NAMES OF THE CASES REPORTED IN THIS NUMBER. Boyse. Rossborough.-(Jurisdiction-Equity-Esta- ....... Hanbury and Others v. Ward.-(Practice-Appearance-43rd Order of August, 1852-15 & 16 Vict. c. 86, 8.52) 205 222 In re Clossey.-(Reversionary Interest in Realty held pur autre Vie-Practice-6 Ann. c. 18-Production of Cestui que Vie) ... 222 223 ADVERTISEMENTS. The Scale of Charges for Advertisements will in future be as follows:£ s. d. 0 2 0 026 For 2 lines or under. 3 4 5 6 0 30 036 040 And so on, at the rate of 6d. per line. A discount, proportioned to the number of repetitions, will be allowed upon all Advertisements ordered for three or more insertions. LONDON, MARCH 18, 1854. institutions, will enable them to compel performance of their orders; and as Courts of equity refuse attempting to compel performance of a simple contract to act, or to sing, or the like, merely because they will not stultify themselves by ordering that to be done which they have no power to force a man to do, so credit may be given to a Court of law that it will not attempt to order a horse to drink, or a man to marry, though it may flog the horse for not drinking, or make the man pay for not marrying. To be serious, the whole current of modern law reform as regards judicature is this-to import into the common law, or rather to add to it, equitable doctrines of THE proposed alterations in the course of common- conduct; and to import from the Court of Chancery law procedure, now before the House of Lords, together into the Courts of common law, and from the latter with those additions which are likely to be made in the into the former, the best and most efficacious of their Commons, will, if carried into effect, probably produce respective modes of procedure; and when it can be great changes, not only in the amount, but in the shewn that in either Court either the doctrines by mode of transacting business in Chancery. By the which it is bound, or the practice according to which additions likely to be made in the Commons, we mean it proceeds, are not such as to produce the one desired the introduction of actions for specific performance into result-justice-the tendency, and the proper tendency, courts of common law-an addition to their jurisdic-is to give to the deficient Court the powers that it did not tion which is almost certain to be made. Now, though, as being ourselves of the equity bar, we cannot personally look with any particular affection on changes the result of which may be to diminish considerably the business of equity, yet, as law reformers, we cannot see the slightest ground for contending that Courts of law ought not to have that jurisdiction, as well as that of admitting equitable defences, and granting injunctions, &c., in actions pending in their jurisdiction. The instance which the Lord Chancellor put, of an action for specific performance of a contract for marriage, was probably put by his Lordship by way of joking off a portion of the subject to which his Lordship entertained an aversion; because, of course, if Courts of law entertain actions for specific performance, they must, like Courts of equity, and every other Court, limit the exercise of their jurisdiction to cases in which the power placed at their disposal by human VOL. XVIII. J possess. To take the question of equitable defences: it does seem not only very absurd, but very inconvenient, that if an action is brought on an instrument under seal, then, in order to set up, by way of defence, some transaction recognisable only on principles of equity, it should be necessary for the defendant to go out of the Court of common law into the Court of Chancery, and there obtain, by a separate and expensive course of proceeding, an order to stop the plaintiff at law from going on, on the ground of the equitable defence; or if an ejectment is brought at law, and the defendant sets up an outstanding term, on which as a legal title he can rest, but on which for some reasons it would be very unjust that he should rest, it seems very inconveniently tedious and expensive that he should have to go into equity, as it is termed, to stay the setting up of the outstanding term. It will be a simpler, more expeditious, and more rational mode of proceeding in either of such cases, that the defendant in the one case, or