SOLICITORS' JOURNAL. INCORPORATED LAW SOCIETY. £200. AS TO FREEHOLDS AND COPYHOLDS. first After the fir-t £2000. MORTGAGOR'S of the Mortgagee's Ditto ditto Ditto ditto The Council is not prepared to suggest a scale for the remuneration of the Mortgagor's Solicitor on this class of securities Sales and Purchases. VENDOR'S MORTGAGEE'S £1 per cent. 1 per cent. the Mort PURCHASER'S For every £100 up to A sum equal to iths £3 per cent. And in addition THE letter of our correspondent, "A Solicitor of NOTES OF NEW DECISIONS. WILL-ERASURE - SUBSTITUTION - DepenDENT RELATIVE REVOCATION.-Where a testator attempts to substitute the name of one legatee for that of another by erasing the name of one and writing the name of the other in its place, if the alteration is not attested in accordance with the Wills Act, the court may receive evidence as to the original form of the will, and pronounce for it in that form. A will contained a bequest to my "sister Louisa," written over an erasure. There was no evidence as to when the erasure was made, but the court being of opinion, from extrinsic evidence, that the words erased were my niece Edith," and also that the alteration had been made in the mistaken belief that the bequest would be valid, granted probate, with the words "niece Edith " restored (In the goods of E. J. Maccabe, 29 L. T. Rep. N. S. 250. Prob.) : 66 SUIT BY WIFE FOR JUDICIAL SEPARATIONCRUELTY-PRIOR DEED OF SEPARATION-WIFE UNSUCCESSFUL-WIFE'S COSTS.-After the execution of a deed of separation the wife filed a petition for judicial separation on the ground of cruelty. She failed to establish cruelty and her petition was dismissed, but the court, being satisfied that her attorney had acted in the belief that she had a substantial case, allowed the wife's costs up to the amount for which security had been given in the registry: (Flower v. Flower, 29 L. T. Rep. N. S. 253. Div.). Brooke, Horace George, 2, Euston-square; Great Berk- Brown, Maurice, Peterborough; and 10, Serle-street, Budd, Samuel, Exeter-W. J. Battishill, Exeter Bulltord, Charles Edward, 29, Tavistock place, Tavi. Clark, Jonathan, the younger, 85, Guildford-street, street Collins, Charles, Firs, Rainhill, near Liverpool-T. Cumming, Alexander, 98, Warwick-street; -W. S. Yarrington, Ipswich. Cunliffe, Walter. Warrington; and 35, Lincoln's-innfiolds-J. F. Marsh, Warrington; J. R. Buckton, Warrington. Curling, Percy Bunce, 9, Durham-terrace, Westbourne- Davis, Charles Henry, 21. Great George-street, West- Dew, Griffith Davies, 10, King's-bench-walk-R. M. Dickson, George Herbert, Preston; and 43, Bedfordrow-J. B. Dickson, Preston. Dodd, Charles Walters, 6, Furnival's-inn-J. D. Finney, Dow, Edward Augustus. 30, Bedford-row-D. T. Miller, Durnfort, Francis Mount, 4, South-square, Gray's-inn; Edwards, John James. 84, Newgate-street-O. C. T. Edwards, Stanley, Lynn; and 2, Cursitor-street-F. R. Elliott, Albert Augustine, 17A, Whitehall-place-J. Mortgagor's Mortgagee's Vendor's Purchaser's Ferguson, Daniel Lawrence, Alford, Lincoln-F. J. Notices of admission for Michaelmas Term, 1873. Bean, Wm. Henry Rodbard, 16 Beauford terrace; 170, Bowling, Arthur Masterson Law, East Lodge, The Mall, Strand. Bowman, John Frederick, 5, Clifford-street, Bond-street Broadbent, Spencer, Liverpool-F. Broadbent, Bolton; J. P. Robinson, Liverpool Folkestone. Rhodes Alford. Fernell, Henry Geo. Tudor, Sheffield; and 9, Bedford- Ferbank, William, Newport-C. B. Fox, Newport. Foster, Edward Walker Webb, Ulster Villa, Leyton- Freeman, John Tilleard, 17A, Whitehall-place-J. Hopgood, 17A, Whitehall-place. Geare, Henry Cecil, 6. Raymond-buildings-C. P. Wood, 6, Raymond-buildings. Ghest, John, the younger, Manchester; and 2, Ellington-street, Islington-J. A. Foyster, Manchester; F. Weatherall, 7, King's Bench walk. Grey, Hubert Allen, 100, Cambridge street, Warwicksquare W. H. Duinan, 15, Bedford row; J. R. Fenwick, 12, Fenchurch street; C. G. G. Rushworth, 15, Bedford-row. Haines, George William, 10, Storey's-gate, Westminster Hamer, Henry, Liverpool-J. Rayner, Liverpool. Harman, Orlando George, 7, Gray's-inn-square—A. H. Harvey, Richard, 5, Barge-yard, Bucklersbury-C. Harvey, Henry Fairfax, Royston; and 9, Bedford-road Hastings, Alfred Gardiner, 23, John-street, Bedford row-E. Futvoye, 23, John-street. Hedger, Philip F. Frushard, 2, Ladbrooke-terrace, Hime, George, Liverpool-H. W. Collins, Liverpool; Hinton, Edmund, 3, Lilford-road, Camberwell; J. Hooper, F. Montgomery B., Exeter, and 55, Chancery- Jackson, Ernest Gratian, Belper-J. G. Jackson, James, Edward, 10, Royal-crescent, Notting-hill-J. S. Jennings, Frederick William, Portsea, and 34, Lime- Kennedy, Arthur, 26, Chancery-lane; T. Kennedy, 26, King, Edward, 1, Bedford-row, and Wirksworth-J. F. Langworthy, Frederick, Modbury, Devon-R. Andrews, Ledgard, John Armitage, Heaton Chapel, near Stock- Lindsell, Frederick R. Barber, Lyme Regis-R. Hill- Lucas Ernest F. Bourne, Louth-T. F. Allison, Louth. Meres, Frederick Augustus, 58, Millman-street; and fields. Minshall, Philip Henry, 106, St. Paul's-road, Camdentown; and Oswestry-W. Shaen, 8, Bedford-row; C. Minshall, Oswestry. Mould, John Clarke, Melton Mowbray-Messrs. La- Nash, William, 142, Rye-lane, Peckham-rye; and 45, needle-street. Northgraves, Charles, Kingston-upon-Hull-R. H. Dawson, Kingston-upon-Hull. O'Brien, Lucius Melville, Southampton-T. Harrison Owen, Morris, Carnarvon-R. D. Williams, Carnarvon. Peddar, Sydney Hampden, 41, Finsbury-circus; and 7, circus. Pinsent, Richard Alfred, Church-road, Essex-road, Islington; aud 9, Bedford-row-T. S. James, Birmiugham. Pomeroy, Edward Bovce, Wymondham-E. P. Clarke, Wymondham; J. White, Wymondham. Porter, Thomas Simpson, Bedford-L. Jessopp, Bedford. Norwich Preston, Donald William, 19, Norfolk-street, Strand; Norwich; and 14, Lincoln's-inn-fields-A. Preston, Prichard, Iltyd Moline, 57, Granville-park, Blackheath; and 43, Chancery-lane-R. Cunliffe, 43, Chancery. Pritchard, Wm. Benning, Beaumont-road, Wimbledonpark-A. J. Pritchard, 7, Knight Rider-street; H. J. Francis, 36, Lincoln's-inn-fields. lane. Quelch, Francis, Everton, Liverpool-S. D. Worship, Liverpool. Quilter, Charles, 140, Tufnel-park-road-J. Beaumont, 53, Coleman-street. Rawlinson, Francis, Dalton-in-Furness-J. Poole, Ul. verstone. Reeves, Edmund Whitelock, Heathfield, Wimbledoncommon-H. W. Reeves, 