New Reports of Cases Heard in the House of Lords: On Appeals and Writs of Error, 6. köideSaunders and Benning, 1835 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 64
Page 17
... answer , it is said , is furnished by Underwood v . Lord Cour- town , that this cannot be done where the party is out of possession . But the case is not rightly understood . Suppose a conveyance by a grandson and no registered ...
... answer , it is said , is furnished by Underwood v . Lord Cour- town , that this cannot be done where the party is out of possession . But the case is not rightly understood . Suppose a conveyance by a grandson and no registered ...
Page 18
... answer should be received , he should abstain from intimating any opinion upon the subject . Lord Tenterden then stated the question to be proposed to the Judges , in which it was alleged that the assignment of the lease was not ...
... answer should be received , he should abstain from intimating any opinion upon the subject . Lord Tenterden then stated the question to be proposed to the Judges , in which it was alleged that the assignment of the lease was not ...
Page 32
... answer to this construction of the fifth section , that it is not to be taken by itself alone , but in conjunction with the fourth section , of which it is contended , that one object was , to control and qualify the operation of the ...
... answer to this construction of the fifth section , that it is not to be taken by itself alone , but in conjunction with the fourth section , of which it is contended , that one object was , to control and qualify the operation of the ...
Page 61
... answer to the bill ; and by an order of the Court of Ex- chequer , made in the cause , bearing date the 3d of July , 1827 , it was ordered , that the bill so filed by the Plaintiff Nainby should be dismissed out of the court , as ...
... answer to the bill ; and by an order of the Court of Ex- chequer , made in the cause , bearing date the 3d of July , 1827 , it was ordered , that the bill so filed by the Plaintiff Nainby should be dismissed out of the court , as ...
Page 103
... answered that it was his own fault . But the effect upon the public would be the same , although it were admitted that he was ig- norant of the illegality of his invitation to the public . The question is , whether the benefit can be ob ...
... answered that it was his own fault . But the effect upon the public would be the same , although it were admitted that he was ig- norant of the illegality of his invitation to the public . The question is , whether the benefit can be ob ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aforesaid agreement amended Appellant argument assigns bearing date bill bond chattels Chief Baron CHOLMELEY COCKERELL codicil COLVIN contract conveyance copyhold Court of Exchequer creditor Crown debtor deed Defendants in error delivered devise entitled execution executors favour fieri facias fourth codicil fraud George Betham GILES granted GROVER HEARLE heirs Henry Charles Englefield Henry Fourdrinier indenture issue John Tebbutt Judges judgment King King's Bench King's debt lands lease Lechmere letters patent Lord Cadogan Lordships LOVELAND marriage ment mentioned opinion owner parties person Peter Beauvoir Plaintiff in error premises prerogative purchaser question registered rent Respondent Samuel Pepys Cockerell says seized seizure sheriff Sir Henry Charles special verdict Stamp Brooksbank statute 33 H suit tenant term testator thereof Thomas Tebbutt tion trustees unregistered Uppom voyage WARBURTON wife William Byam Martin William Rhodes writ of error writ of extent writ of fieri
Popular passages
Page 86 - certain attorney, executors, administrators, or " assigns ; for which payment, to be well and " faithfully made, we bind ourselves, our and each " of our heirs, executors, and administrators, firmly " by these presents, sealed with our
Page 90 - his executors, administrators, and assigns, and every of them, by himself and themselves, or by his and their deputy or deputies, servants or agents, or such others as he the said Jean Jacques Saintmarc, his executors, administrators, or assigns should at any time agree with, and no other, from time to time and at all
Page 174 - the port of London as aforesaid : And further, " that he the said George Betham, his executors " or administrators, shall and will well and truly " pay, or cause to be paid, unto the said owner, " his executors, administrators, or assigns, freight " for the use or hire of the said ship at and after
Page 90 - his executors, administrators, or assigns should at any time agree with, and no other, from time to time and at all times thereafter, during the term of years therein expressed, should and lawfully might make, use, exercise, and vend the said invention within that part of the United Kingdom of
Page 68 - following, a rule was obtained by the Defendant calling upon the Plaintiff to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted; or, why judgment should not be arrested. This rule was discharged in Trinity term
Page 90 - Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland called England, our said Lord the King's dominion of Wales, and town of Berwick upon Tweed, in such manner as to him the said Jean Jacques Saintmarc, his executors, administrators, and assigns, or any of them, should in his or their discretion seem meet; and that he the said Jean Jacques Saintmarc,
Page 89 - 8d. on the third in" stalment on the same shares having been paid, " then the above-written obligation to be void and " of no effect, or else to be and remain in full force " and virtue." The Defendant, after pleading several pleas, on which issues in fact were taken, pleaded the following pleas.
Page 86 - Aime" Duvergier, of South Ville, Wandsworth " Road, aforesaid, Esquire, in the sum of 10,200/. " of good and lawful money of Great Britain, to
Page 455 - questions that were proposed to them by the House. By these answers, a very great majority of the Judges coincided in that opinion, upon which I propose to submit to your Lordships that the judgment of the Court of Exchequer should be affirmed, two only being of a different opinion. The case may be shortly stated
Page 74 - of July, 1824, final judgment was signed for the Plaintiff by the Court of Common Pleas. On this judgment a writ of error was brought in the Court of King's Bench, tested on the 2d of July, 1824, and returnable on the morrow of All Souls in Michaelmas term following ; under which