the plaintiff in the other, should be able to set up the equitable defence in the action. On the subject of specific performance, the giving such jurisdiction to Courts of law seems perfectly rational; but merely to do that, would be a one-sided reform as regards the public. The great object to be attained is, that the suitor may seek his remedy, so far as it is practicable, in any of her Majesty's courts, and that wherever he does choose to go, he may get complete justice. It is a hardship that in one court a plaintiff may get damages, and damages only, for the breach of a contract, and that in another he may have the contract enforced, but can have no more that is, cannot have damages; and that is not merely a theoretical but a practical grievance, because it very often happens that a plaintiff mistakes his course— that is, goes to a Court of equity for specific performance when he is not entitled to it, though he might have been entitled to damages if he had gone originally to a Court of law. Now, what ought to be done for substantial reform of the law on such a point as this is, that whichever court a suitor happens to go into first, there he should be able to obtain complete justice. If he files a bill in Chancery for specific performance, and it turns out that he is not entitled to specific performance, but may be entitled to some damages, he ought not to be turned out of the Court of Chancery, with costs, to seek what remedy he can at law; but the Court of Chancery ought to be armed with power to say, "True it is, you are not entitled to the strict performance of the contract, but you have suffered damage, and are entitled to compensation, and we will give you damages." On the other hand, he ought not at law to be confined strictly to damages, but ought to be able to ask, in the alternative, either performance of the contract or damages. Of course, in administering these equities, Courts of law ought to be bound to take notice of those higher principles of judicial morality, in applying the law to men's contracts, which are acted upon in Courts of equity, but have not been hitherto recognised by Courts of law. If they do not, to give them an equitable jurisdiction will only be putting into their hands a power of doing mischief instead of good. REGULA GENERALIS. ORDER OF COURT.-March 9. chargeable shall be directed, the Registrar shall add the words "subject to legacy duty," or "subject to succession duty," as the case may be, to the title of the against the payment or transfer by the Accountantaccount; and in order the better to provide security General of any fund chargeable with any such duty, without the duty being first paid, the AccountantGeneral, on receiving notice from the proper officer that the duty is payable, is to cause a memorandum to be made in his books in conformity with such notice. And the Accountant-General, before executing any decree or order directing the payment or transfer of any fund, or part of any fund, in respect of which any such duty shall be payable, shall require the production of the official receipt for the duty, or a certificate from the proper officer of the payment of the duty thereof respectively, by any such decree or order chargeable in respect of any such fund or any portion directed to be paid or transferred. (Signed) CRANWORTH, C. PUBLIC EXAMINATION.-TRINITY TERM, 1854. THE Council of Legal Education have approved of the following rules for the public examination of the students. lowing rules of the Inns of Court:The attention of the students is requested to the fol "As an inducement to students to propose themselves for examination, studentships shall be founded of fifty guineas per annum each, to continue for a period of three years, and one such studentship shall be conferred on the most distinguished student at each public examination; and further, the examiners shall select and certify the names of three other students who shall have passed the next best examinations, and the Inns of Court to which such students belong may, if desired, dispense with any terms, not exceeding two, that may remain to be kept by such students previously to their Provided that the examiners being called to the Bar. shall not be obliged to confer or grant any studentship or certificate unless they shall be of opinion