From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 85
Page 6
The claim could be sued for dehors the contract on the obligation to pay imposed by law - in these circumstances . The claim for interest was withdrawn . Chandler v . Webster ( sup . ) overruled . Appeal allowed .
The claim could be sued for dehors the contract on the obligation to pay imposed by law - in these circumstances . The claim for interest was withdrawn . Chandler v . Webster ( sup . ) overruled . Appeal allowed .
Page 63
For similar reasons a claim by any person would not include a claim by the wife or husband of the policy - holder . ... were it not for the express exclusion of claims under the Workmen's Compensation Act in proviso ( a ) .
For similar reasons a claim by any person would not include a claim by the wife or husband of the policy - holder . ... were it not for the express exclusion of claims under the Workmen's Compensation Act in proviso ( a ) .
Page 80
But on a claim by an authorised driver against the insurers under sub - clause 3 the policy - holder was a person whom D. , the chauffeur , was liable tо рау . discerned not only in the text writers , but even , on occasion , in the ...
But on a claim by an authorised driver against the insurers under sub - clause 3 the policy - holder was a person whom D. , the chauffeur , was liable tо рау . discerned not only in the text writers , but even , on occasion , in the ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accepted Advertisers agreement Amendment amount annual apply appointed authority Bank Bill building charge claim common condition considered contract Control Conveyancer costs Council Counsel County Court of Appeal damage death decision defendants Directions duty effect entitled exercise express fact give given grant ground held House husband income Indices interest issue January JUDGE judgment July June Justice L. T. Rep land learned Limited London Lord matter meaning mortgage Notes notice October operation Order Order in Council owner paid parties payable payment person plaintiff position premises present principle purchase question reason received reference refused regard Regulations REPORTS respect respondent rule sect sent September settlement Society Solicitors Street supply taken trade trustees wife