Evolution at the BarHamilton Bros. Scripture Truth Depot, 1922 - 80 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 11
Page 14
... Huxley said , " The present state of knowledge furnishes us with no link between the living and the not - living . ' " " This is a fatal admission ; for assuredly , if the en- tire organic kingdom emerged out of the inorganic , there ...
... Huxley said , " The present state of knowledge furnishes us with no link between the living and the not - living . ' " " This is a fatal admission ; for assuredly , if the en- tire organic kingdom emerged out of the inorganic , there ...
Page 19
... Huxley and Romanes , before their death , utterly repudiated the Darwinian theory of the Origin of Species . It would be difficult or impossible to find a naturalist of the first rank who would support that theory today . Haeckel alone ...
... Huxley and Romanes , before their death , utterly repudiated the Darwinian theory of the Origin of Species . It would be difficult or impossible to find a naturalist of the first rank who would support that theory today . Haeckel alone ...
Page 24
... Huxley , who says : " If you breed from the male and female of the same race , you of course have off- spring of the like kind ; and if you make the offspring breed together , you obtain the same result ; and if you breed from these ...
... Huxley , who says : " If you breed from the male and female of the same race , you of course have off- spring of the like kind ; and if you make the offspring breed together , you obtain the same result ; and if you breed from these ...
Page 25
... Huxley says , " the reason is quite obvious in some cases " ; for the fact is admitted on all hands . Now what , we would ask , is the inference to be drawn from this fact ? Certainly it follows that the evolution of one species from ...
... Huxley says , " the reason is quite obvious in some cases " ; for the fact is admitted on all hands . Now what , we would ask , is the inference to be drawn from this fact ? Certainly it follows that the evolution of one species from ...
Page 26
Philip Mauro. Later on Mr. Huxley definitely rejected the Dar- winian theory , as we will point out hereafter . Repro- We have referred in the foregoing pages to duction the power , inherent in all living creatures , to reproduce their ...
Philip Mauro. Later on Mr. Huxley definitely rejected the Dar- winian theory , as we will point out hereafter . Repro- We have referred in the foregoing pages to duction the power , inherent in all living creatures , to reproduce their ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept admits Alfred Russel Wallace ancestral type animal kingdom assumed atheism Bible breed bryo Christ Christianity cies conclusions contrary Cosmic Evolution Darwin Darwinian theory doctrine of Creation doctrine of Evolution eggs entire essential evidence Evidences of Evolution evolved explanation fact Fairhurst says fish forms further geological gradual Herbert Spencer human affairs human embryo Huxley individual organisms inference inorganic instincts invertebrates lative living crea living creatures Luther Burbank lution Manifestly Matter and Force ment millions modifications Natural Selection ness not-living offspring organic kingdom organic world Origin of Species paleontology posed produced artificially Prof progress proof realm reason resemblances resident forces revelation Science Scripture Spencer spinnerets stages structure suddenly Support of Evolution supposed tendency Theistic Evolution theory of Evolution thing thousand tion trace truth ture universe utterly varieties vegetable vertebrates water spider wings words
Popular passages
Page 18 - There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved.
Page 23 - And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.
Page 25 - But, for all this, our acceptance of the Darwinian hypothesis must be provisional so long as one link in the chain of evidence is wanting ; and so long as all the animals and plants certainly produced by selective breeding from a common stock are fertile, and their progeny are fertile with one another, that link will be wanting.
Page 57 - Thus, we repeat, He admonishes men to return to God ; to reestablish their original likeness to him ; and He, who is " the brightness of his Father's glory, and the express image of his person...
Page 80 - The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord, and against his Anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
Page 36 - The significance of persistent types, and of the small amount of change which has taken place even in those forms which can be shown to have been modified, becomes greater and greater in my eyes, the longer I occupy myself with the biology of the past.
Page 19 - The next stage is still more marvellous, still more completely beyond all possibility of explanation by matter, its laws and forces. It is the introduction of sensation or consciousness, constituting the fundamental distinction between the animal and vegetable kingdoms.
Page 56 - And assuredly, there is no mark of degradation about any part of its structure. It is, in fact, a fair average human skull, which might have belonged to a philosopher, or might have contained the thoughtless brains of a savage.
Page 72 - We might learn of a time, ever so long ago, when their grandfathers were not birds at all. Then they could not fly, for they had neither wings nor feathers. These grandfathers of our birds had four legs, a long tail and jaws with teeth. After a time feathers grew upon their bodies and their front legs became changed for flying. These were strange looking creatures. There are none living like them now.
Page 56 - On the whole we must really acknowledge, that there is a complete absence of any fossil type of a lower stage in the development of man. Nay, if we gather together the whole sum of the fossil men hitherto known, and put them parallel with those of the present time, we can decidedly pronounce that there are among living men a much greater number of individuals who show a relatively inferior type than there are among the fossils known up to this time.