Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 28. köide |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 55
Page 15
Evidence was introduced by the plaintiff , tending to prove that on the 8th of
December , 1852 , he notified the defendant that he had purchased the corn ; but
this was denied by the defendant , whose testimony tended to " prove that no
notice ...
Evidence was introduced by the plaintiff , tending to prove that on the 8th of
December , 1852 , he notified the defendant that he had purchased the corn ; but
this was denied by the defendant , whose testimony tended to " prove that no
notice ...
Page 16
Evidence was given tending to prove that the corn in question was not originally
attached on the writ , in favor of Maynard , but no question of law was reserved on
this part of the case ; and it was claimed on the part of the defendant , that the ...
Evidence was given tending to prove that the corn in question was not originally
attached on the writ , in favor of Maynard , but no question of law was reserved on
this part of the case ; and it was claimed on the part of the defendant , that the ...
Page 67
There was no evidence tending to prove , nor was it claimed that Jones had paid
anything for Briggs , either before or since his receipt of the $ 1 , 400 , excepting
what he might have paid upon the bank notes in question , $ 30 upon the Morse ...
There was no evidence tending to prove , nor was it claimed that Jones had paid
anything for Briggs , either before or since his receipt of the $ 1 , 400 , excepting
what he might have paid upon the bank notes in question , $ 30 upon the Morse ...
Page 77
... —the plaintiff read in evidence a promissory note for $ 74.95 , dated November
16th , 1850 , payable to the plaintiff , and signed by the defendant Franklin ,
accompanied with testimony tending to prove that the note was given for the
amount ...
... —the plaintiff read in evidence a promissory note for $ 74.95 , dated November
16th , 1850 , payable to the plaintiff , and signed by the defendant Franklin ,
accompanied with testimony tending to prove that the note was given for the
amount ...
Page 108
... and upon their neglect to do so had introduced depositions of a witness
tending to prove such a partnersrip , it was held that a further deposition of the
same witness , taken by the defendants in reference to the contents or provisions
of those ...
... and upon their neglect to do so had introduced depositions of a witness
tending to prove such a partnersrip , it was held that a further deposition of the
same witness , taken by the defendants in reference to the contents or provisions
of those ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acceptance action adverse possession agreed agreement allowed amount appeared applied assignment attachment authority award Bank bill building cause charge claim commenced common consideration construction contract costs county court creditors damages debt decree deed defendant defendant's delivered dollars effect entitled evidence excepted execution existed fact favor give given ground hands held interest issue John judgment jury justice land liable limitations March matter necessary notice objection obtained offered officer opinion original paid parties payment person plaintiff possession premises present principal proceedings prove purchase question railroad real estate reason received recover reference regard relation remained removed rendered residence road rule seems settled settlement statute sufficient suit sustained taken tending Term testimony tion town trial trustee wife witness writ
Popular passages
Page 191 - This opinion does not deprive the states of any resources which they originally possessed. It does not extend to a tax paid by the real property of the bank, in common with the other real property within the state, nor to a tax imposed on the interest which the citizens of Maryland may hold in this institution, in common with other property of the same description throughout the state.
Page 82 - ... all, and all manner of action and actions, cause and causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings...
Page 62 - ... that from the mere relation of master and servant no contract, and therefore no duty, can be implied on the part of the master to cause the servant to be safely and securely carried, or to make the master liable for damage to the servant, arising from any vice or imperfection, unknown to the master, in the carriage, or in the mode of loading and conducting it.
Page 325 - Had you called the porter and he had said that, although he had no recollection of the letter in question, he invariably carried to the post office all the letters found upon the table, this might have done...
Page 591 - ... where the proceedings are not according to the course of the common law, nor inrolled , such as the county-court, courts of hundreds, court-baron, &c.
Page 185 - CP 612, is in point in a case of this kind, viz., that he "could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing with the addition of a vituperative epithet.
Page 265 - In consideration whereof the said party of the second part covenants and agrees to and with the said party of the first part to...
Page 363 - ... the agreement is one which by the statute of frauds is required to be in writing.
Page 54 - ... proprietor of the land has a right to the advantage of the stream flowing in its natural course over his land, to use the same as he pleases, for any purposes of his own, not inconsistent with a similar right in the proprietors of the land above or below; so that, neither can any proprietor above diminish the quantity or injure the quality of the water which would otherwise naturally descend, nor can any proprietor below throw back the water without the license or the grant of the proprietor...
Page 502 - In such a case there is no room for any other appropriation than that which arises from the order in which the receipts and payments take place, and are carried into the account. Presumably it is the sum first paid in that is first drawn out. It is the first item on the debit side of the account that is discharged or reduced by the first item on the credit side. The appropriation is made by the very act of setting the two items against each other.
Bibliographic information
| Title | Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Vermont: Reported by the Judges of Said Court, Agreeably to a Statute Law of the State, 28. köide |
| Author | Vermont. Supreme Court |
| Contributors | G. B. Shaw, William Weston, William Slade, Peter T. Washburn, John F. Deane, Charles Langdon Williams |
| Published | 1857 |
| Original from | Harvard University |
| Digitized | 6 juuli 2007 |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |