramwell, B.-Mr C. Russell The proposed representative body in the Court of Common Pleas.

MIDDLESEX-Block v. Pigott [Pigott, B.-Mr Pearce would be one in whom the Bar had confidence.

Moved Michaelmas Term, 1873. He was sure that Sir William Harcourt would

MIDDLESEX-Raper v. The London General Omnibus help them, and he had no doubt but that Lord THE COURTS AND COURT


[Quain, J.-Mr Day Selborne would also. The object would be the

MIDDLESEX-Kirkstall Browery Company v. Furness formation of a body to whom the calling of the


Railway Company

(Denman, J.-Yr. Price Bar would be entrusted, and who would have the SITTINGS AND CAUSE LIST IN AND AFTER

LONDON - Dudgeon v. Pembroke

[Blackburn, J.-Sir J. Karslake general management of the Inns of Court.


LONDON-Irlande v. Lavery

[Quain, J.-Mr. Holker Mr. Wingfield moved, Mr. Maloney seconded,

DURHAX-Lambert v. Madgshon and a proposition was carried to this effect.

(Quain, J.-Nr. Herschell. Mr. c.* Ford said it was a most important

Common Law Courts.

NEWCASTLE-Turnbull v. Murray matter that a deputation should be formed with.

[Brett, J.-Mr. Herschell out delay, to wait on the Lord Chancellor. Indeed,

Court of Queen's Bench,

NORTHUMBERLAND-Reg. v. The Inbabitants of Alnwick

[Quain, J.-Mr. Herschell he thought that it was of the first importance, and


CUMBERLAND-Sloan v. Holliday that there could not be any possible ovil, but much


(Quain, J.-Mr Herschell good likely to arise from this course. Relative to Tuesday

Jan, 13 Monday
Jan. 26 LANCASTER-Taylor v. Rushton

[Quain, J.-Mr Holkar the question of the modification of the present Monday


LIVERPOOL-Stephenson o. Corporation of Liverpool rules, practically preventing solicitors from No London sittings this Term,

(Quain, J.-Mr. C. Russell

LIVERPOOL-Jefferson v. Querner changing to the other branch, the Lord Chancellor,


Middlesex. he said, had written him a letter, from which he

(Quain, J.-Hr. C. Russell London,

Monday... gathered that he was favourable to a modification

LIVERPOOL-Ashcroft v. Crow Orchard Colliery Com.
Feb. 2 | Monday

Feb. 16

[Quain, J.-Mr. Herschell of the consolidated regulations upon the subject, Monday


LIVERPOOL-Francis and Company v. Eastwood

..Jan, 12 Motions and new trials and Sir George Jessel and the Lord Chief Justice

[Brett, J.-Mr. C. Russell Tuesday 13 Ditto

MONMOUTH-Pitman v. Williams of the Court of Common Pleas, and other eminent Wednesday 14 Ditto

[Archibald, J.-Mr Bosanquet men were also interested in the question; and he Thursday

15 Ditto

Devon-Mears v. Evans [L. C. B.-Mr H. T. Cole trusted that the worthy chairman would too, Friday

16 Special paper

CORNWALL-Tenby d. Rule [L. C. B.-Mr Collins interest himself in it. Mr. Ford said he had re

17 Crown paper

CORNWALL-Pender v. Hicks [L. C. B.-Mr Kingdon ceived many letters from distinguished members


19 Enlarged rules, motions, and BRISTOL-Ayles v. Maidment [L. C. B.-Mr Lopes of the Bar on the subject.

new trials

BRISTOL-Same v. Same [L. C. B.-Mr H.T. Cols Tuesday 20 Special paper

BRISTOL-Tasker v. Fielder [L, C. B.-Mr Prideaux It was then arranged that the secretary should Wednesday 21* Motions, new trials, and Crowa HERTFORD-Chapman v, Lapworth be authorised to communicate with the Lord


[Martin, B.-Mr J. Brown Chancellor relative to the reception of the deputa.

22 Motions and new triale

SURREY-Chasemore v. Turner

(Martin B.-Mr Garth tion on the several points which had engaged the

23 Special paper

SJRBEY-Kavanagh v. Kerkbam

(Martin, B.-Mr Da attention of the meeting; and that a circular Monday Saturday

SURREY-Mare v. Rony Martin, B.-Hon. A, Thesiger

26 Motions and new trials should be sent round to the Profession, Betting Tuesday,

SURREY-Pearson v. Lawson, S. & N. Co.

27 Special paper forth the objects of the society. Wednesday .........

[Pigott, B.-Mr Murphy 28 Motions and new trials

SURREY-Nicholls v. Chamberg A cordial vote of thanks was then passed to Mr. Thursday

29 Ditto

(Tigott, B.-Mr W. Williams Charley for presiding, which terminated the pro

30 Ditto

SURREY-Coyte v. Elptrick [Pigott. B.-Mr C. W.Wood ceedings.

31 Ditto

LEEDS-Marks v. Hick [Pollock, B.-Mr D. Seymour * On these days the Court of Queen's Bench will sit [We are requested by Mr. Charles Ford, the ' in two divisions, when motions are excluded.

Tried during Term.
MIDDLESEX-Lane v. Hanbury (Pigott, B.-Mr Prentic


24 Crown paper


[ocr errors]

MIDDLESEX-Dalrymple v. Low [Pigott, B.-Mr Pop. WARWICK-Same v. The Great Western Railway Com. Dauney v. Chatterton
MIDDLESEX-Stopher v. Townshend


Oleaga v. Castellain. Demurrer [Pollock, B.-Mr Horschell DEVOX-Halse v. Halder

Harper v. Dewey. Appeal MIDLLESEX-Lapage v. Kert

SUSSEX-Reg. v. The Visiting Justices of Lewes County Lindsay v. Dale. Demurrer
[Pollock, B.-Mr II, Matthews Gaol

Windus v. Flight. Demurrer
MIDDLESEX-Loveridge v. Hallward
DURHAN-Barnes v. Hutchinson

Caffin v. Lloyd. Special case
[Pollock, B.-Mr M, Chambers BRISTOL-Reg. v. The Guardians of Bedminster Union

Thursday, Jan. 22.
SOUTHAMPTON-Peninsula and Oriental Steam Company Uttley v. Todmorden Local Board. Demurrer

v. Holley
For Judgment.

