Page images
PDF
[blocks in formation]

WEEKLY NOTES:

BEING

NOTES OF CASES

HEARD AND DETERMINED

BY

THE HOUSE OF LORDS:
THE COURT OF APICAL:

THE CHANGER?, KING'S BENCH, AND PROBATE, DIVORCE, AND

ADMIRALTY DIVISIONS

OF

THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE:

AND

CASES IN BANKRUPTCY.

1901.

I EDW. VII.

Editor—SIR FREDERICK POLLOCK, Bart.

Assistant Editor Of The "weekly Notes"—MERYON WHITE, Esq.

Part I.

LONDON:

$rinteo for % Incorporates Council of $afco Reporting for dfmglanb anb Males,
Br WILLIAM CLOWES AND SONS, Limited,

DUKE STREET, STAMFORD STREET, S.E., AND GREAT WINDMILL STREET, W.

PUBLISHING OFFICE, 7, FLEET STREET, E.C.

[ocr errors]

Dec. 28, 1901.

TABLE OF CASES.

In re

PAGE

118 251

Abrahams and Harwood, In re

Acanthus, The .

Aoworth e. Stone. In re Power.
Stone

Adams, Lowe v..

Adie, In re. Ex parte Rushforth

Aflalo v. Lawrence * Ballen, Limited

Ahmed, In re. Ex parte Offloi.il
Reoeiver

Aldam's Settlement, In re .

Alderson r. Palliser .

Allan, Resp.; Scottish Widows' Fund and Life Assuraace Society, Apps. (Revenue (So.)) ....

Allen, jMamell v. In re Da Boohet

Alman e. Oppert ....

Amalgamate.! Society of Railway Servants, Reaps.; Taff Vale Railway Company, Apps. .... 157

Am ilgamited Syndicates, Limited, In re 105

Anderson v. Oullinson

—— — o. Midland Railway Company

Andrew Koowles & Sons, Rosps.;
Lysons, App. .....

Anglesey (Marquis), In re. Wdlmot v.
Gardner

Arclier's Case. In re London and North-
ern Bank .... 236, 217

Argus Printing Company, Stod lart ». . 125

Armstrong, Merchants' Fire O.Boe,
Limited v. .....

Arnot B. United African Lands, Limited

Ashton, .Elridge & Co., Nickoll &
Knight o 97

Ashton Vale Iron Company v. Bristol
Corporation .....

Atluntio Transport Company, Limited,
Cattermole v

Attorney-General v. Eastbourne Corporation. 231

—— — -- v. Eshor Linoleum

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

87 209

a

171

163 28

8

210

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors][ocr errors]

Barnard Castle Urban Counoil r. Wilson 173

Barrow Haematite Steel Company, In re 208

Bury r. Barry ..... 10

Bartlett v. Higgins .... 84

Basset, Damper v. . . . 119

Bastable, In re. Ex parte The Trustee 122 Bus table's Trustee in Bankruptcy,

Pearoe e 70

Batoy t>. Keswick . . . .167

Bathr. Bith 11

B -attic(E. & F.), Limited, In re. . 152 Bjokett, Helyar t>. In re Helyar. . 219 Beokhuson & Gibb) v. Hamblet . . 81 Bidding ton v. Boddington. In re Moses 211 Beoley v. Sidebottom. In re Sidebottom 76

Bel ham, In re. Richardson v. Yates . 80 B illerby v. Rowland & Marwood's

Stea'nship Company, Limited . . Ill Belmore (Countess) v. Kent County

Council ...... 65

Balsoo, Rosenbaum v.. . . . 121

Bennett v. Stone .... 225

Bent, Lee v '. 108

v. Orm >rod .... 105

Bentley, Wagstaffe o 212

Bernard & Co., Limited, Apps.; Haddington Magistrates, Resps. . . 246 Bevan t>. Crawshay Brothers (Cyfartha),

Limited 213

o. Webb . . . . 61, 85

Bilham, In re. Buohanan x>. Hill . 81 Bird, In re. In re Evans. Dodd v.

Evans 53

- o. Lee. In re Rogorson . . 56 Birkenhea I Assessment Committeo, Rosps.; Mersey Docks and Harbour

Board, Apps 90

Birkin, In re. Birkin v. Birkin . . 35

v. Birkin. In re Birkin . . 33

Blades, Great Western Riilway Company v. . . . . . . 160

Blair, App.; Duncan and Scott, Resps. 217

Blakeway, Kirkhouse t>. 250

Blow, Hand » 140

Blundell, In re 103

Boardman p. Soott St Whitworth . . 222 Boles and British Land Company's

Contract, In re . . . . 243

Bolton, Seymour o. In re Latham . 218 Bootle Cold Storage and Ice Company,

In re 54

Boustead o. Cooper. In re Van Strau

benzea ...... 181

Bradshaw v. Widdrington and Oust.

Widdrington and Cust o. Bradshaw . 148

Brandy Distillers' Company, In re . 87

Brazier t>. Glusspool .... 237

Brindley, Greenhalgh v. 125

Bristol City, The . . . .232 Bristol Corporation, Ashton Vale Iron

Company c 8

British Land Company and Bole's Contract, In re 213

British Mutosoope and Biograph Company v. Homer .... 21 Broad, In re. Smith r. Draeger . . 90

Brodhurst, Powell v 106

Brown, Warren ...... 214

Brutton & Barney, Limited, In re . 37

Bruyere, Pepin v 208

Buchanan v. Hill. In re Bilham . 81

Buckeridge, Ayres v 222

Buokett, Ross t> 118

Bidgett v. Improved Patent Force! Draught Furnace Syndioate, Limited 23

Buenos Ayres and Pacific Railway

Company, Ex parte. In re Clark . 12 Bullivant, App.; Attorney-General for

Viotorii.. K"-(. . . . . ■» I

Burnby, E- nunc . i'M Barney's Ku* ''"">ss B o-y ry, I, ■■■ 1 i,

In re . . . . .37

Burrows ». Lang . . . .115

v. Matabele Gold Reefs and

Estates 0omoany .... 68

Burt in, In re. Danby r. Burton. . 202

, Danby r. In re Burton . . 202

Butchart, App.; Bitcnart, Resp.. . 50
Sutlers and Etholl and Mitchells' Con-
tract, In re . . . .73

Caokett o. Koswiok . . . .159
Cale Ionian R lilway Company, Apps.;
Kirkoaldy and Distriot Railway Com-
pany, Resps 102

Callander, Resp.; Smith, App. . . 102
Callend ir, Mears t». . . . .114

Camp, Charrington & Co., Limited t>. . 211

Campbell, In re 228

Campbell Davys e. Lloyd . . . 150
Canadian Agricultural Company, Mort-
gage Insurance Company v. . . 135
Canton Insurance O.lieo, Resps.;

Williams, App. . . . 157 Capital and Counties Bank, Limited,

Gordon J 247

Cardigan (Lady) v. Carzon Howe . 147 Carrington & Son, Limited, Elliman,

Sons & Oo. v 112

Oary and Lott's Contract, In re . . 129
Cash (J. & J.), Limited v. Oash . . 46
Oattermole v. Atlantic Transport Com-
pany, Limited .... 240
Central London Railway Bill C1901),

In re 177

Chaoo (Paraguay) Land Company,"

Limited, In re . . . . 124

Chambers v. Goldthorpe ... 51

« EelmineJätka »