Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 158. köideVermont printing Company, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 82
Page 438
... parties had lived apart for more than six months . The parties , married in 1966 , have three daughters , who were twenty - one , twenty , and fifteen years of age at the time of the decree . Defendant was a hospital administrator and ...
... parties had lived apart for more than six months . The parties , married in 1966 , have three daughters , who were twenty - one , twenty , and fifteen years of age at the time of the decree . Defendant was a hospital administrator and ...
Page 575
... parties , and nonmonetary contribu- tion of wife as homemaker . 15 V.S.A. § 751 . 7. Divorce - Division of Property ... parties ' parental rights and responsibilities . We reverse the property award . The parties were married in 1984 and ...
... parties , and nonmonetary contribu- tion of wife as homemaker . 15 V.S.A. § 751 . 7. Divorce - Division of Property ... parties ' parental rights and responsibilities . We reverse the property award . The parties were married in 1984 and ...
Page 588
... parties were married in 1969 and separated in 1988 . They have two children . Neither party brought substantial tan- gible assets into the marriage , but plaintiff later received from her mother and grandmother a total of 4,000 shares ...
... parties were married in 1969 and separated in 1988 . They have two children . Neither party brought substantial tan- gible assets into the marriage , but plaintiff later received from her mother and grandmother a total of 4,000 shares ...
Contents
Table of Parallel Atlantic Reporter Citations xvii | 1 |
Memorandum Decisions | 635 |
Table of Unpublished Decisions | 657 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admission Affirmed Air Vermont alleged amend appeal apply argument Attorney award Board charge child child custody child sexual abuse Chittenden County Cite as 158 claim clearly erroneous cogeneration commission concluded constitutional contract conviction counsel court erred court found court's findings crime criminal custody decision Defendant argues defendant's denied determine discretion divorce Dooley evidence expert fact failed failure federal fendant food stamp Gibson hearing instruction intent issue judgment jurisdiction juror jury lascivious conduct lewd and lascivious listing agreement ment Miranda rights Morse and Johnson motion murder offense officer Opinion Filed parents parties plain error plaintiff prior probable cause procedure proceeding promissory estoppel prosecution question rule sentence sexual abuse sexual assault State's statement statute superior court testified testimony tion Town trial court U.S. Const Vermont Vermont Constitution victim violation voir dire witness zoning