Lovesy v. Stallard. Appeal
DEWSBURY-Eastwood v. Millar

Pope v. Tearle. Appeal
Hayward v. Newton
NORWICH -Reg. v. The Corporation of Norwich

Mavro v. Ocean Marine Insurance Company. Special
For Argument.
Board of Works for Poplar v. Love. Special case

Court of Common Pleas.

Storey v. Rawlings. Domurrer Coper, Scott. Demurrer


Same v, Kidsan, Demurrer Musgrave v. Inclosure Commissioners for England and

Middlesex, Wales. Special case

Monday, Jan. 26. Jones t. The Menai Company. Special case

Tuesday ............... Jan. 13 | Monday ............. Jan. 26
Wills v. Cohen. Appeal


Court of Exchequer.
Alsop v. The United Kingdom Omnibus and Tram Men

No London sittings this Term.

SITTINGS AT NISI PRIUS-IN TERM. Benevolent Association. Appeal


Middlesex. Wall v. The City of London Real Property Company.



Tuesday ............... Jan. 13 | Monday. ..... Jan. 26 Special case.

.Feb. 2 | Monday
..Feb. 16 Monday..

19 Prince v. Evans. Appeal


No London sittings this Term. Condliff v. Condliff. Demurrer

Monday Jan, 12 Motions and now trials Town v. Shenton. Appeal

Peirce v. Corf. Appeal

13 Ditto


London. 14 Ditto

Monday Tayler v. The Great Eastern Railway Company. Appeal | Wednesday

Feb. 2 | Monday

Feb. 16 London and Provincial Bank o, Roberts. Demurrer

15 Ditto

Omen r. Wright, Demurrer


16 Ditto
17 Ditto

Jones v. Palmer, Demurrer

Jan. 12 Motions per new trials 19 Special paper


13 Per motions and new trials Mid-Wales Railway Company v. Cambrian Railway Monday

20 Motions and new trials Tuesday

Wednesday 14 Motions and new trials Company. Special case

21 Ditto Wednesday


15 Ditto Jefferson v. Querner. Demurrer Thursday

16 Ditto
22 Special paper

To be argued with Nero Trial,

23 Motions and new trials


17 Ditto Lentham v. Bank. Appeal

24 Ditto


19 Special paper Monday Coyte v. Elptrick, Demurrer

26 Special paper


20 Motions and new trials
To be argued with now Trial.

27 Motions and new trials

Wednesday ...... 21 Special paper
Wednesday 28 Ditto


22 Motions and new trials Dudgeon v. Pembroke. Demurrer



23 Ditto

To be argued with new Trial,

30 Ditto


24 Ditto Grant v. Budd. Demurrer

31 Ditto


26 Special paper

27 Motions and new trials Cos r. Leigh. Special case

• The Court of Common Pleas will, when convenient, Tuesday Lane r. Hanbury. Demurrer

28 Ditto sit in two divisions.

Wednesday Isnaridi r. Watts. Demurrer



29 Ditto Brunninghans v. Manchester, Sheffield, and Liverpool


30 Ditto

Enlarged Rules, Railway Cempany. Demurrer


31 Ditto Ianaridi v. Watts. Demurrer Quartley v. Timmins


Court of Exchequer will, when convenient, sit Parisot v. Palmer Wood r. May. Appeal

in two divisions. Re an Attorney (Ex parte Rayment) and others Joseph v. Folroyd. Demurrer

PEREMPTORY PAPER. Walsh v. Walley. Appeal

For Judgment.

To be called on the first day of Term after Motions, Stanton ». Nourse. Demurrer

v. Alsop

and to be proceeded with the next day, if necessary, Green r. Reade. Appeal Miller v. David

before Motions.
Megrath v. Gray

Lord v. Price

[Mr. Cohen-Mr. Myburgh-Mr. Gully
Gray v. Megrath
For Judgment.

For Argument.

NEW TRIAL PAPER. Emanuel v. Bridger

Moved Easter Term, 1873.

For Judgment.
For Argument.
LONDON-Anderson v. Morice (part heard)

Nathangon v. Haarblecher
Feast v Lorymer

Rees v. Forbes

[Brett, J.--Sir J. Karslake Cooper v. Mr. T. Salter, Mr. Michael Sutcliffe, Mr. | LONDON-Lyle v. Wormacott idemurrer to argued with

For Argument.
Philbrick, Mr. Merewether

[Brett, J.-Mr C. Russell

Moved Michaelmas Term, 1872.
Malden u. The Great Northern Railway Company, Mr. LONDON—Daniels v. Harris [Brett, J.-Sir J. Karslake GUILDFORD-Philips r. Hornstedt

LONDON-Freeth v. Burr
[Brett, J.-Mr Garth

[Mr, Hawkins, Q.C.-Mr. Garth
LONDON-Petrococchino v. Bott

Stand over.
For Judgment.

[Brett, J.-Mr Thesiger
Reg. c. Green
LONDON-Austin r. Board of Bethnal Green

Moved Easter Term, 1873. Vestry of St. Mary's, Islington v. Barrett

(Denman, J.-Mr Giffard MonYOUTH-Evans v. The Newport Dry Dock Co. LONDON -Miles v. Lowman [Denman, J.-Mr Willis

(Honyman, J.-Mr. H. Mattheus. For Argument. LONDON-Dothie v. Daw

Stand over.
MIDDLESEX-Reg. v. Tbe Guardians of Stepney Union

(Denman, J.-Mr Serjt. Robinson
NORFOLK-Same v. Middle Level Commissioners
GLAMORGAN-Horriss c. Thomas [Lush, J.-Mr Giffard

Moved Michaelmas Term, 1873.
Board of Works

Moved Trinity Term, 1873.

