« EelmineJätka »
Thursday Friday Saturday. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
.Dec, 4 General paper
9 General paper ......... 10 Ditto
11 Second Seal. Motions and ad
SIDEBOTHAM, NATHAX, and MARSH, JAMES, machinists, Ash.
Gazette, Nov. 18.
Gazette, Nov. 21.
town. April 16, 1872
Liquidations by Arrangement.
Gazette, Nov, 21.
V.C. Hall's Court.
3 General paper Thursday
4 Ditto Friday
5 Petitions, adjourned sum
monses, and general paper Saturday
6 Short causes, adjourned sum
monses, and general paper Monday
8 General paper Tuesday
9 Ditto Wednesday
10 Ditto Thursday ............ 11 Second Seal. Motions, ad.
journed summonses, and geneFriday
12 Petitions, adjourned sum.
monses, and general paper Saturday
13 Short causes, adjourned sum.
monses, and general paper Monday
15 General paper Tuesday
16 Ditto Wednesday
17 Ditto Thursday ............ 18 Third
Seal. Motions, ad. journed summonses, and gene.
ral paper Friday.......... 19 Petitions, adjourned sum
monses, and general paper Saturday.... 20 Sbort causes, adjourned sum.
monses and general paper Any causes intended to be heard as short causes before the Master of the Rolls or either of the Vice. Chancellors must be so marked at least one clear day before tbe same can be put in the paper to be so heard.
N.B.-In Vice-Chancellor Hall's Court no cause, motion for decree or further cousideration, can, except by order of the court, be marked to stand over, if it be within twelve of the last cause or mutter in the printed paper of the day for hearing.
WINTER CIRCUITS. The following is the complete list of the Circuits of the Judges :
(Before Mr. Justice KEATING.) Stafford, Nov. 29
Winchester, Dec. 11 Worcester, Dec. 6
Taunton, Dec. 18 (Before Mr. Baron Pigott.) Maidstone, Dec. 1
Kingston, Dec. 11
Warwick, Dec. 15
(Before Mr. Justice ARCHIHALD.) Leeds, Nov. 29
Cardiff, Dec. 15 Chester, Dec. 10
Gloucester, Dec. 19 (Before Mr. Justice Hoxymax.) Newcastle, Nov. 29
Aylesbury, Dec, 20 Durbam, Dec. 3
APPS, GEORGE, umbrella maker, Mansell-st, Whitechapel. Pet.
Nov. 12. Dec. 3, at ten, at office of Sol. Dobson, Southampton
18. Dec. 10, at three, at offices or Sols. Farrar and Hall, Man.
Dec. 3, at half past three, at office of Sol. Scholefield, Batley
rd, St. John's-wood. Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 12, at two, at the
Guildhall tavern, Gresham.st. Sol. Emanuel, Walbrook
Pet. Nov, 14. Nov. 29, at two, at office of Sol. Hardwick,
19. Dec. 11, at twelve, at offlee of Sols. Messrs. Parrott, Ayles.
Dec. 5, at three, at Brooks, Commercial.chmbs, Horsemarket.
st, WarringtonSols. Davies and Brook, Warrington
Dec. 2, at eleven, at office of Sol. Hodgson, Birmingham
Learoyd and Learoyd, Huddersfield
at office of Sol. Wooler, Batley
dington, also Meard's.ct, Wardour-st, Soho. Pet. Nov. 17.
Dec. 5, at two, at offices of Sol Seale, Lincoln's-inn-flelds
Dec. 6, at ten, at offices of Sols. Berry and Robinson, Brad.
2, at three, at the Swan hotel, Alton. Sols. Messrs. Parker,
dock, and Kingsbridge.pl, Westferry-rd, Millwall. Pet Nov.
Millwall. Sol. Fenton, Worship-st
Dec. 3. at eleven, at office of Sol. Tweed, Saltergate
st, and Harrow-rd, Marylebone. Pet. Nov. 8. Dec. 1, at eleven,
Dobson, Southampton bldgs
Pet. Nov. 17. Dec. 3, sep. creditors of R. Crookall and J
Kirkburton. Pet. Nov. 17. Dec. 4, at 2, at office of Sol, Bouth
Nov. 12. Nov. 29, at ten, at office of Sol. Cave, Newbury
at eleven, at the Cathedral hotel, St. Paul s-churchyard. Sol.
three, at office of Sol. Chambers, Hull
Dec. 9, at threr, at office of sol. May, Princes-st Spitalfields
at office of Sol Hobbs, Bristol.
eleven, at Clark, 1, Bristol.chmbs, Nicholas-st, Bristol. Sol.
Dec. 4, at three, at offices of Sols. Masters and Fletcher, Liver.
at office of Sol. Cheshire, Northwich
9, at three, at offices of Sol. Granger, Leeds
Nov. 14. Dec. 2, at twelve, at the Ram hotel, Newark-on-Trent.
Sol. Belk, Nottingham
at one, at office of Sol, Jackson, Gloucester
bury.st, New North-rd. Pet. Nov. 17. Dec. 3, at two, at office
11. Dec. 3, at twelve, at ottices of Sols. Stead and Sibree. Hull
eleven, at office of Sol. Barker, Southport
5, at eleven, at office of Sol. Duke, Birmingham
ten, at Fawcett and Malcolm, solicitors, Leeds. Sols. Berry and
Dec. 8, at three, at the Fleece hotel, Colchester. Sol. White,
NATHAN, SAMUEL LEWIS, jeweller, Hatton.gdn. Pet. Nov. 18.
Dec. 9, at two), at Ridler's hotel, Holborn. Sols. Messrs. Lewis,
Nov. 24, at half past eleven, at office of Sols. Broomhead,
Wightman, and Moore, Sheffield
three, at the White Hart hotel, Uttoxeter. Sol. Wilson, Bur
ton-on-Trent PRICE, JAMES, fishmonger, Bristo Pet. Noy. 20. Nov. , at
eleven, at office of Sol. Essery, Bristol REED, GEORGE SOMMERS, builder, Ifracombe. Pet. Nov. 15.
Dec. 2, at two, at the Queen's hotel, Nfracombe, Sol. Bencraft,
twelve, at office of Sols. Messrs. Ainsworth, Blackburn ROBINSON, THOMAS, innkeeper, Middleham. Pet. Nov. 15. Dec.
4, at one, at office of Sols. Messrs. Teale, Bedale SKERRITT, CHARLES, plumber, Ruddington, Pet. Nov. 17. Dec.
5, at twelve, at office of Sol. Belk, Nottingham SMITH, BENJAMIN, hay dealer, Leeds. Pet. Nov. 15. Dec. 1, at
three, at othce of Sol. Walker, Leeds SMITH, BENJAMIX, coal dealer, Barrow-In Furness. Pet. Nov. 18.
