3. Amendment of Order XXIIa, Rule 1.-The words Rules 2 to 19" shall be substituted for the words "Rules 2 to 20" in Order XXIIA., Rule 1.

ORDER XXV.-ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS AND ORDERS. The following Rule shall stand as Order XXV., Rule 20a, viz. :--4. Receipt for money paid to bailiff under process, and copy. Form 166.-Whenever any money is levied or paid to a bailiff under any execution or other process, the bailiff shall give a receipt for the same, and retain a carbon copy of such receipt, according to the form in the Appendix, which is hereby substituted for Form 166. ORDER XLIII.-TAXATION OF CHARGES OF RETURNING OFFICERS. The following Rules shall stand as Order XLIII., Rules 9 to 19. THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT, 1918. Taxation of Accounts and Examination of Claims under the Representation of the People Act, 1918, Section 29.

viz. :

5. Taxation of accounts or examination of claims under 7 & 8 Geo. 5, c. 64, s. 29.-The foregoing Rules of this Order shall not apply to the taxation of accounts of returning officers or the examination of claims against returning officers under section 29 of the Representation of the People Act, 1918, but such taxation or examination shall be regulated by the following Rules.

6. Application for Taxation.-An application by the Treasury to the court for the taxation of the accounts of a returning officer under the said section shall be made in writing addressed to the registrar at his office.

7. Notice of time and place for taxation.-On receipt of the application the court shall fix a place and time for proceeding with such taxation, and the registrar shall issue to the bailiff for service on the Treasury and the returning officer notices, signed by the registrar and under the seal of the court, stating the place, day, and hour at and on which the taxation will be proceeded with, and requiring the parties to attend and produce documents and be examined, and warning them that if they do not attend in person or by their solicitors such proceedings will be taken and certificate given as to the court shall seem just.

8. Application for examination of claim against returning officer. -Where application is made for the taxation of a returning officer's account, and such officer applies to the court to examine any claim made by any person against him in respect of matters charged in the account, such application shall be made in writing addressed to the registrar at his office, and shall contain a submission on the part of the applicant to pay what shall be found due on examination."

9. Notice of time and place for examination.-On receipt of any such application the court shall fix a place and time for such examination, which shall take place before the taxation of the returning officer's account is concluded, and such taxation shall if necessary be adjourned until such examination has been completed. The registrar shall issue to the bailiff for service on the returning officer and the person making the claim notices, signed by the registrar and under the seal of the court, stating the place, day, and hour at and on which such examination will be proceeded with, and requiring the parties to attend and produce documents and be examined, and warning them that if they do not attend in person or by their solicitors such proceedings will be taken and order made as to the court shall seem just.

10. Service of notices.-(1) The bailiff shall serve all such notices as hereinbefore mentioned ten clear days at least before the day fixed for any taxation or examination unless the court gives leave for

shorter service.

to the Treasury, and such sum exceeds the amount certified to be payable by the Treasury to the returning officer, or if the amount already advanced by the Treasury to the returning officer on account of his charges exceeds the amount certified to be payable to him, the court shall certify the amount of the excess, and shall order the amount so certified to be paid to the Treasury, and the order shall be enforceable in like manner as a judgment of the court.

13. Order on examination of claim.-On the hearing of an application for the examination of a claim, or at any adjournment thereof, the court may allow or disallow or reduce the claim, and may determine by whom the court fees are to be paid, and may order either party to pay such sum as the court may consider proper by way of costs to the other party, and may give directions as to the addition to the sum allowed to the claimant of any costs ordered to be paid to him, or the set off against such sum of any fees and costs ordered to be paid by him, and as to the payment of the balance ascertained to be due from either party to the other.

14. Forms 423, 424, 425A, 426-428.-Forms 423, 424, 426, 427, and 428 in the Appendix, entitled in the Matter of the Representation of the People Act, 1918, and of the election in question, and with the necessary modifications, may be used for applications for taxation of accounts or examination of claims, notices of time and place fixed for taxation or examination, and orders on examination of claims under these Rules; and Form 425A in the Appendix, with the necessary modifications, may be used for certificates on taxation.

15. Fees. The fees payable under the Treasury Order regulating Fees in the County Courts for taxation of accounts and examination of claims under Rules 1 to 8 of this order shall apply to taxations and examinations under these Rules, with the following modification, that where a notice is served by the high bailiff by post the fee for such service shall be 6d. only.