MIDDLESEX-Wilson v. The Metropolitan Railway Com.

p3ly CAMBRIDGE-Bowers v. Brnyard MIDDLESEX-Benjamin v. Storr

[Bramwell, B.-Mr Garth LONDOX-Moson r, Colby

[Hooyman, J.-Mr Torr CAMBRIDGE-Reg. v. Overseers of Haslingfield

[L. C. B.-Mr Giffard

WINCHESTER-Jenvey v. Styring WABWICK-Reg. v. Church wardens of Sutton Coldfela MIDDLESEX-Nagee v. Lavell (Houyman, J.-Mr Colo

[E. Stephens, Q.C.- Mr Collins WARWICK-Reg. v. Church wardens of Parish of Aston

Moved Michaelmas Term, 1873.

EXETER-Browse v. Badocock (L. C. B.-Mr H. T. Colo and Assessment Committee of Aston Union MIDDLESEX-Hammoud v. Vestry of St. Pancras

BODMIN-Mill v. Hawker (L. C. B.-Mr H. T. Cole BEBK3-Harding 0. Headington

[Bovill, L. C. J.-The Attorney General

BRISTOL-Everett v. Wilking (L. C. B.-Mr Lopes BEDFORD-Reg. . The London and North-Western MIDDLESEX-WELLER v. London, Brighton, and South

LEWES-Cook v. Osborne

(Pigott, B.-Mr Day Railway Company

Coast Railway [Bovill, L. C. J.-Mr D. Soymour CROYDON -Cave v. Wateror [Martin, B.-Mr Willis BEDFORD-Same o. Same MIDDLESEX-Mansell v. Clements

CROYDON-Gale v. Livermore LIVERPOOL-Liverpool Tramway Company v. Mayor,

[Denman, J.-Mr Griffiths CROYDON -Same v. Same

[Pigott, B.- Mr Murphy

[Pigott, B.-Mr Willis &c., of Borough of Liverpool MIDDLESEX-McLachlan v. Brain

AYLESBURY-Phipps o. Great Western Railway Com. YORK-Gallimore v. Goodall

(Honyman, J.-Mr Barnard


[Cleasby, B.--Mr Bulver CARNARVON-Owen v. Parsons and Roberts MIDELESEX-Kelly v. Patterson

BEDFORD-Woodroffe v. Davison STAFFORD-Reg. o. Blackburn

[Honyman, J.-Mr M. Moir

(Cleasby, B.-Mr Bulver Devon-Mullins v. Collins LONDON-Gunn v. Roberts

NORWICY-Makins v. London and NorthWestern Rail. CARDIGAN-Evans v. Smith

[Bovill, L. C. J.-Mr C. Russell

way Company

[Bramwell, B.-Mr Metcalf. YORK-Reg. v. Local Board for District of Oxhenhope LONDON-Applebee v. Percy

WARWICK-Vaughton r. Same (Honyman, J.-Mr Field BOLTOX-Wilson v. Cunliffo

[Honyman, J.-Mr Willoughby LEEDS-Wood v. Wood [Pollock, B.-Mr D. Seymour WORCESTER-Maund v. Mason LONDON—Claridge v. Rumbolt

LEEDS-Harrison v. London and North-Western Rail. LIVERPOOL-Allen v. Church wardens of Liverpool

[Hongman, J.-Mr Grantham

way Company

[Pollock, B.-Mr D. Seymour KENT-Caballero v. Lewis

MANCHESTER-Johnson v. Appleby (Brett, J.-Mr Pope LEEDS-Priesliy v. Dyson [Pollock, B.--Mr Field LASCASHIRE-Overseers of Bootle-cum-Linacre v. Clerk MANCHESTER-Abbott v. Bates (Quain, J.-Mr Herschell LEEDS-Simeon v, Dewburgt [Pollock, B.-Mr Field of the Peace for Lancaster NOTTINGHAM-Smith v. Egington

LEEDS-Sawdon v. Andrew [Pollock, B.-Mr Field. KENT-Redgrave v. Lee

(Honyman, J.-MT D. Seymour LEEDS–Naylor v. Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway LIVERPOOL Inman v. Derby Union

LEEDS--Brown v. Hall

[Pollock, B.-Mr Price

[Pollock, B.-Mr Field DEWSBURY-Pitt v. Millar

BRISTOL-Green v. Heatley (L. C. B.-MT H. T. Cole LEEDS--Ryder v. Jennings. [Pollock, B.-Mr. Compton SOMERSET-Ling v. Warry and others BRISTOL-Tudgay v. Sampson

RuTuin-Williams v. Great Western Railway Company, MIDDLESEX-Reg. v. St. Leonard's Shoreditch

[Mr F. Stephens, Q.C.-Mr A. T. Cole

[Keating, J.-Mir M. Lloyd METROPOLITAN POLICE DISTRICT-Marwick v. Codlin BEDFORD-Millington v. Griffiths

DURHAM-Jackson v. Leeman. BOLTON--Cameron v. Foy

[Bramwell, B.-Mr O'Malley

[Quain, J.-Sir J. Karslake BOLTON-Gaskell u. Bayley NORTHAMPTON-Hancock v. Plant

NEWCASTLE-Taylor v. Holland. BIRYINGHAM - Reg. v. The Guardians of Worcester

[Bramwell, B.-Mr Merewether

LQuaid, J.-Mr Herschell
CROYDON-Maggs r. Barnes [Pigott, B.-Mr Willis

CARLISLE-Williamson v. Bain.
DEFON - Dyer v. Park
CROYDON-Bartlett v. Green (Pigott, B.-Mr Cock

[Quain, J.-Mr Herschell CAKSEIRE-Reg. v. The Guardians of Runcorn


MANCHESTER–Nield v. London and North Western LANCASHIRE-Knight v. Halliwell


Railway Company. [Brett, J.-Mr Herschell BOLTON-Gaskell v. Ormrod

LIVERPOOL-Bain v. Stanford and Levison. [Brett, J.Easer-Vance v. Wilson Monday, Jan. 19.-For Argument.

