The question for the opinion of the court was whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover. If... Queen's Bench Reports - Page 435by Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, John Leycester Adolphus, Great Britain. Court of Queen's Bench, Thomas Flower Ellis - 1853Full view - About this book
| 1792 - 566 lehte
...Comberbach to Dorothy Combeibach, with the remainders over in the will. And the queflion referved for the opinion of the Court was, whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover that third part. LORD KENYON, CJ— -After dating the will, and obferving that the fecond remainder... | |
| William Hunt - 1796 - 426 lehte
...the annuity. The defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in 42/. for goods fold. The queftion for the opinion of the Court was, — Whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover any and what fum beyond the fum of 42/. ? After the cafe had been argued, gued, the Court took time... | |
| Samuel Comyn - 1807 - 646 lehte
...the premifes mentioned in the declaration: that Lady Btratbmore was then living. The queflion for the opinion of the Court was whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover any and what fum of money in this action. The Court were of opinion, that the plaintiff was entitled... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, William Pyle Taunton - 1815 - 860 lehte
...had never appeared in the Gazette as ensign in any regiment of the 1811. line. The question for the opinion of the Court was, whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover : if he was, the verdict was to ROBERTSON "»••<.« .. i , ,. , Vf stand ; ir he was not entitled... | |
| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford, Sir Edward Hyde East - 1817 - 946 lehte
...Cumberbach to Dorothy Comberbach, with the remainders over in the will. And the ques. tion reserved for the opinion of the Court was whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover that third part. Leycester, for the plaintiff, contended that the children of Dorothy Comberbach took... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Bayly Moore - 1821 - 820 lehte
...plaintiff. Mary Le Chevalier is the heir at law of George Donston, the testator. The question for the opinion of the Court was, whether the plaintiff was entitled to recover ? If the Court should be of opinion that he could, a verdict was to be entered for him, if not, for... | |
| |