ORDER LIII.-COSTS AND ALLOWANCES TO WITNESSES. The following Rule shall stand as Order LIII., Rule 50, viz. :—Increase of Costs during Continuance of War.

16. Increase of costs during war.r.-(1) During the continuation of the present war, and thereafter until such date as the Lord Chancellor shall appoint, the total of any items of costs (as distinct from payments) in respect of business done after the thirtieth day of April nineteen hundred and eighteen in any action or matter commenced in or remitted to a county court, or in proceedings under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1906, shall where costs are pay able under Column B or Column C of the higher scale be increased by 20 per centum, and such increase shall be allowed upon any taxation or assessment of costs in respect of any such business as well as between party and party as between solicitor and client. (2) Provided that this Rule shall not affect any power to direct payment of a fixed or gross sum in respect or in lieu of costs.

(3) Provided also that where any items of costs are increased under Rule 8 of this Order, or costs are allowed on any scale higher than that which would otherwise be applicable, the increase authorised by this rule shall not be allowed in respect of such items or in respect of costs allowed on such higher scale, unless the judge otherwise orders.

(4) Provided also that this Rule shall not apply to bills of costs which have at the date when this Rule comes into operation already been delivered to the client sought to be charged therewith or to the person chargeable therewith or liable therefor, or to bills already taxed and certified or allowed.

(5) The increase hereby authorised shall not affect the question whether a bill of costs when taxed is or is not less by one sixth part than the bill delivered, sent, or left.

mentioned election in respect of such election,

The Court doth determine that the amount payable to the said in respect of such charges is the sum of £

doth certify the same accordingly :

and

:

And the Court doth further determine that the Court fees payable on this application, amounting to £ , are to be paid by And doth further order that do pay to the sum of £ by way of costs in respect of this application : And the Court doth certify that the amount payable to the said including the costs payable to him as aforesaid [or after deducting the fees and costs payable by him as aforesaid, is the sum of £

Or, if the balance, after adjusting the fees and costs, and giving credit for any amount already advanced on account of his charges, is against the returning officer,

And the Court doth certify that the balance due from the said after crediting him with the amount payable to him in respect of his charges and debiting him with the amount payable by him for Court fees and costs and the amount already advanced to him on account of his charges, is the sum of £ ; And doth order that the said do on or before the day of 19 pay the said sum of £ of this Court for the use of the Treasury.] Given under the seal of the Court this

to the registrar day of , 19 By the Court,

Registrar.

Rule 1 enables the judges to fix courts for the transaction of ordinary business so as to fit in with the arrangements which must be made by them for the hearing of appeals from registration officers under the Representation of the People Act, 1918. The majority of these appeals will probably come in for hearing about the same time; and as it will be necessary that they should be dealt with as soon as possible, the judges will have to make arrangements accordingly. Rule 1 accordingly provides that instead of being required to fix courts for ordinary business 3 months beforehand, as required by the present rule, they may delay the fixing of such courts until they know approximately what time will be required for the hearing of appeals, and give 6 weeks' notice only of the times fixed for such courts; and further that in country districts where the ordinary business is not likely to require a full day they may fix two courts to be held on the same day, so as to allow more free days for the hearing of appeals.

Rule 2.-The words omitted from Form 23 were inserted by the Rules of 1914. This was done per incuriam, as Order XXIIA., Rule 10, altering the time for filing notice of defence, &c., in actions under the extended jurisdiction conferred by the Act of 1903, applies only to ordinary and not to default summonses; see Order XXIIA., Rule 1.

Rule 3 corrects a clerical error in Order XXIIA., Rule 1. Rule 4 provides a new form of receipt to be given by a bailiff for money paid under process, and for a carbon copy being kept as suggested by the Treasury.

Rules 5 to 15 are based on the existing Rules as to the taxation of the accounts of returning officers, which are still in force as to elections other than parliamentary elections. The only substantial difference is that as the expenses are to be paid by the Treasury a certificate of the amount found to be payable is substituted for an order for payment, as in the case of determination by the county court of a difference as to the amount to be paid for carriages, etc., requisitioned under sect. 115 of the Army Act, 1881. Rule 16 provides for the increase of costs during the war, the Rule recently made for the Supreme Court. June, 1918.

following

We, the Rule Committee of the Supreme Court, hereby make the following Rule:

Registration appeals.-21. The following provisions shall apply to appeals to the Court of Appeal from decisions of the county courts on points of law on the hearing of appeals from registration officers under the Representation of the People Act, 1918, section 14. (1) A person desiring to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision of the county court on any appeal shall give notice of his intention to appeal to the registrar of the county court, and to the registration officer and to the opposite party, if any, within such time and in such form as may be prescribed by County Court Rules. (2) In any such case the party, if any, in whose favour the decision is given shall be the respondent and the registration officer shall also be named as respondent to the appeal.

(3) Every such appeal shall be by notice of motion in accordance with Order LIX., Rule 10; and such notice of motion shall be served and the appeal set down under Order LVIII., Rule 8. within the time limited by Order LIX., Rule 12.

(4) It shall be the duty of the party appealing to apply to the judge or assistant judge of the county court for a signed copy of the note made by him of any point of law raised before him, and of the facts in evidence in relation thereto, and of his decision thereon, and of his decision on the hearing of the appeal, and to furnish such copy, and two additional unsigned copies thereof, for the use of the Court of Appeal; and such signed copy shall be used and received at the hearing of the appeal. If such note is not produced the Court of Appeal shall have power to apply to the judge or assistant judge to furnish such a note, or to hear and determine the appeal upon any other evidence or statement of what occurred before the county court which the Court of Appeal may deem sufficient.

(5) If the Court of Appeal is of opinion that the statement in the note is not sufficient to enable the Court to give judgment in law, the Court may remit the matter to the judge or assistant judge in order that the note may be more fully stated.

(6) No appeal shall be allowed upon any question of fact only, or upon the admissibility or effect of any evidence or admission adduced or made in any case to establish any matter of fact only.

(7) The Court shall have power to extend the time for appealing, or to amend the grounds of appeal, or to rescind or vary any declaration as to consolidation of appeals made by the judge or assistant judge of the County Court or to make any other order on such terms as the Court shall think just to ensure the determination on the merits of the real question in controversy between the parties. (8) Where it appears to the judge or assistant judge that the validity of any number of decisions given by the county court depends upon the same point or points of law, and the parties or any of them have given notice to the county court of their intention to appeal to the Court of Appeal, the judge or assistant judge may, in such manner as may be prescribed by County Court Rules, declare that the appeals to the Court of Appeal ought to be consolidated, and may name any person interested and consenting to be appellant or respondent in the consolidated appeal on behalf of himself and all other persons interested in like manner in the appeals who consent to be parties to and to be bound by the consolidated appeal; and the registration officer shall also be named as a respondent to the consolidated appeal.

(9) With regard to consolidated appeals the like proceedings shall be had and taken and the like rules and regulations shall apply as in the case of any other appeal; and every order, judgment or decision of the Court of Appeal shall be equally valid and effectual and binding and conclusive on all the parties named in or referred to as parties to such consolidated appeals.

(10) Where appeals are consolidated, if the consolidated appeal is not duly prosecuted or answered, the Court of Appeal may give to any party or parties interested in such appeal, upon his or their application, the conduct and direction of the appeal or of the answer thereto, instead of or in addition to any person originally named in that behalf, in such manner and on such terms as the Court may think fit, or may make such other order in the case as may seem just. (11) Every party to a consolidated appeal shall be liable for the costs of the appeal in the same manner and to the same extent as the person named as appellant or respondent in such appeal.

(12) If where appeals are consolidated any party interested in any such appeal refuses to be a party to and to be bound by the consolidated appeal, the appeal in which such party is interested may proceed separately; but such party shall not be entitled to receive any costs of or in such appeal, unless the Court of Appeal shall otherwise order.

(13) Arrangements shall be made for hearing any appeals without delay, and as far as possible continuously.

(14) Subject to the foregoing provisions the rules for the time being in force with respect to appeals from the High Court to the Court of Appeal shall, so far as practicable, apply to and govern appeals under this rule to the Court of Appeal.

(15) Except as in this rule otherwise provided, the costs of any appeal shall be in the discretion of the Court of Appeal.

Such costs may, if the appeal is successful, be ordered to be paid by the registration officer named as respondent to the appeal, whether he shall or shall not appear in support of the decision of the county

court.

Where any person other than the registration officer is respondent to an appeal he shall not be liable or entitled to costs unless he appears in support of the decision of the county court.