Mr. Holkor BRIGHTON-Duddell v. Black Phillips v. Millar. Special case

LIVERPOOL-Same v. Same. (Brett, J.-Mr Herschell STAFFORD-Smart v. Pessoll Williams and another v. Heales. Special case

LIVERPOOL-Smalley v. Lancashire and Yorkshire Rail. GLAMORGAN-Davies v. Harvey

Lyle v. Wormacott. Demurrer YORKSHIRE-Bateson v. Oddie (To be Argued with Rule for New Trial.)

way Company: (Brett, J.-Mr Herschell LANCASHIRE - Rideout v. Jenkinson Hendricks v. Australian Insurance Company. Special LIVERPOOL -- Radley v. London and North Western

Railway Company. [Brett, J.-Mr Herschell BIRMINGHAM-Reg. 8. The Guardians of Cheltenham

LIVERPOOL- Bamlet v. Picksley
Clifford v. Hoare. Special case.

[Quain, J.-Mr Aston

LIVERPOOL--Meck v. Pyman
CORSWALL-Hampton v. Rickard
Fry and another v. Lloyd. Special case.

[Quain, J.-Mr Herschell

STAFFORD-Smith v. Bennett
ST88EI-Reg. v. Goodall
Nelson v. Association for Protection of Commercial

[Denman, J.-Mr Huddleston SUSSEI--Same v. Same

Interests. Special case

STAFFORD-Moss v. London and North-Western and BRECENOCKSHIRE-Same v, The Guardians of Conway Bows v. Fenwick.. Appeal

Great Western Railway Companies
Summers v. The City Bank. Demurrer

(Denman, J.-Mr A. 8. Hill MIDDLESEX-Same v. The Guardians of Norwich IncorCole v, North Western Bank (Limited). Special case

STAFFORD-Hiort v. Bott [Archibald, J.-Mr Huddleston

Thursday, Nov. 13.
CHESHIRE-Roberts v. Egerton
Rhodes v. Airedaile Drainage Commissioners. De-

Moved after 4th day of Michaelmas Term.
AXGLESEY-Reg. v. Williams.

MIDDLESEX-Street 1. The Society of Licensed Vic. murrer EITER-Same v. Sandford Faulkg v. Tremaro. Appeal


[Pollock, B.-Mr Torr DERBY-Same v. The Treasurer of Matlock Turnpike Melhado v. P. A. and N. 'H. and B. Railway Company. MIDDLESEI–Trevitt v. Spick (Cleasby. B.-Mr Care Demurrer

MIDDLESEX-Toy v. Langton [Cleasby, B.-Mr Finlay








ALMOND, CLARK, carpenter, Westow-st, Upper Norwood. Pet.
For Judgment,

Dec. 31. Jan. 20, at eleven, at the Temperance coffee house,

Westow-st, Upper Norwood Barrows v. Green

BARFIELD, SAMUEL, architectural sculptor, Leicester, and Niebuhr v. Kraushaar

Humberstone. Pet. Dec. 30. Jan. 15, at twelve, at offices of Spoor v. Green

Sol. Harvey, Leicester Sydenay v. Michael

BALLS, HAROLD GRIFFIN, currier, Cambridge. Pet. Dec. 31.

Jan. 16, at two, at ottice of Sols. Ellison and Burrows, Cam-
For Argument.

Downing v. Mowlem. Special case. To stand over BARLOW, ROBERT, grocer, Preston, Pet. Dec. 31. Jan. 16, at
Waugh v. The North British Railway Company. De-

two, at office of Sol. Taylor, Preston murrer. To stand over

BEER, HERBERT EDWARD, wine merchant, Deal. Pet. Dec. 30.

Jan. 16, at one, ut office of Doyle and' Edwards, Carey-st, Granville v. Finch. Special case. To be restated

Lincoln's inn. Sol. Delasaux, Canterbury Whitehouse v, The Birmingham Canal Company. De- BELL, EDWARD, bricklayer. March. Pet. Dec. 30. Jan. 21, at murrer. To stand over

twelve, at the County Court house, March, Sol. Dawbarn, jun.,

March Sear v. Green. Demurrer. Part heard. To stand over

BIGGS, CHARLES, builder, Charterhouse-la. Pet. Dec. 30. Jan Davis v. Webster. Demurrer. Part heard. To stand 28, at three, at office of Sol. Heathfield, Lincoln s-inn-fields over

BOWER, DAVID FARRER, iron manufacturer, Leeds. Pet. Dec. Hendry and another v. Dyke, Bart. Demurrer, To

31. Jan, 15, at twelve, at othce of Sol. Pullan, Leeds stand over

BROWN, THOMAS, draper, Cheltenham. Jan. 19, at three, at

offices of Sol. Wheeler, Cheltenham Boden v. Levick. Demurrer. To stand over

BULLEY, WILLIAM THOMAS, carpenter, Great Yarmouth. Pet. Lloyd's Banking Company v. Blech. Demurrer. Το Dec. 29. Jan. 23, at twelve, at office or Blake, accountant, Great stand over

Yarmouth Sol, Palmer, Great Yarmouth

CHAWNER, JOHN, hosiery manufacturer, Leicester. Pet. Dec. Thorn v. Mayor of London