that the examination of the students they select has been such as entitles them thereto." "At every call to the Bar those students who have passed a public examination, and either obtained a studentship or a certificate of honour, shall take rank in seniority over all other students who shall be called on the same day." "No student shall be eligible to be called to the Bar who shall not either have attended during one whole year the lectures of two of the Readers, or have satisfactorily passed a public examination." RULES FOR THE PUBLIC EXAMINATION OF CANDIDATES FOR HONOURS, OR CERTIFICATES ENTITLING STUDENTS TO BE CALLED TO THE BAR. An examination will be held in next Trinity Term, to which a student of any of the Inns of Court, who is desirous of becoming a candidate for a studentship or honours, or of obtaining a certificate of fitness for being called to the Bar, will be admissible. I, the Right Hon. ROBERT MONSEY Lord CRANWORTH, Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, do hereby order and direct in manner following-that is to say, that the General Order made by me bearing date the 31st January, 1853, be discharged, and in lieu thereof I Each student proposing to submit himself for exsdo order, that the Registrar, in drawing up any decree mination will be required to enter his name at the or order whereby the Accountant-General shall be treasurer's office of the Inn of Court to which he be directed to pay or transfer any fund or part of any longs on or before Monday, the 15th day of May next; fund in respect of which any duty shall be payable to and he will further be required to state in writing the revenue under the acts relating to legacy or suc- whether his object in offering himself for examination cession duty, shall, unless such decree or order ex- is to compete for a studentship or other honourable pressly provide for the payment of the duty, direct distinction, or whether he is merely desirous of obtain the Accountant-General to have regard to the circum-ing a certificate preliminary to a call to the Bar. stance that such duty is payable; and where, by any decree or order, any carrying over to a separate account of any fund in respect of which any such duty may be The examination will commence on Monday, the 22nd day of May next, and will be continued on the Tuesday and Wednesday following. It will take place in the Benchers' Reading-room of Lincoln's-inn; and the doors will be closed ten minutes after the time appointed for the commencement of the examination. The examination by printed questions will be conducted in the following order : Monday morning, the 22nd May, at half-past nine, The oral examination will be conducted in the same order, during the same hours, and on the same subjects, as those already marked out for the examination by printed questions, except that on Wednesday afternoon there will be no oral examination. The oral examination of each student will be conducted apart from the other students; and the character of that examination will vary according as the student is a candidate for honours or a studentship, or desires simply to obtain a certificate. The oral examination and printed questions will be founded on the books below mentioned, regard being had, however, to the particular object with a view to which the student presents himself for examination. In determining the question, whether a student has passed the examination in such a manner as to entitle him to be called to the Bar, the examiners will principally have regard to the general knowledge of law and jurisprudence which he has displayed. Jurisprudence, vol. 1; Wigram's Points in the Law of Discovery, ("Introductory Observations" and "First Proposition"); the Act for the Improvement of Equity Jurisdiction, 15 & 16 Vict. c. 86. 2. Mitford on Pleadings in the Court of Chancery; White & Tudor's Leading Cases, (with the Notes), vols. 1 and 2. Candidates for certificates of fitness to be called to the Bar will be expected to be well acquainted with the books mentioned in the first of the above classes. Candidates for a studentship or honours will be examined in the books mentioned in the two classes. The READER on the Law of REAL PROPERTY proposes to examine in the following books and subjects:1. Williams-Real Property. 2. Learning of Powers-1 Sugd. Pow., cc. 1-4. 