(16) Notice of the decision of the Court of Appeal on any appeal shall be given by the proper officer of the Court of Appeal to the registration officer, specifying exactly every alteration or correction to be made on the register in pursuance of the decision; and a copy thereof shall be sent to the registrar of the county court.

(17) This Rule may be cited as the Registration Appeals Rule, 1918, and shall come into operation on the day of 1918.

THE BANKRUPTCY ACT 1914.

RECEIVING ORDERS.
GAZETTE, JUNE 28.

To surrender at the High Court of Justice in Bankruptcy.
HEISTEIN, KRISTEN, Cleveland-sq, Hyde Park. June 26.

To surrender at their respective District Courts. DONALDSON, JAMES METHVEN, Birmingham, tailor. Ct. Birmingham. June 25. FOULDS, HENRY, Baxenden, farmer. Ct. Blackburn and Darwen. June 26. SCHOFIELD, JAMES HENRY, and HADFIELD, THOMAS (trading as Schofield and Hadfield), Heywood, cotton waste spinners. Ct. Bolton. June 25. SAMUELS, SAMUEL ORME, Manchester, solicitor. Ct. Manchester. June 24. HOWELLS, WILLIAM EDWARD, Briton Ferry, producerman. Ct. Neath and Aberavon. June 25. COURTNEY, JOSEPH CAMERON, Portsmouth, skilled labourer. Ct. Portsmouth. June 26.

GAZETTE, JULY 2.

To surrender at the High Court of Justice in Bankruptcy. WATSON, TOM, late Kenley. June 27.

To surrender at their respective District Courts. BATTEN, FRANK, Winchester, collector of taxes. Ct. Winchester. June 28. FENNELL, E. (late E. Schumacher), Rustington, Second Lieutenant, 8th Labour Batt. of His Majesty's Army. Ct. Brighton. June 28. LEWIS, LLEWELLYN, Tonyrefail, farmer. Ct. Pontypridd, Ystradyfodwg, and Porth. June 27.

ADJUDICATIONS.

GAZETTE, JUNE 28.

DE GERDE, OLIVIER GEZA (described in receiving order as Olivier de
Gerdé), Talgarth-mansions, Talgarth-rd, commission agent. Ct.
High Court. June 25.

DONALDSON, JAMES METHVEN, Birmingham, tailor. Ct. Birmingham.
June 26.
HENDRIKS, GEORGE WILLIAM LAWRENCE, Eastwell. Ct. Leicester. June 24.
HOWELLS, WILLIAM EDWARD, Briton Ferry, producerman. Ct. Neath and
Aberavon. June 25.
COURTNEY, JOSEPH CAMERON, Portsmouth, skilled labourer. Ct. Ports-
mouth. June tu.

GAZETTE, JULY 2.

BATTEN, FRANK, Winchester, collector of taxes. Ct. Winchester. June 28. BLEWITT, IDA MARY, late Moulsford, hotel proprietor. Ct. Guildford and Godalming. June 28.

LEWIS, LLEWELLYN, Tonyrefail, farmer: Ct. Pontypridd, Ystradyfodwg, and Porth. June 28.

POTTER, SAMUEL CAMERON, Camden-rd, accountant. Ct. High Court.
June 27.
SEBRIGHT, REGINALD WALTER (described in receiving order as R. W.
Sebright), Service Club, Stratford-pl, a domiciled Englishman. Ct.
High Court. June 28.

TOOTHILL, JOHN SLATER, Tavistock-sq, boarding-house keeper. Ct. High
Court. June 28.
WALLACE, WILLIAM FREW, late Upper Thames-st. Ct. High Court
June 28.

ADJUDICATION ANNULLED.

GAZETTE, JULY 2.

MOULDS, ARTHUR CHARLES, late Barwell, boot manufacturer. Ct. Leicester June 28.

BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND DEATHS.

MARRIAGE.

DAVID-GREGORY JONES.-On July 2, at St. Mary's, Hampstead, Lieut.
A. Noll David, T.F.S. and R.A.F., son of A. J. David, K.C., and
Mrs David, Hampstead, to Violet Norah, elder daughter of Mr
and Mrs J. Gregory Jones, of Hampstead.
HAWDON-GRIFFITH-JONES.-On the 15th ult., at the Parish Church,
Harpenden, Hugh Hawdon, Lieut., D.L.I., son of Mr. Hawdon, of
Upsall Grange, Nunthorpe, Yorks, to Jocelyn, daughter of Capt.
M. P. Griffith-Jones, D.L.I., of the Middle Temple, Barrister-at-law.
DEATHS.