44, Lincoln's-inn-fields. Rickards, Arthur Torriano, Putney; and 39, Old Broadstreet-H. Heald, 23, Throgmorton-street; R. H. Hill, 39, Old Broad-street. Robinson, John, Sunderland-W. S. Robinson, Sunderland. Rundle, Richard Albert, Plymouth; and 3, Mylne street, Mydoletou-square-R. E. Moore, Plymouth. Saver, William, Todmorden; and Richmond-hill-J. Stansfield, Todmorden. Sanders, Off George, 33, King-street, Cheapside-B. Norton, 2, Gresham-buildings; G. T. Powell, 33, King-street. Cheapside. Saxby, Joseph, Heaton Moor, near Stockport; and Fal- Sheppard, Hobart M'Lean, P., 7, Clifton-grove, Dalston Skiaton, Thos., the younger, Chesterfield-T. Shipton, Chester eld. Smith, Alfred Oxnard, Durham-J. Watson, Durham. Spender, Frank Richard, Bradford-on-Avon-J. Sparks, Bradford-on-Avon. Stevens, Samuel George, 26, Northumberland-place, Bayswater-T. L. Wilson, 3, Westminster Chambers. Stow, Montague Haslam, 13, Buckland-crescent, Belsize-park-T. S. Preston, 35, Lincoln's-inn-fields. Sullivan, John Mortimer, 5, Bond-street, Claremontsquare-C. K. Sharp, 31 and 32, Lombard-street. Sumner, John Bird, Cheetham, Manchester-J. W. Addlesham, Manchester. Sykes, Alfred, Crosland Moor, near HuddersfieldT. H. Ramsden, Huddersfield. Talbot, John Edward, Higher Broughton, near Manchester-W. H. Talbot, Manchester. Tanner, Arthur, 144, Ebury-street; and Bristol-R. H. Otter, Bristol. Tanner, William, Chelmsford-W. J. Bruty, Chelmsford. Terry, William Curtis, Fulham-O. Richards, 16, Warwick street, Regent-street. Theobald, John Theophilus, The Limes, Lower Tooting -J. P. Theobald, 8, Furnival's inn. Thomas, George, Carnarvon-E. G. Powell, Carnarvon ; J. H. Roberts, Carnarvon. Thomas, Matthew Watson, jun., Walthamstow; and 26, Martin's-lane, Cannon street-H. W. Nelson, 26, Martin's-lane, Cannon-street. Thompson, Henry, Fairfield; and Liverpool-G. Haigh, Toller, Ernest Edward, East Heath, Hampstead- Tudor, John, Brecon-J. R. Cobb, Brecon. Waller, Arthur, 19, Highbury-terrace-G. Waller, 75, Wallingford, Alfred Bishop, 38, Stockwell Park-road- Ward, Charles Bernard, 32, Bernard-street, Russellsquare-H. E. Hunt, Nottingham. Warne, Harry Duke, 15, Furnival's-inn; and Rochester -J. T. Prau, Rochester. Waugh, Edward Lamb, Cockermouth-E. Waugh, White, Henry Arthur, 12, Great Marlborough-street- Williamson, James, the younger, Surbiton-J. Williamson, 6, John-street, Bedford-row. Wise, William, Ashbourne, Derby: and 70, Upper Gloucester-place, Dorset-square-J. J. Wise, Ash bourne. Woodforde, Randolph, 18, Everett-street, Russellsquare; and Bath-J. Stone, Bath. Woodhouse, James Thomas, Bridge House, Sydenham; Wright, William, Rutland-park, Perry-hill, Lower Pursuant to Judges' Orders. Austinfriars. Calcott, George L. Berkeley, Leighton Buzzard, and 27, Grosvenor-road, Highbury New Park-J. Newton, Leighton Buzzard; F. M. B. Calcott, 52, Lincoln'sinn-fields. Godfrey, Joseph Wallace, 10, Gloucester-terrace, Regent's-park-J. W. Budd, 20, Austinfriars. Greatheed, William, 19, Lincoln's-inn-fields-W. Ledsam, 17, Lincoln's-inn-fields; H. Chaplin, 19, Lincoln's-inn-fields. Hankinson, George Henry, Woodlands-park, near Al W. trincham-R. K. Cooper, Manchester. Overell, Albert Edward, Leamington Priors Overell, Leamington Priors. Pope, John Noble Coleman, Stoke Lodge, near BristolW. Leonard, Bristol. Smith, Francis Peters, Norris-hill, near Ashby-de-laZouch, and 71, Cambridge-street, Pimlico-E. B. Jennings, Burton-upon-Trent. Stanway, Edward Fancutt, 36, Bartholomew-road, Kentish Town-P. C. F. Tatham, 13, Knightriderstreet. Taylor, Henry Alfred, 15, South-street, Finsbury- Baker, George, 25, Larkhall-lane, and 37, Great Percy- Bryan, William, 59, Farrington-square. Jun 14. Johnson, H. Skingley, 38, Walbrook, and 78, Wells street, Oxford-street. June 14. Lindop, Thomas Crump, Torquay. June 2. May, Alfred Henry, Bristol, and Kings' Kerwell, Devon. UNCLAIMED STOCK AND DIVIDENDS IN THE BANK OF ENGLAND. [Transferred to the Commissioners for the Reduction of the National Debt, and which will be paid to the persons respectively whose names are prefixed to each in three months, unless other claimants sooner appear.] MARTINDALE (Edmund), Moka, Mauritius, Esq., £200 New Three per Cent. Annuities. Claimant. Vesey Weston Holt, administrator to Edmund Martindale, deceased. STEVENS (Dr. Wm.), M.D.. Upper Wick House, near Worcester. Three dividends on the sum of £2500 New Three per Cent. Ar nuities. Claimants, Richard Reader Harris and Wm. Wilkes Cawley, executors of Wm. Stevens, deceased. WITTS (Rev. Edward Francis), Upper Slaughter, Gloucestershire; LEA (Geo. Edward), Upper Slaughter farmer; and WITT (Francis Edward Broome), Upper Slaughter, Esq. £166 158. 4d. Reduced Three per Cent. Annuities. Claimants, said Rev. Edward Francis Witts, Geo. Edward Lea, and Francis Edward Broome Witts. APPOINTMENT UNDER THE JOINT-STOCK WINDING-UP ACTS. WIRE TRAMWAY COMPANY (LIMITED). Petition for windingup to be heard Nov. 7, before V.C. M. CREDITORS UNDER 22 & 23 VICT. c. 35. Last Day of Claim, and to whom Particulars to be sent. ADAMS (John), Hollyland, Pembroke, Esq. Dec. 6; A. Scott, solicitor, 39, Lombard-street, London. BASSETT (Hon. Emily H., formerly of Tehidy Park, Cornwall, late of Abbey Hotel, Great Malvern widow. Nov. 30: G. Rooper, solicitor, 17. Lincoln's-inn-fields, Middlesex. BRENNAN (Jas.), 248, Church-street, Walker. Northumberland, grocer. Dec. 20; J. A. Philipson, sol.citor, 65, Pilrim-street, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. BURTON (Henry J.), 53, Pentonville-road, and 7, Philpotlane, London, grocer. Nov. 29; Tamplin and Co., solicitors, 159, Fenchurch-street London. Dec. CLAY (Elizabeth), Rastrick, Halifax. York, widow 31; Ford and Co., solicitors, 70, Albion-street, Leeds. COCKAYNE (Betty), Clarkson-street, Sheffield. York, widow. Dec. 6: A. Smith and Son, solicitors, 26, Castle-street. Sheffiell. CRIDLAND (Henry Wm.), formerly of Dockhead, late of 262, Old Kent-road. Surrey, cheesemonger. Jan. 6; G. H. Hogan, solicitor, 23, Martin's-lane, Cannon-street, London. DOCKER (Joseph), Brook-cottage, Chorlton-cum-Hardy, near Manchester, gentleman. Dec. 15; Sale and Co.. solicitors, 29, Booth-street, Manchester. DOE (Thomas), Mount Bures. E-sex, miller. Dec. 16; Smythies and Co., solicitors, North Hill, Colchester. EARLE (Henry E.), 28, Inverness-terrace, Bayswater, and 