The Law Times, 210. köideOffice of The Law Times, 1950 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 77
Page 210-26
... parties when the contract was made that the parties could not be taken to have intended to apply the provisions of the contract or some of them to the work as actually done , the provisions in question would not apply and if the work ...
... parties when the contract was made that the parties could not be taken to have intended to apply the provisions of the contract or some of them to the work as actually done , the provisions in question would not apply and if the work ...
Page 210-63
... Parties ) ( 209 L. T. Jour . 282 ; ( 1950 ) 1 All E. R. 1072 ) , who agreed to store the plaintiff's furniture for reward , arranged without the plaintiff's knowledge for its storage by third parties . When the plaintiff required ...
... Parties ) ( 209 L. T. Jour . 282 ; ( 1950 ) 1 All E. R. 1072 ) , who agreed to store the plaintiff's furniture for reward , arranged without the plaintiff's knowledge for its storage by third parties . When the plaintiff required ...
Page 210-352
... parties , and it is known from L'Estrange v . Graucob ( ( 1934 ) 2 K. B. 394 ) that a signatory cannot be heard to say that he did not know of the terms in the contract he has signed . Could not an exception be created for the ...
... parties , and it is known from L'Estrange v . Graucob ( ( 1934 ) 2 K. B. 394 ) that a signatory cannot be heard to say that he did not know of the terms in the contract he has signed . Could not an exception be created for the ...
Contents
them suffering and to increase their produce is | 210-16 |
with a will | 210-23 |
TAYLORS for all makes | 210-32 |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement Amendment amount applied appointed authority Bill Board charge claim clause committee compensation considered contained contract costs Council Counsel county court Court of Appeal damages decision defendant duty effect England entitled evidence fact fund further give given Government granted ground Health held hospital House husband income interest issue JUDGE July jurisdiction justices L. T. Jour L. T. Rep land landlord Limited London Lord matter meaning Minister notice November October operation Order in Council paid parties payment person plaintiff Planning possession practice premises present Price proceedings purchaser question reason received reference regard Regulations relating rent REPORTS respect respondent Restriction result rule sect September shares Society Solicitors statutory taken tenant trust wife