PAGE. 256, 648, 649 Steel v. State Line S. S. Co., L. R. 3 App. Cas. 72; 3 Asp. M. L. C. ... Stephens v. Harris, 6 Asp. M. L. C. 193 ... ... ... ... ... 585, 586, 646 508, 589 57 ... Stewart v. Aberdein, 4 M. & W. 211; 1 H. & H. 284... ... Strugnell v. Friederichsen, 12 C. B. N. S. 452; 9 Jur. N. S. 77 Stuart v. British and African S. Nav. Co., 2 Asp. M. L.C. 497; 32 L. T. 257 Sutton v. Tatham, 10 A. & E. 27; 2 P. & D. 308 Svensden v. Wallace, L. R. 10 App. Cas. 404; 54 L. J. Q. B. 497; 5 Asp. M.L.C. 453; 52 L.T. 901; 34 W.R. 369; L.R. 13 Q.B.D. 73 544 Swainston v. Garrick, 2 L. J. (N. S.) Ex. 55 340, 341, 343 Swann v. Barber, L. R. 5 L. C. 264; 42 L. T. 490; Sweeting v. Darthez, 14 C. B. 538; 23 L. J. C. P. 131; 18 Jur. 958; 2 C. & R. 1375 Sweeting v. Pearce, 9 C. B. N.S. 934; 30 L.J.C. P. 109; 5 L.T. 79; 9 W. R. 343 Talca, The, L. R. 5 P. D. 169; 4 Asp. M. L. C. 226; 29 W. R. 123 Tanner v. Phillips, 42 L. J. Ch. 125; 1 Asp. M. L. 27 L. T. 480; 21 W. R. 68 Tapscott v. Balfour, L. R. 8 C. P. 46; 42 L. J. C. P. 16; 1 Asp. 488, 526 ... Taylor v. Caldwell, 3 B. & S. 826; 32 L. J. Q. B. 164; 8 L. T. 356; ... ... ... ... ... Taylor v. Stray, 2 C. B. N. S. 197; 26 L. J. C. P. 185, 287; 3 Jur. PAGE. 152 279 639 30,567, 587 57 29, 255, 482, 582 Tew v. Harris, 11 Q. B. 7; 11 Jur. 947; 17 L. J. Q. B. 1 Tharsis Sulphur Co. v. Morel, L. R. (1891) 2 Q. B. 647; 61 L. J. Q. Thomas v. Fredricks, 10 Q. B. 775; 16 L. J. Q. B. 393; 548 68 Tillett v. Cwm. Avon, 2 Times L. R. 675 Touteng v. Hubbard, 3 B. & P. 291 Trayes v. Wormes, 34 L. J. C. P. 274; 19 C. B. N. S. 159; 12 L. T. 458 596 554 336, 339 265 218 Tully v. Howling, L. R. 2 Q. B. D. 182; 46 L. J. Q. B. 388; 3 Asp. Tully v. Terry, L. R. 8 C. P. 679; 42 L. J. C. P. 240; 2 Asp. M. L. ... Turgot, The, L. R. 11 P. D. 21; 5 Asp. M. L. C. 548; 54 L. T. 276; 34 W. R. 552 ... Turner v. Barlow, 3 F. & F. 946 ... Turner v. Ralli, 2 Ben. L. R. O. C. J. 129 Tutela, The, 6 C. Rob. 177 PAGE. 474 397, 531 Valente v. Gibbs, 6 C. B. N. S. 270; 28 L. J. C. P. 229; ... 29, 215 Van Baggen v. Baines, 9 Ex. 543; 23 L. J. Ex. 213; 2 C. L. R. 543. ... Village Belle, The, 30 L.T. 232; 2 Asp. M. L. C. N. S. 228. 645 624 620 97,99 622 495 ... 513 Vlierboom v. Chapman, 13 M. & W. 230; 13 L. J. Ex. 384; 8 W ... Wagstaff v. Anderson, L. R. 4 C. P. D. 283; L. R. 5 C. P. D. 171; 48 L. J. C. P. 759; 49 L. J. C. P. 485; 4 Asp. M. L. C. 290; 42 L. T. 720; 28 W. R. 856 21, 84, 119, 135, 358 Wake v. Harrop, 31 L. J. Ex. 451; 6 H. & N. 768; 1 H. & C. 202; 1 Asp. M. L. C. 247; 7 L. T. 96; 10 W. R. 626; 8 Jur. N. S. 845 39 Walshe v. Provan, 22 L. J. Ex. 355; 8 Ex. 843; 1 C. L. R. 823 Waltonshaw v. Marshall, 1 Har. & W. 209. Ward v. Felton, 1 East. 507 Warkworth, The, L.R. 9 P.D. 145; 53 L.J. Ad. 65; 5 Asp. M. L. C. 326; 49 L. T. 715; 33 W. R. 112 Warren v. Peabody, 8 C. B. 800; 19 L. J. C. P. 43; 14 Jur. 150 ... Watson v. Shankland, L. R. 2 H. L. Sc. 304; 29 L. T. 349 Whatley. Moreland, 2 C. & M. 347; 2 Dow. 249; 4 Tyr. 255 Whitehead v. Tuckett, 15 East. 400 Wiggins v. Johnston, 15 L. J. Ex. 202; 14 M. & W. 609 ... ... ... ... 200 Williamson v. Barbour, L.R. 9 Ch. D. 529; 50 L.J. Ch. 147; 37 L.T. Wilson v. Balcarres Brook S. S. Co., L. R. (1893) 1 Q. B. 422 567 595 Woodley v. Michell, L. R. 11 Q. B. D. 47; 52 L. J. Q. B. 325; 5 Asp. Woolley v. Reddelien, 12 L. J. C. P. 152; 5 M. & G. 316; 7 Jur. 930; Xantho, The, L. R. 12 App. Cas. 503; 56 L. J. Ad. 116; 6 Asp. M. 615 297 289 567, 629, 636 ... ... 538 Yates v. Mennell, 8 Taunt. 302; 2 Moo. 294 ... Z Zwile er bart v. Hen lerson, 23 L. J. Ex. 234; 9 Ex. 722 ... 134, 477, 488 PART I. THE NATURE OF A CHARTER-PARTY, AND ITS LEGAL INCIDENTS. nature of. THE term charter-party is generally understood Charter-party, to be a corruption of the Latin words chartapartita, the two parts of this and other instruments being usually written in former times on one piece of parchment, which was afterwards divided by a straight line cut through some word or figure, so that one part should fit and tally with the other, as evidence of their original agreement and correspondence, and to prevent the fraudulent substitution of a fictitious instrument for the real deed of the parties. Pothier in his "Traité de Charte-partie" gives the same etymology of this word from Boerius, but with a different explanation. "It was formerly usual," says Boerius, "in England and Aquitaine to reduce contracts into writing on a chart, divided afterwards into two parts from top to bottom, of which each of the contracting parties took one, which they placed together and compared when they had occasion to know the terms of their contract." 1 1 Abbott on Sh, p. 219. |