82, Grosvenor-street, Bond-street, London, wine merchant. Dec. 16; Chas. Earle, 9, Duke-street, Portlandplace, London. EDWARDS (Richard W.), 40, Harrington street, Hampsteadroad. Middlesex, gentleman. Dec. 2: Whitakers and Woolbert, solicitors, 12, Lincoln's-inn fields, Middlesex. ELLIOTT (Samuel), H. M.'s Court of Probate. Doctor's Commons, London, and 42, Harleyford-road, Kennington, Surrey, gentleman. Nov. 30; Brooks and Co. solicitors, 7. Godliman-street, Doctor's Commons, London. ELSDEN (Wm.), formerly of 57, Regent-street, Lambethwalk, and 21, Lambeth-walk, Surrey, late of 69, Loughborough-road, North Brixton, Surrey, gentleman. Dec. 5; Whitakers and Woolbert, solicitors, 12, Lincoln's-innfields, Middlesex. FAULDER Elizabeth, formerly of 15. Fitzroy-square, Middlesex, late of Boulogne-sur-Mer, France, spinster. Nov. 17; Hill and Son, solicitors, 39, Old Broad-street, London. FITZ GIBBON (Lady Isabella, M. A.), 35, Lownde--square, Middlesex, spinster. Dec. 1; Walker and Martineau, solicitors, 13, King's-road, Gray's-inn, Middlesex. FULLER (Louisa M. B. K., late of Brussels, formerly of West Court, near Finchampstead, Berks, and Comeroy, near Honiton, Devon, widow. Dec. 1; Leman and Co., solicitors, 51, Lincoln's-inn-fields, Middlesex. GRAHAM (Alfred), Mossley Vale House, Mossley Vale, near Liverpool, gentleman. Dec 31; G. Webster, solicitor, 6, York-buildings, Dale-street, Liverpool. GUIDE (Wm. J.), formerly of Borough Market, Southwark, and late of 9, Sussex Cottages, Alpha-road, New Cross Kent, fruit salesman. Jan. 1; H. Simpson, solicitor, 20. Borough High--treet. London. GUNNELL (David), Chesterton, Cambridge, gentleman. Dec. 31; Eaden, Harris and Knowles, solicitors, 15, Sidney-street, Cambridge. HENDERSON (Elizabeth Martha),_commonly called Lady James Townshend, Yarrow House, Bintry, Norfolk, widow. Jan. 1; F. Leach, solicitor, 10, Lancaster-place, Strand, London. HERLEY (Jane), late of Torquay, formerly of Weston-superMare, widow. Dec. 1; D. W. J. Thomas, solicitor, Brecon. HICKS (Anne P.), Brooklands, near Ross, Hereford, spinster. Nov. 30; E. J. Austen, solicitor, 79, Denbigh-street, Belgrave-road, London HONE (Jas.), 49, Great College-street, Camden Town, Middlesex, and 38, Charles-street, Midtle ex Hospital, Middlesex, fringe manufacturer. Dec 31; Shaw and Fraser, solicitors, 8, Furnival's Inn, London. JACKSON (Elizabeth), Wigan, widow. Dec. 10; Leigh and Ellis, solicitors, The Arcade, King street, Wigan. JAMES (Mary E), St. Owen-street, Hereford, spinster. Jan. 1; W. J. Humphrey, solicitor, Herefo:d." JOHNS (Samuel), Garibaldi-villa, Warwick, gentleman. Dec. 1; Wm. Moon, solicitor, 15, Lincoln's Inn fielus, Middi sex. KEEN (JOS), Godney, Meare, Somerset, cattle dealer. Nov. 30; S. Hobbs, jun, solicitor, Wells, Somerset KENNEDY (Jos,, Brown-s reet, Manchest r, and The Poplars, Edge lane, Chorlton-cum-Hardy, Lancaster, letterpress printer. Dec. 25; J. Peacock, solicitor, 86, Crossstreet, Manchester. KNIGHT, (Samuel), Pontefract, York. corn merchant. Dec. 26; Coleman and Sangster, solicitors, Pontefract. MARSHALL (Charlot el, Brunswick-villas, near Kw-bridge, Old Brentford, Middlesex, widow. Nov. 1; Ruston and Co., solicitors, Brentford, Middlesex. MCPHERSON (Isabella), High-street, Maidenhead, Berks, widow. Nov. 25; H. C. Draper, solicitor, 51, Vincentsquare, Westminst r. MOON (Wm.), formerly of Liverpool, late of Woolton Hillhouse, within Woolton, Lancashire. Esq. Dec. 1; Pears and Co., solicitors, 3, Harrington-stree', Liverpool. MOORTON (Walter), 129, Pakington-stret, Essex road, Islington, Middlesex, licensed victualler. Nov. 20; Nash and Co., solicitors, 2, Suffolk-lane, Cannou-street, London. NAPIER (Major Gen. Geo. T. C. C. B.), Morpeth-terrace, Westminster. Nov. 2: G. Rooper, solicitor, 17, Lincoln's inn-filds. Middlesex. OWEN John B., formerly of Stamford-hill, Middlesex, late of 17, Upper Hornsey rise, Middlesex, Eq Dec. 18; Rixon and Co., solicitors, 52, Gracechurch-s reet, London. PEARSON (Charles), Tempsford Hall, Tempsford, B dford, Esq. Dec. 1: Burne and Parker, solicitors, 37, Lincoln's Inn-fields, Middl.sex. PETTET (Elizabeth T.), Orchard-hill, Greenwich, Kent, spinster. Dec. 1; Sandom and Kersey, solicitors, 52, Gracechurch-street, London. PRIOR (WM.), formerly of Kemerton, Gloucester, late of Weymouth, gentleman. Nov. 25; L. Jessopp, solicitor, Bedford. RADFORD (Ellen), Southwell, Nottingham, widow. Dec. 1; S. R. P. Shilton, solicitor, St. Peter's Churchside, Nottingham. BADFORD (Jos.) formerly of Alfreton, Derby late of Southwell. Notts, farmer. Dec. 1; S. R. P. Shilton, solicitor, St. Peter's Church-side, Nottingham. RIMMER (Ralph), Wigan. coal propr etor. Dec. 10; Leighand Ellis, solicitors, The Arcade, King-street. Wigan. SUTTON (Sir John, Bart., Norwood-park, Nottingham, and Bruges, Belgium. Dec. 4; Ward ani Co., soli.itors, 1, Gray's-inn square, London. TAYLOR (Geo.), 9, John-street, Bedford-row, Middlesex, and Waveney-villa, Ventnor, Isle of Wight, printer. Dec 15; R. H. Nettleship, solicitor, 37, John-street, Bedford-row, London. WHEELER (Henry), Bolingbroke House, Wandsworth-common, Surrey, Es1. Dec. 1; Lawrance and Co., solicitors, 14, Old Jewry-chambers, London. WILLIAMS (Mary A., Walthamstow, Essex, widow. Dec. 1; W. Houghton, solicitor, 15a, St. Helen's-place, London. WITH a view of depriving naval courts-martial of the right to adjudicate upon offences punishable by civil law, a petition to the House of Commons and memorials to the Lords of the Admiralty and Privy Council have been prepared and are influentially supported. LEGAL NEWS. IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT. THE following letter was lately addressed to the "I have no desire to trespass unduly upon your a of it as well as an insolvent who owes "A COUNTY COURT JUDGE." THE magistrates at Marlborough-street have announced their intention not to hear articled or managing clerks of attorneys. CORRESPONDENCE OF THE PROFESSION. NOTE.-This Department of the LAW TIMES being open to the amending statute, where the reader may find the amendment in full. In such a work any ordinary reader can "find his way about" without difficulty. There is no reason why larger compi lations should not afford the same facilities. But it is not to be doubted that the feverish competition of publishers to be first in the field cramps and embarrasses men even of the highest professional distinction, and to some extent places them in a false position. In the case of Glen's Public Health Law, the grievance is, however, of a different complexion, and the responsibility belongs solely and exclusively to the publishers. A CHAIRMAN OF A LOCAL BOARD. NOTES AND QUERIES ON NOTICE.