Dec. 5, at ten, at the Ship inn, Barrow-in. Furness. Sol. Brad
sbaw, Barrow-inFurnesg SMITH, Esos, shoernaker, Chilmark. Pet. Nov. 17. Dec. 3, at
Ihree, at ottices of Sol. Hill, Salisbury
Sol. Bainbridge, Middlesbrough
at two, at offices of sol, Venderpump, South-square, Gray's-inn STACEY, ALFRED, general dealer, Petersfield Pet. Nov. 12.
Nov. 29, at four, at the Dolphin hotel, Petersfield. Sol. King,
ford. Pet. Nov. 19. Nov. 21, at twelve, at the Talbot hotel,
Oldbury. Sol. Shakespeare, Oldbury
Hoxton. Pet. Nov, 19. Dec. 10, at one, at office of Sol. Hooper,
Nov. 14. Dec. 5, at three, at otfice of Sols. Addleshaw and
ong, at R. Jones and Co. Lancaster.pl, Strand. Sol. Durra't WALLACE, WILLIAN THOMAS, hotel keeper, Dorking. Pet. Nov.
19. Dec. 3, at three, at the Guildhall coffee house, Gresham.st.
Sol. Baker, Old Jewry.chmbs
Dec. , at eleven at office of Sol. Willi-ms. Bristol
Devonshire ter, Kingsland. Pet. Nov. 19. Dec. 15, at two, at
Marelund, St. Swithin's.la
three, at office of Sol. Stimson, Bedford
Pet. Nov. 12. Nov. 24, at twelve, at office of Sol. Moore, War.
hington WILLIAMS, SAMUEL JONN, brotmaker, Mount.st, Grosvenor-sq.
Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 8, at twelve, at 90, Lower Thames-st. Sol.
ting. hill. Pet. Nov. 14. Dec. 1, at eleven, at the Biewery
17. Dec. 5, at three, at the Black Lion hotel, Bridlington. Sol. Harland, Bridlington WORTHY, JAMES, dealer, Templecembe. Pet. Nov. 14. Dec. 2,
at three, at the Greyhound hotel, Wincanton. Sol. Davies,
Gazette, Nov. 25.
Nov. 20. Dev. 5, at office of Sol. Cotton, Liverpool
6, at two, at office of Sols. Picton, Jones, and Roberts, Car
narvon BARBER, EDWix, hairdre-rer, Glossop. Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 11, at
two, ac offices of Sols. Pinnell and Butterworth, Manchester BEARD: WORTH, HENRY, Ecale cutter, Shettield Pes. Nov. 21.
Dec. 8, at twelve, at otllce of Sol. Tattershall, Sheffield BELCHER, GEORGE GRESHAM, commission agent, Manchester.
Pet. Nov. 21. Dec. 8, at three at office of Sol. Leigh, Manches
ter BEYSETT, ROBERT CHRISTIE, architect, Melcombe Regis. Pet.
Nov. 20. Dec. 8, at twelve, at the Auction Mart, Melcombe
Regis. Sol. Howard, Melcomb Regis
Nov. 22. Dec, 8, at three, at the Waterloo hutel, Manchester.
Sols. Messrs. Heuth, Manchester
Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 8, at twelve, at office of Sol. Culshaw, Liver
pool BISNICKS, JOSEPH JAMES, oilman, Bristol. Pet. Nov. 17. Dec. 9,
at two, at office of Barnard, Thomas, Tribe, and Co. account
ants, Bristol. Sol. Thick, Bristol BLEST, DAVID, shoemaker, Wolverhampton. Pet. Nov. 18. Dec.
6, at half-past ten, at office of 8ol. Stratton, Wolverhumpton BOCLD, ENOCII, greengrocer, Hanley. Pet. Nov. 12. Nov. 27, at
eleven, at ottice of Sol. Stevenson, Hanley. BRAYFORD, JAMES, butcher, Hanl-y. Pet. Nov, 13. Nov. 27, at
two, at office of Sol, Stevenson, Hanley
agents, Quren Victoria-st. Pet. Nov. 17. Dec. 4, at twelve, at
Sol. Wickens, Palmerston.blog, Old Broad.st
Dec, 4, at twelve, at office of Sol. Free, Birmingham
Dec. 8. At three, at office of Sols. Lewis, Munns, and Longden.
old Jew'y CHEAL, JOHX, accountant, Reigate. Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 3, at
eleven, at the Market hall, Redhill. Sol. Greece, Redbill COLLISSOx, CHARLES, earthenware manufacturer, Burslem.
Professional Partnerships Dissolbed.
Gazette, Nov. 18.
Nov. 29, at eleven, at office of Sol. Roberts, Coleman-st
at office of Sol. Morris, Cannon-st, London
burn. Pet. Nov. 14. Dec. 5, at two, at the White Bear hotel,
Nov. 18. Dec. 8, at two, at office of Sol. Pearpoint, Leicester.
14. Dec. 2, at two, at the Guildhall coffee-house, Gresham-st.
three, at Graham, Ramsgate. Sol. Trotter
eleven, at office of Sol. Boocock, Halifax
Dee, 8, at three, at office of Scl. Orton, Manchester
18. Deo. 4, at twelve, at the Assembly Rooms, Nottingham.
Sol. A-hwell, Nottingham
22. at iwelve at office of Sol. Moore, Warrington
Dec. 4, at three, at offices of Sols. Gardner and Horner, Man.
Nov. 22, at two, at the Guldhull, Carmarthen. Sol. Perry, Pem.
Pet. Nov. 17. Dec. 4, at eleven, at office of Sol, Barker, St.
Michael's honso, Cornhill
P-t. Nov. 18. Deo. 4, at two, at office of Sol. Barnard, White
Lion-st, Norton Fe gate
eleven, at office of Sol Marshall Cheltenham
Pet. Nov. 13, Dec. 3, at twelve, at office of Heaton, solicitor,
Yov, 19. Dec. 18, al twelve, at 21, Wellington-st, Strand
Shad Thames, Horrelydown, and Bernt Ash-hill, Lee. l'et.
Nov. 21. Dec. 17, at three, at office of Sol. Kearney, Old Jewry CROSSING, JOHN THOMAS, commercial traveller, Plymouth,
Pet. Yov. 17. Dec. 10, at ten, at office of Sol. Square, Plymouth CROWTER, WILLIAM, monetary agent, Southsea. Pet. Nov. 19.
Dec. 6, at two, at Totterdell's Commercial hotel. Sol. King,
20. Dec. 5, at two, at office of Sol. Sewell, Newcastle-upon.
Bermondsey. Pet. Nov. 21. Dec. 10, at one, at offices of sol.
Barron, Queen-et, Cannon et
one, at office of Sol. Ollard, Wisbech
21. Dec. 8, at one, at the Railway hotel, Weston-super-Mare.
Sols. Reed and Cook, Bridgwater
Pancras la, Queen-st
Dec. 3, at three, at office of Sols. Fawcett and Malcolm, Leeds FOSTER, HENRY BENTON, coal merchant, Althorpe-rd, Wandsworth.common. Pet. Nov. 14. Dec. 5, at twelve, at office of
Sols. Miller and Smith, Salters'-hall-ct, Cannon.-
at two, at office of Sol. Hobbe, Wells
Dec. 9, at three, at office of Sol. Dallow, Wolverhampton HAMMOND, HORACE, builder, Tunbridge Wells. Tet. Nov. 21.