3. The Alienation of Freehold Estates by Tenants in Tail and Married Women: with reference to the 3 & 4 Will. 4, c. 74. 4. The Law of Perpetuity: with reference to the Doctrine of Cy-près, Powers of Sale and Exchange, and Powers of Appointment. 5. The Liability of Purchasers to see to the Application of their Purchase Money. 6. The Law of Settlement by Deed: with reference to Ante-Nuptial, Post-Nuptial, and Voluntary Settle ments. tinction will be examined in all the foregoing books Candidates for a studentship or other honorary disand subjects. Candidates for a certificate will be examined in 1, 2, and 3. The READER on JURISPRUDENCE and the CIVIL LAW proposes to examine in the following subjects: writers. 1. The Relation of Jurisprudence to Moral Philosophy. Austin-Province of Jurisprudence Determined, A student may present himself at any number of lect. 5; Whewell-Elements of Morality and Polity, examinations, until he shall have obtained a certificate. book 4, vol. 2, (2nd ed.) The student must be preAny student who shall obtain a certificate may pre-pared to indicate the points of conflict between these sent himself a second time for examination as a candidate for the studentship, but only at one of the three examinations immediately succeeding that at which he shall have obtained such certificate; provided, that if any student so presenting himself shall not succeed in obtaining the studentship, his name shall not appear in the list. Students who have kept more than eleven terms shall not be admitted to an examination for the studentship. The READER on CONSTITUTIONAL LAW and LEGAL HISTORY will expect all students to answer any general questions relating to the History of England, and to know the outlines of Constitutional Law. The candidates for distinction will be expected to know the progress of our institutions, and the changes of our Constitution. They will be examined on the History of the Conqueror and his immediate Successors; on the Reign of Henry II; on the circumstances which ed to the signing of Magna Charta. They will be expected also to know thoroughly the History of Elizabeth, of Charles I, and William III; and to give an ccount of the more remarkable State Trials from the ime of James I to that of Queen Anne. The books for the ordinary examination will be Rapin and Hallam. Those for candidates for distinction will be Hallam, Rapin, Burnet, Millar, Clarendon, May, the State Trials, and the Parliamentary History. The READER on EQUITY proposes to examine in the Following books: 1. Smith's Manual on Equity Jurisprudence; the first seven chapters of Story's Commentaries of Equity 2. The Roman Law of Servitudes, Prescriptions, Testaments, Legacies, and Fidei-Commissa. The modern Commentaries consulted may be, on the first two subjects, the Doctrina Pandectarum of Mühlenbruch; and on the three last, the Institutiones or Commentarii Juris Romani Privati of Warnkönig. 3. The Roman Law of Civil Process at the era of Gaius. Gaius-Comment., lib. 4. The Modern Treatises referred to may be the Innere Geschichte des Römischen Rechts of Tigerström, pp. 86 et seq.; or J. G. Phillimore's Introduction to the Study of Roman Law, pp. 16 et seq. 4. The Conflict and Harmony of Laws on the Subject of Marriage and Divorce. StoryConflict of Laws, cc. 5, 6, 7. 5. National Rights of Self-Preservation, Independence, and Equality. Wheaton-Elements of International Law, part 1, cc. 1, 2, 3. Candidates for distinction will be examined in all the foregoing subjects. 5, Candidates for a certificate will be examined in 4 and and also in 2, so far as the subjects enumerated are treated of in the Institutes of Justinian. The READER on COMMON LAW proposes to examine in the following books and subjects:— 1. The ordinary steps in an Action at Law. 2. The Parties to Contracts-Smith's Lectures on Contracts, 8-10, (omitting the note commencing at p. 253). 3. Offences against Property-Stephen Com., book 6, c. 5. 4. The Law of Landlord and Tenant, so far as it relates to the Right to Distrain and the Obligation to Repair -Woodf. L. & T., 6th ed., book 2, c. 2, ss. 1—3; c. 4, ss. 1, 2. 