 I take it, there are two general rules established, applicable to this question: the first is, that where the risk has not been run, whether its not having been run was owing to the fault, pleasure, or will of the insured, or to any other cause, the premium...  The U.S. Law Cabinet - Page 90by Isaac Ridler Butts - 1852Full view - About this book
 | William Selwyn - 1812 - 732 lehte
...in Stevenson v. Snow, 3 Burr. 1240. " Where the risk has not been run, whether its not having been run was owing to the fault, pleasure, or will of the...the premium shall be returned, because a policy of i»turance is a contract of indemnity. The underwriter receives a premium for running the risk of indemnifying... | |
 | Wyndham Beawes - 1813 - 786 lehte
...Mansfield states the rule to be, that where the risk has not been run, whether its not having been run was owing to the fault, pleasure, or will of the insured, or other cause, the premium shall be returned ; because a policy of insurance is a contract of indemnity... | |
 | James Allan Park - 1817 - 848 lehte
...that Cowp. 668. where the risk has not been run, whether that circumstance was owing to the fault, the pleasure, or will of the insured, or to any other cause, the premium shall be returned. This rule has already been pretty fully discussed. Another rule is, that if the risk has once commenced,... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1817 - 782 lehte
...applicable to the question: The lirst us, that where the risk has not been run, whether its not having been run was owing to the fault, pleasure, or will of the insured, or to any othef cause, the premium shall be returned ; hecause a pulley of insurance is a contract nf indemnity.... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford, Sir Edward Hyde East - 1817 - 708 lehte
...foundation, ex• cept as to about a fortieth part. In 'fj/re \. Fletcher (a), Lord Mansfield said, "A policy of insurance is a contract of indemnity. The underwriter receives a premium for running the risk of indemnifying the insured ; and to whatever cause it be owing, if he do not run... | |
 | GEORGE MAULE AND WILLIAM SELWYN - 1817 - 640 lehte
...been run, whether its not having been run was owing to the fault, pleasure, or will of the assured, or to any other cause, the premium shall be returned ; because a policy of assurance is a contract of indemnity. The underwriter receives a premium for running the risk of indemnifying... | |
 | Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - 1817 - 634 lehte
...been run< .whether its not having been run was owing to ihe fault, pleasure, or will of the assured, or to any other cause, :the premium shall be returned ; because a policy of assurance is a contract of indemnity. The underwriter receives a premium for running the risk of indemnifying... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1820 - 830 lehte
...Stevenaou v. Snow, 3 Burr. U-io. " Where the risk has not been run, whether its not having been run WM owing. to the fault, pleasure, or will of the insured,...other cause, the premium shall be returned, because a poKey ofinturance il a contract of indemnity. The underwriter receives a premium for running the risk... | |
 | William Selwyn - 1824 - 806 lehte
...' I! Marsli.568. , ,. , i Tyrie v. Fletcber.-Cowp.668. Mfyer k Tyrie v. Fleteber, Cowp. 668,, „, was owing to. the fault, pleasure, or will of the...to any other cause, the premium shall be returned, becaute a policy of t'nsuramce is a contract of indemnity. The underwriter receives a premium for running... | |
 | Samuel Comyn - 1824 - 680 lehte
...assumpsit will in general lie to recover it back from the underwriter. And the reason given is, that a policy of insurance is a contract of indemnity ; the underwriter receives the premium for running the risk of indemnifying the insured; and therefore if he run no risk, to whatever... | |
| |
