Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed]

ONLY SIXTY COPIES PRINTED.-TO BE CONTINUED ANNUALLY.

Gateshead-on-Tyne:

PRINTED BY WILLIAM DOUGLAS, OBSERVER OFFICE.

MDCCCXLIII.

[blocks in formation]

HISTORICAL COLLECTIONS,

1842.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

GATESHEAD STREET ACT ASSESSMENT
ON LANDLORDS.

THE owners of property in Gateshead, as are
HE undersigned deems it right to call the atten-

assessed to the Street Act Assessment, to the following clauses
of the Act, under which the Commissioners, and Mr. Kell, their
Clerk, contend the landlords can be compelled to pay the rates
to the collectors:-

"68. Enacts, That one moiety of all and every the rates or assessments hereby ordered to be made shall be allowed by the respective owners of the several lands, tenements and hereditaments hereby made rateable, to the tenants or occupiers thereof respectively who shall pay the same; and such tenants or occupiers are authorised and empowered to deduct and retain out of their respective rents, such sums of money as they shall respectively pay for and on behalf of their respective landlords or owners; and the payment of such moiety by the said tenants or occupiers shall be considered as money actually paid for rent due or to become due to such landlords and owners, who, shall allow the same to their respective tenants out of their rents accordingly, and the other moiety thereof shall be borne and sustained by such occupiers.

"69. Enacts, That the said Commissioners shall and may rate or assess the landlord or owner of any houses or buildings, which shall be let to or occupied by two or more tenants, and the same shall be deemed as one house or tenement; and such rates or assessments shall be paid by one or more of the occupiers of any part or parts of such houses or buildings, who is and are hereby required to pay such sum and sums of money as shall be so rated or assessed upon any such landlord or

owner in pursuance of this Act, and to deduct the same out of his, her, or their rent; and the occupier or occupiers paying such rates or assessments, or any part thereof, shall be acquitted and discharged of and for so much money as he, she, or they shall have so paid, as if the same had been actually paid to the landlord or owner to whom his, ber, or their rent shall be due and payable; and every such landlord or owner is hereby required to allow such deduction upon the receipt of the residue of his, her, or their rent; but no occupier or occupiers shall at any time pay or be liable to pay any greater sum for or towards the discharge of the said rates or assessments and arrears thereof than the amount of rent due and payable by such occupier or occupiers to the landlord or landlords, owner or owners of the premises occupied by him, her, or them.

"70. Enacts, That it shall and may be lawful for the said Commissioners, and they are empowered, upon the complaint of any occupier or owner respectively of a dwelling house or other hereditament subject to the payment of the said rates or assessments, to mitigate, reduce, lessen, remit, or excuse, for or on account of his or their poverty or inability only, the payment of that part of the said rate or assessment, which by this Act is made payable by such owner or occupier for such dwellinghouse or other hereditament, in such manner as the said Commissioners shall in their discretion think just and reasonable; but the respective landlords or occupiers of such dwellinghouses and hereditaments, whose part of the said rate or assessment shall not be mitigated, reduced, lessened, remitted, or excused;, shall nevertheless bear and pay their proportion of such rates or assessments in respect of such premises."

I contend that the above clauses give no power whatever to the Commissioners to recover the rates from any other persons than the occupiers of property; and I have refused to pay certain rates which have been demanded of me, by the collectors, as an owner. The clauses, to my comprehension, are quite décisive against the pretensions of the Commissioners to levy rates from the landlord. The Act says that landlords may be assessed, evidently for the sake of more clearly defining the properties; but the occupiers, and the occupiers only, are to pay the rates to the colleetors, and afterwards to deduct the landlord's proportion from the rent.

The 70th clause, which permits the Commissioners to reduce, lessen, remit, or excuse the rates on account of poverty, does not alter the question, the meaning of it being clearly this, that if the landlord be poor, and the occupier not, the landlord's portion may be remitted; and, on the other hand, if the occupier be poor, and the landlord not, then the occupier only is to be relieved; but still the rate must be recovered from the occupier upon the premises, as directed by the 69th clause.

This I believe to be the law; and so long as it shall continue to be the law, I shall resist any violation of it. Gateshead, Jan. 5, 1842.

[graphic]

JAMES HYMERS.

GENERAL MEETING OF SHIPOWNERS

OF THE PORTS OF NEWCASTLE, SUNDERLAND, AND STOCKTON.