-We must remind our correspondents that this Queries. 1. RELEASE OF DEBT BY WILL-LEGACY DUTY.-A. owes Testator £100. Testator by his will releases the debt. Is such debt liable to legacy duty ?-Q. 2. PRACTICE IN THE COLONIES.-1. Can a clerk, having served his articles to a solicitor in this country and passed the necessary examination, commence practice in any of the colonies-e.g., Queensland, Australia? 2. If so, are there any, and what steps to be taken to enable him to do so? 3. Is it necessary that he should state the fact to the Incorporated Law Society before signing articles,-AN ENQUIRER. 3. NOTICE TO QUIT.-Jones let a farm to Smith, Brown, and Robinson, as joint tenants from year to year with a proviso against underletting; Smith has ceased to occupy the farm, and a notice to quit was given to Robinson, which was addressed to Brown and Robinson only. Query, whether such a notice was a good notice against Smith, and can Jones eject Smith, Brown, and Robinson, and if so, against whom should the action of ejectment be brought? Please refer to cases. B. THE INTERESTS OF THE PROFESSION.-I quite agree with your correspondent's remarks in your last impression that "no educated men are so in"" as solicitors. And why? adequately paid Simply because they quietly submit to the injustice with the utmost complacency. It would be impossible to find outside the profession a body of men so utterly apathetic and indifferent, and so completely devoid of energy when their own interests are affected, as "our noble selves." I feel that in saying this I am only repeating what has been over and over again asserted. The older practitioners, whom we naturally expect to take the initiative, are, to a certain extent, responsible for this inertness. Wedded to the stereotyped procedure and traditions of the past, they look aghast when the slightest innovation is suggested. To some extent this is natural enough, and there has been quite enough of "innovation" of a certain kind already. Law is rapidly losing much of its cumbrous machinery and antiquated forms, and its reformers-with the best intentions, probably-have so far popularised it by establishing County Courts, Building Societies, and similar The result is, that by virtue of institutions. special legislation, the once needful offices of an attorney are frequently all but superseded. The registrar prepares the plaint for the "suitor;" the solicitor to the building club, at a ridiculously small fee, fills up and completes the printed conand veyance or mortgage for the "member; thus the ball rolls, the independent practitioner, when one is employed on the other side, coming in for his full share of abuse because his charges are necessarily made out on a different scale. Now, it is the fear of incurring the bad graces of the client under these and similar circumstances that has brought about another grievance. Our charges are, as is well known, based upon a fixed scale, or, in some cases, upon a certain scale of com. mission. The public think both too high, and the Profession foolishly confirm that opinion by occa sionally giving way. I should like to know who in the country would dare to uniformly enforce the taxing scale, much less that of the Law Society. The fact is that country attorneys are anything but true to themselves in the matter of remunera. tion. Underselling, I am afraid, is more frequently the rule than the exception. The Profession should condescend to take a lesson from the labouring classes, and stick together and "strike" 5. SUCCESSION DUTY ACT.-A., in 1840, purchases real now and again. No doubt this reprehensible estate, the consideration being partly cash and partly a "competition" is partially, though not by any life annuity to the vendor, duly charged and secured on means wholly, owing to the fact that agents the estate by deed of even date. A. dies in 1861, having compete (most improperly) for certain kinds by his will empowered trustees to sell the estate, which of business which should rightly fall to our lot they do in 1871, subject to the annuity. In 1873 the annuity ceases by reason of the death of the anuuitant. exclusively. These interlopers are readily sup-s succession duty now payable in respect of the cesser ported in their nefarious traffic by the public, who fall an easy prey-though they don't think so-to their exactions; and although the attention of the attorneys must be repeatedly drawn to this empiric phlebotomy, yet no attempt in the interests of the Profession is made to suppress it! The best solution of the problem is to have, where practicable, an enforced scale of remuneration by commission in substitution of the "bill of costs." This time-honoured document does incalculable mischief to the Profession, when it gets into the hands of the laity. The scale of commission, however, should not be too high. In this respect the Law Society's scale is, I think, open to objection. Again solicitors should combine, and by acting in concert uphold their privileges and secure their full emoluments. Depend upon it, until the Profession makes its voice to be feltnot merely heard-it is quite hopeless to expect the abolition of "certificate duty" or any of the other innumerable grievances and restrictions to which we are so unjustly subjected. We are unfortunately attacked from within and without. Untrue to one another, we find ourselves weakest when we need to be strongest. A. B. LAW AMENDMENT AND LAW PUBLICATIONS. 4. AGENTS AND DEBT COLLECTORS.-Will any of the readers of the LAW TIMES inform me of the best course to pursue in proceeding against so-called "agents" and "debt collectors," who appear as advocates, and conduct cases in the County Court, and refer me to autho rities on the subject ? I presume that such "agents," who in the absence of the plaintiff undertake a cause, may be treated as violating the rights of an attorney (although they may appear as witnesses to testify as to the defendant's means), and be proceeded against accor dingly. BURTON-ON-TRENT. of the annuity? And if so, on what principle should it be calculated, and by whom must it be borne? The purchaser of 1871, and present owner, is a stranger in blood to both A. and his vendor (the annuitant), who were INQUIRER. strangers in blood to each other. 