Powers: A Study in MetaphysicsClarendon Press, 30. nov 2006 - 252 pages George Molnar came to see that the solution to a number of the problems of contemporary philosophy lay in the development of an alternative to Hume's metaphysics. This alternative would have real causal powers at its centre. Molnar set about developing a thorough account of powers that might persuade those who remained, perhaps unknowingly, in the grip of Humean assumptions. He succeeded in producing something both highly focused and at the same time wide-ranging. He showed both that the notion of a power was central and that it could serve to dispel a number of long-standing philosophical problems. Molnar's account of powers is as realist as any that has so far appeared. He shows that dispositions are as real as any other properties. Specifically, they do not depend for their existence on their manifestations. Nevertheless, they are directed towards such manifestations. Molnar thus appropriates the notion of intentionality, from Brentano, and argues that it is the essential characteristic of powers. He offers a persuasive case for there being some basic and ungrounded powers, thus ruling out the reducibility of the dispositional to the non-dispositional. However, he does allow that there are non-power properties as well as power properties. In this respect, his final position is dualistic. This is contemporary metaphysics of the highest quality. It is a work that was almost complete when its author died. It has been edited for publication by another specialist in the subject, Stephen Mumford, who has also provided an introduction that will allow non-specialists to become acquainted with the issues. David Armstrong, one of the greatest living metaphysicians and personal friend of George Molnar, has provided a Foreword. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 68
Page 1
... explain the history of the unfinished manuscript and indicate the editorial principles that saw it through to its current form. The. Debate. An area of metaphysics that has increasingly concentrated minds is the issue of dispositional ...
... explain the history of the unfinished manuscript and indicate the editorial principles that saw it through to its current form. The. Debate. An area of metaphysics that has increasingly concentrated minds is the issue of dispositional ...
Page 2
... explained mental dispositions as analogues to well-known and accepted physical dispositions such as solubility and fragility. More recently, however, physicists have invoked properties of fundamental particles that have an appearance of ...
... explained mental dispositions as analogues to well-known and accepted physical dispositions such as solubility and fragility. More recently, however, physicists have invoked properties of fundamental particles that have an appearance of ...
Page 3
... explained by the substructure of the glass, such as the bonding between molecules. The persistence of such a ... explain the truth of counterfactual conditionals, therefore, which disposition ascriptions seem to entail. Molnar ...
... explained by the substructure of the glass, such as the bonding between molecules. The persistence of such a ... explain the truth of counterfactual conditionals, therefore, which disposition ascriptions seem to entail. Molnar ...
Page 9
... explain the difference between a grounded and ungrounded power. We will have to give up causal analyses of powers in ... explained in terms of derivability—one of the concepts explained in Chapter 1 (1.4.1). A taxonomy of theories of the ...
... explain the difference between a grounded and ungrounded power. We will have to give up causal analyses of powers in ... explained in terms of derivability—one of the concepts explained in Chapter 1 (1.4.1). A taxonomy of theories of the ...
Page 12
... explained another way? Such an explanation was my goal at one time (Mumford 1998). Powers advances the debate in a numbers of ways. Molnar shows in detail that the directedness of physical causal powers meets all the traditional marks ...
... explained another way? Such an explanation was my goal at one time (Mumford 1998). Powers advances the debate in a numbers of ways. Molnar shows in detail that the directedness of physical causal powers meets all the traditional marks ...
Contents
1 | |
POWERS | 19 |
Properties | 21 |
On What There Is | 47 |
3 Directedness | 60 |
4 Independence | 82 |
5 Actuality | 99 |
6 Intrinsicality | 102 |
8 Do Powers Need Grounds? | 125 |
9 The Ontology of Powers | 143 |
10 NonPowers | 158 |
11 Objections Considered | 173 |
12 Powers at Work | 186 |
References | 224 |
Index | 233 |
7 Objectivity | 111 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accept According actual analysis answer appear applied argued argument Armstrong atomic basic bearers behaviour believe causal cause Chapter claim complex concept conclusion conditional connections consider contains contingent definition depends derivative determinate directed dispositional distinct effects entail essential example exist experience explain express extrinsic fact force fundamental give given grounded Hume Humean idea identity important impossible independent intentional object intentionality intrinsic intrinsic properties involve kind laws Lewis logical manifestation matter meaning mental metaphysics modal Molnar nature necessary necessity non-powers object occur ontological pain particles particular philosophers physical position possible powers predicates principle priori probability problem properties propositions qualities question realism reason reduction relation respect response seems sense shape sides simple space statement strong structural suggests theory Thesis thing tion tropes true truth truthmakers turn types universals whole