31. Jan. 27, at eleven, at office of Sols. Freer, Reeva, and Moul v. Moul. Demurrer

Blunt, Leicester

DUNBOBIN, RICHARD, ioiner, Warrington. Pet. Dec. 31. Jan. 16, Copin v. Cressman

at three, nt offices of Davies and Co., Warrington. Sols. Same v. Iarchow

Davies and Brook, Warrington Same v. Sevastapulo

ELLIS, Joun, bootmaker, Liverpool. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 14, at Same v. Evans

three, at Gibson and Bolland, accountants, 10, South John-st,

Liverpool. Sols. Harvey and A'sop, Liverpool
Same v. Andrew

EVANS, DAVID MORIBR, newspaper proprietor, Serjeant's-inn,
Same v. Rayner

Fleet-st, Birchin-la, Finch-la, and South Hackney. Pet. Dec. Same v. Adamson

30. Jan. 12, at the London tavern. Bishopsgate-st, in lieu of Same v. Same

the place originally named

EVANS, EDWIx, victualler, Slough. Pet. Dec. 30. Jan. 14, at Same v. Strachan

three, at the Crown hotel, Slough. Sol, Froggatt, Argyll-st William v. Prothero. Special case

FAGG, GEORGE QUESTED, boot maker, Holloway-rd. Pet. Dec.
Laidlow v.
Hastings Pier Company. Special case

18. Jan. 12, at two, at office of Sol. Vernede, Craven-st, Strand Martin v. Smith.

GOODWIN, EDWARD MORTON, architect, Ferryside. Pet. Dec. 27.

Jan. 28, at twelve, at the Guildhall, Carmarthen, Sol. Soames,
Blanchet v. Powell Llanwit Colleries Company. De- New-inn, Strand

HADEN, JOHN, lamp manufactarer, Birmingham. Pet. Dec. 29. Shackleton v. Tindall. Demnrrer

Jan. 13, at three, at offices of Sols. Wright and Marshall, Bir

mingham Sorby v. Gordon. Special case

HAYDOCK, JOHN, draper. Blackburn. Pet. Dec. 31. Jan. 16, at Biddulph v. Bingham. Appeal

three, at offices of Sol. Darley, Blackburn Bain v. Stanford and Levison. Demurrer

HAYHURST, JOHN, victualler, Colne. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 20, at Same v. Same.

three, at office of Sols. Southern and Nowell, Burnley

HENSMAN, JOHX, maobinist, Ampthill, Pet, Dec. 24. Jan. 9, at * To stand over till issues in fact tried.

at four, at office of Sol. Stimson, Bedford
HODGE, ALFRED, draper, Brotton. Pet. Dec. 31. Jan. 19, at

two, at office of Gibson, Newcastle. Sol. Pybus, jun., New-
Exchequer Chamber.


HOWARD, DAVID, and BUCKLEY, JAMES HARROP, woollen manuThis court will sit on Tuesday, Jan, 13, at ten o'clock. facturers, Saddleworth. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 16, at three, at the QUEEN'S BENCH ERRORS.

George hotel, Huddersfield. Sols, Messrs. Fox, Manchester

IVIMEY, EDWARD, tailor, Cornhill, and Newington causeway,
For Judgment.

and Liverpool-rd, Islington. Pet. Dec. 19. Jan. 15, at two, at Churchwardens of Wigan v. Public Works Loan Com. the Masons'-hall tavern, Masons'-avenue, Basinghall-st. Sol. missioners


Jan. 19, at
JACKSON, JOHN, victualler, Croft. Pet. Dec. 31.
For Argument.

three, at offices of Davies and Co. Warrington. Sols. Davies Kellock v. Enthoven

and Brook, Warrington COMMOX PLEAS ERRORS.

KAY, ROBERT, plumber, High-st, Hampstead, Pet. Dec. 18.

Jan. 13, at two, at offices of Sol. Preston, Newgate-st
For Judgment.

KESTERTON, RICHARD, gun case manufacturer, Birmingham.
Pegge v. The Guardians of Lampeter Union

Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 19, at twelve, at office of Sol. Powell, Bir

mingham For Argument.

LEATON, HENRY, printer, Leicester. Pet. Dec. 30. Jan. 19, at Winch v. The Conservators of the River Thames

eleven, at the Lion and Dolphin inn, Leicester. Sol. Petty, Same v, Same

Leicester Fowler v. Lock

LENNOX, HENRY, plasterer, Nottingham. Pet. Dec. 27. Jan. 16,

at twelve, at office of Sol. Belk, Nottingham Ellis v. The Great Western Railway Company

LETHBRIDGE, SARAH, shoemaker, Crediton. Pet. Dec. 30. Jan. Cowan v. The Imperial Ottoman Bank

17, at eleven, at the ship inn, Crediton. Sol. Floud, Exeter Imperial Ottoman Bank v. Cowan

MACKERETH, JAMES, joiner, Kendal. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 15, at

half past eleven, at the Board Room, Market-pl, Kendal. Sol. Rodocanachi v. Elliott

Thomson, Kendal
Sowerby v. Smith

MASON, MARTHA, farmer, Waltham Holycross. Pet. Dec. 29.

Jan. 13, at twelve, at offices of Sols. Jessop and Gough, Wal-
For Judgment.

tham Abbey

MEAGER, JOSEPH CHARLES, upholsterer, Ventnor, Isle of Wight. Riche o. The Ashbury Railway Carriage and Iron Com- Pet. Dec. 30. Jan. 15, at two, at office of Sol. Urry, King's-rd, pady

Gray's-inn, London
Butcher v. Savory

MORGAN, GEORGE JOSEPH, bootmaker, Chippenham-ter, Har.
For Argument.

row-rd, also Chichester-ter, Canterbury.rd, Kilburn. Pet, Dec.

22, Jan, 12, at two, at office of Sol. Marshall, Lincoln's-inn. Marchant u. The Lee Conservancy Board

fields Daniels 0. The Stepney Union

OWEN, EDWARD, farmer, Ffriddiesa, par. Cerrigydruidion. Pet. Smith v. Fletcher

Dec. 30. Jan. 15, at twelve, at the Saracen's Head hotel, Cer. Same v, Same.

rigydruidion. Sol. James, Corwen

Pet. Dec. 31.