Dec. 10, at ten, at the Camden hotel, Tunbridge Wels. Bol.
Gazette, Nov. 21.
To surrender in the Country.
19. Res. Kay. Sur. Dec. 3
Pez. Lloyd Sur. Dec. 3.
Nov. 13. Kez. Key Sur. Dec. 4
Gazette, Nov. 25.
Cator-ct, Broad-st Pet. Nov. 20. Reg. Pepys. Sur. Dec. 9
Ki Hazlitt. Sur. Dec. 10
To surrender in the Country.
Darvill. Sur. Dec. 13
Pet. Nov. 20. Reg.
MILIS, GEORGE bootmaker, Sundurland, and south shields. PARTRIDGE AND COOPER,
Country Gentleman's Newspaper,
HODGSON, JOHN OSWALD, llcensed victualler, Long-acre. Pet. H. T. merchant, arst, old. At Trust. A. W. Chalmers, 5, Fenwick.
Now ready, price 1s., free by post ls. 24d.,
Winser, Hadlow, Tunbridge. --Shaw, T. joiner, first and Anal, 58. THE R U R A L A L M A NAC HUBBARD, JOHN MICHAEL, ship's eteward, Lynton-rd, Bermond. At Trust. J. Simpson, Bank-chrbs, Nottingham.-Young, G. sey. Pet. Nov, 18. Dec. 4, at three, at office of Sol. Webster, watchmaker, first and final, 6d. At Mesers, Haigh and Atkinson,
Wide-st, Selby HUGHES, WILLIAM, draper, Manchester. Pet. Nov. 21. Dec. 11,
SPORTSMAN'S ILLUSTRATED CALENDAR at three, at office of Sol. Rylance. Manchester ISAACS, Isaac, tatlor. Westminster bridge-rd. Pet. Nov. 22. Apply at Provisional Assignee's Office, Portugal-st, Lincoln's.
inn, between 11 and 2 on Tuesdays.
The Letterpress consists of
Lists of Hounds, their Masters, Whips, Kennels, &c. one, at office of Sols. Simons and Plews, Merthyr Tydfil
Clubs and their Club Houses.
BIRTHS MARRIAGES AND DEATHS JONES, FREDERICK, hatter, Oxford-st. Pet. Nov. 21. Dec. 19, at two, at office of Sol. Geoghegan, Lincoln's-inn-fields
Yachts and their Stations, Commodore, Vice-Commodore, JONES, WILLIAM FRANC18, draper, Llandudno. Pet. Nov. 17.
Secretaries, &c., with the Winning Yachts for the Year Dec. 6, 20 twelve, at the Queen hotel, Chester. Sol. Louis,
TIUNT.-On the 23rd inst., the wife of Joseph Hunt, Esq., solicitor, Chambers of Agriculture, KIRKMAN, JAMES, draper, Bradford. Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 5, at Ware, Herts, of a son.
Epitome of Acts of Parliament passed relating to Country three, »t offices of Sol, Walker, Leeds
MERRICK.-On the 23rd inst., at 2, Rayner's-road, Lime-grove. Gentlemen. LEE, ANN, refreshment-house keeper, Wigan. Pet. Nov. 20. Dec park, Putney, s. w., the wife of Wiliam Merrick, Bolicitor, of a 10, at eleven, at office of Sol. Ashton, Wigan daughter.
SEVENTEEN FULL-PAGE ENGRAVINGS. LEVI, JOSEPH, clothier, Birmingham. Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 5, at
DEATH. eleven, at office of Sol. Cottrell, Birmingham
JOHNSTONE.-On the 21st inst., at 33, Montpellier-terrace, Chel LYONS, LEWIS HENRY, umbrella manufneturer, Red Cross-st.
tenham, aged 82 years, the Hon. J. W. Johnstone, Judge in Pet. Nov. 21. Dec. 8, at two, at office of Ladbury, Collison, and
And a vast amount of Information relating to the Farm,
Equity of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia. Viney, Cheapside. Sols. Messrs. Lewis, Eiy-pl, Holborn
Stable, Hunting, Country House, Garden, Natural HisMASSINGHAM, GEORGE PLOWRIGHT, watchmaker, Boston. Pet.
tory, the Government and Government Offices, Rates of . 8, eleven, at offices of . ,
Postage, and other matters usually looked for in an
London: HORACE Cox, 846, Strand, W.C.
WHOLESALE & RETAIL STATIONERS,
192, FLEET-STREET, AND 1 & 2, CHANCERY-LANE, LONDON, E.C. dealers, Cornhill. Pet. Nov. 22. Dec. 15, at four, at the Free. Carriage paid to the Country on Orders exceeding 208.
masons' tavern, Great Queen-st, Holborn. Sol. May
BRIEF PAPER, 158. 6d., 178. 6d., and 238. 61. per ream. PARKER, JOHN CHARLES, builder, Hastings, ann Rye. Pet. Nov.
FOOLSCAP PAPER, 108. 6d., 12s. 6d., and 158. 6d. per ream. 29. Dec. 8, at four, at office of Mr. Cogswell, 72, Gracechurch.
OREAM LAID NOTE, 38., 48., and 5s. per ream,
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 29.
The Weakness of “The Force."
The Custom of Warranty-Horses.
The Ceylon Jungle Fowl (with an illustration). Nov 20. Dec. 8, at two, at ofice of Ivey, public accountant, 9s. 6d. per ream,
Ornithological Rambles in Spain. Liverpool. Sol. Hughes, Liverpool "We should direct particular attention to their New Club
The Depths of the Sea. RADFORD, CHARLES, wholesale provision merchant, Manchester. honse Paper: in our opinion it is the very best paper we ever
The A. B. C. Rerolving Pistol (with an illustration). Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 4, at three, at office of Sols. Messrs. Bond,
Shooting in Sonth Africa. wrote upon."-London Mirror. Manchester
Newmarket and other Coursing Meetings. RIGBY, GEORGE, hat manufacturer, Ashton-under-Lyne. Pet.
Croydon Steeplechases. Nov. 22. Deo. 12, at eleven, at the Pitt and Nelson hotel, Ash
Hunting Notes from Leicestershire, Ireland, &c. INDENTURE SKINS, Printed and Machine-ruled, to hold twenty ton-under. Lyne, Sol. Lord, Ashton-under-Lyne
Emigrant Fields of North America.
Prospects of British Columbia.
Şport on the Coast of Mantchuria. ROBERTS, JOHN, grocer, Warrington. Pet. Nov, 20. Dec. 11, at
A Trip in the Gulf of Siam. three, at the Spread Eagle hotel, Manchester. Sols. Grundy and 1058. per roll.
Athletics at Oxford
and Cambridge. Kershaw, Manchester RECORDS or MEMORIALS, 7d. each, 6s. 6d. per dozen.