5. The following Leading Cases, with the Notes thereto, (Smith's L. C., 3rd ed.):-Semayne's case, The Six Carpenters' case, Price v. The Earl of Torrington, and Higham v. Ridgway. Candidates for certificates of fitness to be called to the Bar will be examined in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd of the above subjects. Candidates for the studentship or for honours will be expected to be conversant with all the above subjects. By order of the Council, RICHARD BETHELL, Chairman. Council Chamber, Lincoln's Inn, March 9, 1854. COMMISSIONERS TO ADMINISTER OATHS IN CHANCERY. The Lord Chancellor, under the powers of the 16 & 17 Vict. c. 78, intituled "An Act relating to the Appointment of Persons to administer Oaths in Chancery, and to Affidavits made for Purposes connected with Registration," has appointed the following gentlemen to be Commissioners for administering Oaths in Chancery: To be London Commissioners. Charles Wells Rolfe, 6, South-square, Gray's-inn. Alfred Charles Tatham, 11, Staple-inn, and North-road, Highgate. William Burchell, 47, Parliament-street. Frederick Mayhew, 4, Verulam-buildings, and Haverstock-hill, Hampstead. Charles Thomas Jenkinson, 29, Lombard-street, City. John Danby Christopher, 26, Argyle-street, Regent street. Thomas Lacy, 19, King's Arms-yard, City. Cyril John Monkhouse, 3, Craven-street, Strand. John Curtis, Haberdashers'-hall, Gresham-street West, Wm. Braikenridge, 16, Bartlett's-buildings, Holborn. Edward John Cox Davies, Crickhowell, Breconshire. George Batchelor, Newport, Monmouthshire. George Bradley, Castleford, Yorkshire. London Gazettes. FRIDAY, MARCH 10. BANKRUPTS. WILLIAM JOHN WATSON, Upper Holloway, Middlesex, builder, dealer and chapman, March 21 at 12, and April 20 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Bell; Sol. Brown, 21, Finsbury-place.—Petition filed March 4. HENRY JOHNSON, Turnwheel-lane, Cannon-street, London, and Thames Ditton, Surrey, machinist and engineer, dealer and chapman, March 23 at half-past 1, and April 27 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Bell; Sol. Teague, 5, Crown-court, Cheapside.-Petition filed Feb. 28. WILLIAM CLUFF HULME, High-street, Putney, Surrey, grocer, March 24 and April 25 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Edwards; Sols. Hare & Whitfield, 1, Mitre-court, Temple, London.-Petition filed March 10. WILLIAM JOHN HICKS, Waltham Abbey, Essex, draper, dealer and chapman, March 18 at 12, and April 21 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Cannan; Sols. Davidson & Bradbury, 22, Basinghall-street, London.Petition dated March 2. FREDERICK BHEAR, George-yard, Lombard-street, London, hotel keeper, March 22 at 2, and April 25 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London: Off. Ass. Stansfeld; Sols. Miller & Carr, 24, Eastcheap, London.-Petition filed March 4. EDWIN SHAW, Birmingham, pocket-book maker, dealer and chapman, March 25 and April 24 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham: Off. Ass. Christie; Sol. Hodgson, Birmingham.-Petition dated March 8. Edward Doyle, 2, Verulam-buildings, Gray's-inn, and JAMES POTTS, Stoke-upon-Trent, Staffordshire, confec 87, Camden-road-villas, Camden-town. William Henry Clapham, 29, Great Portland-street, Marylebone. Frederick Tritton, 11, Three Crown-square, Southwark, and 10, Paragon, New Kent-road. Philip Augustus Hanrott, jun., 29, Queen-square, Bloomsbury. William Wyke Smith, 16, Southampton-street, Bloomsbury. Frederick Paley Chappell, 25, Golden-square. Robert Henry Baines, 3, Verulam-buildings, Gray's-inn. David Williams Wire, 9, St. Swithin's-lane, City, and of Stone-house, Lewisham, Kent. Thomas Mortimer, 4, Albany-court-yard, Piccadilly, and 11, Leonard-place, Kensington. John Charles Williams, 4, Whitehall. tioner, dealer and chapman, March 23 and April 25 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham: Off. Ass. Christie; Sol. Smith, Birmingham. - Petition dated Feb. 28. CHRISTOPHER JAMES TAYLOR, Birmingham, coal dealer, dealer and chapman, March 22 and April 26 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham: Off. Ass Whitmore; Sol. Hodgson, Birmingham.-Petition dated March 7. THOMAS BOOTH, Halifax, Yorkshire, innkeeper, dealer and chapman, March 21 at 12, and April 24 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds: Off. Ass. Hope; Sols. Mit chell, Halifax; Bond & Barwick, Leeds.