AMPHLETT. On the 23rd ult.. at Clent, Worcestershire, John Amphlett,
of Clent, M.A. Oxon, Barrister-at-law.
GOVER. On the 15th ult., Alfred G. Gover, Barrister-at-law, of 15,
Queen's-rd, Beckenham, aged 80 years.

all communications must be authenticated by the game and address of the writer, not necessarily for publication, but as a guarantee of good faith. Anonymous communiostions are invariably rejected.

All communications intended for the Editorial Department should, in order to prevent delay, be addressed to the "EDITOR OF THE LAW TIMES."

Any contributions that may be sent on approval will be carefully considered by the Editor: but no responsibility whatever can be accepted in respect thereof, although, if unsuitable, every effort will be made to return them, provided that a stamped addressed wrapper is inclosed for that purpose.

The copyright of all contributions (including reports paid for) shall belong to the proprietors of the LAW TIMES, together with the right of republication in any form they may think desirable. Apart from any express agreement that may be made, contributions are only received and considered on these conditions.

Advertisements, orders for papers, &o., should be kept distinct, and addressed to the Publisher, "Law Times" Office, Windsor House, Bream's-buildings, E.C. 4.

Alien Enemies.

It is to be hoped that the Government will deal with this pressing subject with the same expedition as that shown by the special committee who reported to the Prime Minister within one week of entering upon their duties. Their fifteen recommendations are practical and easy of application, while if no attempt is made in the way of undesirable compromise, their adoption should adequately safeguard the interests of the State, and effectually remove from the public mind all apprehension as to enemy influences in this country." We have always held the view that naturalised enemy aliens, whether British, allied or neutral, are even more detrimental to the interests of this country than the enemy alien who openly retains his allegiance to his own country. All naturalised alien enemies should be considered as enemies until the contrary is conclusively shown.

Military Service.

OWING to the intervention of Sir DONALD MACLEAN, Sir HERBERT NIELD, Mr. BETTESWORTH PIGGOTT, Mr. ALBION RICHARDSON, and other chairmen of tribunals, a much more rational system of grading has been adopted for the older men brought in by the Military Service Act of April last. As matters stood before, a lower standard of medical fitness in fact was applied to the older men than to those who were passed for service under the old categories under the earlier Acts. And for this the medical boards were not to blame, for their grading had to be performed according to the rules set forth in the general directions (M.N.S. R. 24) which

were issued by the Ministry of National Service for their guidance. The great majority of medical boards and tribunals have done their work conscientiously and well, but the drafting of the directions we have referred to left much to be desired, the instructions being far from clear and often inconsistent. In future the older men passed by the medical boards as fit for Grade 1 are to be classified Grade 1 (B. I.) ; men graded 2 are to be classified Grade 2 (B. II.); and those graded 3 are to be classified Grade 3 (B. III). Instructions are to be issued by the Local Government Board to tribunals that, in considering the relative military value of Grade 1 (B. I.), they must assume that the men are not fit to be trained for first line infantry. That, in considering the relative military values of men in the new classifications Grade 2 (B. II.) and Grade 3 (B. III.), they must assume that they are of substantially less military value than the men under the previous Military Service Acts placed in Grade 2 and Grade 3 respectively. Instructions will be given to each National Service representative that, if and when requested by a tribunal, he shall state whether a man placed in Grade 3 has been found by the medical board to be fit only for sedentary work. No notice calling up a man of these ages for service is to give shorter notice than fourteen days, nor is it to be issued until ten days after the date upon which the man is due to report for medical examination.

The Dutch Convoy.

THE right of search, which this country has always strenuously upheld, is distinctly one that cannot be abandoned, but to our mind a great deal of unnecessary commotion has been raised by the special concession given to the Netherlands Government. Stress is laid upon the alleged inconsistencies between the Foreign Office dispatch of the 7th June and the "confidential statement" made the same day by the Under-Secretary to the Dutch Minister. In both those pronouncements our right is fully insisted upon, and it is made quite clear that the measure of indulgence afforded will never be repeated. Mr. BALFOUR in the dispatch makes our position perfectly plain. He states:

His Majesty's Government feel compelled to reiterate in the most formal manner that the right of visit and search which Great Britain, whether she was a neutral or a belligerent, has, in conformity with the rules of international law, consistently upheld for centuries, is not one which she can abandon.