Rowing at the Universities. SCOTT, FALLOWS, tailor, Cockermouth, Pet. Nov. 19. Dec. 4, at
Bream Fishing on the South-west Coast of Ireland, eleren, at office of Sol. Wicks, Cockermouth
An Act for the Preservation of Coarse Fish.
An immense stock in various bindings.
Chess at the City of London Club, &c. 10, at two, at offices of Hime, Liverpool. Sol. Pearson, LiverILLUSTRATED PRICE-LIST of Inkstands, Postage Scales
Crib-biting and Wind-sucking in Horses. pool SENIOR, Amos, yarn spinner, Kirkburton. Pet. Nov. 21. Dec. Copying Presses, Writing Cases, Despatch Boxes, Oak and
The Manulacture and Preservation of Manure. 8, at three, at office of Sols. Robinson and Johnson, Hudders.. Walnut Stationery Cabinets, and other useful articles
Scotch Agricultural Notes. field adapted to Library or Office, post free.
Preparing Young Vines for Planting. SKIPWORTH, SABAH, widow, farmer, Billericay. Pet. Nov. 20°
Golf, Bicycling, Football, Poultry, and Pigeons. Dec. 9, at tso, at the Saracen's Head hotel, Chelmsford. Sol Dubots, King-st, Cheapaide NUNERAL REFORM.
Dec. 4, at twelve, at offices of Sol. Wake, Sheffield
4, at eleven, at office of sol, Lind, Beaufort-bldgs, Strand & view of applying a remedy to this serious evil the
extensive cemetery at Woking, held themselves preBroad-st
pared to undertake the whole duties relating to interments STONIER, JOHN BEXSOX, writing clerk, Birmingham. Pet. Nov.
at fixed and moderate scales of charge, from which survivors THE LADY'S NEWSPAPER, 5. Dec. 5, at ten, at effice of Sol. East, Biriningham STRINGER, WILLIAM, beer house keeper, Huddersfield. Pet. Nov. may choose according to their means and the requirements
OF of the case. The Company also undertakes the conduct of 22. Dec. 11, at eleven, at office of Sol. Sykes, Huddersfield TARRY, HARRIS, baker, Grosvenor-pk, Camberwell. Pet. Nov. Funerals to other cemeteries, and to all parts of the United
SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 29. 19. Dec. 4, as three, at office of Sols. Stocken and Jupp, Leaden. Kingdom. A pamphlet containing full particulars may be hall-st obtainer, or will be forwarded, upon application to the
CONTAINS : TAYLOR, HENRY, custom house agent, Leadenhall-st. Pet. Nov. Chief Office, 2, Lancaster-place, Strand, W.C.
Lady School Board Candidates. 14. Dec. 2, at three, at the Bell inn, Edmonton, Sol. Philp,
Fellow Travellers: III. Third Class. Pancras-la, Queen-st
The“ Boarding out" System. TODD, ELLEN, boot manufacturer, Leeds. Pet. Nov. 19. Dec. 4,
Portraits of Sir rnet Wolseley, C.B., and Charles II., at three, at office of Sols. F#wcett and Malcolm, Leeds
late Duke of Brunswick. TRUMAN, WILLIAM SAMUEL, wing merchant, Botolpb-la, East. cheap. Pet. Nov, 12. Dec. 1, at twelve, at the Guildhall coffee.
The Mantuan Onyx Vase, with Illustration, house, Gresham-st. Sol. Smith, Leadenhall-st
Canserie de Paris. USRAW, WILLIAM, watchmaker, Kingston-on-Hull. Pet. Nov, 20.
The Tabarde Inn Southwark, with Illustration.
Silver Chatelaine and Pendants, with Illustrations. upon-Huil
Fashionable Boots and Shoes, with Illustrations. WARE, EDWIN, wine merchant, Portaea. Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 10,
at two, at omce of Brett, Milford, Pattinson, and Co. 150. Leadenhall-st, London, Bols. Cousins and Burbidge, Ports.
A LARGE VARIETY OF
COLOURED SUPPLEMENT OF mouth WHITEHURST, WILLIAM, and Whitehurst, Hugh, elastic web NEW GOODS for COATS and TROUSERS
KNITTED MITTENS. manufacturers, Derby. Pet. Nov. 18. Dec. 11, at twelve, at Office of Sol, Leech, Derby
FOR THE SEASON. WIGG, SAMUEL LEGGETT, builder, Keesingland. Pet. Nov, 21
DRESS AND FASHION: The Parisian Fashions (from our Dec. 11, at twelve, at office of Sol. Seager, Lowestoft WILKINSON, SAMUEL, licensed victualler, Wolverhampton, Pet. 315, HIGH HOLBORN Black Silk, Grey Cloth, and Brown Faille Costumes Faille
own Correspondent): -Striped Velveteen Bodice
and Tunic; Dec. , at
and Velvet Indoor Toilette ; Carringe, Dinner, and Evening hampton
LONDON WILLIAMS, FRANCIS, builder, Kingston-on-Thames. Pet. Nov.
Toilettes; Fashionable Buttons; Invalid's Flannel Jacket; 20. Dec. 11, at three, at office of Sol. Buckland, Kingston-on
Embroidered Chemise; Dress Improver ; Caps, &c., with
(Four Doors East of Chancery-lane.) Thames
Illu-trations. WILSON, BENJAMIN COULTMAN, house agent, Belgrava.sq. Pet.
THE WORK TABLE.-Hibernian Embroidery; The School Nov. 17. Dec. 8, at two, at otice of Sols. Link ater, Hackwood,
of Art Needlework, &c. Addison, and Brown, Walbrook
THE HOUSEWIFE.-On Home Service; Notes and Queries; WINTERS, GEORGE, tailor, Bitchin. Pet. Nov, 19. Dec. 8, at
Hereditary diseases are never more likely to develop Answers, Cuisine : Medieval Cookery; Notes and Queries, eleven, at Guildhall coffee-house, Greshamn-st. Soi. Shillitoe, Kitchin
their existence, and to display their intensity, than during Answers.
Music and Musicians. Gazette des Dames. The Tourist.
parent to child, exercises a wide influence in producing Boudoir. Court Chronicle. Society. Obituary. WOOTTON, GEORGE, draper, Clophill. Pet. Nov. 20. Dec. 8, at disease remedial by these preparations. Consumption,
Notes and Queries on Dress, Work, Music, and other twelve, at office of Sol. Conquest, Bedford gout, and scrofulous disorders are from this cause ever pre
subjects useful and interesting to Ladies. sent, and yearly rob us of our dearest treasures. Hollo.
All the Fasbionable intelligence of the Week. way's Ointment and Pills have the power of removing from
May be had of News Agents, Booksellers, and at the RailOrders of Discharge. the blood the rnorbid qualities, in which lies the essence of
Price 6d ; Post Free, 6!d.
blood, but purify every living tissue throughout the frame. OFFICE: 346, STRAND, LONDON, W.C.