AT a GENERAL MEETING of SHIPOWNERS

of the ports of Newcastle, Sunderland, and Stockton, and their dependencies, convened by the Newcastle and Gateshead Shipowners' Society, and held in the Hall of the Trinity House of Newcastle, on Tuesday, the 18th of January, 1842, (JOHN RAYNE, JUN., Esq., the Deputy Master of the Trinity House, in the Chair,) it was resolved :—

On the motion of J. T. CARR, Esq., Sheriff of Newcastle,
Seconded by W. NICHOLSON, Esq., of Sunderland.
I. That the shipping interest of the kingdom has been re-
duced to a state of unprecedented distress.

On the motion of ROBERT ANDERSON, Esq., of South
Shields,

Seconded by W. ORD, Esq., of Sunderland.

2. That this meeting being convinced, after sixteen years' experience, that the continued and increasing distress to which the shipping interest is reduced, is mainly to be attributed to the encouragement given to the foreign shipping and seamen of the north of Europe by the alteration of the Navigation Laws, is determined to use every exertion to recover the protection of which they have been unjustly deprived; and they therefore consider it essential that a thorough investigation into the effects produced on British navigation by the said alterations should be instituted by Parliament, with a view to the speedy alleviation and ultimate removal of the distress.

On the motion of the SHERIFF OE NEWCASTLE, Seconded by GEORGE JOBLING, Esq., of Seaton Sluice. 3. That this meeting cannot, for a moment, doubt, that the legislature of the country will zealously enter upon the investigation of an evil which, if unchecked, would prove, in the end, not only ruinous to the shipowner, but destructive of that proud superiority on the seas, which the commercial marine, by its supply of seamen, has hitherto enabled the navy of England to maintain.

On the motion of GEORGE STRAKER, Esq., of New. castle,

Seconded by ROBERT ANDERSON, Esq.

4. That the cordial thanks of this meeting be given to the Members of the House of Commons, who have kindly attended on the present occasion, and that they be requested to urge, in their places in Parliament, the necessity of immediately entering upon the inquiry which this meeting recommends.

On the motion of W. ORD, Esq.,

Seconded by WM. RICHMOND, Esq., of North Shields. 5. That the preceding resolutions be advertised, three times, in all the local papers; also, in the Shipping and Mercantile Gazette; and that the expense thereof be defrayed jointly by the Shipowners' Societies of the Tyne and Wear.

On the motion of MATTHEW BELL, Esq., M.P.,
Seconded by JOHN JOBLING, Esq., of Newcastle.

6. That the best thanks of this meeting be given to the Master and Brethren of the Trinity House, for the use of their Hall on the present occasion.

On the motion of WM. RICHMOND, Esq., Seconded by W. ANDERSON, Esq., of Bent House. 7. That a petition, founded on the preceding resolutions, and also praying for an inquiry into the causes of the present depressed state of the shipping interest, be prepared by Messrs. R. Anderson, W. Richmond, and W. Pearson, for signature by the shipowners of the district, and for presentation to the House of Commons; and that Mr. Hinde, M.P., be respectfully requested to present the same, and Mr. Ord, M.P., to support its prayer. JOHN RAYNE, JUN., Chairman.

The Chairman having left the chair, it was resolved,
On the motion of WM. RICHMOND, Esq.,
Seconded by W. ORD, Esq.

That the thanks of the meeting be given to the Chairman, for his able and impartial conduct in the chair.

GENERAL MEETING OF SHIPOWNERS.

A GENERAL meeting of the shipowners of the ports of Newcastle, Sunderland, and Stockton, with their dependencies, convened by the Newcastle and Gateshead Shipowners' Society, was held on Tuesday last, at mid-day, in the Hall of the Trinity House, Newcastle, (John Rayne, jun., Esq., the Deputy Master