PAINE, ALFRED, butcher, Essex-rd, Islington. Phelps v. Hornstedt

Jan. 16, at twelve, at office of Sols. Sole, Turner, and Turner, Liver Alkali Works Company v. Johnson


PEACOCK, JOHN THOMAS, victualler, Jamaica-rd, Bermondsey.
Court of Criminal Appeal.

Pet Dec. 30. Jan. 16, at two, at office of Sole. Messrs. Beard,

This court will sit on Saturday, Jan, 24, at ten o'clock. PROUDLOVE, ANNIE, hair dresser, Newark. Pet. Dec. 97. Jan. 19,

at twelve, at the Ram hotel, Newark. Sol. Belk, Nottingham Spring Circuits of the Judges chosen on Thursday, RANDS, ELIZABETH, widow, dealer in boots, Ventnor. Pet. Dec.

. Jan. 15.

REW, ROBERT MAY, Regent-st. Pet. Dec. 23. Jan. 13, at eleven,

at office of Sols. Davies, Campbell, Reeves, and Hooper, War:, Regent-st THE GAZETTES.

ROBERTS, WILLIAM, farmer, Hendrellyean. Jan. 17, at twelve,

at the Cymro inn, Llangwm. Sol. James, Corwen
ROYDHOUSE, JOHN, Hull. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 13, at three, at

office of Sol. Hearfield, Hull
SABER, LEWIS, out of business, Liverpool. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan.

16, at three, at offices of Sol. Nordon, Liverpool
Gazette, Jan. 2.

SAVAGE, SAMUEL, shoemaker, Christchurch. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan.
To surrender in the Country.

14, at three, at office of Miller, Bristol. Sol, Sharp, Christchurch CARTER, ROBERT, jeweller, Birmingham. Pet. Dec. 23. Reg. SHIPLEY, WILLIAM SAMUEL, clerk in holy orders, Plungar. Pet. Chauntler. Sur. Jan, 19

Dec. 30. Jan. 23, at twelve, at the Guildhall tavern, Gresham.
DENTZ, JAMES, tobacconist, Hull. Pet. Dec. 29. Reg. Phillips. Bt. Sol. Thurman, Nottingham
Sur. Jan. 15

SIX PRON, JOHN FREDERIC, builder, Leicester. Pet. Dec. 29.
HOCKZEMA, DIRK GROENWOLD, and VAN OMMEBEX, JOHAN. Jan. 19, at twelve, at offices of Sol. Owaton, Leicester
NES. foreign_agents, Manchester. Pet. Dec. 30. Dep-Reg. SLADEN, ELI, bootmaker, Swansea. Pet. Dec. 23. Jan. 12, at two,
Lister. Sur. Jan. 22

at the Stag and Pheasant, Leicester. Sol. Lewis, Swansea LABGE, JAMES, innkeeper, Spalding Moor. Pet. Dec. 30. Reg. SMITH, JAMES, farmer, Old Weston. Per. Dec. 24. Jan. 20, at Phillips. Sur. Jan. 16

two, at offices of Sols. Messrs. Richardson, Thrapston SADLER, HARVEY HENRY, beerseller, Heybridge. Pet. Dec. 23. STANSFIELD, ELIZA, grocer, Springfield. Pet. Dec. 20. Jan. 5, at Reg. Gepp. Sur. Jan. 19

eleven, at office of Sols. Watson and Dickons, Bradford Gazette, Jan, 6.

STRACHAN, THOMAS MAIRE, clerk in holy orders, Bristol. Pet To surrender at the Bankrupts' Court, Basinghall-streec. Dec. 31. Jan. 15, at one, at Messrs. Williams, accountants, THOMPSON, JOHN, upholsterer, Edgware-rd, and WALKER, Bristol. Sols. Brittan, Press, and Inskip, Bristol

TIOMAS. commercial clerk, Langton-rd, Brixton, Pet. Jan. THOMPSON, WILLIAM OSWELL, clerk in holy orders, Slough. Pet.
1. Reg. Pepyn. Sur. Jan. 20

Dec. 29. Jan. 15, at twelve, at the Guildhall coffee-house, Gres-
To surrender in the Country.

ham-st. Sols. Barrett and Dean, Slough
CUSHING, JAMES, builder, Chiswick. Pet. Dec, 31. Reg. Ruston. TRIEB, JEAN, comniission agent, Noble-st. Pet. Dec. 30. Jan.
Sur. Jan. 24

29, at one, at office of Sols. Van Sandau and Cumming, King-et, DANIELA, GEORGE SAMUEL, innkeeper, Warwick. Pet. Jan. 2.

Cheapside Reg. Campbell. Sur. Jan. 17

TURNER, JOHN, farmor, Edwalton. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 20, at LAWTON, JÄRVES, grocer, Glossop. Pet. Jan. 3. Reg. Hall, Sur.

twelve, at office of Sol. Brittle, Nottingham Jan. 22

TURRELL, ALFRED, builder. Whitehead', Chelsea. Pet. Dec.
TOZER, JOHN, bootmaker, Totnes. Pet. Jan. 3. Reg. Pearce. Sur. 23. Jan. 9, at three, at office of Graham, accountant, John-st,
Jan. 19

Bedford-row. Sol. Turner, Lawrance-la
WOODRUFF. THOMAS FREDERICK, grocer, Deal. Pet. Deo 81. TYRRELL, JAMES, clothier, Harrow-on-the-Hill, Pet. Dec. 20.
Reg. Callaway. Sur. Jan. 23

Jan. 16, at two, at offices of Sols. Clapham and Finch, Bishops-

Gazette, Dec. 30.

WARR, JOSEPH, retail brewer, Tipton. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 13, at
OLDHAM, JOUX, grocer, King's Lynn. Dec. 14, 1872

eleven, at office of Sol. Travis, Tipton
WRITE, ISAAC ROBERT, blacksmith, Wroot. Pet. Dec. 16. Jan.

13, At twelve, At offoe of Sols. Shirley and Atkinson. Doncaster
WILKINSON, HENRY, mechanic, Burnley. Pet. Dec, 29. Jan. 17,

Gazette, Jan. 6.
ALLSWORTH, RALPH JOSEPB, grocer, Brompton. Pet. Jan, 2.

