Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 158. köideVermont printing Company, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 80
Page 162
... held in April and May 1990. The court found that certain stocks " held at the beginning of the marriage " and carried in plain- tiff's name were " joint property , " to be divided equally between the parties , including IBM stock valued ...
... held in April and May 1990. The court found that certain stocks " held at the beginning of the marriage " and carried in plain- tiff's name were " joint property , " to be divided equally between the parties , including IBM stock valued ...
Page 277
... held that the imposition of a criminal penalty in a DUI prosecution , following a civil license suspension , did not violate the double jeopardy proscription of the Fifth Amend- ment to the United States Constitution . We first held ...
... held that the imposition of a criminal penalty in a DUI prosecution , following a civil license suspension , did not violate the double jeopardy proscription of the Fifth Amend- ment to the United States Constitution . We first held ...
Page
... held company in divorce action . 15 V.S.A. § 751. Goodrich v . Goodrich 587 . Where divorce court's valuation of stock of closely held company , which accepted wife's view that valuation should reflect what a willing buyer would pay for ...
... held company in divorce action . 15 V.S.A. § 751. Goodrich v . Goodrich 587 . Where divorce court's valuation of stock of closely held company , which accepted wife's view that valuation should reflect what a willing buyer would pay for ...
Contents
Table of Parallel Atlantic Reporter Citations xvii | 1 |
Memorandum Decisions | 635 |
Table of Unpublished Decisions | 657 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admission Affirmed Air Vermont alleged amend appeal apply argument Attorney award Board charge child child custody child sexual abuse Chittenden County Cite as 158 claim clearly erroneous cogeneration commission concluded constitutional contract conviction counsel court erred court found court's findings crime criminal custody decision Defendant argues defendant's denied determine discretion divorce Dooley evidence expert fact failed failure federal fendant food stamp Gibson hearing instruction intent issue judgment jurisdiction juror jury lascivious conduct lewd and lascivious listing agreement ment Miranda rights Morse and Johnson motion murder offense officer Opinion Filed parents parties plain error plaintiff prior probable cause procedure proceeding promissory estoppel prosecution question rule sentence sexual abuse sexual assault State's statement statute superior court testified testimony tion Town trial court U.S. Const Vermont Vermont Constitution victim violation voir dire witness zoning