 | 1890 - 542 lehte
...contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a eaoritice? Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty...organization of society, under the exclusive dominion of the Uuited States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices... | |
 | 1889 - 546 lehte
...law, are done in the name of religion. In Reynolds v. US, 98 US 166,',Mr. Chief Justice Waite said : " So here, as a law of the organization of society under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a ruan excuse his practices to the contrary... | |
 | 1890 - 548 lehte
...government under which he lived conld not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or if a wife religionsly believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pile of her dead husband, wonld it be beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying her belief into practice?... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1890 - 658 lehte
...sacrifices were a necessary part of religions worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice V Or if a wife religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself upon the funeral pile of her dead... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1879 - 696 lehte
...sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere...under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary... | |
 | Francis Wharton, Moreton Stillé - 1882 - 832 lehte
...sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere...government to prevent her carrying her belief into practice f "So here, as a law of the organization of society, under the exclusive dominion of the United States,... | |
 | Jennie Anderson Froiseth - 1882 - 472 lehte
...sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere...upon the funeral pile of her dead husband, would it bo beyond the power of the civil government to prevent her carrying her belief into practice? So here,... | |
 | Citizen of Massachusetts, Alfred Ellingwood Giles - 1882 - 80 lehte
...sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere...religiously believed it was her duty to burn herself 1 In all Catholic countries marriage is a sacrament, and its obligation a religious one, so tliat marriage... | |
 | 1890 - 1130 lehte
...of religious worship, would it be seriously contended that the civil governmentunder which helived could not interfere to prevent a sacrifice? Or, if...under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary,... | |
 | 1911 - 1168 lehte
...sacrifices were a necessary part of a religious worship, would It be seriously contended that the civil government under which he lived could not interfere...under the exclusive dominion of the United States, it is provided that plural marriages shall not be allowed. Can a man excuse his practices to the contrary... | |
| |
Laws are made for the government of actions, and while they cannot interfere with mere religious belief and opinions, they may with practices. Suppose one believed that human sacrifices were a necessary part of religious worship, would it be seriously... 