AMERICAN AND ANGLO-AMERICAN STOVES. HULLOCK, JOEN CHARLES, grocer, Hull
Femra the managertokler bu haberione operaitant FIELD OFFICE, 346, STRAND, LONDON, W.C.
MANEY and CONNOR,
Dec. 11, at twelve, at office or Pickering accountant, Kingston SCIENTIFIC TROUSERS MAKERS.
FOR HEATING AND COOKING.
CAN BE PLACED ANYWHERE.
Almond, R. D. Charles-ut, Wigan, first, 25. 6d. At Trust. W.
To Readers and Correspondents.
Anonymous communications are invariably rejected.
not necessarily for publication, but as a guarantee of good faith.
plaintiff's separate property, and gave her judgment. We think, however, that the Deputy.Judge should have drawn the plaintiff's attention to sect. 13 of the same Act, which makes a married woman liable to the parish for the maintenance of her husband. The pig or its proceeds ought certainly to have been claimed by the guardians—and we might thus have had a very neat decision on this eccentric Act of Parliament.
TO SUBSCRIBERS. The volumes of the Law TIMES, and of the LAW TIMES REPORTS, are strongly and uniformly bound at the Office, as completed, for 5s.6d, for the Journal, and 4s. 6d.
for the Reports. Portfolins for preserving the current numbers of the LAW TIMES. price 5s. 6d., by post 5d. extra. Law Times Reports, price 38. Cd., by post 3d. extra.
CHARGES FOR ADVERTISEMENTS. Four lines or thirty words ........ 3s. 6d. | Every additional ten vords Os. 60.
Advertisements specially ordered for the first page are charged one-fourth more than the above scale.
Advertisements must reach the Office not later than five o'clock on Thursday afternoon.
NOTICE. The LAW TIMES goes to press on Thursday evening, that it may be received in the remotest
parts of the country on Saturday morning. Coinmunications and Advertisements must be transmitted accordingly. None cun appear thut do not reach the office by Thursday
afternoon's post. All communications intended for the Editor of the Solicitors' Department should be so
Tue position taken by Dr. KEVEALY in summing np the evidence for the defence in the Tichborne trial, namely, charging conspiracy upon the part of Romish ecclesiastics for the purpose of obtaining the control of the revennes of the TICIBORNE estates, reminds us that the Tichborne case is but an incident of the warfare which that learned gentleman is professedly waging against the Church of Rome. He was counsel for the defendant in Darby v. Ouseley in 1856, which was a very singular action. It was brought by a tide-waiter at Liverpool for a libel imputing to him that he was a rebel and a traitor by reason of his being a Roman Catholic, and a member of a certain Roman Catholic Society for the Conversion of England“ by prayers and other means" to the Roman Catholic faith. The defendant's counsel, at the close of the plaintiff's casc, did not intimate that he proposed to call witnesses and (having elicited on cross-examination of the plaintiff that he was a Roman Catholic, and considered himself bound by the canons of councils, and believed in the authority of the Pope) in his speech proposed to refer to the notes of the Rheimish Testament, and to describe to the jury the nature of the Austrian Concordat with the Church of Rome, and to read certain canons of the Councils of Lateran and Sens, Trent and Thurles, with a view of shey that the principles and opinions entertained by eminent members of the Roman Catholic Church were inimical to loyalty. The judge ruled that these matters were irrelevant and the defendant's counsel having in his speech repeated the charge against the plaintiff, the learned judge commented upon this in his summing up as evidence of malice, expressed his opinion on the libel in strong terms, and having left the question to the jury as one merely of amount of damages, they found for the plaintiff. This verdict the full court declined to disturb.
Now ready, price 5s. 6d., PART I., VOL. II., of CARITIME LAW REPORTS (New Series). By J. P. ASPINALL,
Esq., Barrister-at-Law, in the Admiralty Courts of England and Ireland, and in all the Superior Courts, with a Selection from the Decisions of the United States Courts, with Sotes by the Elitor. The First Series of "Maritime Law" may now be had com. pete in Three Volumes, half bound, price £5 58. for the set, or any single voluine for 2.2. Back numbers may be had to complete sets,
London : HORACE Cox, 10, Wellingtwn-street, Strand, W.C.
CON TEN TS. 2.EPORTS.
WHITE AND ANOTHER t'. BEXCKEY
LORFF COCRT OF APPEAL IN CIAYCERY.
Broker-Material alteration-Whether De THE MATLOCK OLD BATH HYDROPA.
broker may treat himself as principal 475 THIC COPAXY (CASE OF THE MAX.
BRIDGE. DAINECHETER FINANCE CORPORATION)
Court of Passage-New trial-Motion in Company-Allotinent of fully paid-up
Superior Court for-Judge's notes...... 477 hures in satisfaction of debt
PEYTOX . HATTING-
478 carried on by yurvavius i artner......... 412 Re HEATHCOTE'S TRUSTS
EPSWORTH AND OTHERS. THE ALLIANCE
MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY Wi--Construction-ft over
Marine insurance-Insurable interest... 479 ROLLS COURT. ROTELL E. MORBIS
Practice - Administration suit-Want of parties
LEADING ARTICLES, &c. ST. JOHN » COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE W. EARL OF EFTIXCHAM
TO READERS AND CORRESPONDENTS........ 83 Charity-Trust to present living 447
83 RAGGETT '. FIXDLATER
Libels in Newspapers
The Estates of Partuers in Bankruptcy...
88 FAWKS , LONGRIE
Title to and Transfer of land
865 Wu-Intention to exclude from re.
Contracts by Married Wonien affecting siduary divise
87 KITCHES '. IBBETSOX
87 bill of sale--Bankruptcy of administra. trix-Assun plion it wbsolute owner
SOLICITORS' JOURNAL: 450 Topics of the Week
88 BIDE HARRISON
Nules of New Decisions will-construction-"Sums of money
Two Model Actions at LAW
80 due to me 431 Court of Common Pleas
$9 BAROS PESEDO r. JOHNSON
Heirs-at-Law and Next of Kin
60 Foreign state -- Proper plaintit - De
Unclaimed Stock and Dividends in the murier
89 PEARSE * VE AKSE PEARSE, PEARSE
Report of Sales
89 Pleedings--Exceptions-Scandal 453
Specimens of a Code of Marine Insurance lapos.) , UVERSEERS OF LIVERPOOL
Pour rate-Dock rates-Tenant's profits 454 REAL PROPERTY AND CONVEYANCING: BOARD P. BOARD
Notes of New Decisions ..... Scute or Limitations-Possession un.
COUNTY COURTS:der 1. valid will
The Judicature Commission and the COURT OF EXCHEQUER.
90 KSOWLMAN T. BLUETT
Bradiord County Court
31 Statate or Prauan (27 Car. 2, c. 3), sect. 4 462
BANKRUPTCY LAWCOURT FOR DIVORCE AND MATRI.
Court of Bankruptcy.