As the Netherlands Government is well aware, the claim that immunity from search is conferred on neutral merchant vessels by the fact of their sailing under the convoy of a man-of-war flying the national flag has never been conceded by this country. By the course, therefore, which they are now pursuing, they do in fact demand that Great Britain shall abdicate her belligerent right to stop contraband trade by the regulated exercise of naval force, and, in the middle of a great war, abandon the allied blockade. This is a demand to which Great Britain could not possibly accede.

The same principle is insisted upon by Lord ROBERT CECIL in the "confidential statement," but the reasons are set forth why, in this particular instance, His Majesty's Government are willing to waive their strict rights. It says:

His Majesty's Government, whilst sincerely regretting that the Netherlands authorities should have adopted a course which appears to them to have been lacking both in courtesy and in prudence, are anxious, nevertheless, to take into account the de facto situation in which the Netherlands Govern ment have now placed themselves by their own public announce. ment His Majesty's Government cannot consent to any abatement of the right which they claim to search vessels under

neutral convoy. The repression of contraband and the enforcement of blocklade lie, by international law, with the belligerent alone, and not with the neutral; and this fundamental principle Great Britain is quite determined to uphold with all the force at her command. It is important that the Netherlands Govern⚫ ment should be under no misapprehension on this point.

If, however, the intention underlying the presentation of M. van Swinderen's note of April 29, and of communications in the same sense since made by M. Loudon to Sir W. Townley, was merely to suggest that a friendly arrangement might be arrived at between the two Governments under which such satisfaction would be given to legitimate belligerent requirements as would justify the British Government in dispensing on the present occasion with the formal exercise of their right of search, his Majesty's Government will not refuse to consider such suggestion. They desire, by adopting this conciliatory attitude to give further practical evidence of their constant anxiety to maintain their relations with the Netherlands Government on the most amicable footing, and to show how far they are in fact willing to go out of their way in order to save the susceptibilities which the Dutch official announcement was calculated to arouse, and so to prevent the action of the Netherlands Government from definitely creating a situation gravely imperilling the friendly relations between the two countries.

But if for these motives and in these circumstances His Majesty's Government are to waive their right of search in this particular case, as an act of courtesy, they must lay stress on the altogether exceptional nature of such a concession, which must not be treated as a precedent for similar concessions in future nor held to commit His Majesty's Government in any way to the abandonment of their just claims on other occasions. On this clear understanding His Majesty's Government are ready to state the conditions on which the convoy composed of the ships whose names have been notified might be allowed to pass without interference through the British patrols on the intended journey from Rotterdam or Amsterdam to the Dutch East Indies.

To put the matter quite plainly, the Netherlands Government by their precipitate action had placed themselves in a position of considerable difficulty with their own people. His Majesty's Government, in order to give practical evidence of their desire to maintain relations on the most amicable footing and to save the susceptibilities which the Dutch official announcement was calculated to arouse, dispensed with their right under certain conditions, which were accepted, on this one occasion.

CHEQUE FORGERY AND CUSTOMER'S NEGLI

GENCE.

THE recent case of London Joint Stock Bank v. Macmillan in the House of Lords (ante, p. 163) is one of the first importance, in more than one aspect, to the whole banking and business community of the Empire. But while an important point in commercial law is thus settled for the United Kingdom, the law on this same point is ipso facto unsettled for the Oversea Dominions, and grave difficulties may arise in the oversea courts through the circumstance that the House of Lords' decision conflicts with a decision of the Privy Council which has now been standing for twelve years. In the United Kingdom the rule now is, under London Joint Stock Bank v. Macmillan, that if a cheque be drawn so negligently as to facilitate forgery by alteration of the amount payable, any loss caused by such an alteration being in fact made will fall on the customer who draws the cheque, and not on his banker. Overseas the rule has been, under Colonial Bank of Australasia v. Marshall (95 L.T. Rep. 310; (1906) A. C. 559), settled to the contrary effect-that the loss caused by such an alteration in the cheque falls on the banker.

The facts in London Joint Stock Bank v. Macmillan were very simple. The action was brought by the respondents against the appellant bank to recover the amount of certain forged cheques that had been paid by the bank, and amongst them was a cheque for £120. This cheque had been signed nearly in blank,