of the Trinity House, in the chair). The meeting was very numerously attended, the elegant and capacious hall being completely filled. Among the parties present were-Messrs. M. Bell, M.P., Wm. Hutt, M.P., S. C. H. Ogle, M.P., H. Mitcalfe, M.P., J. H. Hinde, M.P., J. T. Wawn, M.P., Thomas Carr, G. T. Dunn, S. Lowrey, W. Pearson, R. Hodge, E. Graham, G. Palmer, Lindsay, Dale, R. Rayne, C. Rayne, J. Ormston, C. Smith, jun., S. Danson, W. Armstrong, R. P. Philipson, C. Smith, sen., the Sheriff (J. T. Carr), John Jobling, W. H. Brockett, A. Nichol, J. A. Woods, W. N. Greenwell, W. L. Harle, J. Hunter, John Ingo, W. Doeg, A. Parker, G. Straker, J. D. Weatherley, and Matthias Dunn, of Newcastle; Messrs. J. Hymers and Andrew M'Leod, Gateshead; Messrs. J. Tinley, T. Atkinson, M. Forest, W. Brown, G. Guildford, A. Russell. J. Elder, H. Wheatley, John Dale, W. Richmond, A. Bartleman, T. G. Dobinson, Joseph Straker, and R. Peart, of North Shields: Messrs. Robert & Wm. Anderson, Thomas Forsyth, T. Barker, R. Dawson, J. Kirkley, Thomas Bell, R. Geddes, John Eden, John Ness, and T. Adams, of South Shields; Mr. George Jobling, of Seaton Sluice; Mr. Hodgson, of Blyth; and Messrs. W. & R. Ord, W. Nicholson, J. Ridley, J. Storey, Thomas Brown, W. French, John Hay, G. Moon, Lumsdon, John Brunton, and Thomas Simey, of Sunderland.

The minutes of the last meeting of the Newcastle and Gateshead Shipowners' Society having been read, the HON. SECRETARY stated that he had received the following letter from the Secretary of the General Shipowners' Society, in reply to a letter which had been sent to Sir James Duke, on the subject of the importation of grain in Prussian vessels from the Elbe:

General Shipowners' Society, London, Jan. 14. SIR, Sir James Duke having transmitted to me your letter to him of the 10th inst., requesting him to ascertain the grounds on which Prussian vessels are allowed to bring cargoes into this country from the Elbe," I beg, in reply, to acquaint you, that the Order in Council anthorizing this, was of the 11th of August last, and will be found in the London Gazette of that or the following Gazette day.

It is issued under the authority of the 2d section of 3 and 4 Vic., cap. 95, having reference to the late treaty with the King of Prussia, and the other members of the German Union of Commerce, of 2d March last. 1 have the honour to be, Sir,

Your obedient Servant, W. H. Brockett, Esq. WILLIAM OVIATT, Secretary. Mr. Brockett also stated, that, in conformity with his instructions, he had addressed a letter to every Member of Parliament of the counties and boroughs of Northumberland, Durham, and Newcastle, requesting the favour of his attendance on the present occasion, and that he had received letters from Matthew Bell, Esq., M.P., Wm. Hutt, Esq., M.P., and S. C. H. Ogle, Esq., M.P., expressing their intention of being present; and from Messrs. Cresswell, Fitzroy, and Lambton, regretting their inability to attend. The following letters, too, had been received from the Hon. H. T. Liddell, Lord Harry Vane, Mr. Ord, and Mr. Barclay :

Eslington House, Jan. 9, 1912. SIR, I bave to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 7th of January, giving me notice of a meeting of the shipowners of the northern ports, to be held in Newcastle on the 18th inst. I fear that it will not be in my power to attend this meeting, but I request you to convey to the shipowners then and there assembled the assurance of my warm interest in all matters affecting their trade, and the promise of an attentive consideration of all the facts and circumstances connected with its existing depression. I am, Sir, your obedient Servant,

Mr. W. H. Brockett.

HENRY T. LIDDELL.

Berkeley-square, Jan. 10th, 1842. DEAR SIR,-Your letter of the 7th has just reached me, and I hope my present distance from Newcastle will be a sufficient apology to the Shipowners' Society for my absence from their meeting of the 18th inst. I must, however, request you to explain the cause of my absence, and at the same time to assure the meeting of my regret at not being able to attend, and of my readiness to lend any assistance in my power to the promotion of their interests. I am, dear Sir,

Your faithful and obedient Servant, W. H. Brockett, Esq. W. ORD. Cleveland House, St. James's, Jan. 13th, 1842. SIR,-I beg to acknowledge the receipt of your letter, dated Jan. 7th, inviting me to attend a public meeting to be held in the Hall of the Trinity House in Newcastle, on Tuesday, the 18th inst., for the purpose of taking into consideration the present depressed state of the shipping interest. I much regret my inability to be present, from being at this moment unavoidably detained in London, but beg to convey the assur ance of my sincere sympathy in its object, and shall have great pleasure in receiving any suggestions which the Shipowners' Society may offer. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient Servant,

W. H. Brockett, Esq.

H. VANE

Austin Friars, Jan. 15th, 1842. SIR,-The letter which you have done me the favour to address to me having been directed to my private residence in Belgrave-square, which I seldom visit at this season of the year, I only last evening, and then by accident, received your communication on behalf of the NewI should otherwise have castle and Gateshead Shipowners' Society. replied to it immediately.

