40-50. 121 390 202 125 193 154 50 1831 750 208 600 229 182 135 202 75 2381 54 87 210 27 57 42 48 25 550 612 83 383 158 109 75 136 37 1593 656 131 485 177 138 85 155 47 1874 ΙΟ 281 1122 35 178 20 1316 12 36 3 194 102 19 725 I 20 23 808 50-60.... 500 80 31 19 62 14 17 254 60-70. 46 200 50 31 23 261 61 25 83 3247 800 2750 810 666 473 952 302 10000 267 310 919 115 200 123 202 2219 83 67 275 344 342 215 214 108 31 1596 Despondency... 136 392 457 398 248 241 Fear of disgrace. 112 43 2027 69 117 113 56 33 Grief Insanity 37 37 50 50 19 8 429 12 539 2 21 267 427 3 160 1013 31 1361 II 348 Total... 2980 490 1831 695 466 350 750 219 7781 NOTES. The complaint and injunction in the case of the Connecticut Railway and Lighting Company vs. The Amalgamated Association of Street Railroad Employees, No. 193, et al., though not involving any radical departure from precedent, is yet significant as marking one step in the progress of the legal control of strikes and boycotts. This case is remarkable for the large number of defendants and for the sweeping nature of the injunction, but perhaps equally for the fact that thus far the resistance on the part of the defendants has been almost entirely lacking. The document begins by ordering the sheriff to attach to the value of $25,000 the goods or estate of thirty-three members of the Amalgamated Association of Street Railway Employees, mentioned by name, as well as the Association itself. It further includes the officers of the Central Labor Union, the Central Labor Union itself, and the officers of each of the fifteen separate unions as well as the unions themselves. All of these unions are purely voluntary, unincorporated associations. The complaint recites the familiar story of the Waterbury strike and of the boycott of the Street Railway Company by the trade unions of the city, acting in concert. It describes in detail each of the defendant trade unions and alleges that they have "combined, confederated and conspired together by the same means to prevent persons from furnishing supplies to and dealing with the plaintiff, and from furnishing food, lodging and necessaries of life to such persons as the plaintiff has been able to employ in the places of said defendants, and to boycott the plaintiff and its present employés, and to threaten trouble, loss and ruin of business to such persons as deal with the plaintiff or its present employés, or ride on its cars, and to boycott such persons." In order to make the attachment effectual, the sheriff is commanded "to leave a true and attested copy of this writ and of the accompanying complaint, at least twelve days before the session of the Court to which it is made returnable, at the usual places of business of The Waterbury National Bank, The Citizens' National Bank, The Manufacturers' National Bank, The Fourth National Bank, The Colonial Trust Company, The Waterbury Savings Bank, and The Dime Savings Bank, all corporations located in and doing business in said Waterbury, as they, or one or more of them, are or is the agent or agents, trustee or trustees, or debtor or debtors of said defendants, or of one or more of them, and has or have concealed in its or their hands the goods, effects or estate of said defendants, or of one or more of them, and is or are indebted to them, or to one or more of them." The injunction issued by the Court March 13, 1903, after reciting the main features of the complaint, commands and enjoins the defendants "under a penalty of ten thousand dollars ($10,000), forthwith absolutely to desist and refrain from doing any unlawful act or thing whatsoever by the means or methods set forth in the complaint, in the furtherance of any combination or conspiracy or purpose to hinder, interfere with, or prevent the plaintiff, its officers and employés in the free and unhindered conduct and control of its business, or to molest or injure its employés or property; From in any manner interfering with the present employés of the plaintiff and with any person who may desire to enter the employ of the plaintiff, by way of threats, intimidations, violence, or any act or language intended or tending to prevent persons from continuing in or entering the employment of the plaintiff, or intended or tending to induce any such person or persons to leave the employ of the plaintiff ; From congregating or loitering about or near the railroad station and highways and public squares of said Waterbury, or the premises and tracks of the plaintiff, and from picketing or patrolling said places, or causing the same to be done, with intent to interfere with any persons now in the employ of the plaintiff or seeking to enter its employ, or to interfere with the prosecution of the plaintiff's business, or to interfere with or obstruct in any manner the trade or patronage of the plaintiff, or to prevent or induce any person or persons not to deal with the plaintiff or ride on its cars or to use its electric lights; From boycotting the plaintiff or its employés, either by threats, intimidation, unlawful persuasion or otherwise; From interfering with, intimidating, boycotting or molesting, or attempting to interfere with, intimidate, boycott or molest, any person or persons or corporation by threats, direct or indirect, express or implied, of loss or trouble or harm to person, property or business, or otherwise, with the intent to induce such person or persons or corporation not to deal or do business with the plaintiff or its employés, or with its patrons or those who ride on its cars, or not to furnish it or them with supplies, food and lodgings, or not to ride upon its cars, or not to use its electric lights; and from representing or causing to be represented, in express or implied terms, to any |