-Petition dated March 7. HENRY JAMES ROGERS, Callington, Cornwall, surgeon and apothecary, dealer and chapman, (lately carrying on business with William Hender, under the firm of Hender & Rogers), March 22 at 2, and April 20 at 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Exeter: Off. Ass. Hirtzel; Sols. Edmonds & Sons, Plymouth; Stogdon, Exeter.-Petition filed March 8. DAVID COUZENS, East Stonehouse, Devonshire, cab proprietor, March 27 and April 24 at half-past 1, District Court of Bankruptcy, Plymouth: Off. Ass. Hirtzel; Sol. Elworthy, Plymouth.-Petition filed March 4. THOMAS M'KENNA, Belfast, Antrim, Ireland, draper, dealer and chapman, (trading there and at Manchester, under the firm of Thomas M'Kenna & Co.), March 24 and April 28 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Manchester : Off. Ass. Hernaman; Sols. Sale & Co., Manchester.Petition filed Feb. 27. warehousemen.-G. I. Dickson, Glasgow, merchant.-Hugh Baird & John Baird, Paisley, manufacturers.—Martin, Sons, & Co., Glasgow, vinegar manufacturers. INSOLVENT DEBTORS Who have filed their Petitions in the Court of Bankruptcy, and have obtained an Interim Order for Protection from Process. James Worrall, Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, boat builder, March 21 at 9, County Court of Staffordshire, at WolverJOHN HARRISON, Sunderland, Durham, licensed vic- hampton.-Henry James Potts, Macclesfield, Cheshire, tailor, tualler, dealer and chapman, March 22 at 11, and April 28 March 30 at 11, County Court of Cheshire, at Macclesfield.— at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Thomas Holland, Macclesfield, Cheshire, victualler, March 30 Off. Ass. Wakley; Sols. Abrahams, 23, Southampton- at 11, County Court of Cheshire, at Macclesfield.-W. Motbuildings, Chancery-lane, London; Harle, 20, Southamp-tershead, Priestbury, Cheshire, silk manufacturer, March 30 at ton-buildings, Chancery-lane, London, and Newcastle-upon- 11, County Court of Cheshire, at Macclesfield.-John Hand, Tyne.-Petition filed Feb. 27. MEETINGS. George Hennet, Duke-street, Westminster, Middlesex; Bristol and Bridgewater, Somersetshire; and Plymouth and Teignmouth, Devonshire, railway contractor, March 23 at 2, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.— -John Davis and S. Davis, East Smithfield, Middlesex, clothiers, March 24 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac.-Joseph White, East Cowes, Isle of Wight, Southampton, ship builder, March 22 at 12, Court of Bankruptcy, London, aud. ac. Thomas Wilkinson, Cambridge Wharf, Wilton-road, Pimlico, Middlesex, coal merchant, March 28 at 12, Court of Bank. ruptcy, London, aud. ac.-William Steel, Birmingham, innkeeper, March 21 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Bir. mingham, aud. ac.-Wm. Stiles, Stratford-upon-Avon, Warwickshire, out of business, March 22 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac.-John Robert Gibson, Waterloo, near Liverpool, innkeeper, March 23 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, aud. ac.-Robert Bamfard, Pontefract, Yorkshire, maltster, April 4 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac.; at half-past 11, fin. div. John Bedford, Wakefield, Yorkshire, cloth merchant, March 23 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac. -John Howitt, Sheffield Moor, near Sheffield, Yorkshire, draper, March 25 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Sheffield, aud. ac.-John Spencer and Joseph Pullan, Thornton, Bradford, Yorkshire, top makers, March 23 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Leeds, aud. ac. sep. est. of J. Spencer; March 31 at 11, div. joint est.-William Hinde, Bedford, plumber, April 1 at half-past 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Frederick John Hensley, Montague-place, Russellsquare, Middlesex, apothecary, April 1 at 1, Court of Bankruptcy, London, div.-Henry Purcell, Dudley, Worcestershire, hosier, April 1 at 10, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham, aud. ac. and first and fin. div.-Richard Battersby and James Telford, Liverpool, ironfounders, March 31 at 11, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool, div. sep. est. of Richard Battersby.-Thos. Browne, Amble House, Northumberland, shipowner, March 31 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, first and fin. div.