I regret much that it will be quite impossible for me to attend the meeting on Tuesday the 18th, as my engagements will not permit me to leave town. I feel deeply interested in the subject of the meeting, and bound to exert my best endeavours to relieve the shipping interest from the distress under which it now labours; and I shall feel obliged if you will have the goodness to communicate to me the result of the deliberations of the meeting on Tuesday, and any resolutions which may be passed, which shall have my best consideration.

I have the honour to be, Sir,

Your obedient humble Servant,

D. BARCLAY.

W. H. Brockett, Esq. The SHERIFF of NEWCASTLE (JOHN THOMAS CARR, Esq.) said that he had been requested to propose a series of resolutions to the meeting, which he would now read. They were as follows:

1. That the shipping interest of the kingdom has been reduced to a state of unprecedented distress.

2. That as considerable difference of opinion prevails as to the causes of this serious decline in the prosperity of our commercial marine, it ap pears to this meeting most important that a thorough investigation of the same should be immediately instituted by Parliament, with a view to its speedy alleviation and ultimate removal.

3. That this meeting cannot for a moment doubt that the Legislature of the country will zealously enter upon the investigation of an evil which, if unchecked, would prove in the end not only ruinous to the shipowner, but destructive of that proud superiority on the seas which the commercial marine, by its supply of seamen, has hitherto enabled the Navy of England to maintain.

ROBERT ANDERSON, Esq., of South Shields, having sug. gested that it would be more convenient that the resolutions should be put to the meeting separately, the SHERIFF at once assented; and the first resolution having been seconded by W. NICHOLSON, Esq., of Sunderland, was carried unanimously. The second resolution having been seconded by GEORGE STRAKER, Esq., of Newcastle.

Mr. R. ANDERSON rose to express his regret, that, however desirous for unanimity, he could not concur in the resolution He did not approve of the former part in its present shape.

of it. That there were differences of opinion entertained in a
free country he admitted; but he thought after previous reso-
lutions come to by shipowners, and nearly unanimously come
to, as to the cause of their distress, it would do injury to say
now that there was a considerable difference of opinion among
them. At a very recent meeting, convened in South Shields to
consider Mr. Lyall's intended motion, a resolution was unani.
mously passed, with one or two exceptions, that the alteration
of the navigation laws by the Reciprocity Acts, the effect of
which Mr. Lyall was anxious to inquire into, had been the
main cause of the distress among shipping. He (Mr. A.)
would read the resolution to the meeting, which would show
that however unwilling he might be to differ in opinion as to
the construction of the resolution now before them, he should
be acting in direct opposition to the principles which a great
body of the shipowners had all along endeavoured to maintain,
and from which they had never deviated, were he to assent to
the assertion that any considerable difference existed. [Mr. A.
read the resolution.] He thought the former part of the reso-
In
lution now under consideration might be altered, without com-
promising any gentleman's opinion by a unanimous vote.
order, however, to produce conviction in the minds of gentle-
men as to the cause of distress among shipping, he had col.
lected from parliamentary documents a number of facts, which
he would lay before the meeting, and he believed they would
agree with him that the distress was mainly owing to the
It had been thought by many, that
cause he had mentioned.
since the conclusion of the war British tonnage had very much
increased, but he would show them what it was at that period,
In the year 1816, the
and what it had amounted to since.
amount of British shipping was 22,089: tonnage 2,504,297.
Total-skips 25,864:
Colonial-ships 3,775: tons 279,643.
In 1823, British ships 21,042: tons 2,312,867.
tons 2,983,940.
Total-ships 24,542 :
Colonial-ships, 3,500: tons, 203,893.
tons 2,516,760. And in the year 1839, the latest period at
which returns had been made, British ships amounted to
Colonial-ships 6,708: tons 537,428.
21,037: tons 2.581,005.
The increase on the
Total-ships 27,745: tons 3,118,433.
whole during twenty-three years was 134,493 tons, or about

account.