6. LOCAL AUTHORITY UNDER THE GAS WORKS CLAUSES ACT.-By the Gas Works Clauses Act 1871, s. 35, gas companies are required to forward to the "local authority "certain annual statements of accounts. The prcvisions of this Act apply to every Gas Company who has obtained Parliamentary powers or any provisional order (under the authority of the Gas and Water Works Facilities Act 1870), since July 1871. There must, therefore, be many towns in England in which there are gas companies to which this section applies. Will any of your readers inform me who is the recog nised "local authority " in the case of a market town A. F. W. not being a municipal corporation? 7. CONTRACT-DEBT-RUNNING ACCOUNTS, &c.-A. employs B. on a contract to thresh the corn A. then has, and B., by threshing on five occasions, finishes the contract. A. pays for occasions 1, 3, 4, and refuses to pay for 2 and 5 on account of imperfect work. B. puts A. into the County Court for 5 only, and succeeds by A.'s paying the sum into court. Can B. now County court A. for money due for occasion No. 2?-X. Answers. (Q. 66.) EJECTMENT.-Looking through some back numbers of the LAW TIMES, I notice this query, and the replies of "Jus." and "X. Y." It appears to me that the latter are not put as strongly in favour of the mortthe principal sum remain unpaid on the day named, the gagee as the cases cited and others fairly warrant. If mortgagee can maintain ejectment against the mortgagor, although he remain in possession without giving him notice to quit or demanding possession. Where the mortgagee suffers the mortgagor to remain in possession, the latter is not tenant at will to the former, but at the most tenant by sufferance only, and may be treated as tenant or trespasser at the election of the mortgagee. (See the cases cited by "Jus." and Partridge v. Bird, 5 B & Ald. 604; s. c.; 1 D. R. 272.) The mortgagor is not entitled to possession in respect of his equitable estate, unless there is some agreement to the contrary; but he holds it solely at the will of the mortgagee, who may, at any time, without giving any prior notice, recover the same by ejectment against him, unless he is ready to pay principal, interest, and costs (St. 1017, 2 Sp. 641, 618.). In ejectment by (Q. 81). RECONVEYANCE-COSTS.-A. A. R.'s answer of LAW SOCIETIES. (Q 80.) MEMORANDUM OF DEED. "Consuetudo" is METROPOLITAN AND PROVINCIAL LAW dum may in many cases be properly asked and properly conceded. Take as a reductio ad absurdum of W.'s contention, the case of a conveyance by the same deed of Whiteacre to A. and of Blackacre to B. B. thinks fit to cut up Blackacre into ten or a thousand, or a million, lots, each of which he conveys to a different purchaser. According to W., each purchaser would be entitled to have an abstract of his conveyance indorsed on the original deed, the effect of course being to prejudice A.'s right by turning the original deed into a register of the title to Blackacre, in which A. has no interest. It is the clear right of a part-owner to insist that deeds relating to the common title shall not in any way be tampered with. As to indorsements of notice of charges, &c., see 2 Davidson Conv. part 2, 801-805, 3rd edit. ASSOCIATION. the president, Mr. Charles Pidcock, in the chair. LAND TITLE AND TRANSFER BILL. been made, and the number of such applications is decreasing. "The reasons for this failure are clearly shown in the report of the Royal Commission of 1869 to be, not the opposition of one branch of the Profession, but the danger, delay, and cost of having, in all cases, to prove a sixty years' marketable title, and to settle the boundaries as against adjoining owners. "To put the matter plainly, the landowners of England think the advantages of registration too dear at the price required to obtain it. The Land Transfer Bill of last session, therefore, proposes easier, at the sacrifice of some of the advantages to adopt the second mode-to make registration "1. With absolute certified title; if, after investigation, a twenty years' good holding title is shown. "2. With limited certified title, i.e., limited to a date selected by the applicant. of the Acts of 1862. The settlement of bounMr. G. J. Johnson (Birmingham) read a paper daries is, in all cases, to be optional with the on the Land Title and Transfer Bill. After pre-applicant (Section 35) and he has a choice of three mising that he should confine himself chiefly to modes of registration: the principles as distinguished from the details of the Bill, the writer proceeded to state that, in considering this or any other question of legal reform, the first thing to be done was to ascertain accurately what are the evils which it is supposed that the alteration will remove. These, he said, ranged themselves under the two chief heads of title and transfer, and, after describing the present state of the law as to both, continued: "To (Q. 86.) Loss of GOODS.-B. as A.'s agent, had pre-explain the cause of this state of things is foreign sumably au implied authority to send back in the ordinary course, such goods as he did not approve. A. the owner, is the proper party to sue: (Dutton v. Solo. mons, 3 Bos. & Pul. 584; Dawes v. Peck, 8 Term Rep. 330.) Z. Y. Z. Y. An action against a carrier for loss of goods intrusted to him for conveyance should, in the absence of an express contract for the carriage of them, be by the owner of the goods as the party damnified. Where the goods have been delivered to the carrier to be conveyed to a person named by the consignor, the consignee is prima facie the owner of the goods: (Addison on Torts, 504, 4th edit.) Where the goods were sent merely for approval, the owner sued: (Swain v. Shepherd, 1 Moo. & Rob. 224). A. is the proper party to sue the Railway Company for the loss of the goods. A. A. R. The property in the goods remains in A., and he therefore is the proper party to sue: (Swain v. Shep. herd, 1 Moo. & Rob. 224). H. G. -I think that B., having elected to accept the debt and costs in the action instead of petitioning for an adjudication, the court would not now entertain a new application for payment of costs of the summons. See the decisions of Goulburn, Commissioner, under the somewhat analogous sections of the Act of 1849: (Ex parte Cornick, 31 L. T. Rep. O. S. 346; Anonymous 5 L. T. Rep. N. S. 239). It may be doubted, not withstanding the discretion as to costs given to the court by the Bankruptcy Rules of 1870 (186-189), whether in any case the costs of the debtor's summons can cr ought properly to be charged against the debtor, where the debtor pays within the prescribed period, or where the proceedings do not culminate in an adjudication. 2. Y. to the purpose of this paper, and would require a "1. In the case of stock only one kind of in- (Q. 88.) PROBATE DUTY WHEN EFFECTS DO NOT EXCEED (Q. 89.) FEMALE MORTGAGEE. If the freehold is to pass the deed must be acknowledged. interests in possession, reversion, remainder, and "3. Simple registration, in which the date of registration is the starting point. "It is obvious that in the two latter cases the attainment of the chief benefit of registration, viz., indefeasibility of title, superseding any further investigation, is postponed until by the operation of the Statutes of Limitation the documents placed on the register as the root of the title is secured from impeachment. Until that time arrives, the previous title must be shown and investigated as at present. So also, unless the boundaries are settled as against adjoining owners, and such boundaries must be verified by evidence independent of the register. In these points the scheme is inferior to Lord Westbury's; but, as it is quite clear that the landowners of England will not have the greater benefits of Lord Westbury's scheme on the onerous conditions on which alone it is possible, there is no way to get a starting point other than that proposed by the Bill of last session, viz., beginning with the best provisional one which can be conveniently got, and trusting to time to cure all its original imperfections. To accelerate the ripening of registered titles not certified as absolute at the time of registration, Lord Selborne proposes, by the Real Property Limitation Bill, to shorten by one-half the present statutory periods of limitation." of Then, after describing the technical processes registration and transfer as proposed by Lord Selborne's Bill, and the question of the necessary publicity of the register, the paper summed up the question thus: "As to registered dispositions by registered owners (i.e., absolute sales, mortgages, or, as the Acts call them, charges), certainty of title will be ultimately secured, and, if reasonable facilities are given for searching the register, facility of transfer will be promoted. As to all other dispositions (i.e., all unregistered dispositions by legal owners, and all dispositions by equitable owners), the measure will not affect the present modes of alienation, but will simply add the cost of investigating the registered title to the present. Of the two parts of the Bill, therefore, the provisions as to title seem to be clear and certain in their operation; but the provisions as to transfers appear to be incomplete in theory and uncertain in practice, and to require some years' experience before it can be ascertained whether they are workable or not. In order to place before the meeting certain definite points for discussion, I submit the following as tentative, and not dog Z. Y. - A female mortgagee having married should acknowledge the reconveyance upon the mortgage money "2. The stockholder cannot encroach upon thematical propositions: being paid off. It is a disposition, release, and extin- boundaries of any other stockholder, or be en"1. That so much of the Bill as concerns the guishment of an estate which she aud her husband have croached upon by him; nor is he entitled to, nor registration of title is good, and should be supin her right in land: (sect. 77 of 3 & 4 Will. 4, c. 74.) An estate extends to any interest, charge, lien, or incan he be made subject to, any of the rights over ported by the Profession, as solving the difficulty cumbrance in, upon, or affecting lands either at law or other people's property which lawyers call ease- of ultimately clearing all titles placed on the rein equity: (see definitions same Act; see also Mr. Wil-ments. In the case of land the determination of gister without the costs of a previous judicial inliams's observations at page 410, in his treatise on Per- my boundaries and rights is in reality the deter-vestigation, and avoiding the other difficulties soual Property, 8th edit. mination of the boundaries and rights of every which have been found so inimical to the general adjoining owner. adoption of the Act of 1862. (Q. 56.) RIGHT OF WAY WITH DOGS THROUGH CHURCH TARD-I do not see the inconsistency which "X" alleges 'Now, unless we are prepared to register every tenant in possession of land as the absolute owner thereof, which is seen to be absurd as soon as stated, this starting point can only be got in one of two ways: "1. By investigating the title of the present owner, and if such title be found to be good, placing him on the register, and certifying his ownership. "2. By putting any person on the register who shows an apparently good title, leaving it to the operation of the Statutes of Limitation to perfect such title. 2. That the provisions as to transfer require, in order to the rapid and safe transaction of busi ness, an open register. "3. That the proposed machinery of caveats is susceptible of improvement. "4. That provisions as to mortgages, or, as they are in future to be called, charges, appear to need very careful revision. 5. As before observed, the establishment of District Registries appears absolutely essential to the proper working of the scheme, and I submit that the basis of the index of registration should be the parcels identified by a map, and not by the names of the parties, as the best mode of ensuring facility and accuracy of search. On this point I would direct attention to the very clear pamphlet of Mr. George Whitcombe, of Gloucester, "The first of these modes has the merit of securing a clear starting point, and was the foun- "6. The provisions in the Bill, as to solicitors, dation of Lord Westbury's Act of 1862, and of are some of them satisfactory, and some very Lord Cranworth's Declaration of Title Act of the much the reverse. Section 164, enabling the Board same session. It has been tried, and has failed in of Registry to make rules for our remuneration, the sense that only a comparatively small number based on the principle of a percentage sum of an of applications to place lands on the register havead valorem scale, is a step in the right direction. The expression, or other agents,' which occurs in Sections 12, 36, 46, 160, and 164, should be either omitted altogether or defined to mean agents of solicitors only. The confidence now necessarily reposed in solicitors in transactions in real property will be quite as necessary under the new procedure as it is now; and it is not too much to require that no person should be permitted to engage in these transactions as agent for any other person except he be thoroughly competent, and be under the control which solicitors now are. the law societies and others, with a request for an Mr. C. E. Mathews seconded the motion, and there was a steady increase in the number of members of the association, and he was glad to be able to announce that several members of the Profession in Birmingham had forwarded additional donations to the society's funds. He had [We reserve a portion of the report of the pro-liberality which characterised the operations of been very much struck with the prudence and ceedings until next week, owing to pressure on our space.] SOLICITORS' BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION. The report of the directors, as follows, was the board in the relief which it distributed. Applications had been made from Birmingham, and had been referred to him, as the local director there, for inquiry, and in every case there had been a careful desire on the part of the directors in London to know what the real merits of the case were. When the applicant was deserving, and the assistance given was usefully applied, aid had been repeatedly granted. He had pleasure in calling attention to an item in the receiptsnamely, a bequest of £3000 (legacy duty free) under the will of the late Miss Hannah Brackenbury, of Brighton. He hoped that the admirable example of Miss Brackenbury, in helping their association would be borne in mind by the members of the Profession throughout the kingdom as one worthy of their own adoption. He had great pleasure in moving that the report and statement of accounts now presented be received, whom 791 are life and 1491 annual subscribers. Twenty- adopted, and printed for circulation in the usual The directors, in compliance with the 16th rule of the association, present the thirty-first half-yearly report of its progress and operations. Since April last sixty-six additional members have previous half-year, 146 new members gained during the been elected, making, with those elected during the year; a rate of increase so far satisfactory that it is in excess of that of the previous year. The association has now 2282 members enrolled, of two of the life members are also annual subscribers. "Lastly. I contend that, even with the most perfect system that can be devised a priori, much alteration will be found to be necessary in its practical working, and that, until a satisfactory system has been established and verified by experience, it is highly inexpedient to make regis. tration compulsory after two years, as it is proposed to do by sect. 18. I venture on this head to repeat in substance what I stated in a paper read on this subject at the last meeting at Bristol -that the history both of attempted and actual legislation on this matter is a warning against making provisions compulsory until they have been fairly tried and found to be workable. From the year 1830 to the year 1853 the proper remedy for the admitted evils of real property law was supposed to be a registry of deeds. It was recommended by the Real Property Commissioners in 1830, and embodied in numerous Bills introduced from that time until the year 1850, and in the latter year the Registration and Conveyancing Commission formally reported that this salutary improvement was continually frustrated by the persistent opposition of attorneys and solicitors. In the year 1853 another attempt was made to establish a register of deeds, and the select committee to whom the Bill was referred investigated the whole question, and reported that we had all along been right and the public and the theorists were wrong, and that registration of deeds would do more harm than good. From that time regis- munificent legacy (duty free) of £3000 under the will of tration of deeds (which for a quarter of a century had been the favourite panacea for all the evils of real property law) was discarded in favour of a scheme of registration of title. This latter scheme was embodied in the legislation of 1862, which in its turn has failed in its original shape, and it is about to be improved by Lord Selborne's Bill. The provisions in the measure now before us are new and untried, and, great as is their apparent superiority to the provisions of 1862, we can never be sure that any measure is good until it has been decided by experience; and, having regard to the fact that all dealings with real property (unlike making fresh rules of practice in the courts) are permanent in their character, I maintain it is most unadvisable to make this measure compulsory, unless and until it has been fairly tried, and that, therefore, sect. 18 ought to be struck out of the Bill." Mr. J. Murray (London) read a paper on "Registration of Assurances." The President said the admirable paper of Mr. Johnson was so exhaustive that very little more was to be said on the subject. It must strike everyone that the Bill was a most important one; and should it pass in its present state it would seriously affect not only the interests of the Profession, but their clients at large. Most of the legal reforms had increased the expense of conveyancing instead of diminishing them; and the question was whether they would be increased should this measure pass. He did not doubt that they would. It appeared to him that should the Bill pass in its present shape real property would be transferred in the same way as railway stock and other personal property. Whether that would be beneficial to the