-John Bloomer and Jonathan Philipps, Sheffield, Yorkshire, joiner's tool manufacturers, April 1 at half-past 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Sheffield, div. joint est., and div. sep. est. of Jonathan Philipps. CERTIFICATES. Calne, Wiltshire, sawyer, March 15 at 11, County Court of Wiltshire, at Calne.-D. Clark, Faversham, Kent, fisherman, March 17 at 12, County Court of Kent, at Faversham.-J. H. Starr, Rye, Sussex, licensed victualler, March 27 at 12, County Court of Sussex, at Rye.-G. Eglington, Banbury, Oxfordshire, boot maker, March 28 at 11, County Court of Oxfordshire, at Banbury.-Joseph H. Marsden, Gloucester, hatter, March 28 at 10, County Court of Gloucestershire, at Gloucester.-E. Maddox, Hay, Brecknockshire, boot maker, April 7 at 11, County Court of Brecknockshire, at Hay.-Wm. Whitehead, Ardwick, Manchester, warehouseman, April 3 at 12, County Court of Lancashire, at Manchester.-Thomas Booth, Chorlton-upon-Medlock, Manchester, letter-press printer, April 3 at 12, County Court of Lancashire, at Manchester.-William Peace, Ravens Knowl, Kirkheaton, Yorkshire, stonemason, March 27 at 10, County Court of Yorkshire, at Huddersfield. James Watson, Banbury, Oxfordshire, shoemaker, March 28 at 11, County Court of Oxfordshire, at Banbury.-James Hird, Bristol, lithographic printer, March 15 at 11, County Court of Gloucestershire, at Bristol.-James Parkman, Bristol, butcher, March 15 at 11, County Court of Gloucestershire, at Bristol. The following Persons, who, on their several Petitions filed in the Court, have obtained Interim Orders for Protection from Process, are required to appear in Court as hereinafter mentioned, at the Court-house, in Portugal-street, Lincoln's Inn, as follows, to be examined and dealt with according to the Statute: March 24 at 10, before the CHIEF COMMISSIoner. George Lambert, Upper Berkeley-st., Marylebone, Middlesex, private tutor.-John H. Sewell, Stockbridge-terrace, Vauxhall-bridge-road, Pimlico, Middlesex, shopman to a stationer.-F. Steere, Parish-street, St. John's, Horselydown, Southwark, Surrey, labourer. March 27 at 11, before the CHIEF COMMISSIONER. George Lilley, Hastings-street, Burton-crescent, St. Pancras, Middlesex, printer.-John Bridges, Alfred-place, Old Kent-road, Surrey, carman. The following Prisoners are ordered to be brought up before the Court, in Portugal-street, to be examined and dealt with according to the Statute : March 24 at 10, before the CHIEF COMMISSIONER. Jeremiah Thomas Hooper, Harper-mews, Theobald's-road, To be allowed, unless Cause be shewn to the contrary on or Middlesex, wheelwright. before the Day of Meeting. George Pearson, Birkenhead, Cheshire, grocer, March 31 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Liverpool.-H. Green, Birmingham, button manufacturer, April 4 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Birmingham.-John Bloomer and Jon. Philipps, Sheffield, Yorkshire, joiner's tool manufacturers, April 1 at 12, District Court of Bankruptcy, Sheffield. To be granted, unless an Appeal be duly entered. Jos. Symes, Queen's-buildings, Knightsbridge, Middlesex, cheesemonger.-W. Jolly, Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, carrier.-Jas. Windeyer Lewty, Wilden, and Edmund Lewty, Stourport, Worcestershire, tin-plate workers. PETITION ANNULLED. Wm. Bennett, Foster Mill, near Hebden-bridge, Yorkshire, and Horwich, near Botton, Lancashire, cotton spinner. SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS. March 24 at 10, before Mr. Commissioner MURPHY. Joseph Denney, Nutford-place, Edgeware-road, Middlesex, beer retailer.-Henry Wm. How, Thomas-street, Hackneyroad, Middlesex, out of business. Robert Sandys, Connaught-terrace, West India-road, Limehouse, Middlesex, master mariner.-Benjamin Hubble the younger, Deptford, Kent, bricklayer. March 25 at 11, before Mr. Commissioner PHILLIPS. Wm. B. Heighton, Spring-garden-place, Elizabeth-street, Pimlico, Middlesex, out of business.-Frederick R. Renvoize, Morpeth-terrace, Victoria-road, South Hackney, Middlesex, paper colourer.- Henry A. Newcomb, Upper Dorchesterplace, New North-road, Islington, Middlesex, bill broker. March 27 at 11, before the CHIEF COMMISSIONER. Charles R. D'Azene, Essex-street, Strand, Middlesex, out of business.-Thos. Axtens, Westminster-bridge-road, Surrey, Sawtell, Munn, & Desgrand, Paisley, London, and Paris, out of business. |