THE

ETHNOLOGICAL JOURNAL:

A MONTHLY RECORD OF

Ethnological Research and Criticism.

No. I. JULY, 1865.

LONDON:

TRÜBNER & CO., 60, PATERNOSTER ROW;

LEIPSIC: F. A. BROCKHAUS.

Price One Shilling.

I. ETHNOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY, ARE THEY DISTINCT

SCIENCES?

PAGE

1

II. LUBBOCK ON THE UNITY OF MAN AND NATURAL SELECTION 17

III. REMARKS ON THE INADEQUACY OF MERELY ANATOMICAL

DESCRIPTIONS OF THE HUMAN CRANIUM IN THE STUDY

OF ETHNOLOGY. BY THOMAS SYMES PRIDEAUX, ESQ.. 22

IV. ON THE PLACE OF MAN IN THE ANIMATE SCALE. By

LUKE BURKE, ESQ.

V. NOTES ON THE SOUTH SLAVONIC COUNTRIES IN AUSTRIA

AND TURKEY IN EUROPE.

VI. THE ETHNOLOGICAL JOURNAL

VII. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ETHNOLOGICAL SOCIETY; RECENT

CONTRIBUTIONS TO ETHNOLOGY, &C.

Two Vols., 8vo., price 32s.

DESCRIPTIVE ETHNOLOGY.

25

25

42

47

By R. G. LATHAM, M.A., M.D., F.R.S., late Fellow of King's Coll., Cambridge, &c.

THE ETHNOLOGY OF INDIA. May be had separately, 8vo., 16s.

THE ETHNOLOGY OF EUROPE. Fcap. 8vo., 5s.

THE ETHNOLOGY OF THE BRITISH ISLANDS. Fcap. 8vo., 5s.

THE ETHNOLOGY OF THE BRITISH COLONIES AND DEPEN-

DENCIES. Fcap. 8vo., 5s.

MAN AND HIS MIGRATIONS. Fcap. 8vo., 5s.

THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE VARIETIES OF MAN. 8vo.,

Illustrated, 21s.

JOHN VAN VOORST, 1, Paternoster Row.

Price Twopence; in Monthly Parts, Tenpence.

THE

GEOLOGICAL & NATURAL HISTORY REPERTORY;

An Ellustrated Popular Weekly Magazine of

GEOLOGY, PALÆONTOLOGY, MINERALOGY, AND ZOOLOGY,

AND

JOURNAL OF PREHISTORIC ARCHEOLOGY AND ETHNOLOGY.

LONDON: Published every Saturday by KENT & Co., and TRÜBNER & Co.,

Paternoster Row; and ED. STANFORD, Charing Cross.

PHREN

HRENOLOGY.—A truly skilful and candid analysis of the mental

organization of the young may be of the highest importance in their education

and destination. DR. DONOVAN has had long experience in this most valuable

science, and may be consulted at the London School of Phrenology, 111, Strand,

nearly opposite Exeter Hall.

5-26-27

9 nos.

THE

ETHNOLOGICAL JOURNAL.

JULY, 1865.

ETHNOLOGY AND ANTHROPOLOGY:

ARE THEY DISTINCT SCIENCES, OR ONE AND THE SAME SCIENCE UNDER
DIFFERENT NAMES?

I. INTRODUCTORY ADDRESS ON THE STUDY OF ANTHROPOLOGY. Delivered
before the Anthropological Society of London, February 24th, 1863, by
JAMES HUNT, Ph.D., F.S.A., F.R.S.L., Foreign Associate of the
Anthropological Society of Paris; President.

II. ANNIVERSARY ADDRESS. Delivered before the Anthropological Society of
London, January 5th, 1864, by JAMES HUNT, Ph.D., &c., &c. ; President.
III. ANNIVERSARY ADDRESS, &c., &c. Delivered January 3rd, 1865, by JAMES
HUNT, Ph.D., &c., &c.; President.

IV. REVIEW OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PARIS. By M. PAUL BROCA, Secretary-General, Honorary Fellow of the Anthropological Society of London. Delivered June 4th, 1863.1

HAD the question with which we head this article been proposed for discussion some five or six years ago, the reader would have supposed, as many doubtless will even now suppose, that the object of the argument was to settle some nicety of definition, or to discuss some suggestion relative to a future distribution of scientific labour; but had any well-informed student of the science of man been asked at that time whether there was any serious distinction between the aims and labours of anthropologists and those of ethnologists, the answer would most decidedly have been, None whatever: the aims are so identical, the labours so alike, and the names so much an accident, that had the two words been turned out of the wheel of a lottery, and distributed to the several writers at perfect random, every one would have been sure of receiving an appropriate designation. In fact, many have used both names indifferently, and it has mainly depended on the country of the writer whether he adopted the one or the other. The Germans

1 From the "Anthropological Review," No. 2, August, 1863.

B