Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 158. köideVermont printing Company, 1992 |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 26
Page 527
... rates established by the Board under Docket No. 5177 , and that the Board cannot deny those rates based on its assessment of need and economic benefit . EGC also maintains that the Board's or- der amounted to a collateral attack of ...
... rates established by the Board under Docket No. 5177 , and that the Board cannot deny those rates based on its assessment of need and economic benefit . EGC also maintains that the Board's or- der amounted to a collateral attack of ...
Page 539
... rates and that the project would not provide an eco- nomic benefit to Vermont . That conclusion is well supported by numerous findings , which are in turn supported by the record . Affirmed . Morse , J. , concurring . I agree with the ...
... rates and that the project would not provide an eco- nomic benefit to Vermont . That conclusion is well supported by numerous findings , which are in turn supported by the record . Affirmed . Morse , J. , concurring . I agree with the ...
Page 540
... rates for this appel- lant . I also find unsatisfactory the Court's after - the - fact at- tempt to justify this procedure by distinguishing short - term and long - term avoided costs and levelized and nonlevelized rates based on ...
... rates for this appel- lant . I also find unsatisfactory the Court's after - the - fact at- tempt to justify this procedure by distinguishing short - term and long - term avoided costs and levelized and nonlevelized rates based on ...
Contents
Table of Parallel Atlantic Reporter Citations xvii | 1 |
Memorandum Decisions | 635 |
Table of Unpublished Decisions | 657 |
Copyright | |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admission Affirmed Air Vermont alleged amend appeal apply argument Attorney award Board charge child child custody child sexual abuse Chittenden County Cite as 158 claim clearly erroneous cogeneration commission concluded constitutional contract conviction counsel court erred court found court's findings crime criminal custody decision Defendant argues defendant's denied determine discretion divorce Dooley evidence expert fact failed failure federal fendant food stamp Gibson hearing instruction intent issue judgment jurisdiction juror jury lascivious conduct lewd and lascivious listing agreement ment Miranda rights Morse and Johnson motion murder offense officer Opinion Filed parents parties plain error plaintiff prior probable cause procedure proceeding promissory estoppel prosecution question rule sentence sexual abuse sexual assault State's statement statute superior court testified testimony tion Town trial court U.S. Const Vermont Vermont Constitution victim violation voir dire witness zoning