community or not was another question. After some discussion, in which Mr. Burton, (London) Mr. Miller (Bristol), and Mr. Southall (Worcester), took part. Mr. Shaen (London) proposed: "This meeting, whilst approving generally of the principle on which Lord Selborne's Bill is founded as to the registration of titles, is of opinion that until the provisions as to transfer are tested by experience it is highly inexpedient to make registration com. pulsory." Mr. Dees (Newcastle-upon-Tyne) seconded the motion. Mr. Mr. Torre (London) thought the society should not commit itself to any opinion on the subject until it felt itself fully qualified to do so. Johnson's paper had thrown all the light possible on the subject, which he thought should be brought under the notice of the Lord Chancellor and Lord Cairns; and he suggested, with Mr. Johnson's permission, that a copy of his paper should be sent to each of their Lordships. Mr. Sutherland proposed an amendment, that the principle of registration of titles merely should be approved; which was seconded by Mr. Winterbotham, but negatived; the original motion being caried. Mr. A. Ryland (Birmingham) proposed that Mr. Johnson's paper be printed, and circulated among From the balance-sheet for the five months ending 31st Aug which the directors now present, it will be seen that the receipts during that time have amounted to £4716 28. 9d., which, with those of the previous halfyear make a total of £6382 48. 4d. received during the eleven months. The directors have much pleasure in reporting a the late Miss Hannah Brackenbury, of Brighton; and a legacy of £10 48. 8d. under the will of the late Miss Margaret Collin, of Bishopwearmouth; a further donation of £100 from Mr. John Clayton, of Newcastleupon-Tyne, the present chairman of the board; and a further donation of £47, from the executors of the late Mrs. Frances Sarah Clowes, of London. During the five months included in the account the directors have expended in grants to the necessitous The anniversary festival of the association took place Since the last report the directors have invested a further sum of £3800 in the purchase of Indian Four per Cents, the total funded capital of the association being now £28,032 88. 3d. stock-consisting of £683 38. 3d. Three per Cent. Consols; £7803 178. 8d. Indian Five per Cents; £9425 17s. 4d. Indian Four per Ceuts; £3907 London and North-Western Railway Four per Cent. Perpetual Debenture Stock; £250 London and St. Katharine Docks Four per Cent. Debenture Stock; and £62 10s. Three per Cent Reduced Annuities, producing together annual dividends amounting to £1117. A balance of £251 os. 5d. remains to the credit of the The decease of their respected colleagues, Mr. James It is proposed to elect a third auditor, in pursuance The directors have had great pleasure in appointing the present general meeting to take place at Birmingsincerely hope that one result of this renewal of the ham, where the Association met last in 1862, and they society's visit will be a large increase in the number of its supporters in that important town. (Signed, on behalf of the board,) JOHN CLAYTON, Chairman. The Chairman, in moving the adoption of the report, observed that, although Birmingham had not contributed so much to the association as it might have done, looking at the strength of their body in that town, it was satisfactory to see that On the motion of Mr. C. Pidcock (of Worcester), seconded by Mr. W. H. Guest (of Manchester), a vote of thanks was passed to the directors and auditors for their services during the year. On the motion of Mr. G. J. Johnson (of Birmingham), seconded by Mr. J. Rider (of Leeds), the directors and auditors were re-appointed for the ensuing year. Mr. E. W. Williamson (of London), secretary of the Incorporated Law Society, was added to the list of directors, in the room of Mr. Thomas Kennedy, of London, deceased; Mr. John Henry Kays, of New Inn, London, was appointed an additional auditor; and a vote of thanks having been passed to the chairman for presiding, the meeting, which was fairly attended, terminated. ARTICLED CLERKS' SOCIETY. The committee and officers presented the annual reports, which were very satisfactory in every respect. New officers and committee were elected, and the society commenced its new session under very favourable auspices. BRISTOL ARTICLED CLERKS' DEBATING SOCIETY. A MEETING of this society was held at the Law Library, Small-street, on Monday evening, the 20th inst., J. Inskip, Esq., solicitor, in the chair. Mr. Baylis opened in the affirmative on the subject, "Was the case of Coddington v. Paleologo (15 L. T. Rep. N. S. 581; 15 W. R. 961), rightly decided ?" Mr. A. C. Castle opposed, and the question was ultimately carried on the side of Mr. Baylis by a small majority. LEGAL OBITUARY. NOTE. This department of the LAW TIMES, is Contributed by EDWARD WALFORD, M.A., and late scholar of Balliol College, Oxford, and Fellow of the Genealogical and Historical Society of Great Britain; and, as it is desired to make it as perfect a record as possible, the families and friends of deceased members of the Profession will oblige by forwarding to the Law TIMES Office any dates and materials required for a biographical notice. J. TRAILL, ESQ. THE late James Traill, Esq., of Hobbister, in the Isle of Orkney, and of Rattar, Caithness-shire, formerly police magistrate in London, Greenwich, and Woolwich, who died on the 17th ult., at Worthing, Sussex, in the seventy-ninth year of his age, was the second but eldest surviving son of the late James Traill, Esq., of Rattar, some time sheriff of the county of Caithness; his mother was Lady Janet, second daughter of William, tenth Earl of Caithness, and he was born in the year College, Oxford, and was called to the Bar by the 1794. He was educated at Glasgow and at Balliol Honourable Society of the Middle Temple in Michaelmas Term 1820. Mr. Traill for many years discharged the duties of magistrate at Greenwich, and also previously at the then Union Hall Police-court in London. The deceased's position as a magistrate extended from the year 1838 down to Jan. 1868. when he retired. Mr. Traill married, in 1824, Caroline, youngest daughter of the late William Whateley, Esq., of Handsworth, Staffordshire, and by her, who died. in 1858, he has left issue. |