TABLE OF CASES FOLLOWED, APPLIED, OVERRULED, CONSIDERED, DISCUSSED, DISTINGUISHED, &c. PACE PAGE A. Ciocci v. Ciocci (1853, 1 Sp. Eccl. & Adm., at p. 132), overruled on this point in Foster Cooke v. Midland Great Western Railway Company of Ireland (100 L. T. Rep. 626; (1909) A. C. 229), applied in Glasgow Cor- Craven's Mortgage, Re; Davies v. Craven (97 L. T. Rep. 475; (1907) 2 Ch. 448), approved Borwick's Settlement, Re; Woodman v. Bor- wick (115 L. T. Rep. 183; (1916) 2 Ch. 304), distinguished in Re Boulter; Capital and Bowlby, Re; Bowlby v. Bowlby (91 L. T. Rep. 573; (1904) 2 Ch. 685), followed and applied in Re Mellor; Alvarez v. Dodgson.... Bristol Corporation v. Sinnott (117 L. T. Rep. 644; (1918) 1 Ch. 62), considered in Maccles- field Corporation v. Governors of the Pos- sessions, Revenues, and Goods of the Free Grammar School of King Edward the Sixth Butler v. Springmount Agricultural and Dairy Society (1906, 2 I. R. 193), followed in Dakin v. Cope (1827, 2 Russ. 170), distin- guished in Golden Bread Company Limited Davis v. Bristow (123 L. T. Rep. 655; (1920) Dean v. Brown (101 L. T. Rep. 221; (1909) 2 K. B. 573), principles laid down in, and affirmed by H. of L. in Brown v. Dean (102 TABLE OF CASES FOLLOWED, &C. v. PAGE Heard v. Pickthorne (108 L. T. Rep. 818; Hughes v. Coles (51 L. T. Rep. 226; 27 Ch. 410 490 307 TABLE OF CASES FOLLOWED, &c. PAGE 649 applied in Re Hopkinson; Dyson v. Hop- Lowe v. Thomas (23 L. T. (O. S.) Rep. 49, M. 659 644 763 499 Mac, The (46 L. T. Rep. 907; 4 Asp. Mar. .... 460 Ramsay v. Margrett (70 L. T. Rep. 788; (1894) ..... Reg. v. Ledgard (1 Q. B. 616), considered and Rylands v. Fletcher (19 L. T. Rep. 220; L. Rep. PAGE 445 734 138 97 242 179 70 Whiston's Settlement, Re; Lovatt v. William- 145 Williams v. Minister of Munitions (121 L. T. Wilson v. Wilson (122 L. T. Rep. 223; (1920) Winkfield, The (85 L. T. Rep. 668; 9 Asp. Mar. 689 28 351 114 110 |