ten per cent. Of this tonnage, however, there were the steam vessels, amounting to 86,731 tons, which ought to be taken into These statements would show that the shipowners could not be accused of having recklessly increased their tonnage, particularly if the trade of the country was taken into consideration. It would be seen that the increase of tonnage had been in the colonial shipping, while British tonnage had So that while the populadecreased to an immense amount.

tons.

tion of this country had increased 30 per cent. during the last
23 years, and the trade of the country had also increased, the
shipping had decreased. The shipowners of the north of Eng-
land, when the treaties were pending for an alteration of the
Their convic-
navigation laws, remonstrated against them.
tions were that they could not compete with the northern na-
tions of Europe, while their expenses amounted to double that
of those nations; and the experiment of sixteen years had shown
that all the increase of trade which had taken place, had been
These treaties were
entirely engrossed by foreign shipping.
called reciprocity-treaties, but by placing the navigation of
this country on the same footing with other countries they
were simply navigation-treaties. [Mr. A. read a tabular state-
ment of the rate of freights from 1817 to the end of 1841,
showing that those freights had gradually diminished in value,
and contended that the depression was owing to the alteration
of the navigation-laws, in connection with the Baltic.] He
then called the attention of the meeting to the imports from
the countries in the north of Europe. He would first take the
period intermediate between the conclusion of the war and the
the passing of the reciprocity treaties (the years 1819 and 1820),
and he would compare with that the year 1839, the last year of
which he had been able to obtain a direct parliamentary return.
In the first period the entry inwards of vessels with cargoes from
Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Prussia, was as follows:-
British, 935 ships: 130,200 tons. Foreign, 957 ships: 154,220
In the second period-British, 840 ships: 127,947 tons.
So that while the import
Foreign, 3,954 ships: 494,666 tons.
tonnage had considerably more than doubled, there was a defi-
ciency in British tonnage of 93 ships, and 2,233 tons, and an
increase in foreign tonnage of 2,997 ships, and 344,000 tons, or
220 per cent. When the alteration was made in the navigation
laws, it was said that the interest of the country required it,
and the shipowners were told, "You will find, so great will be
the increase of trade, that you will be more fully and profitably
employed." This statement, used by persons in high places,
had the effect of checking for a time the remonstrances of the
shipowners. They were obliged to wait the result; and now,
what advantage had the manufacturer received from this sacri-
[Mr. A. read extracts from official
fice of the merchant?
sources, showing that the exports to Sweden, Norway, Denmark,
Prussia, &c., had considerably decreased, contrary to the expec-
tations held out to the shipowners.] The ground on which
British shipowners objected to the passing of the reciprocity
treaties was this:-They were compelled to have British ships
manned with British men, and to have a number of apprentices
as recruits for the navy; and to these persons British wages
and British food must be given. The cost of navigating a Bri-
tish ship of 300 tons, allowing 9 men and 3 boys to form the
crew, would be £206 5s. for three months, reckoning 4s. 7d. per
ton per month. The cost of victualling a Norway vessel of the
Here
same burthen would only be £105, or 2s. 4d. per ton, which
made a difference in favour of the foreigner of £101 5s.
was a difference which alone would be a handsome profit. Not-
withstanding the depression of the shipowners, to their credit
it should be remembered, that as a body they had never con-
sulted together for the purpose ol reducing the wages of their
This circumstance redounded very much to their
honour, and he hoped the Hon. Members of Parliament present
would remember it. Shipowners had never enjoyed any exclu-
sive protection. He had looked through the tariff, and saw no
interest whatever that was not protected, except the shipping
interest. For the reasons he had given, he therefore moved
that the resolution should be amended as follows:-(See advt.)
Mr. ORD, of Sunderland, seconded the amendment.
Mr. GEORGE STRAKER could not agree with Mr. Anderson
that the reciprocity laws had occasioned the distress of which
the meeting complained. In his opinion, it was owing to the
imposts and taxes which they had imposed on themselves. He
had taken up the subject when the reciprocity laws were first in
agitation, and he took upon himself individually to present a

seamen.

« EelmineJätka »