« EelmineJätka »
the ghost."-Significantly was the veil of the temple rent in this hour; for the glory then departed from between the cherubims. The legal high priest delivered up his Urim and Thummim, his breastplate, his robes, and his incense; and Christ stood forth as the great High Priest of all succeeding generations. By that one sacrifice which he now offered, he abolished sacrifices for
Altars on which the fire had blazed for ages, were now to smoke no more. Victims were no more to bleed. "Not with the blood of bulls“ and goats, but with his own blood, he now entered into the holy place, there to appear in the presence of God for us."
This was the hour of association and union to all the worshippers of God. When Christ said, “ It is finished,” he threw down the wall or partition, which had so long divided the Gentile from the Jew. He gathered into oné, all the faithful, out of every kindred and people. He proclaimed the hour to be come, when the kaowledge of the true God should be no longer confined to one nation, nor his worship to one temple; but over all the earth, the worshippers of the Father should serve him in spirit and in truth.” From that hour, they who dwelt in the "uttermost ends of the earth, strangers to the covenant of promise," began to be “ brought nigh." In that hour, the light of the gospel dawned from afar on the British Islands.
This was the hour of Christ's triumph over all the powers of darkness; the hour, in which he overthrew dominions and thrones, "led captivity captive, and gave gifts to men.” The contest which the kingdom of darkness had long maintained against the kingdom of light, was now brought to its crisis. Tbe period was come, when " the seed of the woman should bruise the head of the serpent.” For many ages, the most gross superstition had filled the earth. “The glory of the incorruptible God was,” every where, except in the land of Judea, "changed into images made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and beasts, and creeping things. The world, which the Almighty created for himselt, seemed to have become a temple of idols. Even to vice and passions, allars were raised; and what was entitled religion, was, in effect, a discipline of impurity. In the midst of this
universal darkness, Satan had erected leis throne; and the learned and polished, as well as the savage nations, bowed down before him. But at the hour when Christ appeared on the cross, the signal of his defeat was given. His kingdom suddenly departed from him; the reign of diolatry passed away; he was beheld to fall like lightning from heaven.” In that hour, the foundation of every Pagan temple shook; the statue of every false god tottered on its base; the priest fled from his falling shrine; and the heathen oracles became dumb forever.
Death, also, the last foe to man, was the victim of this hour. The formidable appearance of the spectre remained, but his dart was taken away: for, in the hour when Christ expiated guilt, he disarmed death, by securing the resurrection of the just. When he said to his penitent fellow-sufferer, " To-day thou shalt be with me in Paradise,” he announced to all Lis followers, the certainty of heavenly bliss. He declared "the cherubims? to be dismissed, and the flaming sword" to be sheathed, which had been appointed, at the fall, - to keep from man the way of the tree of life.” Faint, before this period, had been the hope, indistinct the prospect, which even good men enjoyed of the heavenly kingdom. "Life and immortality were now brought to light. From the hill of Calvary, the first clear and certain view was give en to the world, of the everlasting manzions. Since that hour, they have been the perpetual consolation of believers in Christ. Under trouble, they scoth their minds; amidst temptations, they support their virtue;, and, in their dying moments, enable them to say, "O death! Where is thy sting ?. O grave! Where is thy victory ???
1.-Speech of the Earl of Chesterfield, in the House of
Lords, February 22, 1740, on the Pension Bill.
of the motion for the second reading of the Pension Bill, by Lords much abler than I am, that I shall detain you but a very short while with what I have to say upon the subject. It has been said by a noble Duke, that this bill can be looked on only as a bill for preventing a grievance that is foreseen, and not as'a bill for remedying a grievance that is already felt; because it is not asserted, nor so much as insinuated, in the preamble of the bill, that any corrupt practices are now made use of, for gaining an undue influence over the other House. My Lords, this was the very reason for bringing in the bill. They could not assert, that any such practices are now made use of, without a proof; and the means for coming at this proof is what they want, and what they propose to get by this bill. They suspect there are such practices, but they cannot prove it. The crime is of such a secret nature, that it can very seldom be proved by witnesses ; and therefore they want to put it to the trial, at least, of being proved by the oath of one of the parties ; which is a method often taken, in cases that can admit of no other proof. This is, therefore, no argument of the grievanee not being felt; for a man may, very sensibly, feel a grievance, and yet may not be able to prove it.
