Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 158. köideVermont printing Company, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 84
Page 283
... jury that if it found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of homicide , the crime was presumed to be of the lesser degree , i.e. , manslaugh- ter , unless the jury was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the ...
... jury that if it found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of homicide , the crime was presumed to be of the lesser degree , i.e. , manslaugh- ter , unless the jury was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that the ...
Page 315
... jury is whether necessity " reasonably appeared to [ defendant ] " ) . The trial court , when it instructed the jury to " measure the expectation of harm by a standard of what a hypothetical rea- sonable ordinary person might expect in ...
... jury is whether necessity " reasonably appeared to [ defendant ] " ) . The trial court , when it instructed the jury to " measure the expectation of harm by a standard of what a hypothetical rea- sonable ordinary person might expect in ...
Page
... JURY JURY Instructions - Appeal There is no error in jury's charge if charge as a whole conveys true spirit and doctrine of law and there is no fair ground to say jury has been misled by it . State v . Benoit , 359 . There is no error ...
... JURY JURY Instructions - Appeal There is no error in jury's charge if charge as a whole conveys true spirit and doctrine of law and there is no fair ground to say jury has been misled by it . State v . Benoit , 359 . There is no error ...
Contents
Table of Parallel Atlantic Reporter Citations xvii | 1 |
Memorandum Decisions | 635 |
Table of Unpublished Decisions | 657 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admission Affirmed Air Vermont alleged amend appeal apply argument Attorney award Board charge child child custody child sexual abuse Chittenden County Cite as 158 claim clearly erroneous cogeneration commission concluded constitutional contract conviction counsel court erred court found court's findings crime criminal custody decision Defendant argues defendant's denied determine discretion divorce Dooley evidence expert fact failed failure federal fendant food stamp Gibson hearing instruction intent issue judgment jurisdiction juror jury lascivious conduct lewd and lascivious listing agreement ment Miranda rights Morse and Johnson motion murder offense officer Opinion Filed parents parties plain error plaintiff prior probable cause procedure proceeding promissory estoppel prosecution question rule sentence sexual abuse sexual assault State's statement statute superior court testified testimony tion Town trial court U.S. Const Vermont Vermont Constitution victim violation voir dire witness zoning