92 DAUNIAL CAUSES.
Biudlord County Court GODERICH GUDERICH
94 Matrimonial suit-Judicial separation -Custody of children given to the
CORRESPONDENCE OF THE PROFESSION ... 94 wife.
NOTES AND QUERIES ON POINTS OF PRAC. POWELL. POWELL AND JONES
Organisation among Solicitors
93 REG, . ADEX
Manchester Low Students' Society Larceny-Ballee
Articled Clerks' Society ....... RES.. DAYXES AND WARNER
Law Students' Debating Society Larceny- Bailee - Offence punishable
Union Society of London #unmadly
468 REG. E. COGGISS
Solicitors' Benevolent Association Larceny - Receiving - Accessory in
Peterborough Articled Clerks' Debating second degree
THE COURTS AND COURT PAPERS:-
97 Terder by public contract-Good con. sideration-Unilateral contract ......... 471 PROMOTIONS AXD APPOINTMENTS
98 ETXT 1. GODLAKE
38 Libel-Declaration - Unsupported in. nuendos 472 BIRTH), MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS
Sir GEORGE JESSEL would appear to be setting an adınirable example in more ways than one. His judgments which we have already reported, are remarkably pithy and concise, it good specimen being that afforded by Pavil v. Jortimer (29 L. T. Rep. N. S. 418.): "Three executors allow an investment of 5901. to remain upon a security which is at the time quite insufficient. They then proceed to distribute the residue. One of them dies, and the legatee claims to be paid her legacy. The surviving executors, under a misapprehension of their duty, resist. The administration of the estate is thrown upon the court, and in the course of it they stop the suit by payment of the legacy. They tien ask the executors of the deceased executor for the difference of the amount realised and the 5001., which is paid. Now they claim the costs of their abortive resistance. I am at a loss to understand upon what principle such a claim can be supported. If a legacy is paid by mistake, executors cannot claim it back from the residuary legatees. If the omission to set apart a sum to meet this legacy were a breach of trust, of course the liability might be established. But it is not a breach of trust, and I hold that the representative of the executor is not liable for the costs of a resistance to the demand of the legatee, which was undertaken without notice to him. The summons must be dismissed with costs." The question in this bare form, it was stated, had not occurred before. In another case (Fothergill v. Rowland, 29 L. T. Rep. N. S. 111) Sir GEORGE JESSEL said he did not approve when at the Bar, and does not now that he is on the Bench, of the practice of not deciding a substantial question when it is fairly raised between the parties and argued, simply because it is raised by demurrer. He thought demurring ought to be encouraged, and questions thus speedily and cheaply determined.
The Law and the Lawyers. .
Law reform is attracting attention in the Australian colonies, and a somewhat remarkable article on the subject appears in the South Australian Advertiser for the 30th of last September, the object being to advocate the extension of the jurisdiction of the local
A very extraordinary illustration of elaborate pleading is given as evidence of the desirability of encouraging the simple procedure of the local courts. The pleading in question was a declaration in the case of the North Australian Company v. Blackmore, commenced three years ago, and still unsettled. The declaration is thus described by our contemporary : “ It consisted of more than 650 pages of brief paper, equal to over 1300 pages of foolscap, containing about 5000 common law folios of seventy-two words each. The cost of a single copy of this immense monument of legal art, at the ordinary rate of 3d. per folio, wonld amount to the trifling sum of £62 10s., and it would take fifty days to write out such a copy.” “ The court,” we are told, “when the simple and concise statement of the plaintiff's cause of action was produced, consisted of three learned and experienced Judges. Even they were incredulous at first. They refused to believe that the
A DePtty County Court Judge has decided that a pig is an investment within the first section of the Married Women's Property Act 1870. The married woman in question was separated from her husband by the operation of the poor law, he being in the workhouse. She managed to earn some money while he was there, which she invested in a pig. She, however, sold the pig to a creditor of her husband, who, instead of paying for the pig, claimed a set-off. The Deputy-Judge held that the pig was the VOL LVI.-No. 1601.
art of man, or the skill of a pleader, could manufacture such a simple and concise declaration as was presented to them. It was only the serious assurance of counsel that this fo:midable mass of paper was really the declaration in the action that at length convinced the court of the correctness of the assertion as to this . question of fact.' On the trial of the cause all parties were happily spared the pending infliction of having these simple and concise pleadings read. This was dispensed with by general consent. Consequently, the trial was had without the plaintiff's own statement of his cause of action being read.” Pleaders who indulge in this monstrous and antiqnated form of declaring are the worst enemies of their own calling, and when the Judicature Act comes into operation it is to be hoped that conciseness and verbal accuracy will be carefully cultivated.
how the costs of the liquidation proceedings should be paid. An application was made by the debtor to a County Court Judge for an order for payment of them out of the estate, but it was dismissed with costs: hence the appeal. The 292nd of the Bankruptcy Rules 1870 says " that where bankruptcy occurs pending proceedings for or towards liquidation by arrangement, the proper costs incurred in relation to such proceedings shall be paid by the trustee out of the debtor's estate, unless the court shall otherwise order.” The Chief Judge states clearly the only circumstances under which the court should otherwise order. He said that he was of opinion chat unless a corrupt and fraudulent motive could be proved against the bankrupt, the costs of the liquidation proceedings ought to be paid, and, in the particular case, the only possible motive of the debtor in filing his petition was to preserve the property for the general body of creditors. A contention was raised that liquidation by arrangement being negatived before the filing of the bankruptcy petition, the bankruptcy did not take place while the liquidation proceedings were pending. His Lordship, however, does not appear to have given any attention to this point, and the debtor got his costs of the liquidation and of the application in the court below.
