New Reports of Cases Heard in the House of Lords: On Appeals and Writs of Error, 6. köideSaunders and Benning, 1835 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 70
Page 20
... granted the lease of 1800 , was at the time of granting it in possession of the premises ; and , as the marriage settlement of 1779 was never put upon the register , he must have appeared to the public , and amongst the rest to the ...
... granted the lease of 1800 , was at the time of granting it in possession of the premises ; and , as the marriage settlement of 1779 was never put upon the register , he must have appeared to the public , and amongst the rest to the ...
Page 34
... granted by a person who would in all other respects , except so far as relates to the prior unregistered settlement , have had right and title to grant the lease . But , after all , why is the clear intelligible language of the fifth ...
... granted by a person who would in all other respects , except so far as relates to the prior unregistered settlement , have had right and title to grant the lease . But , after all , why is the clear intelligible language of the fifth ...
Page 59
... granted that the fourth codicil has necessarily that effect ; but this arises not from his devise of the life estate to his daughter , for the only effect of that devise was to convert her equitable estate for her own separate use into ...
... granted that the fourth codicil has necessarily that effect ; but this arises not from his devise of the life estate to his daughter , for the only effect of that devise was to convert her equitable estate for her own separate use into ...
Page 67
... granted , or , having granted , should at once have discharged the order to show cause , and not have directed a reference , which could only be a useless and unnecessary proceeding , if in point of law a chose in action is , as it is ...
... granted , or , having granted , should at once have discharged the order to show cause , and not have directed a reference , which could only be a useless and unnecessary proceeding , if in point of law a chose in action is , as it is ...
Page 76
... granted , or why the judgment should not be arrested ; which rule was discharged in Trinity term following ; and on the 17th of July , 1824 , final judgment was signed for the Plaintiff by the Court of Common Pleas . On this judgment a ...
... granted , or why the judgment should not be arrested ; which rule was discharged in Trinity term following ; and on the 17th of July , 1824 , final judgment was signed for the Plaintiff by the Court of Common Pleas . On this judgment a ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
aforesaid agreement amended Appellant argument assigns bearing date bill bond chattels Chief Baron CHOLMELEY COCKERELL codicil COLVIN contract conveyance copyhold Court of Exchequer creditor Crown debtor deed Defendants in error delivered devise entitled execution executors favour fieri facias fourth codicil fraud George Betham GILES granted GROVER HEARLE heirs Henry Charles Englefield Henry Fourdrinier indenture issue John Tebbutt Judges judgment King King's Bench King's debt lands lease Lechmere letters patent Lord Cadogan Lordships LOVELAND marriage ment mentioned opinion owner parties person Peter Beauvoir Plaintiff in error premises prerogative purchaser question registered rent Respondent Samuel Pepys Cockerell says seized seizure sheriff Sir Henry Charles special verdict Stamp Brooksbank statute 33 H suit tenant term testator thereof Thomas Tebbutt tion trustees unregistered Uppom voyage WARBURTON wife William Byam Martin William Rhodes writ of error writ of extent writ of fieri
Popular passages
Page 86 - certain attorney, executors, administrators, or " assigns ; for which payment, to be well and " faithfully made, we bind ourselves, our and each " of our heirs, executors, and administrators, firmly " by these presents, sealed with our
Page 90 - his executors, administrators, and assigns, and every of them, by himself and themselves, or by his and their deputy or deputies, servants or agents, or such others as he the said Jean Jacques Saintmarc, his executors, administrators, or assigns should at any time agree with, and no other, from time to time and at all
Page 174 - the port of London as aforesaid : And further, " that he the said George Betham, his executors " or administrators, shall and will well and truly " pay, or cause to be paid, unto the said owner, " his executors, administrators, or assigns, freight " for the use or hire of the said ship at and after
Page 90 - his executors, administrators, or assigns should at any time agree with, and no other, from time to time and at all times thereafter, during the term of years therein expressed, should and lawfully might make, use, exercise, and vend the said invention within that part of the United Kingdom of
Page 68 - following, a rule was obtained by the Defendant calling upon the Plaintiff to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted; or, why judgment should not be arrested. This rule was discharged in Trinity term
Page 90 - Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland called England, our said Lord the King's dominion of Wales, and town of Berwick upon Tweed, in such manner as to him the said Jean Jacques Saintmarc, his executors, administrators, and assigns, or any of them, should in his or their discretion seem meet; and that he the said Jean Jacques Saintmarc,
Page 89 - 8d. on the third in" stalment on the same shares having been paid, " then the above-written obligation to be void and " of no effect, or else to be and remain in full force " and virtue." The Defendant, after pleading several pleas, on which issues in fact were taken, pleaded the following pleas.
Page 86 - Aime" Duvergier, of South Ville, Wandsworth " Road, aforesaid, Esquire, in the sum of 10,200/. " of good and lawful money of Great Britain, to
Page 455 - questions that were proposed to them by the House. By these answers, a very great majority of the Judges coincided in that opinion, upon which I propose to submit to your Lordships that the judgment of the Court of Exchequer should be affirmed, two only being of a different opinion. The case may be shortly stated
Page 74 - of July, 1824, final judgment was signed for the Plaintiff by the Court of Common Pleas. On this judgment a writ of error was brought in the Court of King's Bench, tested on the 2d of July, 1824, and returnable on the morrow of All Souls in Michaelmas term following ; under which