Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States, 14. köide |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 85
Page xii
This is an error . It should read , · The boundary line runs up the river , on and
along its western bank , and the jurisdic . tion of Georgia in the soil extends over
to the line which is waslıcd by the water , wherever it covers the bed of the river ...
This is an error . It should read , · The boundary line runs up the river , on and
along its western bank , and the jurisdic . tion of Georgia in the soil extends over
to the line which is waslıcd by the water , wherever it covers the bed of the river ...
Page 14
This case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois , by a
writ of error issued under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act . The section of the
law of Illinois , under which Eels was indicted in 1842 , and the facts in the case
are ...
This case was brought up from the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois , by a
writ of error issued under the 25th section of the Judiciary Act . The section of the
law of Illinois , under which Eels was indicted in 1842 , and the facts in the case
are ...
Page 17
The plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted under the criminal code of Illinois
for “ harboring and secreting a negro slave . ” The record was removed by writ of
error to the Supreme Court of that State ; and it was there contended , on behalf ...
The plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted under the criminal code of Illinois
for “ harboring and secreting a negro slave . ” The record was removed by writ of
error to the Supreme Court of that State ; and it was there contended , on behalf ...
Page 19
But admitting that the plaintiff in error may be liable to an action under the act of
Congress , for the same acts of harboring and preventing the owner from retaking
his slave , it does . not follow that he would be twice punished for the same ...
But admitting that the plaintiff in error may be liable to an action under the act of
Congress , for the same acts of harboring and preventing the owner from retaking
his slave , it does . not follow that he would be twice punished for the same ...
Page 23
CORNELIUS KANUUSE , PLAINTIFF IN ERROR , v . John M. MARTIN . Where a
motion was made , under the 12th section of the Judiciary Act , to remove a cause
from a State Court to the Circuit Court of the United States , notwithstanding ...
CORNELIUS KANUUSE , PLAINTIFF IN ERROR , v . John M. MARTIN . Where a
motion was made , under the 12th section of the Judiciary Act , to remove a cause
from a State Court to the Circuit Court of the United States , notwithstanding ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
according act of Congress action administrator admitted agreement alleged answer appears appellants applied assignment authority bank bill brought cause charge Circuit Court citizen claim Company complainants consideration considered constitution construction contract copy counsel decided decision decree defendants direct District effect entitled error et al evidence exception execution existence fact filed further give given grant ground hands held improvement instructions interest invention issued John Judge judgment jurisdiction jury Justice land liable machine marshal matter means ment necessary objection obtained opinion original owner paid parties passed patent person plaintiff plea possession present principle proceedings proof proved purchaser question reason received record reference respect river rule statute sufficient suit taken term Texas thing tion treaty trustees United valid writ
Popular passages
Page 275 - The governor and judges, or a majority of them, shall adopt and publish in the district, such laws of the original States, criminal and civil, as may be necessary, and best suited to the circumstances of the district...
Page 514 - ... at a greater distance than one hundred miles from the place of holding the same without the permission of the trial court being first had upon proper application and cause shown.
Page 233 - Wisconsin, which are not repugnant to this constitution, shall remain in force until they expire by their own limitation, or be altered or repealed by the legislature.
Page 132 - The writ of habeas corpus shall in no case extend to a prisoner in jail, unless where he is in custody under or by color of the authority of the United States...
Page 143 - ... upon such evidence of criminality as, according to the laws of the place where the fugitive or person so charged shall be found, would justify his apprehension and commitment for trial if the crime or offence had there been committed...
Page 20 - Every citizen of the United States is also a citizen of a state or territory. He may be said to owe allegiance to two sovereigns, and may be liable to punishment for an infraction of the laws of either. The same act may be an offense or transgression of the laws of both.
Page 507 - On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby reversed...
Page 76 - This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Maryland, and was argued by counsel. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this Court, that the...
Page 192 - On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court, that the decree of the said...
Page 47 - All questions relative to the government of foreign nations, whether of the old or new world, have been treated by the United States as questions of fact only, and our predecessors have cautiously abstained from deciding upon them until the clearest evidence was in their possession, to enable them not only to decide correctly, but to shield their decisions from every unworthy imputation.