Jan. 21, at three, at offices of Sol. Basset, Brompton and

ANDERSON, EDWIN, tobacconist, High-st, Islington. Pet. Dec.

22. Jan. 17, at two, at offices of Sol. Steadman, Coleman-st
bridge. Pet. Jan. 2. Jan. 20, at three, at offices of Nicholson,
London-bridge Railway-approach, Southwark. Sols. Ellison
and Burrows, Cambridge
BLACKBURN, JOHN, joiner, Barnfield. Pet. Dec. 31. Jan. 20, at

eleven, at 30, Fore Bondgate, Bishop Auckland. Sol. Maw, jun. CADMAN, WILLIAM EMMOTT, and CADMAN, WALLACE, print

cutters, Lister-mews, Holloway-rd, Pot. Jan. 1. Jan. 16, at

twelve, at offices of Sol. Chubb, Bucklersbury CHAMBERLAIN, HUGH GOODMAN, fancy hosiery manufacturer,

Leicester. Pet. Jan. 1. Jan. 19, at three, at office of Sol. Owston,

CHEALE, JOHN, builder, Uckfield. Pet. Jan. 2. Jan. 17, at twelve,

at the Bear hotel, Cliffe
CHILDS, JONAH, builder, Haberdasher's-st, Hoxton. Pet. Dec.

31. Jan. 17, at eleven, at office of Booth, Lincoln's-inn-fields CLARK, WILLIAM ROBERT, cheesemonger, Westmoreland-rd,

Camberwell-rd. Pet. Jan. 2. Jan. 17, at two, at office of Sol.

Holmes, Eastcheap
DAVIES, WILLIAM JAMES, furniture dealer, Cardiff. Pet. Jan. 2.

Jan. 20, at two, at office of Barnard, Thomas, Clarke, and Co.,
accountants, Cardiff. Sol. Stephens, Cardifr
DAVIES, WILLIAM, late grocer, Swansea. Pet. Jan. 1. Jan. 2, at

three, at office of Sol. Morris, Swansea DIXON, RICHARD, miner, Brandon Colliery. Pet. Jan. 2. Jan.

28, at eleven, at the Station hotel, Durham. Sol. Brignall, jun.,

DU PRE, EDWARD, Clerk in Holy Orders, Northampton. Pet.

Dec. 19. Jan. 15, at twelve, at the Wentworth hotel, Peter

borough. Sol. Stapleton EALES, ELLEX, dealer in fancy goods, Birmingham, Pet. Dec.

29. Jan. 16, at twelve, at offices of Slade, accountant, 6, Cherry. st, Birmingham. Sol. Kennedy, Birmingham ESSER, AUGUSTUS, importer of fancy goods, Manchester. Pet.

Jan. 2. Jan. 21, at two, at office of Sol. Phillips, Manchester FREELING, JAMES EDWARD, gentleman, Bideford. Pet. Jan. 2.

Jan. 19, at twelve, at Bath House, Bideford. Sol. Smale GILBERTSON, RICHARD, baker, Liverpool. Pet. Jan. 3. Jan.

21, at three, at office of Sol. Ponton, Liverpool GIBSON, MARTHA, widow, Bishopston, par Horfield. Pet. Jan.

2. Jan. 21, at twelv, at office of Hancock, Triggs, and Co., public

accountants, Bristol. Sol. King, Bristol

Lynn. Pet. Jan. 2. Jan. 27, at two, at otlloe of Sol. Vernede,
Craven-st, Strand
HALL, HENRY JOHN, and DYER, JAMES, drysalters, Monckton

Combe. Pet. Jan. 3. Jan, 19, at one, at office of Sol. Wilton,

HERBERT, JOHN EDWARD, machine maker, Bradford. Pet. Jan.

1. Jan. 20, at eleven, at office of Sols. Peel and Gaunt, Brad.

ford HICKS, THOMAS, draper, Bristol. Pet. Jan. 3. Jan. 14, at

two, at office of Sol. Beckingham, Bristol HOLSTINS, NILS WILHELM, licensed beer seller, Falmouth.

Pet. Jan. 2. Jan. 20, at three, at office of Sols. Genn and

Nalder, Falmouth
HUNTER, LEONARD, hotel keeper, Worthing. Pet. Dec. 31. Jan.

22, as two, at offices of Clennell, solicitor, Great James-st, Bed.

ford.row. Sol. Brandreth, Brighton JAMES, JAMES FISON, baker, Ilfracombe. Pet. Jan. 2. Jan. 20,

at two, at offoe of Sol. Thorne, Barnstaple JEAVOXS, JOB, out of business, Dudley. Pet. Dec. 30. Jan. 15,

at twelve, at offices of Sol. Jaques, Birmingham JEPHCOAT, GEORGE, hosier, Birmingham. Pet. Jan. 2. Jan. 3,

at three, at office of Sols. Rowlands, Bagnall, and Rowlands,

JONES, HERBERT, bricklayer, Earnley. Pet. Jan. 1. Jan. 19, at

three, at ottices of Sol. Janman, Chichester
JONES, RICHARD, boot manufacturer, Birmingham. Pet. Jan. 1.

Jan. 20, at eleven, at office of Sol. Duke, Birmingham
JORDAN, FREDERICK POYNER, tailor, Gloucester. Pet. Jan. 3.

Jan. 22, at twelve, at the Bell hotel, Gloucester. Sol. Smith,

LEAKE, THOMAS, upholsterer, Preston. Pet. Jan. 1. Jan. 16,

at two, at Messrs. Watson, Auction Rooms, Fishergate-sti,

Preston. Sols. Cunlifle and Watson, Preston
MARRIOTT, JOSEPH, commercial clerk, Camberwell Neword.

Pet. Jan. 3. Jan. 20, at two, at offices of Sols. Mesars. Lindo,

King's Armsyd, Moorgate-st
MILLARD, JAMES DODDRELL, tailor, Cheltenham. Pet. Jan. 3.