That there is a suspicion of some such practices being now.marle use of, or that they will soon be made use of, the many remonstrances from all parts of the united kingdoms are a sufficient proof. That this suspicion has crept into the other House, their having so frequently sent up this bill, is a manifest demonstration, and a strong argument for its being necessary to have some such bill passed into a law. The other House must be allowed to
be better judges of what passes, or must pass, within their own walls, than we can pretend to be. It is evident, they suspect that corrupt practices have been, or soon may be, made use of, for gaining an undue influence over some of their measures ; and they have calculated this bill for curing the evil, if it is felt, for preventing it, if it is only foreseen. That any such practices have been actually made use of, or are now made use of, is what I shall not pretend to affirm ; but I am sure I shall not affirm the contrary. . If any such are made use of, I will with confidence vindicate his Majesty. I am sure he knows nothing of them. I am sure he will disdain to suffer them ; but I cannot pass such a compliment upon his ministers, nor upon any set of ministers that ever was, or ever will be, in this nation; and therefore, I think I cannot more faithfully, more effectually, serve bis present Majesty, as well as his successors, than by putting it out of the power of ministers to gain any corrupt influence over either House of Parliament. Such an attempt may be necessary for the security of the minister; but never can be necessary for, must always be inconsistent with, the security of his master; and the more necessary it is for the minister's security, the more inconsistent it will always be withthe king's, and the more dangerous to the liberties of the nation.
To pretend, my Lords, that this bill diminishes, or any way encroaches upon the prerogative, is something very strange. What prerogative, my Lords ?. Has the crown a prerogative to bribe, to infringe the law, by sending its pensioners into the other House ? To say so, is destroying the credit, the authority of the crown, under the pretence of supporting its prerogative. If his Majesty knew that any man received a pension from him, or any thing like a pension, and yet kept his seat in the other House, he would himself declare it, or withdraw his pension, because he knows it is against law. This bill, therefore, no way diminishes or encroaches
prerog. ative of the crown, which can never be exercised but for the public good. It diminishes only the prerogative usurped by ministers, which is never exercised but for its destruction. The crowa may still reward merit in the proper way, that is, openly. The bill is intended, and can operate only against clandestine rewards, or gratui
ties given by ministers. These are scandalous, and nerer were, nor will be, given but for scandalous services.
It is very remarkable, my Lords, it is even diverting, to see such a squeamishness about perjury upon this occasion, amongst those, who, upon other occasions, have invented and enacted multitudes of oaths, to be taken by men, who are under great temptations, from their private interests, to be guilty of perjury. Is not this the case of almost every oath that relates to the collection of the public revenue, or to the exercise of any office ? Is not this perjury one of the chief objections made by the Dissenters against the Test and Corporation Act ? And shall we show a less concern for the preservation of our constitution, than for the preservation of our church? The reverend bench should be cautious of making use of this argument; for if they will not allow us an oath Tor the preservation of the former, it will induce many people to think, they ought pot to be allowed an oath for the preservation of the latter.
By this time, I hope, my Lords, all the inconveniencies pretended to arise from this bill, bave vanished ; and therefore I shall consider some of the arguments brought to show that it is not necessary. Here I must observe, that most of the arguments made use of for this purpose, are equally strong for a repeal of the laws we have already in being against admitting pensioners to sit and vote in the other House. If it be impossible to suppose, that a gentleman of great estate and ancient fami. ly, can, by a pension, be influenced to do what he ought not to do ; and if we must suppose that none but such gentlemen can ever get into the other House, I am sure the laws for preventing pensioners from having seats in that House are quite unnecessary, and ought to be repealed. Therefore, if these arguments prevail with your Jordships to put a negative upon the present question, I shall expect to see that negative followed by a motion for the repeal of those laws; nay, in a few sessions, I shall expect to see a bill brought in for preventing any xbao's being a member of the other House, but such as have some place or pension under the crown. As an argument for such a bill, it might be said that his Majesty's most faithful subjects ought to be chosen Members of