H. 50 E. 3, fo. 1. b., pl. 3 M. 7 H. 6, fo. 1, pl. 2 142 142 146 144 171 150 144, 148, 150 278 278 27 656, 657, 658 e. ccciii. (Newport, Abergavenny, and Hereford Railway act.) 699 756 c. cccxcvi. (East and West India Docks and Birmingham Junction Rail / way act.).. c. cciii. (Manchester Corporation Waterworks act, 1847,) 11 & 12, c. 90. (Assessed Taxes.) c. ci. (Manchester Waterworks amendment act, 1848.) 12 & 13, c. 101, s. 12. (County-Court: warrant of commitment.) (County-Court: particulars of claim.) c. 106, s. 67. (Bankrupt : fraudulent assignment.) 13 & 14, e. 61, s. 14. (County-Court: appeal.) .. 160 474 474 622 475 191, 233 747 85, 91, 363,795 291, 510 463, 785 615 302 (a) ..506, 828 720 H. 50 E. 3, fo. 1. b., pl. 3 P. 44 E. 3, fo. 8. a., pl. 7 M. 47 E. 3, fo. 18, pl. 36 P. 8 E. 3, fo. 19. a. b., pl. 3 ARGUED AND DETERMINED IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS AND IN THE Exchequer Chamber, IN HILARY VACATION, IN THE FIFTEENTH YEAR OF THE REIGN OF QUEEN VICTORIA. 1852. STEPHEN CANNON, Demandant; WILLIAM BALLANTINE THIS RIMINGTON, Tenant. Feb. 9. was a writ of formedon in the descender. The An estate-tail count was as follows: having been discontinued by a feoffment tail more than twenty years death,-Held, that the issue before his in tail might bring his writ Cumberland, to wit: Stephen Cannon, the demandant by a in this suit, by W. S., his attorney, demands against tenant-inWilliam Ballantine Rimington ten messuages and five acres of land, with the appurtenances, in the parish of Penrith, in the county of Cumberland, which Stephen Cannon, the grandfather of the demandant, gave to Stephen Cannon, the father of the demandant, and the heirs of the body of the said Stephen Cannon, the father of the demandant; and which, after the death of Stephen Cannon, the father of the demandant, ought to descend to the demandant, the son and heir of the said Stephen Cannon, the father, according to the form of of formedon at any time within twenty years death,-the next after such period of limi tation prescribed by the W. 4, c. 27, statute 3 & 4 not running against him during the life of the tenant-in-tail. |