To the production of what documents a party is entitled at the hands of his adversary is a question of much practical importance, and there is a general principle that letters passing between codefendants are not privileged from production though written after the dispute has arisen, and in contemplation of litigation, or even after the institution of a suit, and with a view to defence in the suit-except as to such parts thereof as contain the opinions of legal advisers consulted by the defendants : (Kerr on Discovery, 146.) A further exception was made by the case of Hamilton v. Nott (L. Rep. 16 Eq. 112), where one defendant was a solicitor, and acted as agent for the solicitor on the record to collect evidence in the suit. The letters which passed between him and his co-defendant were held privileged from production. The principle has been further illustrated by the case of Carr v. New Qrelrada Company, before Vice-Chancellor Malins on the 22nd ult., where it was sought to obtain production of correspondence which had passed between the company and their agent. The documents in question were rough notes kept, made and prepared by the agent, from which a statement was compiled for the use of an arbitrator appointed by the company on the occasion of an arbitration on the subject-matter of the suit. On the ground that the notes were compiled by an agent of the company they refused to produce them, and their refusal was held justifiable. When our police are discovering such extraordinary capacity for false swearing and arresting harmless and unoffending people, it is some small satisfaction to find that the weakness is not confined to this country. A case recently reported from the Supreme Court of Illinois reveals a state of things in that State which we hope is not universal. CHRISTOPHER RAFFERTY was found guilty of the murder of PATRICK O’MEARA, a policeman. In giving judgment in error, Judge MCALLISTER said : " The record contains evidence tending to show that the homicide was committed by the prisoner in resisting the deceased, who was a policeman of the city of Chicago, whilst engaged, in connection with another policeman, whom he was aiding in the act of committing an illegal and wholly unjustifiable invasion of prisoner's liberty, by attempting to seize his person and take him off to prison without any authority to do so." The circumstances of the arrest strangely resemble those to which we are rapidly becoming accustomed. The prisoner, to use the Judge's own words, was sitting quietly and peaceably by a table in a saloon, when O'MEARA, the deceased, and another policeman of the name of SCANLAN, came in. O'MEARA immediately pointed the prisoner out to SCANLAN. The prisoner, upon seeing O'MEARA, addressed him in a friendly manner, asking him to take something to drink, or a cigar, which was declined." He was then told that the police had a warrant for his arrest; the deceased stood at the door to prevent his escape, and then the fatal shot was fired. There was not the slightest pretence that the prisoner had been accused or suspected of having committed any felony, or that at the time he was in the act of committing a misdemeanor or even any violation of a city ordinance. The warrant held by the police was one of several which had been signed by a magistrate in blank, to be filled up by the inspector as "emergency” required. At the trial this warrant was excluded from the attention of the jury, and upon that ground the prisoner's counsel excepted. The Court of Appeal has held that evidence of the illegal nature of the warrant was admissible, the law being clear that in resisting an illegal arrest, if death result, the crime is manslaughter-not murder.
The question whether not only the Croydon Court, but all County Courts within a radius of twenty miles of London should not be abolished, and their jurisdiction vested in the metropolitan courts is one of great importance, and the only objection that can be raised to it must necessarily come from those locally interested, and the meeting held at Croydon on the 25th ult. gives expression to the local feeling temperately and properly. But the public, we conceive, frequently suffer by being obliged to go into districts, carrying with them London counsel and attorneys, in cases which might with much greater convenience be tried in the City, or at Westminster or Marylebone. We suppose, however, that the argument which has been advanced in favour of maintaining the Home Circuit applies equally to the maintenance of the local courts round London. The Judicature Commission, however, has advised their removal, and, this being so, a very strong case must, we anticipate, be made out to save them from extinction. The tendency of recent legislation lies decidedly in that direction. The question of imprisonment for debt was also discussed at the Croydon meeting; On this question we think that the resolutions which were passed at the meeting, and which we publish elsewhere, call for observation. We quite agree that the power to commit to prison those who can and will not pay their debts vested in both the Judges of the Supreme and County Courts, ought to be continued, but we can see no reason for excepting from it any debtor, however much his debt or his earnings, always provided he comes within the clear and simple category of not willing to pay;” and indeed, this is one stronger reason for enforcing payment on the humbler classes according to their ability, because to them credit is absolutely necessary at certain times of want of work, or ability to work, and it is only by the guarantee afforded by the imprisonment of the dishonest that the honest can get credit. We know of no alteration that is required in the law which now wisely rejects all questions of fraud in con: tracting the debts, which are left to the criminal tribunal, but resolves all cases into the simple question-is the debtor able and not willing to pay his just debts? We hope, notwithstanding, the report of the committee of last session as to the law of imprisonment for debt, that we shall not have another added to the many recent changes for change sake.
being able, and
The question of the payment of the costs of liquidation proceedings where bankruptcy supervenes is one which should be understood by practitioners, and we therefore direct their attention to Ex parte Jejery; re Hawes (29 L. T. Rep. N. S. 433). There a debtor being unable to attend to his business, some bill of sale holders, with his consent, took possession of his estate, and called a meeting in order to make some arrangement with his creditors generally. Being, subsequently, apprehensive that his estate was being sold at an undervalue, he instructed his solicitor to file a petition for liquidation. A receiver was forthwith appointed, and took possession of the estate. At the first meeting, however, the proposition to liquidate was negatived by a large majority, and the next day a petition in bankruptcy was presented against the debtor, and he was adjudicated bankrupt. Thereupon the question arose as to
If we may form an opinion upon some observations which appear in the last number of the Irish Law Times, we veed have little scruple in reforming the courts of law in Ireland, and abolishing the intermediate Court of Appeal. We have rarely seen so graphic a description of utter confusion as we find in the columns of our contemporary, and in order that we may not understate the case, we will give his own words : "As the courts are at present constituted,” we are told, “ they do not satisfy the public or themselves, either in the manner they discharge their own business, or review each other's
decisions. The courts of first instance, or those which hear and decide cases of pleading and practice on the common law side of the Hall of the Four Courts, and control the trial and decision of questions of law and fact after their disposal at Nisi Prius, are jealous of their respective regulations, differ in their views, clash in the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and when reviewing each other's decisions in the Court of Error, as at present constituted, “ pay each other
off," withont much consideration or respect. When the Common Pleas and Exchequer fancy they catch the Queen's Bench at fault, they trip them up unmercifully, and when the Queen's Bench come round in their turn to take either of their former critics to task, sometimes find great questions decided on appeal to the Court of Error, by a minority of judges overruling the decision of the majority, and the public are obliged to be content with the law thus laid down, although the reasoning, as well as the number, of the dissentients is more to be relied on. Master of the Rolls and the Vice-Chancellor, on the equity side,
As to the courts of the
we are constrained to say they have each their respective views, and although in the main they have earned the respect and confidence of the public, yet their practice and procedure are not what the Profession and the public desire, especially in the subordinate offices attached to each.” This we venture to think is a lirely Irish sketch, and one in which implicit trust ought not to be placed. It is hardly credible that a number of educated gentlemen entrusted with the highest functions in the State, should administer the law according to the bias of their personal feelings. The Court of Appeal our contemporary is rather shy of, simply observing that matters there have become too exciting to be pleasant. Anything that the Legislature may do with these courts cannot assuredly make them worse than they are--if we believe the Irish Law Times.
THERE seems to be as much inconsistency in the decisions arrived at by the Masters sitting for the Judges at Chambers in matters relating to articled clerks' notices, as there is want of uniformity in the notices themselves. Previous to a Preliminary Examination it is necessary to give one calendar month's notice prior to the day of examination. For an Intermediate one calendar month's notice, prior to the first day of the term in which the candidate proposes to present himself for examination, is requisite. In the ease of a Final Examination a clear term's notice must be given. Our last week's number contaiued a report of two cases determined by Masters sitting at Chambers. In the first application was made, on the 22nd ult. for leave to enter copies of an admission notice, given for Michaelmas Term last, in the Judges' books one day previous to the day pointed for admission, the rules of Hilary Term 1853 prescribing the period when such entries should be made, prior to the Term preceding that in which admission as an attorney is sought. The application seems to have been grounded on an affidavit of the applicant's ignorance of the rules, and an order was made in the terms of the application. In the second case, as reported by us, an order was solicited on the 21th ult. for leave to give to the Masters of the Queen's Bench, and to enter in the same Jndges' books, a similar admission notice for the ensuing. Hilary Term, and the application was refused. The anomaly is apparent. In the first case the publication for one Term of the applicant's name in the usual list must have been taken as being all that was considered necessary, and the entry in the Judges' books a matter of no consequence. In the latter, the same publication for one term in the same list, coupled with the fact of the entries standing in the Judges' books for a period of nearly two months prior to admission, does not suffice, notwithstanding the statement on oath of the applicant that he had been led into the error of not giving his notice in due time, by supposing that a similar notice to that required in the case of an Intermediate Examination was all that was necessary. We commend these cases to the consideration of the various Articled Clerks' Societies in London and the provinces.