Jan. 20, at three, at offices of Sol. Wheeler, Cheltenham MURRAY, JOHN, ironmonger, Manchester. Pet. Jan. 1. Jan. 16, at three, at the Swan inn, Manchester. Sol. Whitlow, Man.

chester NORTON, WILLIAM, butcher, Walsall. Pet. Jan. 3. Jan. 19, at

eleven, at office of Sol Stanley, Walsall
OAKES, THOMAS WILLIAM SMITH, merchant, Austin-friars, and

Calcutta. Pet. Jan. 3. Jan. 21, at twelve, at office of Harding,
Whinney and Co. Old Jewry. Sols. Johnson, Upton, and Budd,

ROSE, JOHN, timber dealer, New Church-rd, Camberwell., and

Union-rd, Rotherhithe. Pet. Jan. 3. Jan. 19, at three, st ofice

of Sol, Slvester, Great Dover-st, Southwark ROSE, WILLIAM, cordwainer, Lincoln. Pet. Jan. 1. Jan. 22, at

eleven, at offices of Jay, public accountant, Lincoln. Sol. Page, jun., Lincoln SATTERTHWAITE, SAMUEL, commission agent, Birmingham.

Pet. Jan. 2. Jan. 21, at two, at offices of Sols. Maher and Poncia,

SHACKLETON, JOHN FARRAR, stone agent, Goole. Pet. Jan. 2.

Jan. 23, at three, at office of Sols. Fernandes and Gill, Wak

field SIMPSON, JOSEPH FREDERICK, manufacturer of patent velvet,

Chorlton-upon-Medlock. Pet. Jan. 3. Jan. 21, at three, at offioe

of Sols. Minor, Manchester SMITHER, CHARLOTTE, grocer, Kew-rd, Richmond, and Chapel

st, Waterloo-st, Hammersmith. Pet. Dec. 23. Jan. 15, at three, at the Guildhall Coffee house, Gresham-st. Sols. Chipperfield and Sturt, Trinity-st, Southwark TAPPENDEN, EDWARD, draper, Torquay. Pet. Jan. 2. Jan. 28,

at twelve, at office of Sols. Messrs. Carter, Torquay TOWLE, JOSEPH, greengrocer, Hanley. Pet. Dec. 31. Jan. 15,

quarter past ten, at offices of Bol, Hollinshead, Tunstall TROIT, THOMAS, builder, Yarcombe Pet. Dec. 24. Jan. 15, at

one, at the D ake's Arms, Yaroombe. Sol. Tweed, Honiton WARD, ESTHER LEONARD, lodginghouse keeper, Scarborough.

Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 17, at eleven, at office of Sol. Williamson,

WILLIAMS, HENRY BULTIEL, upholsterer, Leamington. Pet.

Dec. 29. Jan. 19, at three, at office of Cooper, Craig, and Co.,
public accountante, Cheapside. Sols. Ashurst, Morris, and Co,
Old Jewry



The Official Assignees, &c., are given, to whom apply for the

D' Alterac, J. M. third. 138. &d. on old proofs, and first, second,
and third of 20s. At office of 0.A. Paget, Basinghall-st.-- Fairhall,
E. J. farmer, first, 68. od. At office of 0.A. Paget, Basinghall-st

Dykins, G. plumber, second and final. 4d. At Trust, H. Bolland, 10, South John-st, Liverpool-Heseltine, J. jun., grocer, 2. 3d. At Trust. W. Butcher, 73,, Manchester -- Hoalden, E. wool merchant, second, 28. At Trust. J. Routh, Royal Insurancebldgs, Park-row, Leeds

Orders of Discharge.

Gazette, Dec. 30.
SEAMAX, EDWARD CLEVELAND, attorney and solicitor, Kingston, Oakley-sq

Liquidations by Arrangement.

at eleven. At office of Sol. Baldwin, Burnley FIRST MEETINGS,

WORDINGHAM, JOHN, farmer, Old Bucker ham. Pet. Dec. 29.

Jan. 14, at two, at office of Sols. Winter and Francis, Norwich
Gazette, Jan. 2.

WORTHINGTON, ALFRED, photographer, Aberystwith. Pet. Dec.
ABRAHAM, CHARLES, general dealer, East Stonehouse. Pet. Dec. 23. Jan. 16, at twelve, at office of Balden, Southampton-bldgs,
29. Jan. 15, at eleven, at office of Sols. Elworthy, Curtis, and Sol. Jones, Aberystwish
Dawe, Plymnnuth

WOOTTON, WILLIAM, plumber, Shefford. Pet. Dec. 29. Jan. 14,
ADAMS, WILLIAM JAMES; ADANS, ALFRED WILLIAX; EDEN. at twelve, at the Inns of Court hotel, Holborn. Sol. Conquest,

BOROUGH, FREDERICK, merchants, formerly Benet's-pl, Grace. Bedford
churrh-st. Pet. Dec. 31. Jan. 14, at two, at the City Terrni. WRIGHT, JOHN, boot manufacturer, Denmark house, King's-pl,
nus hotel, South-Eastern Railway Station, Cannon-st. Sols. Commercial-rd-cast. Pet. Dec. 30. Jan. 19, at two, at ottice of
Campbell and Beaumont, Cannon-st

Sol. Chalk, Moorgate-st


BADDELEY.-On the 5th inst., at 28, Widmore-road, Bromley,

Kent, the wife of F. P. Baddeley, solicitor, of a daughter. BULLEN.-On the 27th ult., at 2, Belsize-road, South Hampstead the wife of E. U. Bullen, Esq., barrister-at-law, of a daughter.

ARMSTRONG.-On the 20th ult., at 7, Upper Wimpole-st, aged 77,

Benjamin John Armstrong, Esg., J.P. for the county of Middle-
sex and for Westminster, and Deputy-Lieutenant.

« EelmineJätka »