Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont, 157. köideVermont printing Company, 1991 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 81
Page 7
... motion to suppress . We affirm . On June 30 , 1989 , defendant was arrested for DUI and fol- lowing arraignment filed a motion to suppress on the ground that there was not a reasonable basis for the arresting officer's initial stop . At ...
... motion to suppress . We affirm . On June 30 , 1989 , defendant was arrested for DUI and fol- lowing arraignment filed a motion to suppress on the ground that there was not a reasonable basis for the arresting officer's initial stop . At ...
Page 251
... motion , holding that the State had not established a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the merits . The State's motion for reconsideration was also denied , and the sale from defendant to the Dotolis was com- pleted . Subsequently ...
... motion , holding that the State had not established a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the merits . The State's motion for reconsideration was also denied , and the sale from defendant to the Dotolis was com- pleted . Subsequently ...
Page 513
... Motion for Reargument Denied December 5 , 1991 1. Trial - Motion To Suppress - Generally Motions to suppress are required to be filed pretrial to eliminate from trial disputes over police conduct not immediately relevant to question of ...
... Motion for Reargument Denied December 5 , 1991 1. Trial - Motion To Suppress - Generally Motions to suppress are required to be filed pretrial to eliminate from trial disputes over police conduct not immediately relevant to question of ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
abuse its discretion action affidavit Affirmed alleged Amendment appeal argues argument attorney award Board Burlington charge Cite as 157 claim cocaine conclude conduct consider contract conviction counsel court erred coverage crime criminal damages decision defendant defendant's denied determine dismissal Dooley employee error evidence exclusionary rule fact failed fair trial federal fendant flextime Fourth Amendment grievant hearing hearsay injury intent issue judicial jurors jury juvenile liability ment Miranda warnings Montpelier Morse Munchausen syndrome notice Opinion Filed parties person petitioner plaintiff present pretrial prior privilege probable cause probation proceedings protection Putney School question reasonable reclassification record relevant remanded respondent result reverse Ryegate sentence Sixth Amendment specific standard State's statement statute statutory summary judgment Superior Court Supreme Court testified testimony tion trial court trial judge vehicle Vermont Constitution VIDA violation voir dire warrant witness