of some interest and deserves discussion. In the action of Mr. Dixon against the Pall Mall Gazette, if we remember rightly, references to other criticisms which has reviewed his bock favourably were held inadmissible. In the action of Mr. Gilbert against the same newspaper the line pursued in criticising his previous plays was adverted to to support the suggestion that the critic had been actuated by malice, and this was allowed. The principles upon which matter other than that constituting the libel is admitted has been more than once discussed, and it is clear that such matter should be accepted with great caution. Chief Baron Pollock, in Darby v. Ouseley (25 L. J., Ex., at p. 229) says: "The rule is that other paragraphs or passages of a document put in by the plaintiff are to be read as part of his evidence, if they are connected with, or construe, or control, modify, qualify, or explain the passages which have been read by the plaintiff; but that was not the case in the present instance. Not only was the article an entirely distinct one, but it did not at all interpret, modify, or explain the passages
in by the plaintiff, and it was entirely irrelevant to it; except that it related to the plaintiff, it was upon a different subject.” From this it would seem that in order to entitle a plaintiff to put in anything besides the article complained of, to give colour to it, it must not only refer to him but be relevant to the subject matter; and if it is sought to prove malice by such other publication it must directly affect the alleged libel. "" The subsequent article put in by the plaintiff,” said the Chief Baron in Darby v. Ouseley," was only admissible as evidence of malice, and the passage proposed to be read for the defendants could not be deemed part of that evidence, because it did not at all affect it." In that case the plaintiff's counsel, in order to show actual malice, put in a number of the defendant's paper subsequent to that containing the libel. The defendant's counsel proposed to read as part of the plaintiff's evidence a paragraph in the same paper referring to the action which had then been commenced by plaintiff, but Mr. Justice Willes, not considering that such paragraph was one in any degree mitigating, modifying, or explaining the article put in as evidence of actual malice, ruled that it was not to be read as part of the plaintiff's evidence.
We think it may be contended, therefore, that, in strictness, the fact that in previous articles a newspaper has pursued a course apparently inimical to an author, ought not, unless actually affecting the subject-matter complained of, be admitted as evidence of malice. But publications subsequent to the article complained of may be taken together with it so as to prove malice. Malice, in strictness, is a question of law upon the libel itself, and the libel must be taken in connection only with anything subsequent which controls, explains, or aggravates it.
The course which has been pursued in connection with the case of Gilbert v. Enoch is somewhat extraordinary, and one which we think ought not to be encouraged. Although the jury found both parties innocent of any offence, Mr. Gilbert has resorted to the newspapers to reiterate his charge against the Pall Mall Gazette, and the Pall Mall Gazette has printed its justification, saying in effect that the jury were not warranted in adding anything to their verdict, and that what they did add-namely, that the play was innocent and inoffensive-was untrue. The press generally seemed highly pleased with the verdict and the expression of the jury, and we think both parties might well have rested content. As it is, neither party is satisfied; even the Pall Mall, which has the verdict, quibbling concerning the observations of the jury. Obviously juries would do well to remember the privilege which Mr. Justice Brett reminded a jury a few days since that they enjoy, of giving no reasons for their verdict. The Pall Mall is now seeking to prove that the jury were wrong in saying that the play is innocent, and certainly it would seem that if the play is innocent, the criticism was a libel. Trial by jury will be worth very little if the litigation is to be prolonged in the columns of the press. And, as a rule, comments by a litigant upon his own case are dangerous. (Strauss v. Francis, second action.)
THE ESTATES OF PARTNERS IN BANKRUPTCY.-I. NUMEROUS cases with reference to the administration of the estates of partners in bankruptcy, show clearly enough that the subject is not without difficulty, and it is desirable that the established principles of the bankruptcy law with reference to it should be well understood. We will first consider what is joint estate.
A good illustration of the questions which may arise as to what is joint and what separate estate, is furnished by Re Rowland and Crankshaw (L. Rep. 1 Ch. App. 4:21). The arrangement there was this. Crankshaw was to employ Rowland as his traveller and superintendent for fifteen months; Rowland to purchase goods for Crankshaw without commission, and to receive a salary of £150 a year, and 10 per cent. on the profits remaining after deducting the salary; the business to be carried on under the firm of Rowland and Co.; and that at the end of the fifteen months a partnership should be formed between them on certain terms. In the March previous to the July at which the partnership was to be entered into, Rowland was adjudged bankrupt, and on the day following Crankshaw was also adjudged bankrupt on a separate petition. The question arising on the appeal was whether there was any partnership-whether
LIBELS IN NEWSPAPERS. The case of Gilbert v. Enoch, recently tried before Mr. Justice Brett, seems to have attracted a somewhat undue amount of attention, as if some novel principle had been established, or the old principles applied in some new manner. The alleged libel was contained in a criticism on a comedy, the criticism amounting to this: That the play was coarse, vulgar, and indecent. What did Mr. Justice Brett tell the jury? First, that however hostile in spirit and wrong as a criticism-rather a loose expression, we think --if it does not travel away from the work to slander the author, it is no libel. If the criticism goes beyond the work, and attributes to the composer some conduct or motive which, if truly imputed, would in the eyes of reasonable persons of right senti. ment, cause a feeling of hatred, ridicule, and contempt for him, it is a libel. Bona fides and honest belief in its truth are then immaterial. What is there in this which was not already established law? Was it not said, in effect, by Lord Ellenborough, when he directed the jury, in Tabart v. Tipper (1 Camp. 351), thus : "That publication I shall not consider as a libel which has for its object, not to injure the reputation of any individual,
expose a vicious taste in literature, or to censure what is hostile to morality ?”. And further on, “Reflection upon personal character is another thing. Show me an attack on the moral character of the plaintiff, or any attack upon his character unconnected with his authorship, and I shall be as ready as any Judge who ever sat here to protect him." Or what did Mr. Justice Brett say which was not in effect said by Lord Tenterden in Macleod v. Wakley (3 C. & P. 313) ? “Whatever is fair and can be reasonably said of the authors of works, or of themselves as connected with their works, is not actionable unless it appear that, under the pretext of criticising the works, the defendant takes an opportunity of attacking the character of the author; and then it will be a libel.” We do not, however, wish to detract from the admirable clearness and conciseness of Mr. Justice Brett's direction, which gives us the law applicable to the case under coneideration in terms not to be misunderstood.
There is a feature in the case apart from the direction which is